pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08810 · v2 · pith:M2WZZJFCnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.LG

Continuous Language Diffusion as a Decoder-Interface Problem

Zhicheng Du , Lan Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 18:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.LG
keywords continuous diffusionlanguage modelsdecoder basinembedded language flowstoken recoveryinterface phase diagramdenoising trajectoriesrepresentation-decoder systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Continuous diffusion language models succeed by entering a decoder basin where token recovery becomes simple.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how continuous diffusion models can produce fluent text from Gaussian-corrupted sentence embeddings that lack direct linguistic meaning. It identifies a decoder-basin mechanism in which denoising trajectories eventually reach latent regions allowing the native decoder to extract stable tokens reliably. Evidence comes from a diagnostic protocol applied to public checkpoints that reveals an interface phase diagram: early steps yield weak readability, a middle competition region shows disagreement, and late steps enter a high-margin basin. Inside the basin, simple methods recover most decoder decisions, suggesting that evaluation should treat these models as representation-decoder systems rather than pure latent generators. A reader would care because this reframes why scalar metrics like MSE or perplexity can mislead about actual generative capability.

Core claim

Auditing public ELF checkpoints reveals an interface phase diagram: early predictions are weakly readable, mid-trajectory disagreement marks a competition region, and late predictions enter a high-margin decoder basin. Once inside, token realization is surprisingly simple on generated ELF states: frozen T5 token-embedding lookup recovers 93--96% of native decoder decisions, and a single linear readout reaches 97.9% agreement at 32k samples, leaving an ≈1.1--1.2 perplexity gap in a structured residual tail. A decoder-margin bound explains why token recovery depends on margin and local decoder sensitivity, not latent error alone. Continuous and latent diffusion language models should therefore

What carries the argument

decoder-basin mechanism: latent regions reached during denoising where the native decoder reads stable tokens with high margin

If this is right

  • Token recovery depends on margin and local decoder sensitivity rather than latent error magnitude alone.
  • An explicit margin rule exits denoising roughly 17--28% earlier under conservative held-out gates.
  • Low mean-squared error can discard linguistic content while low perplexity can reflect low-entropy collapse.
  • Boundary checks confirm the same interface questions remain meaningful when state objects and decoders change across models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Training objectives could be redesigned to accelerate entry into decoder basins instead of minimizing global latent error.
  • Decoder agreement metrics might supplement or replace scalar perplexity in model comparisons.
  • Similar basin dynamics could be tested in non-diffusion generative models that map continuous states to discrete tokens.
  • Wider decoder basins might allow shorter trajectories and lower compute at inference time.

