pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2211.04492 · v1 · pith:W6WKHITOnew · submitted 2022-11-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy

Marc Kamionkowski , Adam G. Riess This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 23:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords Hubble tensionearly dark energyLambdaCDMcosmic expansion ratepre-recombination physicscosmological modelcosmic microwave background
0
0 comments X

The pith

Early dark energy resolves the Hubble tension by altering pre-recombination physics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the Hubble tension as the significant mismatch between the Universe's current expansion rate measured from nearby galaxies and supernovae and the lower rate predicted by the standard LambdaCDM model using early-Universe data. It states that systematic errors in the measurements lack support from the breadth of available observations, making unknown errors untestable by definition. The authors conclude that models changing the physics before recombination offer the most viable path forward, with early dark energy serving as a concrete example that fits the majority of the data and remains open to future tests.

Core claim

The Hubble tension has grown to a level requiring a solution, and models that alter the early or pre-recombination physics of LambdaCDM are the most feasible explanations consistent with the majority of the data. Early dark energy provides a workable example of such a model that can be tested with future measurements.

What carries the argument

Early dark energy, a transient component that adds to the energy density before recombination and then fades, which adjusts the sound horizon to raise the inferred Hubble constant while preserving consistency with other observations.

If this is right

  • Any viable model must remain consistent with the majority of cosmological observations beyond the Hubble constant.
  • Future measurements can directly test early dark energy through its effects on the expansion history.
  • Attention focuses on early-Universe modifications rather than untestable errors in current data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This direction may point toward new interactions involving dark energy or dark matter in the early Universe.
  • It opens connections to questions about whether similar adjustments could address other cosmological discrepancies.
  • High-precision surveys of large-scale structure could provide independent tests of the predicted expansion changes.

Load-bearing premise

Proposed systematic errors in the measurements are not supported by the breadth of available data and unknown errors are untestable.

What would settle it

A future high-precision measurement that either identifies a clear systematic bias in local distance determinations or demonstrates that early dark energy produces detectable inconsistencies in the cosmic microwave background power spectrum or baryon acoustic oscillations.

read the original abstract

Over the past decade, the disparity between the value of the cosmic expansion rate directly determined from measurements of distance and redshift or instead from the standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model calibrated by measurements from the early Universe, has grown to a level of significance requiring a solution. Proposed systematic errors are not supported by the breadth of available data (and "unknown errors" untestable by lack of definition). Simple theoretical explanations for this "Hubble tension" that are consistent with the majority of the data have been surprisingly hard to come by, but in recent years, attention has focused increasingly on models that alter the early or pre-recombination physics of $\Lambda$CDM as the most feasible. Here, we describe the nature of this tension, emphasizing recent developments on the observational side. We then explain why early-Universe solutions are currently favored and the constraints that any such model must satisfy. We discuss one workable example, early dark energy, and describe how it can be tested with future measurements. Given an assortment of more extended recent reviews on specific aspects of the problem, the discussion is intended to be fairly general and understandable to a broad audience.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review that outlines the Hubble tension as the growing discrepancy between direct local measurements of the Hubble constant and the value inferred from early-Universe data within LambdaCDM. It states that proposed systematic errors lack support from the breadth of available data, notes the difficulty of finding simple theoretical explanations consistent with most observations, and argues that early-Universe modifications to LambdaCDM are currently the most feasible class of solutions. Early dark energy is presented as a workable example that satisfies existing constraints while remaining testable with future measurements. The discussion is positioned as general and accessible to a broad audience.

Significance. If the assessment holds, the review provides a clear, high-level synthesis of why early-Universe solutions are favored over late-time or systematic-error explanations, drawing on recent observational developments and model constraints. This serves a useful role as an entry point for non-specialists amid more technical reviews on specific aspects of the problem, and the emphasis on future testability strengthens the case for continued focus on models such as early dark energy.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the statement that the tension 'has grown to a level of significance requiring a solution' would be strengthened by citing the current quantitative discrepancy (in sigma) from the most recent local and CMB determinations referenced in the text.
  2. The review notes that early dark energy 'can be tested with future measurements' but does not specify which upcoming datasets or observables (e.g., CMB-S4, DESI, or Euclid) are expected to provide the strongest discriminating power; adding one or two concrete examples would improve clarity without altering the central narrative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary accurately reflects the scope and intent of the manuscript as a general, accessible overview of the Hubble tension favoring early-Universe solutions such as early dark energy. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper summarizing external measurements with no internal derivation reducing to self-inputs

