pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAG

Canonical reference. 90% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

40 Pith papers citing it
Background 90% of classified citations
abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced artificial intelligence by enabling human-like text generation and natural language understanding. However, their reliance on static training data limits their ability to respond to dynamic, real-time queries, resulting in outdated or inaccurate outputs. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a solution, enhancing LLMs by integrating real-time data retrieval to provide contextually relevant and up-to-date responses. Despite its promise, traditional RAG systems are constrained by static workflows and lack the adaptability required for multi-step reasoning and complex task management. Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Agentic RAG) transcends these limitations by embedding autonomous AI agents into the RAG pipeline. These agents leverage agentic design patterns reflection, planning, tool use, and multi-agent collaboration to dynamically manage retrieval strategies, iteratively refine contextual understanding, and adapt workflows through operational structures ranging from sequential steps to adaptive collaboration. This integration enables Agentic RAG systems to deliver flexibility, scalability, and context-awareness across diverse applications. This paper presents an analytical survey of Agentic RAG systems. It traces the evolution of RAG paradigms, introduces a principled taxonomy of Agentic RAG architectures based on agent cardinality, control structure, autonomy, and knowledge representation, and provides a comparative analysis of design trade-offs across existing frameworks. The survey examines applications in healthcare, finance, education, and enterprise document processing, and distills practical lessons for system designers and practitioners. Finally, it identifies key open research challenges related to evaluation, coordination, memory management, efficiency, and governance, outlining directions for future research.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 10

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 32 2025 8

polarities

background 9 unclear 1

representative citing papers

DOTRAG: Retrieval-Time Reasoning Along Paths

cs.IR · 2026-04-06 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

DotRAG reformulates graph retrieval as query-guided path reasoning with Division of Thought, reporting SOTA results on MetaQA and UltraDomain for multi-hop tasks.

An Agentic Approach to Metadata Reasoning

cs.DB · 2026-04-22 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Metadata Reasoner uses agentic LLM reasoning on metadata to select sufficient and minimal data sources, achieving 83.16% F1 on KramaBench and 85.5% F1 on noisy synthetic benchmarks while avoiding low-quality tables 99% of the time.

Agentic GraphRAG: Navigating Unstructured Financial Data with Collaborative AI

cs.IR · 2026-04-15 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Agentic GraphRAG constructs a Neo4j graph via deterministic structured ingestion plus LLM extraction from notices, then deploys modular agents with tool access and reflection to outperform vector-RAG baselines on Swiss commercial gazette data across entity resolution, answer quality, and multi-turn

GraphMind: From Operational Traces to Self-Evolving Workflow Automation

cs.AI · 2026-05-17 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

GraphMind builds and evolves action-centric workflow graphs from operational traces using offline extraction, online multi-agent traversal with LLMs, and Adaptive Traversal Reinforcement to improve automation in cloud database incident handling.

citing papers explorer

Showing 40 of 40 citing papers.