Load-bearing premise

The diagnostic protocol for denoisability, semantic recoverability, order sensitivity, decoder compatibility, and trajectory reliability accurately isolates the decoder-basin mechanism without bias from the specific choice of public checkpoints, ELF formulation, or T5-based decoder.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment in which trajectories are forced to low latent error without entering a high-margin decoder basin yet still produce fluent text at scale, or conversely enter the basin but fail to generate coherent output.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08810 by Lan Ma, Zhicheng Du.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Continuous language diffusion as an interface problem. Unlike noisy images, noisy sentence embeddings do not retain an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: MSE can be misleading: denoisability and semantic recovery decouple. Color indicates state-space family (blue: language [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Controlled interface degradation through a PCA bottleneck. Left: retained variance and latent cosine remain high at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: PCA bottlenecks reduce order sensitivity. Left: mean-pooled representations become less sensitive to stronger order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Order sensitivity is graded. The horizontal axis increases order corruption from none to full word shuffle; the vertical axis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ELF internal signals predict the standard PPL evaluator. Left: each point is one generated sample; the x-axis is the peak [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ELF-L trajectory reliability at larger scale. The x-axis in both panels is Spearman [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Denoising as basin navigation. (a) Decoder margins widen while decoder entropy collapses. (b) Self-conditioning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Interface phase diagram for ELF basin entry. (a) Native decoder margins trace pre-entry, competition, and locked regions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Basin-navigation signals across ELF scale. Left: 10th-percentile native decoder margin over normalized denoising phase. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Shard-level robustness of the basin-navigation audit. Left: basin-entry phase under two margin thresholds. Middle: final [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: ODE and SDE sampler comparison. Left: native decoder margin grows under both samplers. Middle: decoder entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: External boundary checks. Left: LangFlow native step margins provide a weaker latent-step analogue of ELF’s decoder [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: External interface overlay. Left: LangFlow native step margins rise, while sparse final-token commitment probes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: LangFlow delta-margin audit. Left: native lower-tail margins rise along the trajectory; the sparse cross markers show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: BitstreamDiffusion real-code validation. A 512-sample real OWT code sweep matches the earlier structured-code proxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Interface diagnostics beyond ELF. The external checks do not turn the paper into a benchmark suite; they show how [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Layer-wise decoder-basin tests. Left: clean token recovery for hidden states decoded through their native or matched [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: PPL–entropy frontier for fixed and front-loaded self-conditioning schedules. Each point is a sampling configuration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Time-region and signal-gate controls. Left: front-loading self-conditioning improves over the reversed schedule, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Three minimal probes of the decoder basin. BGEE measures basin-entry timing, ZSBD measures frozen token-embedding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Basin-Guided Early Exit (BGEE) as a basin-timing probe. Left: speed-quality curve for fixed exits, margin gates, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Cross-scale BGEE confirmation. Left: geometric PPL versus denoising compute saved for margin-gated exits across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Minimal Decoder Protocol (MDP). Left: GPT-2-Large PPL of linear readouts trained on 1k–32k generated final latents, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: MDP cross-scale confirmation. Left: native-token agreement for 1k and 4k matching sets across ELF-B/M/L. Middle: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Zero-shot and reverse-basin tests. Left: ZSBD decodes final ELF states by nearest-neighbor lookup in frozen T5 token [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: ZSBD cross-scale confirmation. Left: frozen nearest-neighbor agreement with the native decoder, using the T5 token [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_27.png] view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: Intermediate-step ZSBD at larger scale. Left: ZSBD-native agreement over normalized denoising phase. Middle: native [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_28.png] view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Basin probes in one view. Left: ELF checkpoints enter the decoder basin at different normalized phases. Middle: frozen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_29.png] view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: Inside the decoder basin. Panel A illustrates basin entry: margin and frozen token-embedding alignment rise together as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_30.png] view at source ↗
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: RBN cross-scale confirmation. Left: token agreement after adding isotropic noise to final ELF states. Right: corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_31.png] view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: Directional reverse-basin navigation. Left: token agreement under isotropic and matched-norm directional perturbations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_32.png] view at source ↗
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: Cross-scale directional RBN. From left to right, the panels compare isotropic noise, a sentiment direction, the first PCA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_33.png] view at source ↗
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: 32k MDP residual-tail analysis. Left: error rate by native margin bucket. Middle-left: overlap between MDP errors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_34.png] view at source ↗
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: Paired clean-vs-generated decoder-basin depth. For the same generated token sequences, clean T5 interface states have a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_35.png] view at source ↗
Figure 36
Figure 36. Figure 36: Tail-gated readout as a tail-calibration check. Left: native-token agreement versus the fraction of token positions routed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_36.png] view at source ↗
Figure 37
Figure 37. Figure 37: Multi-metric and boundary evidence. (a) MAUVE and PPL can rank schedules differently. (b) A small decoder can obtain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_37.png] view at source ↗
Figure 38
Figure 38. Figure 38: Per-sample operating regions. Left: schedule choices move samples along a PPL-entropy cloud rather than a single scalar. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_38.png] view at source ↗
Figure 39
Figure 39. Figure 39: Entropy-calibrated ELF vs. GPT-2-small. Left: full temperature sweep in the PPL–entropy plane. Right: zoom near the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_39.png] view at source ↗
Figure 40
Figure 40. Figure 40: Decoder-margin basin test. Left: token recovery and positive-margin fraction as final ELF latents are corrupted away [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_40.png] view at source ↗
Figure 41
Figure 41. Figure 41: Per-token decoder-margin evidence. Left: token recovery as a function of latent error and clean decoder margin. Right: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_41.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gaussian-corrupted sentence embeddings have no direct linguistic interpretation, yet continuous diffusion language models can generate fluent text from them. We study this puzzle through Embedded Language Flows (ELF) and identify a decoder-basin mechanism: our evidence suggests that denoising becomes reliable when trajectories reach regions where the native decoder can read stable tokens. We introduce a diagnostic protocol for denoisability, semantic recoverability, order sensitivity, decoder compatibility, and trajectory reliability. It exposes failures hidden by scalar metrics: low mean-squared error can discard linguistic content, low perplexity can reflect low-entropy collapse, and clean latent reconstruction can coexist with a narrow decoder basin. A decoder-margin bound explains why token recovery depends on margin and local decoder sensitivity, not latent error alone. Auditing public ELF checkpoints reveals an interface phase diagram: early predictions are weakly readable, mid-trajectory disagreement marks a competition region, and late predictions enter a high-margin decoder basin. Once inside, token realization is surprisingly simple on generated ELF states: frozen T5 (Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer) token-embedding lookup recovers $93$--$96\%$ of native decoder decisions, and a single linear readout reaches $97.9\%$ agreement at 32k samples, leaving an $\approx1.1$--$1.2$ perplexity gap in a structured residual tail. Under conservative held-out gates, a margin rule exits roughly $17$--$28\%$ earlier in denoising steps under an explicit diagnostic monitor. Boundary checks on LangFlow, BitstreamDiffusion, and the Continuous Latent Diffusion Language Model (Cola-DLM) show that the same interface questions remain meaningful when the state object and decoder change. Continuous and latent diffusion language models should therefore be evaluated as representation-decoder systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that continuous diffusion language models operate through a decoder-basin mechanism: denoising trajectories in Embedded Language Flows (ELF) enter high-margin regions where native decoders can reliably read tokens. This is evidenced by audits of public checkpoints revealing an interface phase diagram (early weak readability, mid-trajectory competition, late high-margin basin), with frozen T5 token-embedding lookup recovering 93-96% of native decisions and a linear readout reaching 97.9% agreement (leaving a 1.1-1.2 perplexity gap). A diagnostic protocol for denoisability, semantic recoverability, order sensitivity, decoder compatibility, and trajectory reliability is introduced to expose limitations of scalar metrics, a decoder-margin bound is proposed, and boundary checks on LangFlow, BitstreamDiffusion, and Cola-DLM are performed to suggest broader relevance. The conclusion is that such models should be evaluated as representation-decoder systems.