full rationale

This is a review article that describes the Hubble tension as arising from independent local distance-redshift measurements versus early-Universe CMB calibrations of LambdaCDM. The central narrative cites the breadth of available data to argue against systematics and favors early-Universe modifications (with EDE as an example) based on external literature and constraints. No load-bearing step in the text reduces a claimed prediction or result to a parameter fitted within the paper or to a self-citation chain; the discussion remains self-contained against external benchmarks and falsifiable observations outside this manuscript.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review relies on standard cosmological assumptions and cited observational results rather than introducing new free parameters, axioms, or entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The standard LambdaCDM model calibrated by early-Universe measurements provides the baseline for comparison with direct distance-redshift measurements.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the reference against which the tension is measured.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5498 in / 1183 out tokens · 26449 ms · 2026-05-17T23:37:18.907063+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • Foundation.DimensionForcing dimension_forced unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    attention has focused increasingly on models that alter the early or pre-recombination physics of LambdaCDM as the most feasible... one workable example, early dark energy

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 17 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dispersion Measure Distribution of Unlocalized Fast Radio Bursts as a Probe of the Hubble Constant

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The DM distribution of unlocalized FRBs yields H0 = 73.8 +14.0/-12.3 km/s/Mpc with 18% uncertainty.

  2. DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    astro-ph.CO 2024-04 accept novelty 7.0

    First-year DESI BAO data are consistent with flat LambdaCDM and, when combined with CMB, show a 2.5-3.9 sigma preference for evolving dark energy (w0 > -1, wa < 0) that strengthens with certain supernova datasets.

  3. Geometric Constraints on the Pre-Recombination Expansion History from the Hubble Tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Model-independent reconstruction shows that early-universe modifications resolving the Hubble tension exist at the background level, requiring a smooth ~15% pre-recombination expansion rate enhancement.

  4. Double the axions, half the tension: multi-field early dark energy eases the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Two-field axion-like early dark energy reduces Hubble tension to 1.5 sigma residual and improves high-ell CMB fits over single-field models.

  5. Non-minimally coupled quintessence with sign-switching interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new quintessence model with non-minimal coupling produces an effective sign-switching interaction that fits current data better than LambdaCDM or w0waCDM and accounts for late-time dark energy weakening without phan...

  6. Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Smooth Transitions with Recent DESI DR2 Observations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Sign-switching dark energy with a transition at z_† fits recent DESI DR2, Planck CMB, and Pantheon+ data better than ΛCDM while raising the inferred Hubble constant and easing the Hubble tension.

  7. Alleviating the Hubble Tension Using $\Lambda$sCDM Model: A Coupled Dark Energy - Dark Matter Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The ΛsCDM model with coupled dark sectors reduces the Hubble tension to 1.2σ via late-time expansion changes while keeping the early-universe sound horizon nearly unchanged.

  8. Cosmological Impact of Redshift-Dependent Type Ia Supernovae Calibration

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A phenomenological redshift-dependent SNIa magnitude correction shows no evidence in ΛCDM but is preferred at 4.3σ with dynamical dark energy, reducing Hubble tension to 1.5σ.

  9. A barotropic alternative to Early Dark Energy for alleviating the $H_0$ tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A barotropic fluid with ω_s ≈ 0.29 and Ω_s ≈ 1.5×10^{-5} raises the inferred H0 to match SH0ES while remaining consistent with Planck CMB, DESI BAO, and Pantheon data.

  10. Disentangling cosmic distance tensions with early and late dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Early dark energy resolves CMB-BAO tension and, combined with thawing quintessence, reduces overall cosmological tensions without phantom crossing.

  11. Revisiting the Matter Creation Process: Observational Constraints on Gravitationally Induced Dark Energy and the Hubble Tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    Gravitationally induced particle creation models fit cosmological data as well as ΛCDM and reduce the Hubble tension from 4.3σ to 2.4–3σ.

  12. Joint Constraints on Neutrinos and Dynamical Dark Energy in Minimally Modified Gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The w†VCDM model shows a statistically significant preference for late-time quintessence-phantom crossing dark energy, raises the Hubble constant, and satisfies neutrino mass and Neff constraints from current cosmolog...

