Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 32 cited by

UniVideo claims that one dual-stream model can unify video understanding, generation, and editing, and that joint training lets its image-editing skill transfer to unseen video edits.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 10:45 UTC pith:WCNPFGM5

load-bearing objection UniVideo is a plausible engineering extension of the dual-stream video recipe, but the headline zero-shot generalization claims rest on a 20-case benchmark and qualitative demos—too thin to take at face value. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2510.08377 v4 pith:WCNPFGM5 submitted 2025-10-09 cs.CV

UniVideo: Unified Understanding, Generation, and Editing for Videos

Cong Wei , Quande Liu , Zixuan Ye , Qiulin Wang , Xintao Wang , Pengfei Wan , Kun Gai , Wenhu Chen This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords video generationvideo editingunified multimodal modelin-context learningtext-to-videoimage-to-videoinstruction followingvideo understanding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

UniVideo claims that video understanding, generation, and editing can be unified in a single model without task-specific modules or masks. Using a frozen multimodal language model for instruction understanding and a frozen video diffusion transformer for generation, connected by a trained connector, the system is jointly trained across text/image-to-video, in-context generation, in-context editing, and image editing. On benchmarks, it matches or surpasses task-specific baselines in generation and editing while retaining the language model's visual-understanding scores. The load-bearing generalization is that joint training transfers image-editing capability to free-form video editing instructions never seen in training, and lets the model compose tasks, such as swapping an identity and restyling a scene in one instruction.

Core claim

The central claim is that a single dual-stream architecture, where one stream supplies semantic embeddings from a multimodal language model and the other preserves fine-grained visual detail from VAE-encoded inputs, is enough to unify diverse video tasks under one instruction-following paradigm. The authors show that this design, trained jointly over a broad mix of generation and editing data, reaches or beats specialist models on in-context video generation and editing, and that it generalizes zero-shot to free-form editing and task compositions. In the author's own framing, UniVideo is an assembled multimodal generative system—it couples two frozen backbones through a small trained connect

What carries the argument

The dual-stream coupling: an MLLM's last-layer hidden states are aligned by a trainable MLP into a multimodal diffusion transformer's understanding stream, while VAE-encoded images and videos enter the generation stream directly to preserve fine details. Three-dimensional positional embeddings let the transformer distinguish conditioning latents from noisy target latents. A three-stage training scheme—connector alignment, high-quality fine-tuning, then multi-task training—induces shared instruction-handling capability without retraining either backbone.

Load-bearing premise

The synthetic editing supervision used for training—object-deletion targets produced by a video inpainting model, stylized videos produced by a text-to-video model plus a control module, and image edits from an external generator—is assumed to teach genuine editing semantics rather than artifacts; the paper reports no validation of label quality.

What would settle it

Re-run the training pipeline with human-verified editing pairs (or with the synthetic targets replaced by real edited videos) and compare free-form video editing success rates; if the zero-shot transfer collapses, the claimed generalization was an artifact of the auto-generated labels. Concretely, a clean benchmark of 100 unseen editing instructions on real videos, with outputs scored against ground-truth target edits, would settle the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A single checkpoint can serve text-to-video, image-to-video, in-context generation, in-context editing, image editing, and visual-prompt-driven synthesis.
  • Mask-free instruction-based editing matches or beats specialist models that require explicit masks or task-specific bias embeddings.
  • Editing skill learned on image data transfers to video instructions the model never saw, including material and environment changes.
  • Task composition works without dedicated training, e.g., combining identity deletion with style transfer in one instruction.
  • The frozen understanding branch keeps its native visual-understanding benchmarks, so unification does not trade away comprehension.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the transfer is real, the field can prioritize scaling image-editing data over expensive video-editing supervision for many tasks.
  • The modular frozen-backbone design means improvements to either the language model or the diffusion backbone should plug in directly, making UniVideo a reusable testbed.
  • The zero-shot composition ability suggests the instruction parser, not the generator, is the binding constraint for novel combinations; end-to-end training might tighten the coupling further.
  • A controlled data-ablation—withholding image editing data and measuring free-form video editing success—would quantify exactly how much of the transfer comes from that data source.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes UniVideo, a dual-stream framework that combines a frozen Qwen2.5-VL-7B MLLM for instruction understanding with a HunyuanVideo-based MMDiT generator, connected by a trainable MLP. Training proceeds in three stages: connector alignment on about 50M image/text-to-video examples, quality fine-tuning, and multi-task training covering T2I, T2V, I2V, image editing, in-context generation/editing, and stylization. The paper claims state-of-the-art or competitive performance in text/image-to-video generation, in-context generation, and in-context editing, and two generalization behaviors: task composition (e.g., editing plus style transfer) and zero-shot transfer from image editing to free-form video editing. The architecture also supports visual-prompt understanding by parsing visual annotations through the MLLM.

