pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05931 · v1 · pith:M4R5HCMMnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.CV· cs.IR· cs.LG· cs.MM· eess.AS

To Be Multimodal or Not to Be: Query-Adaptive Audio-Visual Person Retrieval via Active Modality Detection

Erfan Loweimi , Mengjie Qian , Kate Knill , Guanfeng Wu , Chi-Ho Chan , Abbas Haider , Muhammad Awan , Josef Kittler
show 2 more authors
Hui Wang Mark Gales
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 02:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.IRcs.LGcs.MMeess.AS
keywords person retrievalaudio-visual retrievalmodality detectioncross-modal consistencyvideo archivesadaptive fusionmultimodal retrieval
0
0 comments X

The pith

A query-adaptive system detects active modalities via cross-modal score consistency to achieve higher person retrieval precision than fixed strategies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that in broadcast video archives, always fusing voice and face scores can hurt performance when one modality is missing for the target person. It introduces a method to detect which modalities are active by measuring how consistently the top results from one modality also rank highly in the other. Classifiers using these consistency features reach 89 percent accuracy in modality detection. On a large corpus of over 12,000 videos, the adaptive approach reaches 94.2 percent precision at rank one, beating single-modality and fixed-fusion baselines while closing most of the gap to an ideal system that knows the modalities in advance.

Core claim

The paper claims that by using cross-modal score consistency to detect active modalities, a retrieval system can adaptively select whether to use audio, visual, or both, avoiding the noise introduced by fusing an absent modality. This adaptive framework achieves 89% accuracy in detecting active modalities and delivers 94.2% P@1 on the BBC Rewind corpus, outperforming unimodal and fixed fusion methods.

What carries the argument

Cross-modal score consistency, which measures agreement between rankings from audio and visual modalities to indicate if both are active for the query target.

If this is right

  • The adaptive system recovers 64% of the gap to an oracle with ground-truth modality labels.
  • It outperforms speaker-only (82.9%), face-only (93.4%), and fixed fusion (90.0%) approaches.
  • Modality detection enables avoiding fusion when one modality is absent, preventing precision degradation.
  • The method works on real broadcast videos where targets may be heard but unseen or seen but unheard.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This consistency-based detection could extend to other multimodal tasks where modality presence varies per query, such as image-text retrieval.
  • Archive search systems could benefit from query-adaptive rather than global modality choices to handle diverse content.
  • Testing the approach on additional corpora with known modality labels would confirm its generalizability beyond the BBC Rewind set.

Load-bearing premise

Cross-modal score consistency reliably indicates the presence or absence of a modality in real-world broadcast videos where targets may be heard but unseen, seen but unheard, or both.

What would settle it

A controlled test on videos with ground-truth labels for active modalities per target person, checking whether the consistency features still classify presence or absence at the claimed accuracy level.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05931 by Abbas Haider, Chi-Ho Chan, Erfan Loweimi, Guanfeng Wu, Hui Wang, Josef Kittler, Kate Knill, Mark Gales, Mengjie Qian, Muhammad Awan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Query-adaptive MVSE framework for multimodal person retrieval. The modality combination module analyses modality scores to decide whether to be multimodal or not. speaker diarisation via PyAnnote [21, 22] to segment each video into per-speaker regions. Speaker embeddings are then extracted with a pre-trained ECAPA-TDNN [6] from Speech￾Brain [23], selected over x-vectors [5] and TitaNet [7] based on benchma… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Feature extraction for modality detection. Solid lines: within-modal scores; dashed lines: cross-modal scores. speaker-retrieved files are relevant, but these files need not con￾tain the target face (since the person is not visually present), so cs→f will be low. The pattern is symmetric for VoP. This inter-modal consistency is the central discriminative signal: as we will see in the experimental results (… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

When retrieving a person from a video archive by voice and face, should the system be multimodal or not? In real-world broadcast archives, unlike curated benchmarks, a target may be heard but unseen, seen but unheard, or both. Fusing scores from an absent modality injects noise, degrading precision below the best unimodal system. We propose a query-adaptive framework that detects active modalities via cross-modal score consistency: when both modalities are active, files retrieved by one also score highly on the other; this agreement breaks down when a modality is absent. Classifiers driven by these cross-modal features achieve 89% detection accuracy. On the BBC Rewind corpus (with over 12,000 broadcast videos) the adaptive system attains 94.2% P@1, outperforming speaker-only (82.9%), face-only (93.4%), and fixed fusion (90.0%), recovering 64% of the gap to an oracle with ground-truth modality labels (96.6%).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a query-adaptive audio-visual person retrieval framework that detects active modalities via cross-modal score consistency features. Classifiers trained on these features achieve 89% detection accuracy. On the BBC Rewind corpus (>12,000 broadcast videos), the adaptive system reports 94.2% P@1, outperforming speaker-only (82.9%), face-only (93.4%), and fixed fusion (90.0%) while recovering 64% of the gap to an oracle with ground-truth modality labels (96.6%).