  13. Alleviating the Hubble Tension Using $\Lambda$sCDM Model: A Coupled Dark Energy - Dark Matter Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The ΛsCDM interacting dark sector model reduces the Hubble tension to 1.2σ via late-time energy transfer from dark matter to dark energy while leaving the sound horizon nearly unchanged.

  14. Impact of the SNe Ia Magnitude Transition at 20 Mpc on Cosmological Parameter Estimation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A 0.19 mag step in supernova absolute magnitude at 20 Mpc improves data fit and increases the Hubble constant by 2% while leaving matter density and dark energy parameters stable.

  15. Cosmological constraints on the big bang quantum cosmology model

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The JCDM model yields H0 of 66.95 plus or minus 0.51 km/s/Mpc and Omega_m of 0.3419 plus or minus 0.0065 in a flat universe, rising to H0 of 69.13 plus or minus 0.56 with slight positive curvature, fitting late-time d...

  16. Observational tests of \texorpdfstring{$\Lambda(t)$}{Lambda(t)} cosmology in light of DESI DR2

    physics.gen-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    MCMC constraints on two Lambda(t) models with DESI DR2, CC, and Pantheon+ data yield H0 ~72.5-73 km/s/Mpc, Omega_m0 near standard values in joint fits, and n~0.3 indicating mild deviation from LambdaCDM.

  17. Dark energy from string theory: an introductory review

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    String theory imposes constraints on dark energy but permits various construction attempts for de Sitter vacua and single-field exponential quintessence models despite obstructions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 146 canonical work pages · cited by 16 Pith papers · 63 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Asimov’s Chronology of Science & Discovery: Updated and Illustrate

    Isaac Asimov. Asimov’s Chronology of Science & Discovery: Updated and Illustrate . Harper- Collins, New York, 1994

    work page 1994

  2. [2]

    W. L. Freedman et al. Final results from the Hubble Space Telescope key project to measure the Hubble constant. Astrophys. J., 553:47–72, 2001, astro-ph/0012376. www.annualreviews.org • H0 and EDE 27

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  3. [3]

    Carnegie Hubble Program: A Mid-Infrared Calibration of the Hubble Constant

    Wendy L. Freedman, Barry F. Madore, Victoria Scowcroft, Chris Burns, Andy Monson, S. Eric Persson, Mark Seibert, and Jane Rigby. Carnegie Hubble Program: A Mid-infrared Calibration of the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J., 758(1):24, October 2012, 1208.3281

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys., 641: A6, 2020, 1807.06209. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological Implications from two Decades of Spectroscopic Surveys at the Apache Point observatory

    Shadab Alam et al. Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory. Phys. Rev. D , 103(8):083533, 2021, 2007.08991

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    T. M. C. Abbott et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Phys. Rev. D , 105(2):023520, 2022, 2105.13549

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    A 3% Solution: Determination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space Telescope and Wide Field Camera 3

    Adam G. Riess, Lucas Macri, Stefano Casertano, Hubert Lampeitl, Henry C. Ferguson, Alexei V. Filippenko, Saurabh W. Jha, Weidong Li, and Ryan Chornock. A 3% Solution: Determination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space Telescope and Wide Field Camera 3. Astrophys. J., 730:119, 2011, 1103.2976. [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 732, 129 (2011)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant

    Adam G. Riess et al. A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J., 826(1):56, 2016, 1604.01424

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team

    Adam G. Riess et al. A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/sec/MpcUncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 934(1):L7, 2022, 2112.04510

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

    S. Perlmutter et al. Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high redshift supernovae. Astrophys. J., 517:565–586, 1999, astro-ph/9812133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  11. [11]

    Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant

    Adam G. Riess et al. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron. J., 116:1009–1038, 1998, astro-ph/9805201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  12. [12]

    Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

    Elcio Abdalla et al. Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies. JHEAp, 34:49–211, 2022, 2203.06142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    The Physics of Cosmic Acceleration

    Robert R. Caldwell and Marc Kamionkowski. The Physics of Cosmic Acceleration. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. , 59:397–429, 2009, 0903.0866

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [14]

    Early dark energy, the Hubble-parameter tension, and the string axiverse

    Tanvi Karwal and Marc Kamionkowski. Dark energy at early times, the Hubble parameter, and the string axiverse. Phys. Rev. D , 94(10):103523, 2016, 1608.01309