Significance. If the performance and transfer claims hold, UniVideo would be a valuable demonstration that a frozen MLLM + MMDiT assembly can unify multiple video tasks and acquire compositional generalization from multi-task training. The main architectural principle—preserving fine-grained visual latents in the generation stream while injecting semantic MLLM features—is plausible, and the ablations in Tables 6 and 7 provide concrete evidence that multi-task training and the dual-stream visual input are beneficial. The paper also promises release of model and code, which would allow independent verification. However, the quantitative evidence for the two headline generalization claims is currently too thin to support the abstract's statements, and several key results are point estimates without variance, significance, or released evaluation materials.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section E.2 / Table 4] The in-context generation benchmark has only 20 cases, and the human evaluation uses "at least three annotators" with no per-case scores, inter-annotator agreement, or confidence intervals. Reported differences, e.g., single-ref PF 0.93 vs. Kling1.6 0.95 and multi-ref Overall 0.85 vs. Kling1.6 0.95, are within plausible sampling noise for n=20. Please report per-case scores, agreement, confidence intervals, and release the test-set prompts and outputs; otherwise the abstract's "matches or surpasses SOTA" is not established.
  2. [Section 3.3.1 / Figure 5] Zero-shot free-form video editing and task composition are core claims but are supported only by qualitative examples. Appendix C explicitly concedes that the success rate in free-form editing is lower than in image editing, yet no quantitative success rate or blinded comparison is provided. Define a benchmark with a fixed instruction set, measure success/failure, and report the numbers.
  3. [Section 3.2.3 / Table 5] Many automatic-metric comparisons are very close (e.g., insert CLIP-I 0.693 vs. Pika2.2 0.692; swap DINO-I 0.427 vs. UNIC 0.429), yet no variance, significance tests, or per-item breakdowns are given. Without these, "superior or competitive" cannot be distinguished from noise. Please also clarify whether the mask-free setting is uniformly harder/easier for all baselines and how prompts were standardized across methods.
  4. [Appendix D.1/D.2] The editing training targets are auto-generated by SAM2 + video inpainting and by T2V + ControlNet pipelines. No label-quality validation is reported. Since the claimed image-to-video transfer and the editing metrics depend on the quality of these synthetic pairs, please include human or automatic quality statistics and examples of failure cases.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 3] The asterisk explains that UniVideo's understanding scores come from the frozen Qwen2.5-VL-7B MLLM. As a result, the comparison in the understanding block is not a trained-model result; clarify in the text to avoid implying that joint training improved understanding.
  2. [Abstract / Section 1] The abstract and conclusion say the model and code are released, while Section 1 gives a GitHub URL that says "will release." Harmonize the wording so the archival status is unambiguous.
  3. [General] Typography and layout are irregular in places (e.g., the title rendering and some figure spacing); proofread the final version.
  4. [Section E.2] "20cases" should be "20 cases"; consider including the full test set or a summary table of IDs and prompts to support reproducibility.
  5. [Figure 4] The qualitative comparison does not state whether UniVideo used identical instruction templates as the baselines; please describe prompt normalization in the protocol.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the paper's claims are empirical system-evaluation results, not derivations that reduce to their own inputs.

full rationale

UniVideo contains no derivation chain in which an output quantity is defined from, or statistically forced by, the same quantity it is claimed to predict. The central claims—matching or surpassing task-specific baselines and zero-shot transfer from image editing to free-form video editing—are empirical claims about a trained system. Appendix Table 1 explicitly lists the training tasks and does not include free-form video editing, and Section 3.3.1/Figure 5 present qualitative evidence for the transfer claim, while Appendix C candidly concedes that the free-form success rate is lower than image editing. This is an evidence-strength limitation, not a definitional reduction. The benchmarks built 'Following FullDiT' and 'Following UNIC' do involve overlapping authorship with the present paper (both groups include Kuaishou/Kling authors), and the in-context generation test set is small (Appendix E.2: 20 cases) with no error bars, but this affects how strongly the numbers support generalization, not whether the claim is circular. No equation equates a fitted parameter with a prediction, and no load-bearing argument is justified solely by a self-citation. The self-citations to UNIC, FullDiT, and ConceptMaster are methodology and dataset-provenance references; the actual comparisons in Tables 4 and 5 are measurements against external baselines. Underdetermination, benchmark provenance, and limited qualitative evidence are validity risks that belong in a correctness/evidence review, not a circularity finding. Accordingly, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

