GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M_odot Black Hole with a 2.6 M_odot Compact Object
Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:44 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Gravitational waves reveal a merger of a 23-solar-mass black hole with a 2.6-solar-mass compact object, the most unequal mass ratio observed.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We report the observation of a compact binary coalescence involving a 22.2 - 24.3 M⊙ black hole and a compact object with a mass of 2.50 - 2.67 M⊙. The source has the most unequal mass ratio yet measured with gravitational waves, 0.112, and its secondary component is either the lightest black hole or the heaviest neutron star ever discovered in a double compact-object system. The dimensionless spin of the primary black hole is tightly constrained to ≤ 0.07. Tests of general relativity reveal no measurable deviations from the theory, and its prediction of higher-multipole emission is confirmed at high confidence. We estimate a merger rate density of 1-23 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} for the new class of
What carries the argument
The GW190814 gravitational-wave signal extracted from LIGO-Virgo detector data using general-relativity waveform templates for parameter estimation of masses, spins, and distance.
Load-bearing premise
The detected signal arises from a compact binary coalescence whose waveform matches general-relativity templates without significant unmodeled noise or alternative contributions.
What would settle it
A reanalysis of the three-detector strain data that yields a secondary mass outside the 2.50-2.67 solar mass range or shows clear deviations from general-relativity waveform predictions would falsify the reported interpretation.
read the original abstract
We report the observation of a compact binary coalescence involving a 22.2 - 24.3 $M_{\odot}$ black hole and a compact object with a mass of 2.50 - 2.67 $M_{\odot}$ (all measurements quoted at the 90$\%$ credible level). The gravitational-wave signal, GW190814, was observed during LIGO's and Virgo's third observing run on August 14, 2019 at 21:10:39 UTC and has a signal-to-noise ratio of 25 in the three-detector network. The source was localized to 18.5 deg$^2$ at a distance of $241^{+41}_{-45}$ Mpc; no electromagnetic counterpart has been confirmed to date. The source has the most unequal mass ratio yet measured with gravitational waves, $0.112^{+0.008}_{-0.009}$, and its secondary component is either the lightest black hole or the heaviest neutron star ever discovered in a double compact-object system. The dimensionless spin of the primary black hole is tightly constrained to $\leq 0.07$. Tests of general relativity reveal no measurable deviations from the theory, and its prediction of higher-multipole emission is confirmed at high confidence. We estimate a merger rate density of 1-23 Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$ for the new class of binary coalescence sources that GW190814 represents. Astrophysical models predict that binaries with mass ratios similar to this event can form through several channels, but are unlikely to have formed in globular clusters. However, the combination of mass ratio, component masses, and the inferred merger rate for this event challenges all current models for the formation and mass distribution of compact-object binaries.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript reports the detection of gravitational-wave event GW190814 on 2019 August 14, a compact binary coalescence observed by the LIGO-Virgo network with network SNR 25. It claims component masses of 22.2-24.3 M⊙ (primary black hole) and 2.50-2.67 M⊙ (secondary compact object) at 90% credible level, mass ratio 0.112, luminosity distance 241 Mpc, and sky localization 18.5 deg². The analysis includes matched-filter searches, Bayesian parameter estimation with GR waveform templates, tests showing no deviations from general relativity and confirmation of higher multipoles, and a single-event Poisson estimate of the merger rate density for this source class as 1-23 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}. Astrophysical implications for formation channels are discussed.
Significance. If the central result holds, the detection is significant for identifying the first compact object in the neutron-star/black-hole mass gap within a binary system and for measuring the most extreme mass ratio yet observed with gravitational waves. The high SNR enables tight spin constraints (primary spin ≤0.07) and robust GR consistency tests. The rate estimate, while broad, adds to the emerging population statistics for unequal-mass systems. Strengths include the direct use of validated matched-filter and Bayesian pipelines with explicit cross-detector consistency checks and higher-multipole confirmation.
minor comments (3)
- Abstract: the statement that 'no electromagnetic counterpart has been confirmed to date' would benefit from a brief citation to the relevant follow-up papers or a note on the depth of the searches performed.
- Rate estimation section: the quoted 1-23 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1} interval is derived from a single-event Poisson likelihood; a short quantitative discussion of sensitivity to the comoving-volume prior choice would clarify the robustness of the bounds.