Significance. If the decoder-basin mechanism and phase diagram hold under the diagnostic protocol, the work would meaningfully reframe evaluation of continuous and latent diffusion language models by shifting focus from latent reconstruction quality alone to interface properties between representations and decoders. The empirical recovery rates and margin-based early-exit rule could inform more efficient inference, while the critique of scalar metrics (MSE discarding content, low perplexity from collapse) provides a useful diagnostic lens. The boundary checks, though limited, indicate the interface questions are not ELF-specific.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (boundary checks paragraph): The claim that the decoder-basin mechanism is not an artifact of the T5-based ELF formulation rests on boundary checks showing that 'the same interface questions remain meaningful' for LangFlow, BitstreamDiffusion, and Cola-DLM. However, no quantitative token recovery rates, agreement percentages, or phase-diagram statistics are reported for these models (unlike the detailed 93-96% and 97.9% figures for ELF), leaving the generality of the mechanism load-bearing but under-supported.
  2. [Section describing the diagnostic protocol] Section describing the diagnostic protocol and auditing of public ELF checkpoints: The protocol is presented as isolating the decoder-basin without bias from checkpoint choice or T5 decoder, yet no details are given on quantitative phase definitions (e.g., exact margin thresholds separating early/mid/late), data exclusion rules, or statistical controls for the reported recovery rates and 17-28% earlier exits. This directly affects the reliability of the central empirical claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract reports an '≈1.1--1.2 perplexity gap in a structured residual tail' without specifying the base model, vocabulary size, or exact computation (e.g., whether it is conditional or unconditional perplexity), which reduces clarity for readers attempting to interpret the residual tail's significance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments. We address each major point below with clarifications and proposed revisions where the manuscript can be strengthened without misrepresentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (boundary checks paragraph): The claim that the decoder-basin mechanism is not an artifact of the T5-based ELF formulation rests on boundary checks showing that 'the same interface questions remain meaningful' for LangFlow, BitstreamDiffusion, and Cola-DLM. However, no quantitative token recovery rates, agreement percentages, or phase-diagram statistics are reported for these models (unlike the detailed 93-96% and 97.9% figures for ELF), leaving the generality of the mechanism load-bearing but under-supported.

    Authors: We agree the boundary checks are qualitative and illustrative rather than providing matching quantitative metrics for the other models. The manuscript uses them only to indicate that the diagnostic questions (denoisability, semantic recoverability, decoder compatibility) transfer when state objects and decoders differ, without claiming identical performance. To address the under-support concern, we will revise the abstract and boundary-checks section to explicitly qualify these as preliminary observations and note the limitation that full quantitative audits were not performed on the other models due to checkpoint and implementation differences. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section describing the diagnostic protocol] Section describing the diagnostic protocol and auditing of public ELF checkpoints: The protocol is presented as isolating the decoder-basin without bias from checkpoint choice or T5 decoder, yet no details are given on quantitative phase definitions (e.g., exact margin thresholds separating early/mid/late), data exclusion rules, or statistical controls for the reported recovery rates and 17-28% earlier exits. This directly affects the reliability of the central empirical claim.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the current text describes the phases qualitatively (early weak readability, mid-trajectory competition, late high-margin basin) and reports aggregate recovery and early-exit figures without specifying exact margin thresholds, exclusion criteria, or statistical controls such as variance across checkpoints. We will revise the diagnostic-protocol section to add these details: explicit margin thresholds derived from the decoder-margin bound, sentence-length and quality exclusion rules, and basic statistical reporting (e.g., standard deviation of recovery rates). This directly improves the reliability of the empirical claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on empirical audits of public checkpoints

full rationale

The paper presents observational findings from auditing ELF checkpoints, measuring token recovery rates (93-96% with frozen T5 embeddings, 97.9% with linear readout), and describing an interface phase diagram. No mathematical derivation, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain is present in the text; the decoder-margin bound is invoked descriptively without equations that reduce the result to inputs by construction. Boundary checks on other models are cited to support generality, but the core evidence is direct measurement rather than tautological reduction. This matches the default expectation of no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the empirical observations obtained by applying the diagnostic protocol to public ELF checkpoints; because only the abstract is available, the ledger is necessarily incomplete and limited to entities and assumptions explicitly named in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • margin threshold for early exit
    The margin rule that exits 17-28% earlier is described as conservative and held-out, implying a threshold chosen or tuned on data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions about embedding spaces and decoder behavior in transformer language models
    The interpretation of the phase diagram and recovery rates presupposes that the audited models follow typical transformer decoder mechanics.
invented entities (2)
  • decoder-basin mechanism no independent evidence
    purpose: Explains why denoising trajectories produce fluent text despite Gaussian-corrupted embeddings lacking direct linguistic interpretation
    Introduced to account for the observed phase diagram and high agreement between frozen embeddings and native decoders
  • Embedded Language Flows (ELF) no independent evidence
    purpose: Framework for studying the puzzle of Gaussian-corrupted sentence embeddings in continuous diffusion language models
    Defined in the paper as the object of study