UniVideo is an empirical training recipe rather than a mathematical derivation, so the ledger lists the load-bearing engineering assumptions and hand-set hyperparameters. The two backbones are frozen; all task understanding is delegated to Qwen2.5-VL, all generation to HunyuanVideo. The connector, sampling ratios, and timestep shift are chosen without reported sensitivity analysis. No new physical or mathematical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Stage-3 task data sampling ratios = T2I-HQ 0.05, T2V-HQ 0.05, I2V 0.1, Image Editing 0.3, Image Style Transfer 0.1, IC Video Editing 0.1, IC Video Generatio
    Hand-set mixture; no ablation of the ratios is shown, yet the mix is what produces multi-task capability and the claimed image-to-video editing transfer.
  • Connector MLP expansion = 4x
    Hand-chosen bridge between Qwen2.5-VL hidden states and HunyuanVideo MMDiT; the whole semantic-grounding pipeline depends on this dimension.
  • Diffusion timestep shift = 5.0
    Kept constant across all stages; no analysis of its effect on editing/generation fidelity is provided.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Frozen Qwen2.5-VL-7B understands complex multimodal video instructions accurately enough to guide generation and editing.
    All instruction understanding, visual-prompt parsing, and task discrimination are delegated to this frozen MLLM; no part of the MLLM is trained on the target video task mixture (Section 2.1, 2.4).
  • domain assumption HunyuanVideo MMDiT retains high-quality generation when its text encoders are removed and it is driven by aligned MLLM hidden states plus VAE latents.
    Generation quality, identity preservation, and motion fidelity are inherited from this backbone; the paper claims parity after Stage 2 without quantitative evidence.
  • domain assumption Auto-generated training targets for editing are valid supervision (SAM2+inpainting deletions, T2V-then-ControlNet stylizations, FLUX/OmniEdit image edits).
    These synthetic labels are the only supervision for editing; if they encode shortcuts, the zero-shot free-form editing claim and the editing metrics are undermined (Appendix D.1-D.3).
  • domain assumption Point estimates from three annotators and standard clip/benchmark metrics are sufficient to rank models for in-context generation and editing.
    The superiority claims are built on these estimates without confidence intervals, inter-annotator agreement, or release of raw judgments (Section 3.2.2, Appendix E).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18281 in / 17566 out tokens · 140477 ms · 2026-08-04T10:45:17.477843+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Unified multimodal models have shown promising results in multimodal content generation and editing but remain largely limited to the image domain. In this work, we present UniVideo, a versatile framework that extends unified modeling to the video domain. UniVideo adopts a dual-stream design, combining a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) for instruction understanding with a Multimodal DiT (MMDiT) for video generation. This design preserves the MLLM's original text generation capabilities, enables accurate interpretation of complex multimodal instructions, and maintains visual consistency in the generated content. Built on this architecture, UniVideo unifies diverse video generation and editing tasks under a single multimodal instruction paradigm and is jointly trained across them. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UniVideo matches or surpasses state-of-the-art task-specific baselines in text/image-to-video generation, in-context video generation and in-context video editing. Notably, the unified design of UniVideo enables two forms of generalization. First, UniVideo supports task composition, such as combining editing with style transfer, by integrating multiple capabilities within a single instruction. Second, even without explicit training on free-form video editing, UniVideo transfers its editing capability from large-scale image editing data to this setting, handling unseen instructions such as changing the environment or altering materials within a video. Beyond these core capabilities, UniVideo also supports visual-prompt-based video generation, where the MLLM interprets visual prompts and guides the MMDiT during synthesis. To foster future research, we released our model and code.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.08377 by Cong Wei, Kun Gai, Pengfei Wan, Qiulin Wang, Quande Liu, Wenhu Chen, Xintao Wang, Zixuan Ye.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: UniVideo is a unified system that can understand multi-modal instructions and gener￾ate video content. More videos are available on project website. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Model architecture. UniVideo is a dual-stream model consisting of an MLLM for understanding and an MMDiT module for generation. While prior work such as Qwen-Image and OmniGen2, explores a similar idea in the image domain, our model generalizes this design to video. 2 METHOD 2.1 MODEL ARCHITECTURE As demonstrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: UniVideo leverages the MLLM stream to understand and interpret user intent from complex mul￾timodal prompts that cannot be handled by the DiT alone. For example, users can provide diagrams or visual annotations to guide video generation without writing dense textual prompts. guide video generation. Unlike agent-based approaches that invoke multiple downstream genera￾tors, UniVideo offers a more simplified … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Zero-Shot Generalization. We demonstrate two type of generalization. (i) UniVideo was not trained on General Free-form Video Editing data. It transfers this ability from diverse image editing data to the video domain through joint training with in-context video generation and editing data (limited to ID deletion, swapping, addition, and stylization), enabling it to handle previously unseen video editing in… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative results of UniVideo with visual prompt inputs. We illustrate two types of visual prompts: in the first three examples, annotations are drawn on a canvas, while in the last example, the annotation is drawn directly on an input image. 3.3.2 VISUAL PROMPT UNDERSTANDING We demonstrate the results of visual prompting with UniVideo in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Construction pipeline of in-context video generation test set. The single-ID examples are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Example of single-ID test case in in-context video generation test set. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example of multi-ID test case in in-context video generation test set. E.3 IN-CONTEXT VIDEO EDITING For the in-context video editing, we evaluate on the UNICBench Ye et al. (2025b) across four tasks: ID Insertion, ID Swap, ID Deletion, and Stylization. Since our setting differs from other video editing models (which may require masks to indicate the edited area, while ours uses instructions instead), we de… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Example of ID insertion test case. For ID swap, the elements in UNICBench consist of a reference video, mask, reference ID, and a caption for the target video. The goal of ID swap is to replace specific elements in the target video with corresponding elements from the reference ID while preserving the original video’s context and motion. In our setting, we don’t need a mask to indicate the editing area; i… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Example of ID swap test case. For ID deletion, UNICBench provides a reference video, mask, and a caption for the target video. ID deletion aims to naturally remove specified objects or elements from the video while maintaining visual consistency and filling the removed areas with appropriate background content. While current video editing methods use masks to specify the object for removal, our approach s… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Example of ID deletion test case. Elements in UNICBench Inputs of VOGUE Transform the video of into the style of the reference image. A woman with long hair and glasses stands near a river [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Example of stylization test case. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 32 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Apple-$\pi$: Benchmarking Thinking with Video Towards Law-Grounded Physical Intelligence