- Figure captions (e.g., those showing posterior distributions): explicitly note the credible intervals (90%) used for the reported mass and distance ranges to aid quick comparison with other GW events.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive review of our manuscript on the detection of GW190814 and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary accurately captures the key results, including the component masses, mass ratio, SNR, localization, GR tests, higher-multipole confirmation, and rate estimate. No major comments were raised in the report.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in derivation chain
full rationale
The paper reports a high-SNR gravitational-wave detection and parameter estimation for GW190814 using standard matched-filter searches, coherent Bayesian inference with established GR waveform templates, and a single-event Poisson likelihood for the merger rate. Mass and spin constraints follow directly from data-to-template comparison without self-definition or renaming of fitted quantities as predictions. Rate bounds use a uniform comoving-volume prior whose minor sensitivity is explicitly noted and does not force the central observational claim. No load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is present; the analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks such as prior LIGO/Virgo detections and independent noise characterization.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- merger rate density =
1-23 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}
axioms (1)
- domain assumption General relativity accurately predicts the waveform of a compact binary coalescence including higher multipoles
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.DimensionForcingdimension_forced unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We report the observation of a compact binary coalescence involving a 22.2 - 24.3 M⊙ black hole and a compact object with a mass of 2.50 - 2.67 M⊙
-
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.Hamiltonianenergy_conservation unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Tests of general relativity reveal no measurable deviations from the theory
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 17 Pith papers
-
GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors
The first informative astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors is reported using GW240925 and GW250207.
-
Inspiral gravitational waveforms from charged compact binaries with scalar hair
In Einstein-scalar-Maxwell theories, charged compact binaries produce gravitational waveforms containing a leading -1 post-Newtonian dipole correction controlled by one deviation parameter b.
-
GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run
LIGO and Virgo detected 39 compact binary coalescence events in O3a, including 13 new ones, with black hole binaries up to 150 solar masses and the first significantly asymmetric mass ratios.
-
Two types of quasinormal modes of Casadio-Fabbri-Mazzacurati brane-world black holes
Quasinormal modes of massive scalars in CFM brane-world black holes split into two types, with modes disappearing at critical masses where real or imaginary frequency parts reach zero.
-
Beyond the Standard Model of Cosmology: Testing new paradigms with a Multiprobe Exploration of the Dark Universe
Proposes primordial black holes from modified small-scale fluctuations and entropic acceleration in expanding spacetime as explanations for dark matter and dark energy.
-
Quasi-resonances in the vicinity of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black hole
Increasing the mass of a perturbing scalar field around Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black holes strongly suppresses damping in several quasinormal branches, producing quasi-resonant long-lived oscillations.
-
Long-lived quasinormal modes, shadows and particle motion in four-dimensional quasi-topological gravity
Massive scalar quasinormal modes in quasi-topological black holes become long-lived as scalar mass grows, while photon-sphere radius, shadow size, and ISCO exhibit moderate deviations from Schwarzschild.
-
Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog
No evidence for deviations from general relativity is found in LIGO-Virgo binary black hole events, with improved constraints on waveform parameters, graviton mass, and ringdown properties.
-
Characterizing the quark-hadron mixed phase in compact star cores : sensitivity to nuclear saturation and quark-model parameters at finite-temperature
The quark-hadron mixed phase width in hybrid stars is mainly controlled by effective nucleon mass and symmetry energy, with temperature reducing the width and softening the EOS while strong vector repulsion is needed ...
-
Axial $w$-modes of anisotropic neutron stars
Axial w-mode frequencies in anisotropic neutron stars decrease monotonically with mass, show approximately linear dependence on compactness modified by anisotropy type and strength, and come with empirical fitting exp...
-
GW190711_030756 and GW200114_020818: astrophysical interpretation of two asymmetric binary black hole mergers in the IAS catalog
Two asymmetric BBH mergers are characterized with mass ratios 0.35 and ≤0.20; one shows high spins, negative χ_eff, and strong precession, suggesting an emerging population of massive rapidly spinning systems.
-
Telling tails and quasi-resonances in the vicinity of Dymnikova regular black hole
Massive scalar perturbations on the Dymnikova regular black hole exhibit growing oscillation frequencies, reduced damping rates leading to quasi-resonances, power-law oscillatory tails, and mass-dependent suppression ...