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5845 in / 1667 out tokens · 33406 ms · 2026-06-27T18:25:21.650762+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 39 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Consistent Diffusion Language Models

    Hasan Amin, Yuan Gao, Yaser Souri, Subhojit Som, Ming Yin, Rajiv Khanna, and Xia Song. Consistent diffusion language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.00161, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.00161. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00161

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.00161 2026

  2. [2]

    Block Diffusion: Interpolating Between Autoregressive and Diffusion Language Models

    Marianne Arriola, Aaron Gokaslan, Justin T. Chiu, Zhihan Yang, Zhixuan Qi, Jiaqi Han, Subham Sekhar Sahoo, 50 and V olodymyr Kuleshov. Block diffusion: Interpolating between autoregressive and diffusion language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09573, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.09573. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2503.09573

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.09573 2025

  3. [3]

    Johnson, Jonathan Ho, Daniel Tarlow, and Rianne van den Berg

    Jacob Austin, Daniel D. Johnson, Jonathan Ho, Daniel Tarlow, and Rianne van den Berg. Structured denoising diffusion models in discrete state-spaces. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 17981–17993. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021. URLhttps://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/ paper/2021/file/958c530554f78bcd8e97125b70e697...

    2021

  4. [4]

    Towards Closing the Autoregressive Gap in Language Modeling via Entropy-Gated Continuous Bitstream Diffusion

    Georgios Batzolis, Mark Girolami, and Luca Ambrogioni. Towards closing the autoregressive gap in language modeling via entropy-gated continuous bitstream diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.07013, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.07013. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.07013 2026

  5. [5]

    Highly compressed tokenizer can generate without training

    Lukas Lao Beyer, Tianhong Li, Xinlei Chen, Sertac Karaman, and Kaiming He. Highly compressed tokenizer can generate without training. InProceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 267 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 4096–4114. PMLR, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.08257. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08257

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.08257 2025

  6. [6]

    JAX: Composable transformations of python+numpy programs, 2018

    James Bradbury, Roy Frostig, Peter Hawkins, Matthew James Johnson, Chris Leary, Dougal Maclaurin, and Skye Wanderman-Milne. JAX: Composable transformations of python+numpy programs, 2018. URL https: //github.com/jax-ml/jax

    2018

  7. [7]

    One billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling

    Ciprian Chelba, Tomas Mikolov, Mike Schuster, Qi Ge, Thorsten Brants, Phillipp Koehn, and Tony Robinson. One billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling. InInterspeech, pages 2635–2639,

  8. [8]

    URL https://www.isca-archive.org/interspeech_ 2014/chelba14_interspeech.html

    doi: 10.21437/INTERSPEECH.2014-564. URL https://www.isca-archive.org/interspeech_ 2014/chelba14_interspeech.html

    work page doi:10.21437/interspeech.2014-564 2014

  9. [9]

    Langflow: Continuous diffusion rivals discrete in language modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.11748, 2026

    Yuxin Chen, Chumeng Liang, Hangke Sui, Ruihan Guo, Chaoran Cheng, Jiaxuan You, and Ge Liu. Langflow: Continuous diffusion rivals discrete in language modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.11748, 2026. doi: 10. 48550/arXiv.2604.11748. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11748

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    DMax: Aggressive Parallel Decoding for dLLMs

    Zigeng Chen, Gongfan Fang, Xinyin Ma, Ruonan Yu, and Xinchao Wang. DMax: Aggressive parallel decoding for dLLMs.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.08302, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.08302. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2604.08302

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.08302 2026

  11. [11]

    Scaling Categorical Flow Maps

    Oscar Davis, Anastasiia Filippova, Pierre Ablin, Victor Turrisi, Amitis Shidani, Marco Cuturi, and Louis Béthune. Scaling categorical flow maps.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.07820, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.07820. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07820

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.07820 2026

  12. [12]

    Generative Modeling via Drifting

    Mingyang Deng, He Li, Tianhong Li, Yilun Du, and Kaiming He. Generative modeling via drifting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.04770, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.04770. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04770

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.04770 2026

  13. [13]

    BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding

    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Jill Burstein, Christy Doran, and Thamar Solorio, editors,Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volu...

