BenchJack audits 10 AI agent benchmarks, synthesizes exploits achieving near-perfect scores without task completion, surfaces 219 flaws, and reduces hackable-task ratios to under 10% on four benchmarks via iterative patching.
hub
Mle-bench: Evaluating machine learning agents on machine learning engineering
23 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
23
Pith papers citing it
abstract
We introduce MLE-bench, a benchmark for measuring how well AI agents perform at machine learning engineering. To this end, we curate 75 ML engineering-related competitions from Kaggle, creating a diverse set of challenging tasks that test real-world ML engineering skills such as training models, preparing datasets, and running experiments. We establish human baselines for each competition using Kaggle's publicly available leaderboards. We use open-source agent scaffolds to evaluate several frontier language models on our benchmark, finding that the best-performing setup--OpenAI's o1-preview with AIDE scaffolding--achieves at least the level of a Kaggle bronze medal in 16.9% of competitions. In addition to our main results, we investigate various forms of resource scaling for AI agents and the impact of contamination from pre-training. We open-source our benchmark code (github.com/openai/mle-bench/) to facilitate future research in understanding the ML engineering capabilities of AI agents.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 1
other 1
citation-polarity summary
representative citing papers
Enforcing role separation in agent teams reveals that prompt-only setups hide coordination failures, with verifiers approving 49% of failing work and teams sometimes harming performance when solo agents already succeed.
AcademiClaw is a new benchmark of 80 student-sourced academic tasks where the best frontier AI agents achieve only a 55% pass rate.
LLMs predict outcomes of real scientific experiments at 14-26% accuracy, comparable to human experts, but lack calibration on prediction reliability while humans demonstrate strong calibration.
FrontierFinance benchmark shows human financial experts outperform state-of-the-art LLMs by achieving higher scores and more client-ready outputs on realistic long-horizon tasks.
DataMaster deploys an AI agent to autonomously engineer data via tree search over external sources, shared candidate pools, and memory of past outcomes, yielding 32% higher medal rates on MLE-Bench Lite and a small GPQA gain over the base instruct model.
SkillSafetyBench shows that localized non-user attacks via skills and artifacts can consistently induce unsafe agent behavior across domains and model backends, independent of user intent.
OPT-BENCH and OPT-Agent evaluate LLM self-optimization in large search spaces, showing stronger models improve via feedback but stay constrained by base capacity and below human performance.
Odysseus adapts PPO with a turn-level critic and leverages pretrained VLM action priors to train agents achieving at least 3x average game progress over frontier models in long-horizon Super Mario Land.
In a game-theoretic model of ML contests, low-type contestants engage in benchmark hacking while high-types focus on creative effort, with more skewed rewards improving overall outcomes.
SimpleTES scales test-time evaluation in LLMs to discover state-of-the-art solutions on 21 scientific problems across six domains, outperforming frontier models and optimization pipelines with examples like 2x faster LASSO and new Erdos constructions.
TREX automates the LLM training lifecycle via collaborative agents and tree-based exploration, delivering consistent performance gains across 10 real-world fine-tuning tasks in FT-Bench.
Frontier-Eng is a new benchmark for generative optimization in engineering where agents iteratively improve designs under fixed interaction budgets using executable verifiers, with top models like GPT 5.4 showing limited success.
Pioneer Agent automates the full lifecycle of adapting and continually improving small language models via diagnosis-driven data synthesis and regression-constrained retraining, delivering gains of 1.6-83.8 points on benchmarks and large lifts in production-style tasks.
In-Place TTT adapts LLM MLP projection matrices at test time with a next-token-aligned objective and chunk-wise updates, enabling better long-context performance as a drop-in enhancement.
Localizing judge prompts to five languages shows that LLM backbones interact with language in agent-as-a-judge evaluations, inverting rankings and revealing no universal best model with low inter-judge agreement.
PACEvolve++ uses a phase-adaptive reinforcement learning advisor to decouple hypothesis selection from execution in LLM-driven evolutionary search, delivering faster convergence than prior frameworks on load balancing, recommendation, and protein tasks.
EvoMaster is a self-evolving agent framework that achieves state-of-the-art results on scientific benchmarks by enabling iterative hypothesis refinement and knowledge accumulation across domains.
Spatial Atlas implements compute-grounded reasoning via a structured scene graph engine and deterministic computations to deliver competitive accuracy on spatial QA and Kaggle ML benchmarks while preserving interpretability.
The paper unifies perspectives on Long CoT in reasoning LLMs by introducing a taxonomy, detailing characteristics of deep reasoning and reflection, and discussing emergence phenomena and future directions.
Humanity's Last Exam is a new 2,500-question benchmark at the frontier of human knowledge where state-of-the-art LLMs show low accuracy.
The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.
AGI may arrive by 2030-2040 and reshape global power balances, requiring Europe to close gaps in compute, talent retention, industrial adoption, and unified policy responses through a coordinated preparedness agenda.
citing papers explorer
No citing papers match the current filters.