Significance. If the detection mechanism holds, the work addresses a practical issue in real-world archives where targets may be heard but unseen or vice versa. Concrete performance numbers on a large broadcast corpus and explicit comparison to an oracle provide clear, falsifiable evidence of gains from avoiding noisy fusion. The cross-modal consistency signal offers a lightweight, training-free cue for adaptivity that could generalize beyond the reported setting.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported 94.2% P@1 (vs. 93.4% face-only) depends on the claim that cross-modal score agreement reliably drops when a modality is absent. No analysis or ablation is described that tests whether shared training biases between speaker and face embeddings could produce spurious agreement for heard-but-unseen targets, which would make the consistency signal correlational rather than causal and undermine the adaptive improvement.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states the corpus size and metric values but omits any mention of evaluation protocol, query construction, or how ground-truth modality labels were obtained for the oracle; adding one sentence would strengthen reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reported 94.2% P@1 (vs. 93.4% face-only) depends on the claim that cross-modal score agreement reliably drops when a modality is absent. No analysis or ablation is described that tests whether shared training biases between speaker and face embeddings could produce spurious agreement for heard-but-unseen targets, which would make the consistency signal correlational rather than causal and undermine the adaptive improvement.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit test isolating potential training biases would strengthen the causal interpretation of the consistency signal. The current manuscript supports the claim via the oracle gap recovery (64% of the 96.6%–82.9% gap closed) and the 89% detection accuracy, but does not contain a dedicated ablation on shared embedding biases. In revision we will add such an analysis (e.g., consistency scores computed with cross-dataset or frozen embeddings) to directly address this concern. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical method with reported metrics

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical framework that trains classifiers on cross-modal score agreement features to detect active modalities, then applies the detector for adaptive fusion. All reported figures (89% detection accuracy, 94.2% P@1 on BBC Rewind, comparisons to unimodal and fixed-fusion baselines) are experimental outcomes on a held-out corpus rather than predictions derived from fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes appear in the provided text; the central claim rests on measured retrieval performance, not on any reduction to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities used in the work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5758 in / 993 out tokens · 49278 ms · 2026-06-28T02:07:26.478376+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Person retrieval can exploit two complementary biomet- ric modalities: speaker voice via speaker embeddings [5, 6, 7] and facial appearance via face embeddings [8, 9]

    Introduction Locating a specific individual across a large-scale video archive is critical for journalism, forensics, and media indexing [1, 2, 3, 4]. Person retrieval can exploit two complementary biomet- ric modalities: speaker voice via speaker embeddings [5, 6, 7] and facial appearance via face embeddings [8, 9]. When both modalities are available, a ...

  2. [2]

    To Be Multimodal or Not to Be: Query-Adaptive Audio-Visual Person Retrieval via Active Modality Detection

    The MVSE Framework This work builds upon the Multimodal Video Search by Ex- amples (MVSE) framework [13, 18], an EPSRC-funded system for content-based retrieval in the BBC Rewind archive—a pub- licly available collection of 12,594 video files (409 h) spanning 1948–1979, covering news footage with diverse acoustic and visual conditions [12]. Figure 1 illus...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1948

  3. [3]

    Cross” = cross-modal scores; “µ+σ

    Query-Adaptive Retrieval Framework Figure 1 illustrates the proposed extension to the MVSE pipeline: amodality combinationmodule that detects which modalities are active for a given query and sets the fusion weight accordingly, before producing the final ranked list. 3.1. Scoring and fusion Given query embeddingse (q) spk ande (q) face, the per-modality s...

  4. [4]

    Experimental Setup The BBC Rewind corpus [12] is a publicly available, in- the-wild broadcast archive from Northern Ireland, comprising 12,594 video files (409 hours) spanning 1948–1979. Unlike standard curated academic datasets, BBC Rewind reflects real editorial footage, including interviews, debates, voice-overs, and crowd scenes, where a person may be...

    1948

  5. [5]

    Fixed” usesλ=0.5. “Adaptive

    Results and Discussion 5.1. Modality classification Table 2 reports classification accuracy under LoSoCV . Within- modal scores alone achieve∼82%, already well above the 81.3% majority-class baseline (note A VP accounts for 425/523 queries). Adding cross-modal scores yields a∼6 pp boost, con- firming inter-modal consistency as the dominant discriminative ...