    2019

  14. [14]

    Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies,

    Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/N19-1423. URL https://aclanthology. org/N19-1423/

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423

  15. [15]

    How contextual are contextualized word representations? comparing the geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 embeddings

    Kawin Ethayarajh. How contextual are contextualized word representations? comparing the geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 embeddings. InProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 55–65,

    2019

  16. [16]

    URLhttps://aclanthology.org/D19-1006/

    doi: 10.18653/v1/D19-1006. URLhttps://aclanthology.org/D19-1006/

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1006

  17. [17]

    Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(120):1–39, 2022

    William Fedus, Barret Zoph, and Noam Shazeer. Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(120):1–39, 2022. URL https: //jmlr.org/papers/v23/21-0998.html. 51

    2022

  18. [18]

    Nemotron- labs-diffusion: A tri-mode language model unifying autoregressive, diffusion, and self-speculation decod- ing

    Yonggan Fu, Lexington Whalen, Abhinav Garg, Chengyue Wu, Maksim Khadkevich, Nicolai Oswald, Enze Xie, Daniel Egert, Sharath Turuvekere Sreenivas, Shizhe Diao, Chenhan Yu, Ye Yu, Weijia Chen, Sa- jad Norouzi, Jingyu Liu, Shiyi Lan, Ligeng Zhu, Jin Wang, Jindong Jiang, Morteza Mardani, Mehran Maghoumi, Song Han, Ante Jukic, Nima Tajbakhsh, Jan Kautz, and Pa...

    2026

  19. [19]

    Openwebtext corpus, 2019

    Aaron Gokaslan and Vanya Cohen. Openwebtext corpus, 2019. URL https://skylion007.github.io/ OpenWebTextCorpus/

    2019

  20. [20]

    DiffuSeq: Sequence to Sequence Text Generation with Diffusion Models

    Shansan Gong, Mukai Li, Jiangtao Feng, Zhiyong Wu, and Lingpeng Kong. Diffuseq: Sequence to sequence text generation with diffusion models. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2210.08933. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2210.08933. ICLR 2023 camera ready

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.08933 2023

  21. [21]

    Continuous latent diffusion language model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.06548,

    Hongcan Guo, Qinyu Zhao, Yian Zhao, Shen Nie, Rui Zhu, Qiushan Guo, Feng Wang, Tao Yang, Hengshuang Zhao, Guoqiang Wei, and Yan Zeng. Continuous latent diffusion language model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.06548,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Continuous Latent Diffusion Language Model

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.06548. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06548

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.06548

  23. [23]

    SSD-LM: Semi-autoregressive simplex-based diffusion language model for text generation and modular control

    Xiaochuang Han, Sachin Kumar, and Yulia Tsvetkov. SSD-LM: Semi-autoregressive simplex-based diffusion language model for text generation and modular control. InProceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 11575–11596, 2023. doi: 10.18653/ v1/2023.acl-long.647. URLhttps://aclantholog...

    2023

  24. [24]

    Locally Coherent Parallel Decoding in Diffusion Language Models

    Michael Hersche, Nicolas Menet, Ronan Tanios, and Abbas Rahimi. Locally coherent parallel decoding in diffusion language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.20216, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.20216. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.20216 2026

  25. [25]

    Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance

    Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classifier-free diffusion guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598, 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2207.12598. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2207.12598

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.12598 2022

  26. [26]

    Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. InAdvances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 6840–6851, 2020. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2006.11239. URL https: //proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/4c5bcfec8584af0d967f1ab10179ca4b-Abstract. html

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11239 2020

  27. [27]

    ELF: Embedded Language Flows

    Keya Hu, Linlu Qiu, Yiyang Lu, Hanhong Zhao, Tianhong Li, Yoon Kim, Jacob Andreas, and Kaiming He. ELF: Embedded language flows.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.10938, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.10938. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10938

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.10938 2026

  28. [28]

    TextLDM: Language Modeling with Continuous Latent Diffusion

    Jiaxiu Jiang, Jingjing Ren, Wenbo Li, Bo Wang, Haoze Sun, Yijun Yang, Jianhui Liu, Yanbing Zhang, Shenghe Zheng, Yuan Zhang, Haoyang Huang, Nan Duan, and Wangmeng Zuo. TextLDM: Language modeling with continuous latent diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.07748, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.07748. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07748

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.07748 2026

  29. [29]

    Kingma and Max Welling

    Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2014. URLhttps://openreview.net/forum?id=33X9fd2-9FyZd

    2014

  30. [30]

    Just on time: Token-level early stopping for diffusion language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.11133, 2026

    Zahar Kohut, Severyn Shykula, Dmytro Khamula, Mykola Vysotskyi, Taras Rumezhak, and V olodymyr Karpiv. Just on time: Token-level early stopping for diffusion language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.11133, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.11133. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11133

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.11133 2026

  31. [31]

    Where Should Diffusion Enter a Language Model? Geometry-Guided Hidden-State Replacement

    Injin Kong, Hyoungjoon Lee, and Yohan Jo. Where should diffusion enter a language model? geometry-guided hidden-state replacement.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.14368, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.14368. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14368

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.14368 2026

  32. [32]

    Learn from your own latents and not from tokens: A sample-complexity theory

    Daniel J. Korchinski, Alessandro Favero, and Matthieu Wyart. Learn from your own latents and not from tokens: A sample-complexity theory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.27734, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.27734. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27734. 52

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.27734 2026

  33. [33]

    Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited

    Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Honglak Lee, and Geoffrey Hinton. Similarity of neural network representations revisited. InProceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 97 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 3519–3529. PMLR, 2019. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1905.00414. URLhttps://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/kornblit...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.00414 2019

  34. [34]

    Flow Map Language Models: One-step Language Modeling via Continuous Denoising

    Chanhyuk Lee, Jaehoon Yoo, Manan Agarwal, Sheel Shah, Jerry Huang, Aditi Raghunathan, Seunghoon Hong, Nicholas M. Boffi, and Jinwoo Kim. Flow map language models: One-step language modeling via continuous denoising.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.16813, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.16813. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2602.16813

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.16813 2026

  35. [35]

    DiLaDiff: Distilled Latent-Augmented Diffusion for Language Modeling

    Jean-Marie Lemercier, Tomas Geffner, Karsten Kreis, Morteza Mardani, Arash Vahdat, and Ante Juki´c. DiLaDiff: Distilled latent-augmented diffusion for language modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.23605, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.23605. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23605

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.23605 2026

  36. [36]

    A diversity-promoting objective function for neural conversation models

    Jiwei Li, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Jianfeng Gao, and Bill Dolan. A diversity-promoting objective function for neural conversation models. InProceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 110–119, 2016. doi: 10.18653/v1/N16-1014. URLhttps://aclantho...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1014 2016

  37. [37]

    Diffusion Language Models Know the Answer Before Decoding

    Pengxiang Li, Yefan Zhou, Dilxat Muhtar, Lu Yin, Shilin Yan, Li Shen, Soroush V osoughi, and Shiwei Liu. Diffusion language models know the answer before decoding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.19982, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.19982. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19982

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.19982 2025

  38. [38]

    A Survey on Diffusion Language Models

    Tianyi Li, Mingda Chen, Bowei Guo, and Zhiqiang Shen. A survey on diffusion language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10875, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.10875. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10875

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.10875 2025

  39. [39]

    Hashimoto

    Xiang Lisa Li, John Thickstun, Ishaan Gulrajani, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto. Diffusion- lm improves controllable text generation. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2205.14217. URL https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/hash/ 1be5bc25d50895ee656b8c2d9eb89d6a-Abstract-Conference.html

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.14217 2022

  40. [40]

    Speech meets ELF: Audio conditional continuous-target diffusion for speech recognition and translation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.10368,

    Xuanchen Li, Tianrui Wang, Yuheng Lu, Zikang Huang, Yu Jiang, Chenghan Lin, Chenrui Cui, Ziyang Ma, Xingyu Ma, Chunyu Qiang, Guochen Yu, Xie Chen, Longbiao Wang, and Jianwu Dang. Speech meets ELF: Audio conditional continuous-target diffusion for speech recognition and translation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.10368,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Speech Meets ELF: Audio Conditional Continuous-Target Diffusion for Speech Recognition and Translation

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.10368. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10368

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.10368

  42. [42]

    J. Lin. Divergence measures based on the shannon entropy.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 37(1):145– 151, 1991. doi: 10.1109/18.61115. URLhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/61115

    work page doi:10.1109/18.61115 1991

  43. [43]

    Flow Matching for Generative Modeling

    Yaron Lipman, Ricky T. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel, and Matt Le. Flow matching for generative modeling. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2210.02747. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747v2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.02747 2023

  44. [44]

    RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach

    Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. RoBERTa: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach.arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692, 2019. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1907.11692. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 1907

  45. [45]

    Weinberger

    Justin Lovelace, Varsha Kishore, Chao Wan, Eliot Shekhtman, and Kilian Q. Weinberger. Latent dif- fusion for language generation. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2212.09462. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/hash/ b2a2bd5d5051ff6af52e1ef60aefd255-Abstract-Conference.html

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09462 2023

  46. [46]

    Measuring Temporal Linguistic Emergence in Diffusion Language Models

    Harry Lu. Measuring temporal linguistic emergence in diffusion language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.23235, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.23235. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.23235 2026

  47. [47]

    DAWN: Dependency-aware fast inference for diffusion LLMs.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06953, 2026

    Lizhuo Luo, Zhuoran Shi, Jiajun Luo, Zhi Wang, Shen Ren, Wenya Wang, and Tianwei Zhang. DAWN: Dependency-aware fast inference for diffusion LLMs.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06953, 2026. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.2602.06953. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06953. 53

    arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    How to Train Your Latent Diffusion Language Model Jointly With the Latent Space

    Viacheslav Meshchaninov, Alexander Shabalin, Egor Chimbulatov, Nikita Gushchin, Ilya Koziev, Alexander Korotin, and Dmitry Vetrov. How to train your latent diffusion language model jointly with the latent space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.07933, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.07933. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2605. 07933

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.07933 2026

  49. [49]

    Fast-decoding diffusion language models via progress-aware confidence schedules.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02892, 2025

    Amr Mohamed, Yang Zhang, Michalis Vazirgiannis, and Guokan Shang. Fast-decoding diffusion language models via progress-aware confidence schedules.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02892, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512. 02892. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02892

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512 2025

  50. [50]

