pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.20732 · v1 · pith:6UPARSE2new · submitted 2025-05-27 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.LG

SPA-RL: Reinforcing LLM Agents via Stepwise Progress Attribution

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.LG
keywords progressagentstepwisetasktrainingcompletionrewardrewards
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) holds significant promise for training LLM agents to handle complex, goal-oriented tasks that require multi-step interactions with external environments. However, a critical challenge when applying RL to these agentic tasks arises from delayed rewards: feedback signals are typically available only after the entire task is completed. This makes it non-trivial to assign delayed rewards to earlier actions, providing insufficient guidance regarding environmental constraints and hindering agent training. In this work, we draw on the insight that the ultimate completion of a task emerges from the cumulative progress an agent makes across individual steps. We propose Stepwise Progress Attribution (SPA), a general reward redistribution framework that decomposes the final reward into stepwise contributions, each reflecting its incremental progress toward overall task completion. To achieve this, we train a progress estimator that accumulates stepwise contributions over a trajectory to match the task completion. During policy optimization, we combine the estimated per-step contribution with a grounding signal for actions executed in the environment as the fine-grained, intermediate reward for effective agent training. Extensive experiments on common agent benchmarks (including Webshop, ALFWorld, and VirtualHome) demonstrate that SPA consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art method in both success rate (+2.5\% on average) and grounding accuracy (+1.9\% on average). Further analyses demonstrate that our method remarkably provides more effective intermediate rewards for RL training. Our code is available at https://github.com/WangHanLinHenry/SPA-RL-Agent.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 21 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SENTINEL: Failure-Driven Reinforcement Learning for Training Tool-Using Language Model Agents

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SENTINEL generates targeted tasks from model failures in a Controller-Proposer-Solver loop, raising Pass^1 from 66.4 to 74.9 on Tau2-Bench Retail and outperforming standard RL.

  2. TRACER: Verifiable Generative Provenance for Multimodal Tool-Using Agents

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TRACER attaches verifiable sentence-level provenance records to multimodal agent outputs using tool-turn alignment and semantic relations, yielding 78.23% answer accuracy and fewer tool calls than baselines on TRACE-Bench.

  3. The Moltbook Files: A Harmless Slopocalypse or Humanity's Last Experiment

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An AI-agent social platform generated mostly neutral content whose use in fine-tuning reduced model truthfulness comparably to human Reddit data, suggesting limited unique harm but flagging tail risks like secret leaks.

  4. Semantic Consistency Policy Optimization for Reinforcement Learning of LLM Agents

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SCPO recovers step-level credit from successful siblings within rollout groups to reduce semantic inconsistency in group-based RL for LLM agents, matching or exceeding baselines on ALFWorld and WebShop.

  5. Learning with a Single Rollout via Monte Carlo Pass@k Critic

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SR-PPO trains a Pass@k critic from single-rollout Monte Carlo outcomes to enable token-level advantage estimation in language model RL, yielding stable training and Pass@128 gains on math benchmarks.

  6. Harness-1: Reinforcement Learning for Search Agents with State-Externalizing Harnesses

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Harness-1 uses a state-externalizing harness for RL-trained search agents and reports 0.730 average curated recall, outperforming the next open subagent by 11.4 points.

  7. COMAP: Co-Evolving World Models and Agent Policies for LLM Agents

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    COMAP co-evolves textual world models and agent policies for LLMs through on-policy self-distillation, yielding up to 16.75% relative gains on embodied planning, web navigation, and tool-use tasks.

  8. PAIR: Prefix-Aware Internal Reward Model for Multi-Turn Agent Optimization

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PAIR combines a hidden-state probe with an attention correction to deliver robust step-level rewards for GRPO-based optimization of multi-turn LLM agents, achieving high AUROC on contaminated trajectories at low cost.

  9. Skill1: Unified Evolution of Skill-Augmented Agents via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Skill1 trains one policy to jointly evolve skill query generation, re-ranking, task solving, and distillation from a single task-success signal, with low-frequency trends crediting selection and high-frequency variati...

  10. AEM: Adaptive Entropy Modulation for Multi-Turn Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AEM lifts entropy analysis to the response level and uses a derived uncertainty proxy to rescale advantages, enabling better exploration-exploitation balance and consistent gains over RL baselines on agent benchmarks.

  11. The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey

    cs.AI 2025-09 accept novelty 6.0

    Survey that defines agentic RL for LLMs via POMDPs, introduces a taxonomy of planning/tool-use/memory/reasoning capabilities and domains, and compiles open environments from over 500 papers.

  12. Trust Region On-Policy Distillation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TrOPD stabilizes on-policy distillation for LLMs with trust-region learning, outlier estimation, and off-policy guidance, outperforming prior OPD methods on reasoning and code benchmarks.

  13. Learning CLI Agents with Structured Action Credit under Selective Observation

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CLI agents trained with RL benefit from selective observation via σ-Reveal and structured credit assignment via A³ that leverages AST action sub-chains and trajectory margins.

  14. Skill1: Unified Evolution of Skill-Augmented Agents via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Skill1 trains a single RL policy to co-evolve skill selection, utilization, and distillation in language model agents from one task-outcome reward, using low-frequency trends to credit selection and high-frequency var...

  15. Skill1: Unified Evolution of Skill-Augmented Agents via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Skill1 co-evolves skill selection, utilization, and distillation inside a single policy using only task-outcome reward, with low-frequency trends crediting selection and high-frequency variation crediting distillation...

  16. On Training Large Language Models for Long-Horizon Tasks: An Empirical Study of Horizon Length

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Longer action horizons bottleneck LLM agent training through instability, but training with reduced horizons stabilizes learning and enables better generalization to longer horizons.

  17. HIPIF: Hierarchical Planning and Information Folding for Long-Horizon LLM Agent Learning

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    HIPIF trains LLM agents end-to-end using subgoal-based hierarchical planning and information folding of completed histories, plus hierarchical reflection and process rewards, to handle long-horizon tasks without auxil...

  18. AEM: Adaptive Entropy Modulation for Multi-Turn Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    AEM adaptively modulates response-level entropy in agentic RL to improve credit assignment and exploration-exploitation balance, yielding gains on ALFWorld, WebShop, and SWE-bench.

  19. A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence

    cs.AI 2025-07 accept novelty 4.0

    The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.

  20. StepGuard: Guarding Web Navigation via Single-Step Calibration

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    StepGuard framework with DDPO and CANR claims SOTA navigation and answer accuracy on web benchmarks by switching policies and triggering reflection on low-confidence steps.

  21. Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems

    cs.AI 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    This survey frames foundation agents using brain-inspired modular architectures and reviews challenges in evolution, collaboration, and safety.