Recognition: unknown
Object Hallucination in Image Captioning
read the original abstract
Despite continuously improving performance, contemporary image captioning models are prone to "hallucinating" objects that are not actually in a scene. One problem is that standard metrics only measure similarity to ground truth captions and may not fully capture image relevance. In this work, we propose a new image relevance metric to evaluate current models with veridical visual labels and assess their rate of object hallucination. We analyze how captioning model architectures and learning objectives contribute to object hallucination, explore when hallucination is likely due to image misclassification or language priors, and assess how well current sentence metrics capture object hallucination. We investigate these questions on the standard image captioning benchmark, MSCOCO, using a diverse set of models. Our analysis yields several interesting findings, including that models which score best on standard sentence metrics do not always have lower hallucination and that models which hallucinate more tend to make errors driven by language priors.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 11 Pith papers
-
Prefill-Time Intervention for Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
Prefill-Time Intervention (PTI) reduces hallucinations in large vision-language models by applying a one-time modality-aware steering correction to the initial KV cache at the prefill stage rather than during autoregr...
-
Mitigating Action-Relation Hallucinations in LVLMs via Relation-aware Visual Enhancement
A new attention-enhancement method using ARS scores and RVE reduces action-relation hallucinations in LVLMs while generalizing to spatial and object hallucinations.
-
CAST: Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Caption-Guided Visual Attention Steering
CAST reduces object hallucination in LVLMs by 6.03% on average across five models and five benchmarks by identifying caption-sensitive attention heads and applying optimized steering directions to their outputs, with ...
-
Online Self-Calibration Against Hallucination in Vision-Language Models
OSCAR exploits the generative-discriminative gap in LVLMs to build online preference data with MCTS and dual-granularity rewards for DPO-based calibration, claiming SOTA hallucination reduction and improved multimodal...
-
Mitigating Multimodal Hallucination via Phase-wise Self-reward
PSRD mitigates visual hallucinations in LVLMs via phase-wise self-reward decoding, cutting rates by 50% on LLaVA-1.5-7B and outperforming prior methods on five benchmarks.
-
Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuning
A new dataset of 400k visual instructions including negative examples at three semantic levels reduces hallucinations in models like MiniGPT-4 when used for fine-tuning while improving benchmark performance.
-
MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models
MiniGPT-4 shows that aligning a frozen vision encoder to Vicuna via one projection layer plus a second-stage detailed-description fine-tune produces GPT-4-like vision-language abilities including detailed captions, cr...
-
Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models without Performance Degradation
MPD reduces hallucinations in LVLMs by 23.4% while retaining 97.4% of general capability through semantic disentanglement and selective parameter updates.
-
Spotlight and Shadow: Attention-Guided Dual-Anchor Introspective Decoding for MLLM Hallucination Mitigation
DaID mitigates MLLM hallucinations by attention-guided selection of dual layers that calibrate token generation using internal perceptual discrepancies.
-
MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phone
MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 delivers GPT-4V-level multimodal performance on phones through architecture, pretraining, and alignment optimizations.
-
Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
The survey organizes causes of hallucinations in MLLMs, reviews evaluation benchmarks and metrics, and outlines mitigation approaches plus open questions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.