-
Impact of Anisotropy on Neutron Star Structure and Curvature
Moderate positive pressure anisotropy raises neutron star maximum mass to about 2.4 solar masses and compactness by up to 20 percent, with curvature scalars tied to matter showing strong sensitivity while the Weyl sca...
-
GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run
GWTC-2.1 adds eight new high-significance compact binary coalescence events to the prior catalog, extending the observed black hole mass range and including candidates inside the pair-instability mass gap.
-
Residual Test for the Third Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog
Residuals after subtracting best-fit waveforms from GWTC-3 events show no significant deviation from noise according to three standard goodness-of-fit tests.
-
Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3
No evidence for physics beyond general relativity is found in the analysis of 15 GW events from GWTC-3, with consistency in residuals, PN parameters, and remnant properties.
-
Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments
Primordial black holes in specific mass ranges could account for some or all dark matter while resolving structure-formation and seed problems in standard cosmology.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Aasi , J., Abbott , B. P., Abbott , R., et al. 2015, , 32, 074001, 10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001
-
[2]
Abbott , B. P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T. D., et al. 2016 a , , 116, 061102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
-
[3]
2016 b , , 6, 041015, 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041015
---. 2016 b , , 6, 041015, 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041015
-
[4]
2016 c , , 33, 134001, 10.1088/0264-9381/33/13/134001
---. 2016 c , , 33, 134001, 10.1088/0264-9381/33/13/134001
-
[5]
2016 d , , 93, 122003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.122003
---. 2016 d , , 93, 122003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.122003
-
[6]
2016 e , , 93, 122004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.122004
---. 2016 e , , 93, 122004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.122004
-
[7]
2016 f , , 116, 241102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241102
---. 2016 f , , 116, 241102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241102
-
[8]
2016 g , , 116, 221101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.221101
---. 2016 g , , 116, 221101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.221101
-
[9]
---. 2017 a , , 119, 161101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101
-
[10]
2017, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 848, L12, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9
---. 2017 b , , 848, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9
-
[11]
---. 2017 c , , 848, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c
-
[12]
2017 d , , 850, L39, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9478
---. 2017 d , , 850, L39, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9478
-
[13]
2017 e , Nat, 551, 85, 10.1038/nature24471
---. 2017 e , Nat, 551, 85, 10.1038/nature24471
-
[14]
2017 f , , 851, L35, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0c
---. 2017 f , , 851, L35, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0c
-
[15]
2017 g , , 851, L16, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9a35
---. 2017 g , , 851, L16, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9a35
-
[16]
2018, Physical Review Letters, 121, doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.161101
---. 2018, , 121, 161101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101
-
[17]
2019 a , PhRvX, 9, 031040, 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040
---. 2019 a , PhRvX, 9, 031040, 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040
-
[18]
---. 2019 b , , 9, 011001, 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.011001
-
[19]
2019 c , arXiv:1908.06060 https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06060
---. 2019 c , arXiv:1908.06060 https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06060
-
[20]
2019 d , , 123, 011102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.011102
---. 2019 d , , 123, 011102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.011102
-
[21]
2019 e , , 100, 104036, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.104036
---. 2019 e , , 100, 104036, 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.104036
-
[22]
