pith. sign in

arxiv: 1807.06210 · v2 · pith:4KGSVGYFnew · submitted 2018-07-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing

Planck Collaboration: N. Aghanim , Y. Akrami , M. Ashdown , J. Aumont , C. Baccigalupi , M. Ballardini , A. J. Banday , R. B. Barreiro
show 149 more authors
N. Bartolo S. Basak K. Benabed J.-P. Bernard M. Bersanelli P. Bielewicz J. J. Bock J. R. Bond J. Borrill F. R. Bouchet F. Boulanger M. Bucher C. Burigana E. Calabrese J.-F. Cardoso J. Carron A. Challinor H. C. Chiang L. P. L. Colombo C. Combet B. P. Crill F. Cuttaia P. de Bernardis G. de Zotti J. Delabrouille E. Di Valentino J. M. Diego O. Dor\'e M. Douspis A. Ducout X. Dupac G. Efstathiou F. Elsner T. A. En{\ss}lin H. K. Eriksen Y. Fantaye R. Fernandez-Cobos F. Forastieri M. Frailis A. A. Fraisse E. Franceschi A. Frolov S. Galeotta S. Galli K. Ganga R. T. G\'enova-Santos M. Gerbino T. Ghosh J. Gonz\'alez-Nuevo K. M. G\'orski S. Gratton A. Gruppuso J. E. Gudmundsson J. Hamann W. Handley F. K. Hansen D. Herranz E. Hivon Z. Huang A. H. Jaffe W. C. Jones A. Karakci E. Keih\"anen R. Keskitalo K. Kiiveri J. Kim L. Knox N. Krachmalnicoff M. Kunz H. Kurki-Suonio G. Lagache J.-M. Lamarre A. Lasenby M. Lattanzi C. R. Lawrence M. Le Jeune F. Levrier A. Lewis M. Liguori P. B. Lilje V. Lindholm M. L\'opez-Caniego P. M. Lubin Y.-Z. Ma J. F. Mac\'ias-P\'erez G. Maggio D. Maino N. Mandolesi A. Mangilli A. Marcos-Caballero M. Maris P. G. Martin E. Mart\'inez-Gonz\'alez S. Matarrese N. Mauri J. D. McEwen A. Melchiorri A. Mennella M. Migliaccio M.-A. Miville-Desch\^enes D. Molinari A. Moneti L. Montier G. Morgante A. Moss P. Natoli L. Pagano D. Paoletti B. Partridge G. Patanchon F. Perrotta V. Pettorino F. Piacentini L. Polastri G. Polenta J.-L. Puget J. P. Rachen M. Reinecke M. Remazeilles A. Renzi G. Rocha C. Rosset G. Roudier J. A. Rubi\~no-Mart\'in B. Ruiz-Granados L. Salvati M. Sandri M. Savelainen D. Scott C. Sirignano R. Sunyaev A.-S. Suur-Uski J. A. Tauber D. Tavagnacco M. Tenti L. Toffolatti M. Tomasi T. Trombetti J. Valiviita B. Van Tent P. Vielva F. Villa N. Vittorio B. D. Wandelt I. K. Wehus M. White S. D. M. White A. Zacchei A. Zonca
This is my paper
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords lensingsigmaplanckpowertextitcombinedresultsconstraints
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing potential using the final $\textit{Planck}$ 2018 temperature and polarization data. We increase the significance of the detection of lensing in the polarization maps from $5\,\sigma$ to $9\,\sigma$. Combined with temperature, lensing is detected at $40\,\sigma$. We present an extensive set of tests of the robustness of the lensing-potential power spectrum, and construct a minimum-variance estimator likelihood over lensing multipoles $8 \le L \le 400$. We find good consistency between lensing constraints and the results from the $\textit{Planck}$ CMB power spectra within the $\rm{\Lambda CDM}$ model. Combined with baryon density and other weak priors, the lensing analysis alone constrains $\sigma_8 \Omega_{\rm m}^{0.25}=0.589\pm 0.020$ ($1\,\sigma$ errors). Also combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data, we find tight individual parameter constraints, $\sigma_8=0.811\pm0.019$, $H_0=67.9_{-1.3}^{+1.2}\,\text{km}\,\text{s}^{-1}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$, and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.303^{+0.016}_{-0.018}$. Combining with $\textit{Planck}$ CMB power spectrum data, we measure $\sigma_8$ to better than $1\,\%$ precision, finding $\sigma_8=0.811\pm 0.006$. We find consistency with the lensing results from the Dark Energy Survey, and give combined lensing-only parameter constraints that are tighter than joint results using galaxy clustering. Using $\textit{Planck}$ cosmic infrared background (CIB) maps we make a combined estimate of the lensing potential over $60\,\%$ of the sky with considerably more small-scale signal. We demonstrate delensing of the $\textit{Planck}$ power spectra, detecting a maximum removal of $40\,\%$ of the lensing-induced power in all spectra. The improvement in the sharpening of the acoustic peaks by including both CIB and the quadratic lensing reconstruction is detected at high significance (abridged).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 25 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Effective description of lensed gravitational waves diffracted by stellar fields