    A corpus and cloze evaluation for deeper understanding of commonsense stories

    Nasrin Mostafazadeh, Nathanael Chambers, Xiaodong He, Devi Parikh, Dhruv Batra, Lucy Vanderwende, Pushmeet Kohli, and James Allen. A corpus and cloze evaluation for deeper understanding of commonsense stories. InProceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, p...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1098 2016

  51. [51]

    Scaling up masked diffusion models on text.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18514, 2024

    Shen Nie, Fengqi Zhu, Chao Du, Tianyu Pang, Qian Liu, Guangtao Zeng, Min Lin, and Chongxuan Li. Scaling up masked diffusion models on text.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18514, 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.18514. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18514

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.18514 2024

  52. [53]

    PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library

    Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, Alban Desmaison, Andreas Kopf, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Martin Raison, Alykhan Tejani, Sasank Chilamkurthy, Benoit Steiner, Lu Fang, Junjie Bai, and Soumith Chintala. PyTorch: An imperative style, high-perfo...

    2019

  53. [54]

    Llm layers immediately correct each other

    Arjun Patrawala, Jiahai Feng, Erik Jones, and Jacob Steinhardt. Llm layers immediately correct each other. InThe Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025. URL https://neurips.cc/ virtual/2025/poster/119727

    2025

  54. [55]

    Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2212.09748. URL https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/ICCV2023/papers/Peebles_Scalable_Diffusion_ Models_with_Transformers_ICCV_2023_paper.pdf

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09748 2023

  55. [56]

    Don't Retrain, Align: Adapting Autoregressive LMs to Diffusion LMs via Representation Alignment

    Fred Zhangzhi Peng, Alexis Fox, Anru R. Zhang, and Alexander Tong. Don’t retrain, align: Adapting au- toregressive lms to diffusion lms via representation alignment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.06885, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.06885. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06885

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.06885 2026

  56. [57]

    Mauve scores for generative models: Theory and practice.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(356):1–92, 2023

    Krishna Pillutla, Lang Liu, John Thickstun, Sean Welleck, Swabha Swayamdipta, Rowan Zellers, Sewoong Oh, Yejin Choi, and Zaid Harchaoui. Mauve scores for generative models: Theory and practice.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(356):1–92, 2023. URLhttps://jmlr.org/papers/v24/23-0023.html

    2023

  57. [58]

    Language models are unsupervised multitask learners

    Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. Technical report, OpenAI, 2019. URL https://cdn.openai.com/ better-language-models/language_models_are_unsupervised_multitask_learners.pdf

    2019

  58. [59]

    Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(140):1–67, 2020. URLhttps://jmlr.org/papers/v21/20-074.html

    2020

  59. [60]

    Sentence- BERT : Sentence Embeddings using S iamese BERT -Networks

    Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. InProceed- ings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 3982–3992, 2019. doi: 10.18653/v1/D19-1410. URL https://aclanthology.org/D19-1410/. 54

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1410 2019

  60. [61]

    A ConvNet for the 2020s , booktitle =

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042. URL https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2022/papers/Rombach_Hi...

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01042 2022

  61. [62]

    Categorical flow maps.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12233, 2026

    Daan Roos, Oscar Davis, Floor Eijkelboom, Michael Bronstein, Max Welling, ˙Ismail ˙Ilkan Ceylan, Luca Ambrogioni, and Jan-Willem van de Meent. Categorical flow maps.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12233, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.12233. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12233

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.12233 2026

  62. [63]

    Chiu, Alexander Rush, and V olodymyr Kuleshov

    Subham Sekhar Sahoo, Marianne Arriola, Yair Schiff, Aaron Gokaslan, Edgar Marroquin, Justin T. Chiu, Alexander Rush, and V olodymyr Kuleshov. Simple and effective masked diffusion lan- guage models. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024. doi: 10. 48550/arXiv.2406.07524. URL https://proceedings.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/hash/ eb0b1...

    arXiv 2024

  63. [64]

    Chiu, and V olodymyr Kuleshov

    Subham Sekhar Sahoo, Justin Deschenaux, Aaron Gokaslan, Guanghan Wang, Justin T. Chiu, and V olodymyr Kuleshov. The diffusion duality. InProceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 267 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 52584–52619. PMLR, 2025. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.2506.10892. URLhttps://proceedings.mlr.pres...

    arXiv 2025

  64. [65]

    CoDAR: Continuous diffusion language models are more powerful than you think.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02547, 2026

    Junzhe Shen, Jieru Zhao, Ziwei He, and Zhouhan Lin. CoDAR: Continuous diffusion language models are more powerful than you think.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02547, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.02547. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02547

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.02547 2026

  65. [66]

    Dystruct: Dynamically Structured Diffusion Language Model Decoding via Bayesian Inference

    Bian Sun, Kevin Zhai, Mubarak Shah, and Zhenyi Wang. Dystruct: Dynamically structured diffusion language model decoding via bayesian inference.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.09820, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.09820. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09820

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.09820 2026

  66. [67]

    Forward-Free Diffusion Language Models

    Haotian Sun, Rushi Qiang, Yuqian Zheng, and Bo Dai. Forward-free diffusion language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.08357, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.08357. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08357