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Cosmological implications of ultra-light axion-like fields

    Vivian Poulin, Tristan L. Smith, Daniel Grin, Tanvi Karwal, and Marc Kamionkowski. Cosmo- logical implications of ultralight axionlike fields. Phys. Rev. D, 98(8):083525, 2018, 1806.10608

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Jose Luis Bernal, Licia Verde, and Adam G. Riess. The trouble with H0. JCAP, 10:019, 2016, 1607.05617

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe

    L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess. Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe. Nature Astron., 3:891, 7 2019, 1907.10625

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Hubble constant hunter’s guide

    Lloyd Knox and Marius Millea. Hubble constant hunter’s guide. Phys. Rev. D , 101(4):043533, 2020, 1908.03663

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    Eleonora Di Valentino, Olga Mena, Supriya Pan, Luca Visinelli, Weiqiang Yang, Alessandro Melchiorri, David F. Mota, Adam G. Riess, and Joseph Silk. In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions. Class. Quant. Grav. , 38(15):153001, 2021, 2103.01183

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant

    Paul Shah, Pablo Lemos, and Ofer Lahav. A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant. Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 29(1):9, December 2021, 2109.01161

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [22]

    Witte, Vivian Poulin, and Julien Lesgourgues

    Nils Sch¨ oneberg, Guillermo Franco Abell´ an, Andrea P´ erez S´ anchez, Samuel J. Witte, Vivian Poulin, and Julien Lesgourgues. The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models. Phys. Rept., 984:1–55, 2022, 2107.10291

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [23]

    Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe

    Joshua Frieman, Michael Turner, and Dragan Huterer. Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. , 46:385–432, 2008, 0803.0982

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [24]

    Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration

    David H. Weinberg, Michael J. Mortonson, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Christopher Hirata, Adam G. 28 Kamionkowski and Riess Riess, and Eduardo Rozo. Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration. Phys. Rept. , 530: 87–255, 2013, 1201.2434

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [25]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    Dillon Brout et al. The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints. Astrophys. J. , 938 (2):110, 2022, 2202.04077

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [26]

    Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM

    Adam G. Riess, Stefano Casertano, Wenlong Yuan, Lucas M. Macri, and Dan Scolnic. Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyond LambdaCDM. Astrophys. J., 876 (1):85, 2019, 1903.07603

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [27]

    R. F. Christy. Pulsation Theory. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. , 4:353, January 1966

    work page 1966

  27. [28]

    D. W. Pesce et al. The Megamaser Cosmology Project. XIII. Combined Hubble constant constraints. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 891(1):L1, 2020, 2001.09213

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [29]

    Milky Way Cepheid Standards for Measuring Cosmic Distances and Application to Gaia DR2: Implications for the Hubble Constant

    Adam G. Riess et al. Milky Way Cepheid Standards for Measuring Cosmic Distances and Application to Gaia DR2: Implications for the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J. , 861(2):126, 2018, 1804.10655

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [30]

    Riess, Stefano Casertano, Wenlong Yuan, J

    Adam G. Riess, Stefano Casertano, Wenlong Yuan, J. Bradley Bowers, Lucas Macri, Joel C. Zinn, and Dan Scolnic. Cosmic Distances Calibrated to 1% Precision with Gaia EDR3 Par- allaxes and Hubble Space Telescope Photometry of 75 Milky Way Cepheids Confirm Tension with ΛCDM. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 908(1):L6, 2021, 2012.08534

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [31]

    Riess, Stefano Casertano, and Lucas M

    Wenlong Yuan, Adam G. Riess, Stefano Casertano, and Lucas M. Macri. A First Look at Cepheids in a SN Ia Host with JWST. 9 2022, 2209.09101

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [32]

    D. M. Scolnic et al. The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample. Astrophys. J., 859(2):101, 2018, 1710.00845

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [33]

    The Carnegie Supernova Project: Absolute Calibration and the Hubble Constant

    Christopher R. Burns et al. The Carnegie Supernova Project: Absolute Calibration and the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J., 869(1):56, 2018, 1809.06381

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [34]

    Clarifying the Hubble constant tension with a Bayesian hierarchical model of the local distance ladder

    Stephen M. Feeney, Daniel J. Mortlock, and Niccol` o Dalmasso. Clarifying the Hubble constant tension with a Bayesian hierarchical model of the local distance ladder.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 476(3):3861–3882, 2018, 1707.00007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [35]

