pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generation

Canonical reference. 86% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

66 Pith papers citing it
Background 86% of classified citations
abstract

We introduce a method to measure uncertainty in large language models. For tasks like question answering, it is essential to know when we can trust the natural language outputs of foundation models. We show that measuring uncertainty in natural language is challenging because of "semantic equivalence" -- different sentences can mean the same thing. To overcome these challenges we introduce semantic entropy -- an entropy which incorporates linguistic invariances created by shared meanings. Our method is unsupervised, uses only a single model, and requires no modifications to off-the-shelf language models. In comprehensive ablation studies we show that the semantic entropy is more predictive of model accuracy on question answering data sets than comparable baselines.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 6 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

clear filters

representative citing papers

Inducing Artificial Uncertainty in Language Models

cs.CL · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Inducing artificial uncertainty on trivial tasks allows training probes that achieve higher calibration on hard data than standard approaches while retaining performance on easy data.

Active Testing of Large Language Models via Approximate Neyman Allocation

cs.AI · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Proposes surrogate semantic entropy stratification followed by approximate Neyman allocation for active testing of LLMs on generative benchmarks, reporting up to 28% MSE reduction and 22.9% average budget savings versus uniform sampling.

FASE: Fast Adaptive Semantic Entropy for Code Quality

cs.SE · 2026-06-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

FASE approximates functional correctness via MST on structural and semantic dissimilarity graphs, reporting 25% better Spearman correlation and 19% better ROCAUC than LLM-based semantic entropy at 0.3% runtime cost on HumanEval and BigCodeBench.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.