A new benchmark with cognitive traps shows frontier deep research agents achieve only 13-16% acceptance on expert consulting tasks under combined verifier and rubric criteria.
hub Canonical reference
The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Canonical reference. 93% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
abstract
For a long time, humanity has pursued artificial intelligence (AI) equivalent to or surpassing the human level, with AI agents considered a promising vehicle for this pursuit. AI agents are artificial entities that sense their environment, make decisions, and take actions. Many efforts have been made to develop intelligent agents, but they mainly focus on advancement in algorithms or training strategies to enhance specific capabilities or performance on particular tasks. Actually, what the community lacks is a general and powerful model to serve as a starting point for designing AI agents that can adapt to diverse scenarios. Due to the versatile capabilities they demonstrate, large language models (LLMs) are regarded as potential sparks for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), offering hope for building general AI agents. Many researchers have leveraged LLMs as the foundation to build AI agents and have achieved significant progress. In this paper, we perform a comprehensive survey on LLM-based agents. We start by tracing the concept of agents from its philosophical origins to its development in AI, and explain why LLMs are suitable foundations for agents. Building upon this, we present a general framework for LLM-based agents, comprising three main components: brain, perception, and action, and the framework can be tailored for different applications. Subsequently, we explore the extensive applications of LLM-based agents in three aspects: single-agent scenarios, multi-agent scenarios, and human-agent cooperation. Following this, we delve into agent societies, exploring the behavior and personality of LLM-based agents, the social phenomena that emerge from an agent society, and the insights they offer for human society. Finally, we discuss several key topics and open problems within the field. A repository for the related papers at https://github.com/WooooDyy/LLM-Agent-Paper-List.
hub tools
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract For a long time, humanity has pursued artificial intelligence (AI) equivalent to or surpassing the human level, with AI agents considered a promising vehicle for this pursuit. AI agents are artificial entities that sense their environment, make decisions, and take actions. Many efforts have been made to develop intelligent agents, but they mainly focus on advancement in algorithms or training strategies to enhance specific capabilities or performance on particular tasks. Actually, what the community lacks is a general and powerful model to serve as a starting point for designing AI agents that
co-cited works
representative citing papers
LLM agents achieve greater flexibility during execution by classifying actions via a reversibility taxonomy and using an Earliest-Conflict Rollback algorithm that matches full-restart quality while wasting far less completed work.
This paper delivers the first systematic taxonomy and cross-benchmark consistency analysis of 40 agent safety benchmarks, finding broad but shallow risk coverage, no ranking concordance across evaluations, and that benchmark choice systematically alters reported safety.
Lightfall provides an API-first, LLM-addressable control platform for synchrotron beamlines enabling natural language extensions by scientists through plugin skills.
AdaPlanBench introduces a multi-turn benchmark where LLM agents must adapt plans under progressively revealed dual constraints, with top models reaching only 67.75% accuracy.
Introduces Sentinel Challenge benchmark and CoSaR framework for cooperative spatial reasoning and planning among 3-5 decentralized embodied agents across 14 city-scale scenes.
Survey of 112 agentic AI for social good papers reveals moral-geographic asymmetry with 73% lacking geographic context (lowest for SDG 16) and only 25% reporting deployments.
DecisionBench supplies a fixed task suite, model pool, delegation interface, and multi-axis metrics to evaluate emergent delegation, showing similar quality across awareness conditions but 15-31 point headroom under perfect delegation.
A survey that unifies prior work on multi-agent LLM systems via the LIFE framework, mapping dependencies across collaboration, failure attribution, and autonomous self-evolution while identifying cross-stage challenges.
A multi-dimensional behavioral scoring system using LLM judges evaluates agentic stock predictors and feeds scores into closed-loop RL to improve one-day MAPE by 11.5% on held-out data.
MAD-OPD recasts on-policy distillation teachers as a debating collective to supply better supervision, lifting agentic and code performance over single-teacher OPD across multiple model sizes.
OCR-Memory encodes agent trajectories as images with visual anchors and retrieves verbatim text via locate-and-transcribe, yielding gains on long-horizon benchmarks under strict context limits.
A new 7x4 taxonomy organizes agentic AI security threats by architectural layer and persistence timescale, revealing under-explored upper layers and missing defenses after surveying 116 papers.
Dr.Sai autonomously executed full physics analysis pipelines on real BESIII data to re-measure ten J/psi decay branching fractions, matching established benchmarks without any manual coding.
FORGE uses a reasoning-action-observation loop and Dynamic Forest of Agents to perform scalable LLM-based binary analysis, finding 1,274 vulnerabilities across 591 of 3,457 real-world firmware binaries at 72.3% precision and broader coverage than prior methods.
SAGE is a new multi-agent benchmark that formalizes service SOPs as dynamic dialogue graphs to measure LLM agents on logical compliance and path coverage, uncovering an execution gap and empathy resilience across 27 models in 6 scenarios.
MCP lifecycle is defined with four phases and 16 activities; a threat taxonomy of 16 scenarios is constructed, validated via case studies, and paired with phase-specific safeguards.
Introduces loop engineering as a distinct practice layer for coding agents, supplies a taxonomy and verification ladder, and analyzes a hand-coded corpus of fifty real loops.
A shared polarity-flipping encoding subspace in LLM residual streams supports covert encoding and enables real-time detection of agentic data exfiltration via internal probes.
The authors introduce a three-part ontology-based verification system for AI agents that generates regulatory and adversarial test scenarios and issues machine-verifiable trust certificates, with pilot results indicating improved coverage over baselines in four industries.
Dynamic separator generation via domain-separated SHA-256 reduces attack success rate from 0.88 to 0.38 and eliminates leakage exposure in evaluations against 16 payloads on Llama and DeepSeek models.
ESLD extracts safety signals directly from the latent space of any guard model to enable faster and more accurate prompt-injection detection without retraining.
CHAL is a multi-agent dialectic system that performs structured belief optimization over defeasible domains using Bayesian-inspired graph representations and configurable meta-cognitive value system hyperparameters.
A practical evaluation protocol for AI pentesting agents that uses validated vulnerability discovery, LLM semantic matching, and bipartite scoring to assess performance in realistic, complex targets.
citing papers explorer
-
Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models
The paper surveys reinforced reasoning techniques for LLMs, covering automated data construction, learning-to-reason methods, and test-time scaling as steps toward Large Reasoning Models.