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.08357 2026

  67. [68]

    Is noise conditioning necessary for denoising generative models? InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2025

    Qiao Sun, Zhicheng Jiang, Hanhong Zhao, and Kaiming He. Is noise conditioning necessary for denoising generative models? InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, 2025. URL https://proceedings. mlr.press/v267/sun25g.html

    2025

  68. [69]

    K-Forcing: Joint Next-K-Token Decoding via Push-Forward Language Modeling

    Zhiwei Tang, Yuanyu He, Yizheng Han, Wangbo Zhao, Jiasheng Tang, Fan Wang, and Bohan Zhuang. K-Forcing: Joint next-k-token decoding via push-forward language modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.10820, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.10820. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10820

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.10820 2026

  69. [70]

    Entropy Aware Reward Guidance for Diffusion Language Model Alignment

    Atula Tejaswi, Litu Rout, Constantine Caramanis, Sanjay Shakkottai, and Sujay Sanghavi. Entropy aware reward guidance for diffusion language model alignment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05000, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv. 2602.05000. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05000

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 2026

  70. [71]

    Diffuse and disperse: Image generation with representation regularization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09027, 2025

    Runqian Wang and Kaiming He. Diffuse and disperse: Image generation with representation regularization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09027, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.09027. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506. 09027

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.09027 2025

  71. [72]

    Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou

    Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed H. Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. InAd- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 24824–24837, 2022. doi: 10. 48550/arXiv.2201.11903. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  72. [73]

    Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Remi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, Joe Davison, Sam Shleifer, Patrick von Platen, Clara Ma, Yacine Jernite, Julien Plu, Canwen Xu, Teven Le Scao, Sylvain Gugger, Mariama Drame, Quentin Lhoest, and Alexander M. Rush. Transformers: State-of-the-art...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 2020

  73. [74]

    Fast-dLLM: Training-free Acceleration of Diffusion LLM by Enabling KV Cache and Parallel Decoding

    Chengyue Wu, Hao Zhang, Shuchen Xue, Zhijian Liu, Shizhe Diao, Ligeng Zhu, Ping Luo, Song Han, and Enze Xie. Fast-dllm: Training-free acceleration of diffusion LLM by enabling KV cache and parallel decoding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22618, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.22618. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505. 22618

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.22618 2025

  74. [75]

    BlockBatch: Multi-scale consensus decoding for efficient diffusion language model inference.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.29233, 2026

    Xiaoyou Wu, Cheng-Jhih Shih, Binfei Ji, Yong Liu, and Yingyan Lin. BlockBatch: Multi-scale consensus decoding for efficient diffusion language model inference.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.29233, 2026. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.2605.29233. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29233

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  75. [76]

    Streaming-dllm: Accelerating diffusion LLMs via suffix pruning and dynamic decoding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.17917, 2026

    Zhongyu Xiao, Zhiwei Hao, Jianyuan Guo, Yong Luo, Jia Liu, Jie Xu, and Han Hu. Streaming-dllm: Accelerating diffusion LLMs via suffix pruning and dynamic decoding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.17917, 2026. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.2601.17917. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17917

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  76. [77]

    m T 5: A Massively Multilingual Pre-trained Text-to-Text Transformer

    Linting Xue, Noah Constant, Adam Roberts, Mihir Kale, Rami Al-Rfou, Aditya Siddhant, Aditya Barua, and Colin Raffel. mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer. InProceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 483–498, 2021. doi: ...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.41 2021

  77. [78]

    B y T 5: Towards a Token-Free Future with Pre-trained Byte-to-Byte Models

    Linting Xue, Aditya Barua, Noah Constant, Rami Al-Rfou, Sharan Narang, Mihir Kale, Adam Roberts, and Colin Raffel. ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte models.Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:291–306, 2022. doi: 10.1162/tacl_a_00461. URL https://aclanthology. org/2022.tacl-1.17/

    work page doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00461 2022

  78. [79]

    Continuous Diffusion Scales Competitively with Discrete Diffusion for Language

    Zhihan Yang, Wei Guo, Shuibai Zhang, Subham Sekhar Sahoo, Yongxin Chen, Arash Vahdat, Morteza Mardani, and John Thickstun. Continuous diffusion scales competitively with discrete diffusion for language.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.18530, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.18530. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18530

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.18530 2026

  79. [80]

    Representation Alignment for Generation: Training Diffusion Transformers Is Easier Than You Think

    Sihyun Yu, Sangkyung Kwak, Huiwon Jang, Jongheon Jeong, Jonathan Huang, Jinwoo Shin, and Saining Xie. Representation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think. InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.06940. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06940

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.06940 2025

  80. [81]

    Roll Out and Roll Back: Diffusion LLMs are Their Own Efficiency Teachers

    Fanqin Zeng, Feng Hong, Geng Yu, Huangjie Zheng, Xiaofeng Cao, Ya Zhang, Bo Han, Yanfeng Wang, and Jiangchao Yao. Roll out and roll back: Diffusion LLMs are their own efficiency teachers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.16941, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.16941. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16941

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.16941 2026

Showing first 80 references.