Recognition: unknown
CodeRL+: Improving Code Generation via Reinforcement with Execution Semantics Alignment
read the original abstract
While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at code generation by learning from vast code corpora, a fundamental semantic gap remains between their training on textual patterns and the goal of functional correctness, which is governed by formal execution semantics. Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) approaches attempt to bridge this gap using outcome rewards from executing test cases. However, solely relying on binary pass/fail signals is inefficient for establishing a well-aligned connection between the textual representation of code and its execution semantics, especially for subtle logical errors within the code. In this paper, we propose CodeRL+, a novel approach that integrates execution semantics alignment into the RLVR training pipeline for code generation. CodeRL+ enables the model to infer variable-level execution trajectory, providing a direct learning signal of execution semantics. CodeRL+ can construct execution semantics alignment directly using existing on-policy rollouts and integrates seamlessly with various RL algorithms. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CodeRL+ outperforms post-training baselines (including RLVR and Distillation), achieving a 4.6% average relative improvement in pass@1. CodeRL+ generalizes effectively to other coding tasks, yielding 15.5% and 4.4% higher accuracy on code-reasoning and test-output-generation benchmarks, respectively. CodeRL+ shows strong applicability across diverse RL algorithms and LLMs. Furthermore, probe analyses provide compelling evidence that CodeRL+ strengthens the alignment between code's textual representations and its underlying execution semantics.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Evaluating the Formal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through Chomsky Hierarchy
LLMs display clear performance stratification on formal language tasks aligned with Chomsky hierarchy complexity levels, limited by severe efficiency barriers rather than absolute capability.
-
Think Anywhere in Code Generation
Think-Anywhere lets LLMs invoke on-demand reasoning at any token during code generation via cold-start imitation followed by outcome-based RL, reaching state-of-the-art results on LeetCode, LiveCodeBench, HumanEval, and MBPP.
-
Schedule-and-Calibrate: Utility-Guided Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning for Code LLMs
ASTOR improves a single code LLM across four tasks by 9.0-9.5% over the best specialist and 7.5-12.8% over prior multi-task RL baselines via utility-driven data scheduling and adaptive KL regularization.
-
SPS: Steering Probability Squeezing for Better Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models
SPS interleaves RL and IRL to counteract probability squeezing in LLM reasoning trajectories, improving Pass@k on five benchmarks while identifying an empirical upper bound on multi-sample performance.
-
TestDecision: Sequential Test Suite Generation via Greedy Optimization and Reinforcement Learning
By proving test suite coverage is monotone submodular and training LLMs with RL to maximize marginal gains, TestDecision improves branch coverage 38-52% and bug detection up to 95% over base models on ULT and LiveCodeBench.
-
Boosting Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards via Randomly Selected Few-Shot Guidance
FEST improves RLVR sample efficiency on math and coding benchmarks by combining supervised signals, on-policy signals, and decaying weights on just 128 randomly chosen demonstrations, matching full-dataset baselines.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.