  6. [6]

    to be multimodal or not to be

    Conclusions We presented a query-adaptive framework that answers the question“to be multimodal or not to be”for audio-visual per- son retrieval in uncurated broadcast archives. By detecting ac- tive modalities through cross-modal score consistency analysis, namely the agreement between one modality’s retrieval set and the other’s scores, the system achiev...

  7. [7]

    Acknowledgement This work was supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under Grants EP/V002856/1, EP/V006223/1 and EP/V002740/2 (Multi- modal Video Search by Examples), and by Cambridge Univer- sity Press & Assessment (CUP&A), a department of the Chan- cellor, Masters, and Scholars of the University of Cambridge. This...

  8. [8]

    Multimedia information retrieval: Theory and tech- niques,

    L. Stone, “Multimedia information retrieval: Theory and tech- niques,”Library Review, vol. 63, no. 4/5, pp. 373–374, 2014

    2014

  9. [9]

    R ¨uger,Multimedia Information Retrieval, ser

    S. R ¨uger,Multimedia Information Retrieval, ser. Synthesis Lec- tures on Information Concepts, Retrieval and Services. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010

    2010

  10. [10]

    Spoken content retrieval: A sur- vey of techniques and technologies,

    M. Larson and G. J. F. Jones, “Spoken content retrieval: A sur- vey of techniques and technologies,”Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, vol. 5, no. 4–5, pp. 235–422, 2012

    2012

  11. [11]

    Scalable identity-oriented speech retrieval,

    C. Chen, D. Jiang, J. Peng, R. Lian, Y . Li, C. Zhang, L. Chen, and L. Fan, “Scalable identity-oriented speech retrieval,”IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 3261–3265, 2023

    2023

  12. [12]

    X-vectors: Robust DNN embeddings for speaker recogni- tion,

    D. Snyder, D. Garcia-Romero, G. Sell, D. Povey, and S. Khudan- pur, “X-vectors: Robust DNN embeddings for speaker recogni- tion,” inProc. ICASSP, 2018, pp. 5329–5333

    2018

  13. [13]

    ECAPA- TDNN: Emphasized channel attention, propagation and aggre- gation in TDNN based speaker verification,

    B. Desplanques, J. Thienpondt, and K. Demuynck, “ECAPA- TDNN: Emphasized channel attention, propagation and aggre- gation in TDNN based speaker verification,” inProc. INTER- SPEECH, 2020, pp. 3830–3834

    2020

  14. [14]

    TitaNet: Neural model for speaker representation with 1D depth-wise separable convolu- tions and global context,

    N. R. Koluguri, T. Park, and B. Ginsburg, “TitaNet: Neural model for speaker representation with 1D depth-wise separable convolu- tions and global context,” inProc. ICASSP, 2021, pp. 8102–8106

    2021

  15. [15]

    FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering,

    F. Schroff, D. Kalenichenko, and J. Philbin, “FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering,” inProc. CVPR, 2015, pp. 815–823

    2015

  16. [16]

    ArcFace: Additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition,

    J. Deng, J. Guo, N. Xue, and S. Zafeiriou, “ArcFace: Additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition,” inProc. CVPR, 2019, pp. 4685–4694

    2019

  17. [17]

    V oxCeleb: A large- scale speaker identification dataset,

    A. Nagrani, J. S. Chung, and A. Zisserman, “V oxCeleb: A large- scale speaker identification dataset,” inProc. INTERSPEECH, 2017, pp. 2616–2620

    2017

  18. [18]

    V oxCeleb2: Deep speaker recognition,

    J. S. Chung, A. Nagrani, and A. Zisserman, “V oxCeleb2: Deep speaker recognition,” inProc. INTERSPEECH, 2018, pp. 1086– 1090

    2018

  19. [19]

    BBC Rewind,

    British Broadcasting Corporation, “BBC Rewind,” https:// bbcrewind.co.uk/, 2024

    2024

  20. [20]

    Multimodal video search by examples (MVSE),

    H. Wang, M. Mulvenna, R. Bondet al., “Multimodal video search by examples (MVSE),” 2021, EPSRC Grant Reference EP/V002740/2

    2021

  21. [21]

    On the usefulness of speaker embeddings for speaker retrieval in the wild: A com- parative study of x-vector and ECAPA-TDNN models,

    E. Loweimi, M. Qian, K. Knill, and M. Gales, “On the usefulness of speaker embeddings for speaker retrieval in the wild: A com- parative study of x-vector and ECAPA-TDNN models,” inProc. INTERSPEECH 2024, 2024, pp. 3774–3778