    Inspecting the Cepheid Distance Ladder: the Hubble Space Telescope Distance to the SN Ia Host Galaxy NGC 5584

    Behnam Javanmardi, Antoine Merand, Pierre Kervella, Louise Breuval, Alexandre Gal- lenne, Nicolas Nardetto, Wolfgang Gieren, Grzegorz Pietrzynski, Vincent Hocde, and Simon Borgniet. Inspecting the Cepheid Distance Ladder: the Hubble Space Telescope Distance to the SN Ia Host Galaxy NGC 5584. Astrophys. J., 911(1):12, 2021, 2102.12489

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [36]

    Riess, and Pierre Kervella

    Louise Breuval, Adam G. Riess, and Pierre Kervella. An Improved Calibration of the Wavelength Dependence of Metallicity on the Cepheid Leavitt law. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2205.06280, May 2022, 2205.06280

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [37]

    Riess, Louise Breuval, Wenlong Yuan, Stefano Casertano, Lucas M

    Adam G. Riess, Louise Breuval, Wenlong Yuan, Stefano Casertano, Lucas M. ˜Macri, J. Bradley Bowers, Dan Scolnic, Tristan Cantat-Gaudin, Richard I. Anderson, and Mauri- cio Cruz Reyes. Cluster Cepheids with High Precision Gaia Parallaxes, Low Zero-point Uncer- tainties, and Hubble Space Telescope Photometry. Astrophys. J., 938(1):36, 2022, 2208.01045

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [38]

    Hoyt, Rachael L

    Taylor J. Hoyt, Rachael L. Beaton, Wendy L. Freedman, In Sung Jang, Myung Gyoon Lee, Barry F. Madore, Andrew J. Monson, Jillian R. Neeley, Jeffrey A. Rich, and Mark Seibert. The Carnegie Chicago Hubble Program X: Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distances to NGC 5643 and NGC 1404. Astrophys. J., 915(1):34, July 2021, 2101.12232

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [39]

    Freedman et al

    Wendy L. Freedman et al. The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch. 7 2019, 1907.05922

    work page arXiv 2019

  39. [40]

    Anand, Luca Rizzi, R

    Gagandeep S. Anand, Luca Rizzi, R. Brent Tully, Edward J. Shaya, Igor D. Karachentsev, Dmitry I. Makarov, Lidia Makarova, Po-Feng Wu, Andrew E. Dolphin, and Ehsan Kourkchi. The Extragalactic Distance Database: The Color-Magnitude Diagrams/Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distance Catalog. Astron. J., 162(2):80, August 2021, 2104.02649

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [41]

    Blakeslee, Joseph B

    John P. Blakeslee, Joseph B. Jensen, Chung-Pei Ma, Peter A. Milne, and Jenny E. Greene. www.annualreviews.org • H0 and EDE 29 The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances. Astrophys. J., 911(1):65, April 2021, 2101.02221

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [42]

    Siyang Li, Stefano Casertano, and Adam G. Riess. A Maximum Likelihood Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch Luminosity from High Latitude Field Giants using Gaia Early Data Release 3 Parallaxes. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2202.11110, February 2022, 2202.11110

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [43]

    John Soltis, Stefano Casertano, and Adam G. Riess. The Parallax of ω Centauri Measured from Gaia EDR3 and a Direct, Geometric Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch and the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 908(1):L5, February 2021, 2012.09196

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [44]

    Peterson et al

    Erik R. Peterson et al. The Pantheon+ Analysis: Evaluating Peculiar Velocity Corrections in Cosmological Analyses with Nearby Type Ia Supernovae. 10 2021, 2110.03487

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [45]

    Stubbs, and Adam G

    Sasha Brownsberger, Dillon Brout, Daniel Scolnic, Christopher W. Stubbs, and Adam G. Riess. The Pantheon+ Analysis: Dependence of Cosmological Constraints on Photometric- Zeropoint Uncertainties of Supernova Surveys. 10 2021, 2110.03486

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [46]

    Bernard F. Schutz. Determining the Hubble Constant from Gravitational Wave Observations. Nature, 323:310–311, 1986

    work page 1986

  46. [47]

    B. P. Abbott et al. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 119(16):161101, 2017, 1710.05832

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [48]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. Astrophys. J. Lett., 848(2):L12, 2017, 1710.05833