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A law-grounded benchmark, Apple-PI, grades video models stage-by-stage on physics reasoning and finds they top out at 0.473, well short of reliable simulation.

  2. MotiMotion: Motion-Controlled Video Generation with Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MotiMotion adds visual reasoning via a training-free VLM to refine primary trajectories and hallucinate secondary motions, plus a confidence-aware guidance scheme, yielding more plausible interactions on the new MotiB...

  3. What Semantics Survive the Connector? Diagnosing VLM-to-DiT Alignment in Video Editing

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VLM-to-DiT alignment in video editing models acts as a semantic bottleneck that degrades fine-grained structural semantics, demonstrated via a new diagnostic dataset and protocol on relation-based edits.

  4. Aurora: Unified Video Editing with a Tool-Using Agent

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Aurora introduces a VLM-based agent that converts raw user video edit requests into structured conditioning inputs for a unified diffusion transformer, improving performance on underspecified tasks via a new benchmark.

  5. Sparkle: Realizing Lively Instruction-Guided Video Background Replacement via Decoupled Guidance

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Sparkle supplies a large-scale dataset and benchmark for instruction-driven video background replacement, enabling models that generate more natural and temporally consistent new scenes than earlier approaches.

  6. Physics-Aware Video Instance Removal Benchmark

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The PVIR benchmark tests video object removal on physical consistency using 95 annotated videos and shows that existing methods struggle with complex interactions like lingering shadows.

  7. VideoCoF: Unified Video Editing with Temporal Reasoner

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VideoCoF adds an explicit reasoning step using edit-region latents in video diffusion models to enable precise mask-free editing and motion alignment with only 50k training pairs.

  8. FlexComposer: Unified Video Compositing from Images to Dynamic Footage with Flexible Trajectory Control

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A single video-diffusion framework composites both static images and dynamic footage along user-defined trajectories by transporting canonical foreground latents directly into the background latent sequence.

  9. VIPER: Visual In-Context Physics Reasoning for Physically Plausible Video Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    An MLLM extracts transferable physical cues from a reference video and conditions a pretrained I2V generator so new scenes follow that physics without exhaustive prompts.

