pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs

Canonical reference. 88% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

36 Pith papers citing it
Background 88% of classified citations
abstract

Scaling inference compute enhances reasoning in large language models (LLMs), with long chains-of-thought (CoTs) enabling strategies like backtracking and error correction. Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a crucial method for developing these capabilities, yet the conditions under which long CoTs emerge remain unclear, and RL training requires careful design choices. In this study, we systematically investigate the mechanics of long CoT reasoning, identifying the key factors that enable models to generate long CoT trajectories. Through extensive supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and RL experiments, we present four main findings: (1) While SFT is not strictly necessary, it simplifies training and improves efficiency; (2) Reasoning capabilities tend to emerge with increased training compute, but their development is not guaranteed, making reward shaping crucial for stabilizing CoT length growth; (3) Scaling verifiable reward signals is critical for RL. We find that leveraging noisy, web-extracted solutions with filtering mechanisms shows strong potential, particularly for out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks such as STEM reasoning; and (4) Core abilities like error correction are inherently present in base models, but incentivizing these skills effectively for complex tasks via RL demands significant compute, and measuring their emergence requires a nuanced approach. These insights provide practical guidance for optimizing training strategies to enhance long CoT reasoning in LLMs. Our code is available at: https://github.com/eddycmu/demystify-long-cot.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 7 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

clear filters

representative citing papers

CLORE: Content-Level Optimization for Reasoning Efficiency

cs.AI · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

CLORE augments correct on-policy rollouts by deleting repetitive and irrelevant segments then optimizes with auxiliary DPO to improve accuracy-efficiency trade-off on math benchmarks.

Hint Tuning: Less Data Makes Better Reasoners

cs.CL · 2026-05-09 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

Hint Tuning reduces token usage 24-66% (31.5% avg) in reasoning models via 1K self-annotated samples aligned to an instruct model's capabilities while keeping benchmark accuracy.

rePIRL: Learn PRM with Inverse RL for LLM Reasoning

cs.LG · 2026-02-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

rePIRL learns effective process reward models for LLM reasoning via a dual policy-PRM update process inspired by inverse RL, unifying online and offline methods with reported gains over prior approaches on math and coding datasets.

Unlocking Zero-Shot Geospatial Reasoning via Indirect Rewards

cs.CV · 2025-09-29 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Geo-R1 uses indirect proxy rewards from cross-view alignment with geolocation metadata to drive reinforcement learning, enabling zero-shot geospatial reasoning that transfers across 25+ tasks and sometimes exceeds supervised specialists.

Grounded Reinforcement Learning for Visual Reasoning

cs.CV · 2025-05-29 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

ViGoRL introduces visually grounded RL that anchors reasoning steps to image coordinates and uses multi-turn zooming to outperform standard RL and supervised baselines on spatial and GUI reasoning benchmarks.

Trust Region On-Policy Distillation

cs.LG · 2026-05-31 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

TrOPD stabilizes on-policy distillation for LLMs with trust-region learning, outlier estimation, and off-policy guidance, outperforming prior OPD methods on reasoning and code benchmarks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 10 of 10 citing papers after filters.