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [49]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 848(2):L13, 2017, 1710.05834

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [50]

    B. P. Abbott et al. A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant. Nature, 551(7678):85–88, 2017, 1710.05835

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [51]

    Hsin-Yu Chen, Maya Fishbach, and Daniel E. Holz. A two per cent Hubble constant measure- ment from standard sirens within five years. Nature, 562(7728):545–547, 2018, 1712.06531

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  51. [52]

    First measurement of the Hubble constant from a dark standard siren using the Dark Energy Survey galaxies and the LIGO/Virgo binary-black-hole merger GW170814

    M. Soares-Santos et al. First Measurement of the Hubble Constant from a Dark Standard Siren using the Dark Energy Survey Galaxies and the LIGO/Virgo Binary–Black-hole Merger GW170814. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 876(1):L7, 2019, 1901.01540

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [53]

    Huang, Adam G

    Caroline D. Huang, Adam G. Riess, Wenlong Yuan, Lucas M. Macri, Nadia L. Zakamska, Stefano Casertano, Patricia A. Whitelock, Samantha L. Hoffmann, Alexei V. Filippenko, and Daniel Scolnic. Hubble Space Telescope Observations of Mira Variables in the Type Ia Su- pernova Host NGC 1559: An Alternative Candle to Measure the Hubble Constant. 8 2019, 1908.10883

    work page arXiv 2019

  53. [54]

    Schneider

    John Tonry and Donald P. Schneider. A New Technique for Measuring Extragalactic Distances. Astron. J., 96:807, September 1988

    work page 1988

  54. [55]

    Wood, Peter Milne, Joseph B

    Peter Garnavich, Charlotte M. Wood, Peter Milne, Joseph B. Jensen, John P. Blakeslee, Peter J. Brown, Daniel Scolnic, Benjamin Rose, and Dillon Brout. Connecting Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances to Type Ia Supernova Hosts: Testing the Top Rung of the Distance Ladder. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2204.12060, April 2022, 2204.12060

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [56]

    https://eventhorizontelescope.org

    work page

  56. [57]

    S. Refsdal. On the possibility of determining Hubble’s parameter and the masses of galaxies from the gravitational lens effect. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , 128:307, 1964

    work page 1964

  57. [58]

    Vanderriest, J

    C. Vanderriest, J. Schneider, G. Herpe, M. Chevreton, M. Moles, and G. Wlerick. The value of the time delay delta T (A,B) for the ’double’ quasar 0957+561 from optical photometric monitoring. Astron. Astrophys., 215:1–13, May 1989

    work page 1989

  58. [59]

    C. R. Keeton and C. S. Kochanek. Determining the Hubble constant from the gravitational lens PG-1115+080. Astrophys. J., 487:42, 1997, astro-ph/9611216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  59. [60]

    The Quadruple Gravitational Lens PG1115+080: Time Delays and Models

    Paul L. Schechter et al. The Quadruple gravitational lens PG1115+080: Time delays and models. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 475:L85–L88, 1997, astro-ph/9611051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  60. [61]

    L. V. E. Koopmans, T. Treu, C. D. Fassnacht, R. D. Blandford, and G. Surpi. The Hub- ble Constant from the gravitational lens B1608+656. Astrophys. J. , 599:70–85, 2003, astro- 30 Kamionkowski and Riess ph/0306216

    work page arXiv 2003

  61. [62]

    Wong et al

    Kenneth C. Wong et al. H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early- and late-Universe probes. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , 498(1):1420–1439, 2020, 1907.04869

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [63]

    E. E. Falco, M. V. Gorenstein, and I. I. Shapiro. On model-dependent bounds on H 0 from gravitational images : application to Q 0957+561 A, B. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 289:L1–L4, February 1985

    work page 1985

  63. [64]

    Birrer et al

    S. Birrer et al. TDCOSMO - IV. Hierarchical time-delay cosmography – joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles. Astron. Astrophys., 643:A165, 2020, 2007.02941

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [65]

    Millon et al

    M. Millon et al. TDCOSMO. I. An exploration of systematic uncertainties in the inference of H0 from time-delay cosmography. Astron. Astrophys., 639:A101, 2020, 1912.08027

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [66]