2019 f , , 875, 160, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f3d
---. 2019 f , , 875, 160, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f3d
-
[23]
2020 a , ApJL, 892, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5
---. 2020 a , ApJL, 892, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5
-
[24]
---. 2020 b , arXiv:1304.0670v10 https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0670v10
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
-
[25]
2020 c , CQGra, 37, 045006, 10.1088/1361-6382/ab5f7c
---. 2020 c , CQGra, 37, 045006, 10.1088/1361-6382/ab5f7c
-
[26]
Abbott , R., Abbott , T. D., Abraham , S., et al. 2020 d , arXiv:2004.08342 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.08342
-
[27]
2010, CQGra, 27, 194011, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194011
Accadia , T., Acernese , F., Antonucci , F., et al. 2010, CQGra, 27, 194011, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194011
-
[28]
2018, , 35, 205004, 10.1088/1361-6382/aadf1a
Acernese , F., Adams , T., Agatsuma , K., et al. 2018, , 35, 205004, 10.1088/1361-6382/aadf1a
-
[29]
Acernese , F., Agathos , M., Agatsuma , K., et al. 2015, , 32, 024001, 10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001
-
[30]
2020, arXiv:2002.01950 https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01950
Ackley , K., Amati , L., Barbieri , C., et al. 2020, arXiv:2002.01950 https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01950
-
[31]
2016, CQGra, 33, 175012, 10.1088/0264-9381/33/17/175012
Adams , T., Buskulic , D., Germain , V., et al. 2016, CQGra, 33, 175012, 10.1088/0264-9381/33/17/175012
-
[32]
Ade , P. A. R., Aghanim , N., Arnaud , M., et al. 2016, , 594, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830
-
[33]
Ageron, M., Baret, B., Coleiro, A., et al. 2019, , 25330. https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/gcn3/25330.gcn3
work page 2019
-
[34]
Ajith, P., Fotopoulos, N., Privitera, S., Neunzert, A., & Weinstein, A. J. 2014, PhRvD, 89, 084041, 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084041
-
[35]
2011, , 106, 241101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.241101
Ajith , P., Hannam , M., Husa , S., et al. 2011, , 106, 241101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.241101
-
[36]
Alsing , J., Silva , H. O., & Berti , E. 2018, , 478, 1377, 10.1093/mnras/sty1065
-
[37]
Andreoni , I., Goldstein , D. A., Kasliwal , M. M., et al. 2020, , 890, 131, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6a1b
-
[38]
2020, , 492, 3904, 10.1093/mnras/stz3142
Antier , S., Agayeva , S., Aivazyan , V., et al. 2020, , 492, 3904, 10.1093/mnras/stz3142
-
[39]
Antonini , F., & Perets , H. B. 2012, , 757, 27, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/27
-
[40]
Antonini , F., Toonen , S., & Hamers , A. S. 2017, , 841, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6f5e
-
[41]
Apostolatos, T. A., Cutler, C., Sussman, G. J., & Thorne, K. S. 1994, , 49, 6274, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6274
-
[42]
2020, CmPhy, 3, 43, 10.1038/s42005-020-0310-x
Arca Sedda , M. 2020, CmPhy, 3, 43, 10.1038/s42005-020-0310-x
-
[43]
G., Buonanno, A., Faye, G., & Ochsner, E
Arun, K. G., Buonanno, A., Faye, G., & Ochsner, E. 2009, , 79, 104023, 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.104023
-
[44]
Arun, K. G., Iyer, B. R., Qusailah, M. S. S., & Sathyaprakash, B. S. 2006 a , PhRvD, 74, 024006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.024006
-
[45]
2006 b , CQGra, 23, L37–L43, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/9/l01
---. 2006 b , CQGra, 23, L37–L43, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/9/l01
-
[46]
Ashton , G., H \"u bner , M., Lasky , P. D., et al. 2019, , 241, 27, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab06fc
-
[47]
2017, , 464, L36, 10.1093/mnrasl/slw177
Askar , A., Szkudlarek , M., Gondek-Rosi \'n ska , D., Giersz , M., & Bulik , T. 2017, , 464, L36, 10.1093/mnrasl/slw177
-
[48]
Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068
-
[49]
2017, PhRvD, 95, 024010, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.024010
Babak, S., Taracchini, A., & Buonanno, A. 2017, PhRvD, 95, 024010, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.024010
-
[50]
Bailyn , C. D., Jain , R. K., Coppi , P., & Orosz , J. A. 1998, , 499, 367, 10.1086/305614
-
[51]
2013, PhRvD, 87, 024035, 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024035
Baird, E., Fairhurst, S., Hannam, M., & Murphy, P. 2013, PhRvD, 87, 024035, 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024035
-
[52]
2014, LRR, 17, 2, 10.12942/lrr-2014-2
