AI reviews for all 22,977 AAAI-26 papers were preferred by authors and PC members over human reviews on accuracy and suggestions and outperformed baselines at spotting weaknesses.
hub
The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery
71 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
71
Pith papers citing it
abstract
One of the grand challenges of artificial general intelligence is developing agents capable of conducting scientific research and discovering new knowledge. While frontier models have already been used as aides to human scientists, e.g. for brainstorming ideas, writing code, or prediction tasks, they still conduct only a small part of the scientific process. This paper presents the first comprehensive framework for fully automatic scientific discovery, enabling frontier large language models to perform research independently and communicate their findings. We introduce The AI Scientist, which generates novel research ideas, writes code, executes experiments, visualizes results, describes its findings by writing a full scientific paper, and then runs a simulated review process for evaluation. In principle, this process can be repeated to iteratively develop ideas in an open-ended fashion, acting like the human scientific community. We demonstrate its versatility by applying it to three distinct subfields of machine learning: diffusion modeling, transformer-based language modeling, and learning dynamics. Each idea is implemented and developed into a full paper at a cost of less than $15 per paper. To evaluate the generated papers, we design and validate an automated reviewer, which we show achieves near-human performance in evaluating paper scores. The AI Scientist can produce papers that exceed the acceptance threshold at a top machine learning conference as judged by our automated reviewer. This approach signifies the beginning of a new era in scientific discovery in machine learning: bringing the transformative benefits of AI agents to the entire research process of AI itself, and taking us closer to a world where endless affordable creativity and innovation can be unleashed on the world's most challenging problems. Our code is open-sourced at https://github.com/SakanaAI/AI-Scientist
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract One of the grand challenges of artificial general intelligence is developing agents capable of conducting scientific research and discovering new knowledge. While frontier models have already been used as aides to human scientists, e.g. for brainstorming ideas, writing code, or prediction tasks, they still conduct only a small part of the scientific process. This paper presents the first comprehensive framework for fully automatic scientific discovery, enabling frontier large language models to perform research independently and communicate their findings. We introduce The AI Scientist, which
co-cited works
roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Agent-BRACE improves LLM agent performance on long-horizon partially observable tasks by 5.3-14.5% through a decoupled belief state of verbalized atomic claims with certainty labels that keeps context length constant.
A new native-runtime benchmark reveals that current frontier AI agents succeed on at most 62 percent of realistic long-horizon CLI tasks.
AutoResearchBench is a new benchmark showing top AI agents achieve under 10% success on complex scientific literature discovery tasks that demand deep comprehension and open-ended search.
FermiLink is a unified AI agent framework that automates multidomain scientific simulations via separated package knowledge bases and a four-layer progressive disclosure mechanism, reproducing 56% of target figures in benchmarks and generating research-grade results on unpublished problems.
AEvo introduces a meta-agent that edits the evolution procedure or agent context based on accumulated state, outperforming baselines by 26% relative improvement on agentic benchmarks and achieving SOTA on open-ended tasks.
AutoLLMResearch trains agents via a multi-fidelity environment and MDP pipeline to extrapolate configuration principles from inexpensive to costly LLM experiments.
ASIA uses an LLM-based coding agent to autonomously perform system identification, tested empirically on two benchmarks while noting limitations in transparency and reproducibility.
PaperFit uses rendered page images in a closed loop to diagnose and repair typesetting defects in LaTeX documents, outperforming baselines on a new benchmark of 200 papers.
HDRI is a six-principle eight-stage framework for hypothesis-organized LLM research featuring gap-driven iteration, traceable fact reasoning, and subject locking, realized in INFOMINER with reported gains in fact density and completeness.
Starling uses LLMs and agents to turn 22.5M PubMed papers into 6.3M nuanced structured records across six tasks with 0.6-7.7% frontier-model rejection rates, lower than error rates on existing curated databases.
An interactive AI workbench for mathematicians achieves 48% on FrontierMath Tier 4 and helped solve open problems in early tests.
AI CFD Scientist autonomously discovers a Spalart-Allmaras runtime correction reducing lower-wall Cf RMSE by 7.89% on the periodic hill at Reh=5600 while using a vision-language gate to detect 14 of 16 silent failures missed by solver checks.
EIG represents research ideas as evolving graphs with nodes for claims and edges for relations, using a learned controller for edits and commits to produce higher-quality scientific proposals than text-only multi-agent baselines.
Agentic-imodels evolves scikit-learn regressors via an autoresearch loop to jointly boost predictive performance and LLM-simulatability, improving downstream agentic data science tasks by up to 73% on the BLADE benchmark.
Comet-H orchestrates LLMs via deficit-scoring prompt selection and half-life task tracking to co-evolve research software components, demonstrated by a static analysis tool reaching F1=0.768 versus a 0.364 baseline.
An LLM agent autonomously identifies and experimentally validates a previously unreported optical bilinear interaction on a physical platform.
Proposes a levels x laws taxonomy for world models in AI agents, defining L1-L3 capabilities across physical, digital, social, and scientific regimes while reviewing over 400 works to outline a roadmap for advanced agentic modeling.
Knows uses a YAML sidecar specification to provide structured, agent-consumable representations of research papers, yielding large accuracy gains for small LLMs on comprehension tasks and rapid community adoption via a public hub.
ReviewGrounder decomposes review generation into rubric-guided drafting and tool-integrated grounding stages, outperforming larger baseline models on a new benchmark measuring alignment with human judgments and review quality.
VERITAS is a multi-agent system for verifiable hypothesis testing on multimodal clinical MRI datasets that achieves 81.4% verdict accuracy with frontier models and introduces an epistemic evidence labeling framework.
Camyla autonomously generates research proposals, experiments, and manuscripts in medical image segmentation, outperforming baselines on 24 of 31 recent datasets while producing 40 human-reviewed papers.
LLM-native figures embed provenance and enable direct LLM interaction with scientific visualizations to accelerate discovery and improve reproducibility.
k-server-bench formulates potential-function discovery for the k-server conjecture as a code-based inequality-satisfaction task; current agents fully solve the resolved k=3 case and reduce violations on the open k=4 case.
citing papers explorer
No citing papers match the current filters.