  10. ReBind: Multi-Reference Video Editing via Structured Instructions with Explicit Reference Relationships

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Writing editing instructions that explicitly bind each attribute to a reference image via `<Image_N>` tokens substantially improves multi-reference video editing, and a specialized MLLM trained with GRPO generates the...

  11. SteerVTE: Seamless Video Text Editing with Style and Glyph Control

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SteerVTE adds lightweight style and dual-granularity glyph adapters to a frozen video diffusion model, introduces a glyph-aware loss and progressive training, and releases a 1M synthetic dataset to enable accurate vid...

  12. AlbedoEdit: Unified Instance-Level Video Editing with Albedo Guidance

    cs.GR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AlbedoEdit fine-tunes video foundation models to translate RGB videos into edited versions conditioned on user-edited first-frame albedo maps, trained on a new synthetic paired dataset for insertion, removal, and text...

  13. Lumos-Nexus: Efficient Frequency Bridging with Homogeneous Latent Space for Video Unified Models

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Lumos-Nexus is a training-efficient video generation framework using two-stage alignment of a lightweight model followed by progressive frequency bridging to a high-fidelity generator in homogeneous latent space, plus...

  14. What Semantics Survive the Connector? Diagnosing VLM-to-DiT Alignment in Video Editing

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces TRACE-Edit dataset and evaluation protocol demonstrating semantic degradation of structural variables during VLM-to-DiT alignment in flow-matching video editors.

  15. Lance: Unified Multimodal Modeling by Multi-Task Synergy

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Lance presents a dual-stream mixture-of-experts model with modality-aware positional encoding and staged multi-task training that outperforms prior open-source unified models on image and video generation while keepin...

  16. LIVEditor-14B: Lightning Unified Video Editing via In-Context Sparse Attention

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LIVEditor-14B applies a new sparse attention method (ISA) that prunes context and uses query-sharpness routing to cut attention latency ~60% with no loss in editing quality on standard benchmarks.

  17. Tuna-2: Pixel Embeddings Beat Vision Encoders for Multimodal Understanding and Generation

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tuna-2 shows that direct pixel embeddings can replace vision encoders in unified multimodal models, achieving competitive generation and stronger understanding at scale.

  18. How Far Are Video Models from True Multimodal Reasoning?

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Current video models succeed on basic understanding but achieve under 25% success on logically grounded generation and near 0% on interactive generation, exposing gaps in multimodal reasoning.

  19. VEFX-Bench: A Holistic Benchmark for Generic Video Editing and Visual Effects

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    VEFX-Bench releases a large human-labeled video editing dataset, a multi-dimensional reward model, and a standardized benchmark that better matches human judgments than generic evaluators.

  20. InsEdit: Towards Instruction-based Visual Editing via Data-Efficient Video Diffusion Models Adaptation

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    InsEdit adapts a video diffusion backbone for text-instruction video editing via Mutual Context Attention, achieving SOTA open-source results with O(100K) data while also supporting image editing.

  21. ImVideoEdit: Image-learning Video Editing via 2D Spatial Difference Attention Blocks

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ImVideoEdit learns video editing from 13K image pairs by decoupling spatial modifications from frozen temporal dynamics in pretrained models, matching larger video-trained systems in fidelity and consistency.

  22. Under One Sun: Multi-Object Generative Perception of Materials and Illumination

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Factorizing video editing into semantic-token anchoring and motion-restoration pre-training produces strong zero-shot and SOTA open-source instruction-guided video edits without heavy external structural priors.

  23. LLaMo: Scaling Pretrained Language Models for Unified Motion Understanding and Generation with Continuous Autoregressive Tokens

    cs.CV 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLaMo scales pretrained LLMs for unified motion-language tasks by encoding motion into continuous causal latents and adding a flow-matching head for real-time autoregressive generation and captioning.

  24. iMontage: Unified, Versatile, Highly Dynamic Many-to-many Image Generation

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    iMontage repurposes a pretrained video diffusion model to generate coherent yet highly dynamic image sets from arbitrary numbers of input images.

  25. Bridging Video Understanding and Generation in a Unified Framework

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Vega unifies video understanding and generation via shared vocabulary and hybrid autoregressive-diffusion architecture, reporting strong results on VBench and VideoMME.

  26. Smart-Insertion-V: Photorealistic Video Insertion via a Closed-Loop Feedback Dual-Stream Framework

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Smart-Insertion-V is a dual-stream closed-loop framework with Dual-World-View RoPE and a Decoupled Guidance Module that inserts reference objects into videos while achieving stylistic harmony despite domain gaps.