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Authors synthesize SVD-based reduced-order models from wave-optics simulations to provide an effective stochastic description of stellar microlensing distortions on lensed gravitational waves.

  2. Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models

    astro-ph.IM 2020-05 accept novelty 7.0

    Cobaya is a modular Bayesian analysis code that exploits model interdependencies via automatic caching and a novel parameter-blocking algorithm to minimize sampling cost.

  3. Non-linear Structure Formation in Planck+DESI Favoured Interacting Dark Energy Cosmologies

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    N-body simulations of IDE with Q=ξHρ_x show scale-dependent deviations in the matter power spectrum, density morphology, and halo abundance that standard ΛCDM-calibrated prescriptions cannot reproduce.

  4. Dipoles for everyone: the pseudo-$C_\ell$ approach to directional stacking

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Directional stacking signals are reconstructed without information loss as cross-power spectra between the target field and the E/B modes of the spin field weighted by galaxy density.

  5. Double the axions, half the tension: multi-field early dark energy eases the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Two-field axion-like early dark energy reduces Hubble tension to 1.5 sigma residual and improves high-ell CMB fits over single-field models.

  6. Into the Gompverse: A robust Gompertzian reionization model for CMB analyses

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A Gompertzian reionization model with three nuisance parameters demotes optical depth to a derived quantity, reducing its uncertainty by a factor of three and revealing potential neutrino mass tension in CMB analyses.

  7. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2021-05 accept novelty 6.0

    DES Y3 3x2pt analysis constrains S8=0.776±0.017 and Ωm=0.339±0.032 in flat ΛCDM, consistent with Planck CMB results at p=0.13-0.48.

  8. Are Cosmological Data Excluding Sterile Neutrinos or Only the Fully Thermalized Limit?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Cosmological observations constrain the effective abundance of light sterile neutrinos tightly while allowing non-fully-thermalized realizations to remain viable across LambdaCDM and CPL models.

  9. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Probing new signatures of ultralight axions with gravitational lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New upper limits on ultralight axion dark matter fraction (<1.5% at 10^{-26} eV, <9% at 10^{-25} eV at 95% CL) from combined CMB lensing data, plus marginal 2.1σ preference at 10^{-24.5} eV driven by few points.

  10. A barotropic alternative to Early Dark Energy for alleviating the $H_0$ tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A barotropic fluid with ω_s ≈ 0.29 and Ω_s ≈ 1.5×10^{-5} raises the inferred H0 to match SH0ES while remaining consistent with Planck CMB, DESI BAO, and Pantheon data.

  11. Is the $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy data?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Planck PR4 CMB data mildly favors dynamical dark energy, but this preference weakens when accounting for possible excess smoothing, indicating the signal may partly arise from data processing issues.

  12. The Bayesian view of DESI DR2 with unimpeded: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0

    Bayesian evidence computation on DESI DR2 plus Planck and supernovae eliminates the frequentist 3.1 sigma preference for w0waCDM over LambdaCDM when using the DES-Dovekie recalibration, yielding ln B = -0.30 favoring ...

