pith. sign in

14 Preprint

7 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

7 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) improves final-answer accuracy on reasoning tasks, but it does not reliably improve reasoning quality. Because outcome rewards only assess final answers, they also reward spurious successes: flawed reasoning can still receive maximal reward when it accidentally reaches the correct outcome. This outcome reward hacking creates biased gradients, making current RLVR insufficient for learning faithful reasoning. Process Reward Models (PRMs) provide step-wise supervision, but directly optimizing PRMs or naively combining them with outcome rewards is unstable under distribution shift during RL training process. We introduce PRocess cOnsistency Filter (PROF), a data curation method that uses PRM--ORM consistency for sample selection rather than direct reward optimization. PROF keeps correct responses with strong process support and incorrect responses with weak process support while maintaining a balanced training ratio. Experiments show that PROF consistently improves both final-answer accuracy and intermediate reasoning quality over strong baselines, with less dependence on strong PRMs.

citation-role summary

background 1 method 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 6 2025 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 7

clear filters

representative citing papers

Trust Region On-Policy Distillation

cs.LG · 2026-05-31 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

TrOPD stabilizes on-policy distillation for LLMs with trust-region learning, outlier estimation, and off-policy guidance, outperforming prior OPD methods on reasoning and code benchmarks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.