  27. Bernini: Latent Semantic Planning for Video Diffusion

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bernini is a framework that uses an MLLM planner to output semantic representations for a DiT renderer to generate or edit videos, reporting SOTA benchmark performance.

  28. Lance: Unified Multimodal Modeling by Multi-Task Synergy

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Lance introduces a dual-stream MoE model with modality-aware rotary positional encoding and staged multi-task training that outperforms open-source unified models on image and video generation while retaining understa...

  29. LIVEditor-14B: Lightning Unified Video Editing via In-Context Sparse Attention

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ISA prunes low-saliency context tokens and routes queries by sharpness to either full or 0-th order Taylor sparse attention, enabling LIVEditor to cut attention latency ~60% while beating prior video editing methods o...

  30. Tuna-2: Pixel Embeddings Beat Vision Encoders for Multimodal Understanding and Generation

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Tuna-2 shows pixel embeddings can replace vision encoders in unified multimodal models, achieving competitive or superior results on understanding and generation benchmarks.

  31. Controllable Video Object Insertion via Multiview Priors

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A multi-view prior-based framework for video object insertion that uses dual-path conditioning and an integration-aware consistency module to improve appearance stability and occlusion handling.

  32. Mamoda2.5: Enhancing Unified Multimodal Model with DiT-MoE

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Mamoda2.5 is a 25B-parameter DiT-MoE unified AR-Diffusion model that reaches top video generation and editing benchmarks with 4-step inference up to 95.9x faster than baselines.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 34 linked inside Pith · cited by 28 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, et al. Qwen2. 5-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [5]

    Dreamllm: Synergistic multimodal comprehension and creation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11499,

    Runpei Dong, Chunrui Han, Yuang Peng, Zekun Qi, Zheng Ge, Jinrong Yang, Liang Zhao, Jianjian Sun, Hongyu Zhou, Haoran Wei, et al. Dreamllm: Synergistic multimodal comprehension and creation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11499,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [6]

    Seed-x: Multimodal models with unified multi-granularity comprehension and generation

    Yuying Ge, Sijie Zhao, Jinguo Zhu, Yixiao Ge, Kun Yi, Lin Song, Chen Li, Xiaohan Ding, and Ying Shan. Seed-x: Multimodal models with unified multi-granularity comprehension and generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14396,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [7]

    Metamorph: Learning universal controllers with transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11931,

    Agrim Gupta, Linxi Fan, Surya Ganguli, and Li Fei-Fei. Metamorph: Learning universal controllers with transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11931,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [8]

    Conceptmaster: Multi-concept video customization on diffusion transformer models without test-time tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04698,

    Yuzhou Huang, Ziyang Yuan, Quande Liu, Qiulin Wang, Xintao Wang, Ruimao Zhang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, and Kun Gai. Conceptmaster: Multi-concept video customization on diffusion transformer models without test-time tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04698,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [9]

    Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07598,

    Zeyinzi Jiang, Zhen Han, Chaojie Mao, Jingfeng Zhang, Yulin Pan, and Yu Liu. Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07598,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [10]

    Fulldit: Multi-task video generative foundation model with full attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19907,

    Xuan Ju, Weicai Ye, Quande Liu, Qiulin Wang, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, Kun Gai, and Qiang Xu. Fulldit: Multi-task video generative foundation model with full attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19907,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [11]

    Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603,

    Weijie Kong, Qi Tian, Zijian Zhang, Rox Min, Zuozhuo Dai, Jin Zhou, Jiangfeng Xiong, Xin Li, Bo Wu, Jianwei Zhang, et al. Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [12]

    Anyv2v: A tuning-free frame- work for any video-to-video editing tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14468,

    Max Ku, Cong Wei, Weiming Ren, Harry Yang, and Wenhu Chen. Anyv2v: A tuning-free frame- work for any video-to-video editing tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14468,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [13]

    13 Black Forest Labs, Stephen Batifol, Andreas Blattmann, Frederic Boesel, Saksham Consul, Cyril Diagne, Tim Dockhorn, Jack English, Zion English, Patrick Esser, et al. Flux. 1 kontext: Flow matching for in-context image generation and editing in latent space.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15742,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [14]

    Mogao: An omni foundation model for interleaved multi-modal generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05472,

    Chao Liao, Liyang Liu, Xun Wang, Zhengxiong Luo, Xinyu Zhang, Wenliang Zhao, Jie Wu, Liang Li, Zhi Tian, and Weilin Huang. Mogao: An omni foundation model for interleaved multi-modal generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05472,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [15]