    Jos´ e Luis Bernal, Licia Verde, Raul Jimenez, Marc Kamionkowski, David Valcin, and Ben- jamin D. Wandelt. The trouble beyond H0 and the new cosmic triangles. Phys. Rev. D , 103 (10):103533, 2021, 2102.05066

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [67]

    Constraining Cosmological Parameters Based on Relative Galaxy Ages

    Raul Jimenez and Abraham Loeb. Constraining cosmological parameters based on relative galaxy ages. Astrophys. J., 573:37–42, 2002, astro-ph/0106145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  67. [68]

    Cosmic Chronometers: Constraining the Equation of State of Dark Energy. I: H(z) Measurements

    Daniel Stern, Raul Jimenez, Licia Verde, Marc Kamionkowski, and S. Adam Stanford. Cosmic Chronometers: Constraining the Equation of State of Dark Energy. I: H(z) Measurements. JCAP, 02:008, 2010, 0907.3149

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  68. [69]

    Improved constraints on the expansion rate of the Universe up to z~1.1 from the spectroscopic evolution of cosmic chronometers

    M. Moresco et al. Improved constraints on the expansion rate of the Universe up to z˜1.1 from the spectroscopic evolution of cosmic chronometers. JCAP, 08:006, 2012, 1201.3609

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  69. [70]

    Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers

    Michele Moresco, Raul Jimenez, Licia Verde, Andrea Cimatti, and Lucia Pozzetti. Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers. II. Impact of Stellar Population Synthesis Models Systematics and Full Covariance Matrix. Astrophys. J., 898(1):82, 2020, 2003.07362

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [71]

    Toward a Better Understanding of Cosmic Chronometers: Stellar Population Properties of Passive Galaxies at Intermediate Redshift

    Nicola Borghi, Michele Moresco, Andrea Cimatti, Alexandre Huchet, Salvatore Quai, and Lucia Pozzetti. Toward a Better Understanding of Cosmic Chronometers: Stellar Population Properties of Passive Galaxies at Intermediate Redshift. Astrophys. J. , 927(2):164, 2022, 2106.14894

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [72]

    Absolute Ages and Distances of 22 GCs using Monte Carlo Main-Sequence Fitting

    Erin M. O’Malley, Christina Gilligan, and Brian Chaboyer. Absolute Ages and Distances of 22 GCs Using Monte Carlo Main-sequence Fitting. Astrophys. J. , 838(2):162, April 2017, 1703.01915

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [73]

    The local and distant Universe: stellar ages and $H_0$

    Raul Jimenez, Andrea Cimatti, Licia Verde, Michele Moresco, and Benjamin Wandelt. The local and distant Universe: stellar ages and H0. JCAP, 03:043, 2019, 1902.07081

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [74]

    Gerard Jungman, Marc Kamionkowski, Arthur Kosowsky, and David N. Spergel. Cosmological parameter determination with microwave background maps.Phys. Rev. D, 54:1332–1344, 1996, astro-ph/9512139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  74. [75]

    D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, John C. Mather, R. A. Shafer, and E. L. Wright. The Cosmic Microwave Background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS data set. Astrophys. J., 473:576, 1996, astro-ph/9605054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  75. [76]

    Scott Dodelson and Michael S. Turner. Nonequilibrium neutrino statistical mechanics in the expanding universe. Phys. Rev. D , 46:3372–3387, 1992

    work page 1992

  76. [77]

    Cosmology from Maxima-1, Boomerang and COBE/DMR CMB Observations

    Andrew H. Jaffe et al. Cosmology from MAXIMA-1, BOOMERANG and COBE / DMR CMB observations. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 86:3475–3479, 2001, astro-ph/0007333

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  77. [78]

    C. L. Bennett et al. Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results. Astrophys. J. Suppl. , 208:20, 2013, 1212.5225

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  78. [79]

    D. N. Spergel et al. First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Determination of cosmological parameters. Astrophys. J. Suppl. , 148:175–194, 2003, astro- ph/0302209

    work page arXiv 2003

  79. [80]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Param- eters

    Simone Aiola et al. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Param- eters. JCAP, 12:047, 2020, 2007.07288

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [81]

    Dutcher et al

    D. Dutcher et al. Measurements of the E-mode polarization and temperature-E-mode corre- www.annualreviews.org • H0 and EDE 31 lation of the CMB from SPT-3G 2018 data. Phys. Rev. D , 104(2):022003, 2021, 2101.01684

    work page arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.