Blanchet, L. 2014, LRR, 17, 2, 10.12942/lrr-2014-2
-
[53]
Blanchet , L., Damour , T., Esposito-Far \`e se , G., & Iyer , B. R. 2005, , 71, 124004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.124004
-
[54]
Blanchet , L., Damour , T., Iyer , B. R., Will , C. M., & Wiseman , A. G. 1995, , 74, 3515, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3515
-
[55]
Blanchet, L., Faye, G., Iyer, B. R., & Sinha, S. 2008, CQGra, 25, 165003, 10.1088/0264-9381/25/16/165003, 10.1088/0264-9381/29/23/239501
-
[56]
2017, , 95, 044028, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044028
Boh \'e , A., Shao , L., Taracchini , A., et al. 2017, , 95, 044028, 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044028
-
[57]
Brown, D. A., Kumar, P., & Nitz, A. H. 2013, PhRvD, 87, 082004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.082004
-
[58]
1999, , 59, 084006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.084006
Buonanno, A., & Damour, T. 1999, , 59, 084006, 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.084006
-
[59]
2003, , 67, 104025, 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104025, 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.029904
Buonanno, A., et al. 2003, , 67, 104025, 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104025, 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.029904
-
[60]
2019, MNRAS, 485, 3153, 10.1093/mnras/stz543
Burrows, A., Radice, D., & Vartanyan, D. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3153, 10.1093/mnras/stz543
-
[61]
Burrows , A., Vartanyan , D., Dolence , J. C., Skinner , M. A., & Radice , D. 2018, , 214, 33, 10.1007/s11214-017-0450-9
-
[62]
2012, , 748, 136, 10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/136
Cannon , K., Cariou , R., Chapman , A., et al. 2012, , 748, 136, 10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/136
-
[63]
2016 a , PhRvD, 96, 082002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.082002
Capano, C., Dent, T., Hanna, C., et al. 2016 a , PhRvD, 96, 082002, 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.082002
-
[64]
2016 b , PhRvD, 93, 124007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.124007
Capano, C., Harry, I., Privitera, S., & Buonanno, A. 2016 b , PhRvD, 93, 124007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.124007
-
[65]
2019, LRR, 22, 4, 10.1007/s41114-019-0020-4
Cardoso , V., & Pani , P. 2019, LRR, 22, 4, 10.1007/s41114-019-0020-4
-
[66]
1971, , 26, 331, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.331
Carter , B. 1971, , 26, 331, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.331
-
[67]
2004, , 21, S1809, 10.1088/0264-9381/21/20/024
Chatterji, S., et al. 2004, , 21, S1809, 10.1088/0264-9381/21/20/024
-
[68]
Chen, H.-Y., Fishbach, M., & Holz, D. E. 2018, Nat, 562, 545, 10.1038/s41586-018-0606-0
-
[69]
Chernoff , D. F., & Finn , L. S. 1993, , 411, L5, 10.1086/186898
-
[70]
2017, , 848, L19, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa905c
Chornock , R., Berger , E., Kasen , D., et al. 2017, , 848, L19, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa905c
-
[71]
Clausen , D., Sigurdsson , S., & Chernoff , D. F. 2013, , 428, 3618, 10.1093/mnras/sts295
-
[72]
2007, , 76, 102004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.102004
Cokelaer, T. 2007, , 76, 102004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.102004
-
[73]
Cook , G. B., Shapiro , S. L., & Teukolsky , S. A. 1994, , 424, 823, 10.1086/173934
-
[74]
2011, PhRvD, 84, 062003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.062003
Cornish, N., Sampson, L., Yunes, N., & Pretorius, F. 2011, PhRvD, 84, 062003, 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.062003
-
[75]
Cornish, N. J., & Littenberg, T. B. 2015, , 32, 135012, 10.1088/0264-9381/32/13/135012
-
[76]
2018, PhRvD, 98, 084028, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.084028
Cotesta, R., Buonanno, A., Bohé, A., et al. 2018, PhRvD, 98, 084028, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.084028
-
[77]
W., Dietrich , T., Antier , S., et al
Coughlin , M. W., Dietrich , T., Antier , S., et al. 2020, , 492, 863, 10.1093/mnras/stz3457
-
[78]
Cowperthwaite , P. S., Berger , E., Villar , V. A., et al. 2017, , 848, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8fc7
-
[79]
Cromartie , H. T., Fonseca , E., Ransom , S. M., et al. 2019, NatAs, 439, 10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2
-
[80]
Cutler, C., & Flanagan, E. E. 1994, , 49, 2658, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2658
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.