    Magicedit: High- fidelity and temporally coherent video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14749,

    Jun Hao Liew, Hanshu Yan, Jianfeng Zhang, Zhongcong Xu, and Jiashi Feng. Magicedit: High- fidelity and temporally coherent video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14749,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [16]

    Uniworld: High-resolution semantic encoders for unified visual understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03147,

    Bin Lin, Zongjian Li, Xinhua Cheng, Yuwei Niu, Yang Ye, Xianyi He, Shenghai Yuan, Wangbo Yu, Shaodong Wang, Yunyang Ge, et al. Uniworld: High-resolution semantic encoders for unified visual understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03147,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [17]

    Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 26296–26306, 2024a. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Sheng Shen, and Yong Jae Lee. Llavanext: Improved reasoning, ocr, and world knowled...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [18]

    Step-video-t2v technical report: The practice, challenges, and future of video foundation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10248, 2025a

    Guoqing Ma, Haoyang Huang, Kun Yan, Liangyu Chen, Nan Duan, Shengming Yin, Changyi Wan, Ranchen Ming, Xiaoniu Song, Xing Chen, et al. Step-video-t2v technical report: The practice, challenges, and future of video foundation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10248, 2025a. Yiyang Ma, Xingchao Liu, Xiaokang Chen, Wen Liu, Chengyue Wu, Zhiyu Wu, Zizheng Pan, Zh...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [19]

    Transfer between modalities with metaqueries.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06256,

    Xichen Pan, Satya Narayan Shukla, Aashu Singh, Zhuokai Zhao, Shlok Kumar Mishra, Jialiang Wang, Zhiyang Xu, Jiuhai Chen, Kunpeng Li, Felix Juefei-Xu, et al. Transfer between modalities with metaqueries.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06256,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [20]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952,

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas M ¨uller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [21]

    Movie gen: A cast of media founda- tion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13720,

    14 Adam Polyak, Amit Zohar, Andrew Brown, Andros Tjandra, Animesh Sinha, Ann Lee, Apoorv Vyas, Bowen Shi, Chih-Yao Ma, Ching-Yao Chuang, et al. Movie gen: A cast of media founda- tion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13720,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [23]

    Lmfusion: Adapting pretrained language models for multimodal generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15188, 2024a

    Weijia Shi, Xiaochuang Han, Chunting Zhou, Weixin Liang, Xi Victoria Lin, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Lili Yu. Lmfusion: Adapting pretrained language models for multimodal generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15188, 2024a. Yichun Shi, Peng Wang, and Weilin Huang. Seededit: Align image re-generation to image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06686, 2024b. Peize...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [24]

    Generative multimodal models are in-context learners

    Quan Sun, Yufeng Cui, Xiaosong Zhang, Fan Zhang, Qiying Yu, Yueze Wang, Yongming Rao, Jingjing Liu, Tiejun Huang, and Xinlong Wang. Generative multimodal models are in-context learners. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, pp. 14398–14409, 2024b. Zhenxiong Tan, Songhua Liu, Xingyi Yang, Qiaochu Xue, and Xi...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [25]

    Omni-video: Democ- ratizing unified video understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06119,

    Zhiyu Tan, Hao Yang, Luozheng Qin, Jia Gong, Mengping Yang, and Hao Li. Omni-video: Democ- ratizing unified video understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06119,

    arXiv

  22. [26]

    Chameleon: Mixed-modal early-fusion foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09818,

    Chameleon Team. Chameleon: Mixed-modal early-fusion foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09818,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [27]

    Metamorph: Multimodal understanding and generation via instruction tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14164,

    Shengbang Tong, David Fan, Jiachen Zhu, Yunyang Xiong, Xinlei Chen, Koustuv Sinha, Michael Rabbat, Yann LeCun, Saining Xie, and Zhuang Liu. Metamorph: Multimodal understanding and generation via instruction tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14164,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [28]

    Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314,

    Team Wan, Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianxiao Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [29]

    Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12191, 2024a

    15 Peng Wang, Shuai Bai, Sinan Tan, Shijie Wang, Zhihao Fan, Jinze Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, et al. Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12191, 2024a. Xinlong Wang, Xiaosong Zhang, Zhengxiong Luo, Quan Sun, Yufeng Cui, Jinsheng Wang, Fan Zhang, Yueze Wan...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [30]