    2024

  22. [22]

    Seeing voices and hearing faces: Cross-modal biometric matching,

    A. Nagrani, J. S. Chung, and A. Zisserman, “Seeing voices and hearing faces: Cross-modal biometric matching,” inProc. ECCV, 2018, pp. 381–396

    2018

  23. [23]

    Self- supervised learning of audio-visual objects from video,

    T. Afouras, A. Owens, J. S. Chung, and A. Zisserman, “Self- supervised learning of audio-visual objects from video,” inProc. ECCV, 2020

    2020

  24. [24]

    Multimodal ma- chine learning: A survey and taxonomy,

    T. Baltru ˇsaitis, C. Ahuja, and L.-P. Morency, “Multimodal ma- chine learning: A survey and taxonomy,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 423–443, 2019

    2019

  25. [25]

    Multi-modal video search by examples—a video quality impact analysis,

    G. Wu, A. Haider, X. Tian, E. Loweimi, C. H. Chan, M. Qian, A. Muhammad, I. Spence, R. Cooper, W. W. Y . Ng, J. Kit- tler, M. Gales, and H. Wang, “Multi-modal video search by examples—a video quality impact analysis,”IET Computer Vi- sion, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1017–1033, 2024

    2024

  26. [26]

    Zero-shot audio topic reranking using large language models,

    M. Qian, R. Ma, A. Liusie, E. Loweimi, K. Knill, and M. Gales, “Zero-shot audio topic reranking using large language models,” in IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), 2024

    2024

  27. [27]

    Speaker retrieval in the wild: Challenges, effectiveness and robustness,

    E. Loweimi, M. Qian, K. Knill, and M. Gales, “Speaker retrieval in the wild: Challenges, effectiveness and robustness,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.18950

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    pyannote.audio: Neural building blocks for speaker diarization,

    H. Bredin, R. Yin, J. M. Coria, G. Gelly, P. Korshunov, M. Lavechin, D. Fustes, H. Titeux, W. Bouaziz, and M.-P. Gill, “pyannote.audio: Neural building blocks for speaker diarization,” inProc. ICASSP, 2020

    2020

  29. [29]

    End-to-end speaker segmentation for overlap-aware resegmentation,

    H. Bredin and A. Laurent, “End-to-end speaker segmentation for overlap-aware resegmentation,” inProc. INTERSPEECH, 2021

    2021

  30. [30]

    SpeechBrain’s ECAPA-TDNN implemen- tation for speaker embedding extraction,

    M. Ravanelliet al., “SpeechBrain’s ECAPA-TDNN implemen- tation for speaker embedding extraction,” https://huggingface.co/ speechbrain/spkrec-ecapa-voxceleb, 2021

    2021

  31. [31]

    V oxCeleb: Large-scale speaker verification in the wild,

    A. Nagrani, J. S. Chung, W. Xie, and A. Zisserman, “V oxCeleb: Large-scale speaker verification in the wild,”Computer Speech & Language, vol. 60, p. 101027, 2020

    2020

  32. [32]

    Additive margin softmax for face verification,

    F. Wang, J. Cheng, W. Liu, and H. Liu, “Additive margin softmax for face verification,”IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 926–930, 2018

    2018

  33. [33]

    Keep an eye on faces: Robust face detection with heatmap-assisted spatial attention and scale-aware layer attention,

    L. Ju, J. Kittler, M. A. T. Rana, W. Yang, and Z. Feng, “Keep an eye on faces: Robust face detection with heatmap-assisted spatial attention and scale-aware layer attention,”Pattern Recognition, vol. 140, p. 109553, 2023

    2023

  34. [34]

    Least-squares estimation of transformation param- eters between two point patterns,

    S. Umeyama, “Least-squares estimation of transformation param- eters between two point patterns,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 376–380, 1991

    1991

  35. [35]

    WebFace260M: A benchmark unveiling the power of million-scale deep face recognition,

    Z. Zhu, G. Huang, J. Deng, Y . Ye, J. Huang, X. Chen, J. Zhu, T. Yang, D. Du, J. Lu, and J. Zhou, “WebFace260M: A benchmark unveiling the power of million-scale deep face recognition,” in Proc. CVPR, 2021, pp. 10 492–10 502

    2021

  36. [36]

    Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python,

    F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V . Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V . Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay, “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830, 2011

    2011

  37. [37]

    spacy: Industrial-strength natural language pro- cessing in Python,

    Explosion AI, “spacy: Industrial-strength natural language pro- cessing in Python,” https://spacy.io, 2015

    2015

  38. [38]

    C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Sch ¨utze,Introduction to In- formation Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2009

    2009