  13. Probing Dynamical Dark Energy with Late-Time Data: Evidence, Tensions, and the Limits of the $w_0w_a$CDM Framework

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Evidence for dynamical dark energy in the w0waCDM framework is strongly dataset-dependent, driven by mismatches in low-redshift BAO distance ratios that produce divergent expansion histories and inconsistent Hubble te...

  14. Joint Constraints on Neutrinos and Dynamical Dark Energy in Minimally Modified Gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The w†VCDM model shows a statistically significant preference for late-time quintessence-phantom crossing dark energy, raises the Hubble constant, and satisfies neutrino mass and Neff constraints from current cosmolog...

  15. Future Parameter Constraints from Weak Lensing CMB and Galaxy Lensing Power- and Bispectra

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Forecasts show that CMB and galaxy lensing bispectra improve parameter constraints over power spectra alone for stage-4 surveys, with strong synergy between the two probes especially on neutrino mass when using weak priors.

  16. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity from Quaia

    astro-ph.CO 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Reports f_NL = -20.5^{+19.0}_{-18.1} (68% CL) from combined Quaia quasar auto-correlation and CMB lensing cross-correlation assuming p_phi=1, or -28.7^{+26.1}_{-24.6} for p_phi=1.6.

  17. CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps

    astro-ph.CO 2022-06 accept novelty 5.0

    Planck PR4 maps with optimal filtering yield CMB lensing amplitude 1.004 ± 0.024 and σ8 Ωm^0.25 = 0.599 ± 0.016, the tightest lensing constraint yet.

  18. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    astro-ph.CO 2018-07 accept novelty 5.0

    Final Planck CMB data confirms the flat 6-parameter ΛCDM model with Ω_c h² = 0.120 ± 0.001, Ω_b h² = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, n_s = 0.965 ± 0.004, τ = 0.054 ± 0.007, H_0 = 67.4 ± 0.5 km/s/Mpc, and no strong evidence for extensions.

  19. Constraints on Cosmic Strings from the Curl-Mode CMB Lensing Power Spectrum measured by ACT DR6

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    ACT DR6 curl lensing yields 2σ bounds Gμ P^{-1} ≤ 3.5×10^{-5} (small-P) and Gμ ≤ 5.0×10^{-5} (P=1), tightened further with Planck 2013 data.

  20. Redshift evolution of the Hubble constant: Constraints and new insights from an interacting dark energy model

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Modified IDE model with interaction parameter alpha ~0.01 from late-universe data shows H0 decreasing with redshift, tightening to 10^-5 when CMB priors are added.

  21. New Insights into Dark Energy from DESI DR2 with CMB and SNIa

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Systematic dataset swaps show DESY5 low-redshift SNIa, Planck CMB plus lensing, and DESI-DR2 BAO as the dominant sources of w0waCDM tension with ΛCDM, while other combinations remain consistent.

  22. Cosmic Strings as Dynamical Dark Energy: Novel Constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0

    Cosmic string networks are constrained to less than ~1% of the energy density using CMB+BAO+SN data, with some models preferring mildly negative densities but no Bayesian evidence favoring them over LambdaCDM.

  23. Cosmological Concordance in an Especially Opaque Universe: A Tentative Cosmological Detection of Physical Neutrino Mass in $\Lambda$CDM

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 reject novelty 3.0

    Imposing a high prior on τ = 0.11 ± 0.006 produces a 2σ positive neutrino mass sum of 0.10 eV and restores concordance between CMB and DESI data inside ΛCDM.

  24. Cosmological structure growth in energy-momentum squared gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    In f(R,T²) gravity, the growth index decreases with redshift and approaches standard matter-dominated values at early times, with fσ8 predictions staying within ±2σ observational bounds for viable coupling parameters ...

  25. 2020 Global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture

    hep-ph 2020-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Updated global fit of neutrino oscillation data gives precise measurements of mixing parameters with a 2.5 sigma preference for normal mass ordering.