    Qwen-image technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324, 2025a

    Chenfei Wu, Jiahao Li, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kaiyuan Gao, Kun Yan, Sheng-ming Yin, Shuai Bai, Xiao Xu, Yilei Chen, et al. Qwen-image technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324, 2025a. Chengyue Wu, Xiaokang Chen, Zhiyu Wu, Yiyang Ma, Xingchao Liu, Zizheng Pan, Wen Liu, Zhenda Xie, Xingkai Yu, Chong Ruan, et al. Janus: Decoupling visual encoding ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [31]

    Show-o: One single transformer to unify multimodal understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12528,

    Jinheng Xie, Weijia Mao, Zechen Bai, David Junhao Zhang, Weihao Wang, Kevin Qinghong Lin, Yuchao Gu, Zhijie Chen, Zhenheng Yang, and Mike Zheng Shou. Show-o: One single transformer to unify multimodal understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12528,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [32]

    Show-o2: Improved native unified multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15564,

    Jinheng Xie, Zhenheng Yang, and Mike Zheng Shou. Show-o2: Improved native unified multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15564,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [33]

    Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072,

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [34]

    Imgedit: A unified image editing dataset and benchmark.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20275, 2025a

    Yang Ye, Xianyi He, Zongjian Li, Bin Lin, Shenghai Yuan, Zhiyuan Yan, Bohan Hou, and Li Yuan. Imgedit: A unified image editing dataset and benchmark.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20275, 2025a. Zixuan Ye, Xuanhua He, Quande Liu, Qiulin Wang, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, Kun Gai, Qifeng Chen, and Wenhan Luo. Unic: Unified in-context video editing.arXiv p...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [35]

    Transfusion: Predict the next token and diffuse images with one multi-modal model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11039,

    Chunting Zhou, Lili Yu, Arun Babu, Kushal Tirumala, Michihiro Yasunaga, Leonid Shamis, Jacob Kahn, Xuezhe Ma, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Omer Levy. Transfusion: Predict the next token and diffuse images with one multi-modal model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11039,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [36]

    While we do not observe task confusion, it sometimes fails to strictly follow editing instructions, occasionally over-editing unre- lated regions

    C LIMITATION ANDFUTUREWORK Our model is trained on diverse tasks with multimodal instructions. While we do not observe task confusion, it sometimes fails to strictly follow editing instructions, occasionally over-editing unre- lated regions. Due to backbone limitations, the model also struggles to fully preserve the motion of original videos, indicating t...

    2025

  33. [37]

    We also source open source data such as OmniEdit(Wei et al., 18 Table 8: Model capabilities across understanding, generation, editing, and in-context generation

    to create diverse image editing data. We also source open source data such as OmniEdit(Wei et al., 18 Table 8: Model capabilities across understanding, generation, editing, and in-context generation. ✓indicates support;✗indicates not supported. The last row is highlighted. Model Understanding Image Gen. Video Gen. Image Edit. Video Edit. In-context Video ...

    2024

  34. [38]

    E EVALUATIONBENCHMARK E.1 VISUALUNDERSTANDING ANDGENERATION For thetext-to-video generation task, we use the prompt suite provided in VBench Huang et al. (2024), which contains 946 prompts covering 16 dimensions, includingsubject consistency, back- ground consistency, aesthetic quality, imaging quality, object class, multiple objects, color, spatial relat...

    2024

  35. [2021]

    Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714,

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman R¨adle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, et al. Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [2023]

    Blip3-o: A family of fully open unified multimodal models-architecture, training and dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09568, 2025a

    Jiuhai Chen, Zhiyang Xu, Xichen Pan, Yushi Hu, Can Qin, Tom Goldstein, Lifu Huang, Tianyi Zhou, Saining Xie, Silvio Savarese, et al. Blip3-o: A family of fully open unified multimodal models-architecture, training and dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09568, 2025a. 12 Junying Chen, Zhenyang Cai, Pengcheng Chen, Shunian Chen, Ke Ji, Xidong Wang, Yunjin Yan...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [2024]

    Videocrafter1: Open diffusion models for high- quality video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19512,

    Haoxin Chen, Menghan Xia, Yingqing He, Yong Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Shaoshu Yang, Jinbo Xing, Yaofang Liu, Qifeng Chen, Xintao Wang, et al. Videocrafter1: Open diffusion models for high- quality video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19512,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [2025]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023a

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Dominik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram V oleti, Adam Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023a. Andreas Blattmann, Robin Rombach, Huan Ling, Tim Dockhorn, Seung Wook Kim, Sanj...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv