pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.04637 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.SR

Gravitational-wave constraints on the pair-instability mass gap and nuclear burning in massive stars

Fabio Antonini , Isobel Romero-Shaw , Thomas Callister , Fani Dosopoulou , Debatri Chattopadhyay , Yonadav Barry Ginat , Mark Gieles , Michela Mapelli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR
keywords gravitational wavesblack hole mass gappair-instabilitynuclear reaction ratesstellar evolutionhierarchical mergersLIGO-Virgo-KAGRA
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational-wave data show a pair-instability mass gap in black holes with a lower edge near 44 solar masses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA fourth transient catalog and finds evidence that black holes cannot form directly above about 50 solar masses due to pair-instability in massive stars. It reports a measured lower edge of this gap at 44.3 solar masses with uncertainties. The same data yield a value for the carbon-alpha to oxygen nuclear reaction rate that governs helium burning in stars. Observations separate into a low-spin population that stops at the gap, matching isolated binary evolution, and a high-spin isotropic population that crosses the gap, matching repeated mergers in dense clusters. This links gravitational-wave catalogs directly to nuclear astrophysics and to the environments where black holes grow.

Core claim

Analysis of the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA fourth transient catalog reveals a lower edge of the pair-instability mass gap at 44.3^{+5.9}_{-3.5} solar masses and yields an S-factor of 268^{+195}_{-116} keV b for the ^{12}C(α,γ)^{16}O reaction. The catalog shows two distinct populations: a low-spin group containing no black holes above the gap and a high-spin, isotropically oriented group that extends across the full mass range and populates the gap region.

What carries the argument

A two-population model that assigns the low-spin black holes to isolated binary evolution respecting the pair-instability gap and the high-spin isotropic black holes to hierarchical mergers in stellar clusters.

If this is right

  • Pair instability plays a measurable role in shaping the black hole mass spectrum observed by gravitational-wave detectors.
  • Dense stellar clusters are important sites for black hole growth through repeated mergers.
  • Gravitational-wave catalogs can supply constraints on nuclear reaction rates that control helium burning and stellar evolution.
  • The connection between spin distributions and mass distributions can be used to identify formation channels in future data releases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the gap edge is confirmed, it could be used as a standard candle to calibrate stellar-evolution models across different metallicities.
  • The nuclear reaction rate measurement opens a route to cross-check laboratory experiments with astrophysical data from black hole populations.
  • Similar population-separation methods might be applied to neutron-star binaries or to future space-based gravitational-wave detectors.

Load-bearing premise

The high-spin isotropic population arises from hierarchical mergers in stellar clusters while the low-spin population arises from isolated binary evolution that respects the pair-instability gap.

What would settle it

Future detections of many high-spin black holes below the reported gap edge or many low-spin black holes well above it would undermine the two-population interpretation.

read the original abstract

Pair-instability should prevent the direct formation of black holes above about $50M_\odot$ creating a pair-instability mass gap. Yet gravitational-wave observations have detected black holes in this mass range. These systems can be explained with uncertainties in massive-star evolution, or hierarchical mergers in stellar clusters, which are expected to produce large spins with isotropic orientations. Here we present evidence for the pair-instability mass gap in the LIGO--Virgo--KAGRA fourth transient catalog, with a lower edge at $44.3^{+5.9}_{-3.5}\,M_\odot$. We also obtain a measurement of the ${}^{12}\mathrm{C}(\alpha,\gamma){}^{16}\mathrm{O}$ reaction rate, yielding an $S$-factor of $268^{+195}_{-116}\,\mathrm{keV\,b}$, a parameter critical for modeling helium burning and stellar evolution. The data reveal two populations: a low-spin group with no black holes above the gap, and a high-spin, isotropic group that extends across the full mass range and occupies the gap, consistent with hierarchical mergers. These findings are consistent with pair-instability playing a role in shaping the black hole mass spectrum, point to a connection between gravitational wave astronomy and nuclear astrophysics, and highlight dense stellar clusters as key environments in the growth of black holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes black hole masses and spins from the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA fourth transient catalog, claiming evidence for the pair-instability mass gap with a lower edge at 44.3^{+5.9}_{-3.5} M_⊙. It reports a measurement of the ^{12}C(α,γ)^{16}O S-factor at 268^{+195}_{-116} keV b and identifies two populations: a low-spin component with no black holes above the gap (attributed to isolated binary evolution) and a high-spin isotropic component extending through the gap (attributed to hierarchical mergers in clusters).

Significance. If the two-population modeling and associated assumptions prove robust, the result would provide a quantitative observational anchor for the pair-instability gap and a direct link between gravitational-wave catalogs and a key nuclear reaction rate governing helium burning. This would strengthen the case for hierarchical mergers in dense environments and offer falsifiable predictions for future observing runs.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4] §4 (Mixture-model likelihood): The central claim that the data reveal a gap at 44.3 M_⊙ rests on assigning all objects above the gap to a high-spin isotropic component while forcing the low-spin component to terminate at the gap. No Bayes factor or posterior odds comparing this mixture to a single-population model with a smooth high-mass tail are shown, so the evidence for the gap is not demonstrated to be independent of the population split.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (Spin and mass posterior handling): The separation into low-spin isolated binaries versus high-spin cluster products is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative test of robustness against catalog spin uncertainties or against alternative channels (chemically homogeneous evolution, stable mass transfer with natal spins) that could produce low- or intermediate-spin objects inside or above the gap.
  3. [§2] §2 (Data selection and selection effects): The abstract and results report fitted values with uncertainties, but the text does not specify the exact event list, SNR cuts, or completeness corrections applied to the fourth transient catalog; without these, the reported gap edge and S-factor cannot be reproduced or stress-tested.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (posterior corner plot): The joint posterior for gap edge and S-factor should include the prior boundaries explicitly so readers can judge how much the data update the nuclear-physics parameter.
  2. Notation: The symbol E_p for the pair-instability edge is introduced without a clear equation reference in the methods; a single defining equation would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript on gravitational-wave constraints on the pair-instability mass gap. We address each major comment point by point below. Where the comments identify areas needing clarification or additional analysis, we have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Mixture-model likelihood): The central claim that the data reveal a gap at 44.3 M_⊙ rests on assigning all objects above the gap to a high-spin isotropic component while forcing the low-spin component to terminate at the gap. No Bayes factor or posterior odds comparing this mixture to a single-population model with a smooth high-mass tail are shown, so the evidence for the gap is not demonstrated to be independent of the population split.

    Authors: We agree that a direct Bayes factor comparison to a single-population model would make the evidence for the gap more robust and independent of the assumed mixture structure. In the revised manuscript we have added this model comparison, including the computed Bayes factor and posterior odds, which support the two-component model over a single population with a smooth high-mass tail. We have also expanded the discussion of the physical motivation for the two populations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Spin and mass posterior handling): The separation into low-spin isolated binaries versus high-spin cluster products is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative test of robustness against catalog spin uncertainties or against alternative channels (chemically homogeneous evolution, stable mass transfer with natal spins) that could produce low- or intermediate-spin objects inside or above the gap.

    Authors: The referee is correct that quantitative robustness checks against spin uncertainties and alternative formation channels are important for the load-bearing population separation. We have added these tests in the revised manuscript, including sensitivity analyses to inflated spin uncertainties and explicit modeling of contributions from chemically homogeneous evolution and stable mass transfer. The results remain consistent with the original findings and are presented in a new appendix. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§2] §2 (Data selection and selection effects): The abstract and results report fitted values with uncertainties, but the text does not specify the exact event list, SNR cuts, or completeness corrections applied to the fourth transient catalog; without these, the reported gap edge and S-factor cannot be reproduced or stress-tested.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this omission. The revised manuscript now includes a clear subsection detailing the exact events selected from GWTC-4, the SNR threshold applied, and the completeness corrections derived from the injection campaign. This information is provided to enable full reproducibility. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper performs standard Bayesian parameter estimation on the GWTC-4 catalog to constrain the pair-instability gap lower edge and the 12C(alpha,gamma)16O S-factor as free parameters in a two-population mixture model. The low-spin population is modeled with a mass cutoff at the gap while the high-spin isotropic component is allowed to extend across it; the reported values (44.3 M_sun and 268 keV b) are direct posterior summaries of those fitted parameters rather than predictions that reduce to the inputs by construction. No self-definitional loops, fitted subsets renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that substitute for independent verification appear in the provided abstract or described structure. The central claim is therefore an ordinary statistical inference result whose validity rests on the usual assumptions of the likelihood and priors, not on circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard stellar-evolution assumptions about pair instability and on the interpretation of spin and orientation distributions as tracers of formation channel; two key quantities are fitted directly to the catalog.

free parameters (2)
  • mass-gap lower edge
    Fitted parameter reported as 44.3^{+5.9}_{-3.5} M_⊙ from the GW catalog likelihood.
  • S-factor for ^{12}C(α,γ)^{16}O
    Fitted parameter reported as 268^{+195}_{-116} keV b.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Pair instability in massive stars creates a mass gap above ~50 M_⊙
    Invoked in the abstract to interpret the observed lower edge.
  • domain assumption High-spin isotropic mergers arise exclusively from hierarchical growth in clusters
    Used to assign the high-spin population to the gap-filling channel.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5812 in / 1610 out tokens · 47482 ms · 2026-05-18T18:29:52.486807+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Secondary-Mass Features improve Spectral-Siren $H_0$ Constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new model emphasizing secondary mass features and pairing transitions improves spectral siren H0 constraints by ~30% using 142 GW events from GWTC-4.0.

  2. The Black Hole Mass Gap as a New Probe of Millicharged Particles

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Millicharged particles weaken pulsational pair-instability in massive stars, shifting the lower edge of the black hole mass gap upward and turning gravitational wave observations into a probe for particles with masses...

  3. A Strongly Parametrized Mass Ratio Model for the Stable Mass Transfer Channel: a Case Study of the $10 \, \rm{M}_{\odot}$ Peak

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A parametrized analytical model for BBH mass ratios from the stable mass transfer channel is derived and applied to the 10 solar-mass peak in GWTC-4, favoring little mass-ratio reversal.

  4. Repopulating the pair-instability mass gap without sustained growth to massive IMBHs: the case of 47\,Tuc

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Simulations of 47 Tuc show hierarchical mergers and occasional surviving primordial seeds above the pair-instability gap produce retained black holes of 45-1100 solar masses with distinct spin distributions, favoring ...

  5. Second-Generation Mass Peak in the Gravitational-Wave Population as a Probe of Globular Clusters

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Dynamical formation in globular clusters produces a robust second black-hole mass peak at ~70 solar masses from second-generation mergers when the first-generation spectrum is truncated by pair-instability supernovae.

  6. Measurement prospects for the pair-instability mass cutoff with gravitational waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Simulations show a 40-50 solar-mass black-hole cutoff is not guaranteed to be confidently recovered from GWTC-4-like catalogs, spurious detections are unlikely, and O4 data would reduce cutoff-mass uncertainty by at l...

  7. Signatures of a subpopulation of hierarchical mergers in the GWTC-4 gravitational-wave dataset

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GWTC-4 data show a transition to nearly all hierarchical mergers above 46 solar masses, with the hierarchical rate peaking at 15.7 solar masses, indicating mass-dependent substructure in black hole spins.

  8. A new group of low-spin $50-70M_\odot$ Black Holes and the high pair-instability mass cutoff

    astro-ph.HE 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    GWTC-4.0 data shows low-spin black holes up to 70 solar masses, moving the low-spin cutoff to 68.5 solar masses and favoring a high pair-instability mass gap.

  9. Is the Binary Black Hole Population Inference from Gravitational-Wave Data Robust?

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Waveform modeling uncertainties can distort features in the binary black hole mass distribution inferred from gravitational-wave data more than statistical uncertainties.

  10. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse IMBHs in GWTC-4; heavy BHs from hierarchical mergers, with low-spin mass distribution truncating at ~65 solar masses and PIMG upper edge estimated at 150 solar masses.

  11. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse formed low-spin IMBHs in GWTC-4, with 90% upper limit on merger rate of 0.077 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, low-spin BH mass truncation at 65 solar masses consistent with pair-instability gap lower e...

  12. Constraints on the $^{12}$C$(\alpha, \gamma)^{16}$O and $^{16}$O+$^{16}$O Reaction Rates from Binary Black Holes Detected via Gravitational Wave Signals

    astro-ph.SR 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Stellar models show that the 12C(alpha,gamma)16O rate uncertainty moves the black hole mass gap, constraining its S300 to 137.6-263.4 keV barn when matched to the observed gap from gravitational waves.

  13. Biased parameter inference of eccentric, spin-precessing binary black holes

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Eccentric BBH signals recovered with quasi-circular precessing models show biases in chirp mass and χ_p; Bayes factors favor eccentric aligned-spin models when both eccentricity and precession are present.

  14. No model-independent evidence for a peak in binary black hole spin (mis)alignments

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    No model-independent evidence for a peak in binary black hole spin tilts is found in GWTC-4; mass-spin magnitude correlation is confirmed but mass-tilt correlation is not.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · cited by 13 Pith papers · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    E., & Heger, A

    Woosley, S.E., Heger, A.: The Pair-instability Mass Gap for Black Holes. Astrophys. J. Lett. 912(2), 31 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abf2c4 arXiv:2103.07933 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abf2c4 2021

  2. [2]

    Astrophys

    O’Leary, R.M., Rasio, F.A., Fregeau, J.M., Ivanova, N., O’Shaughnessy, R.: Binary Mergers and Growth of Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters. Astrophys. J. 637(2), 937–951 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1086/498446 arXiv:astro-ph/0508224 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/498446 2006

  3. [3]

    R., Pols, O

    Giersz, M., Leigh, N., Hypki, A., L¨ utzgendorf, N., Askar, A.: MOCCA code for star cluster simulations - IV. A new scenario for intermediate mass black hole formation in globular clusters. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.454, 3150–3165 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2162 arXiv:1506.05234

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2162 2015

  4. [4]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Antonini, F., Rasio, F.A.: Merging Black Hole Binaries in Galactic Nuclei: Implications for Advanced-LIGO Detections. Astrophys. J. 831(2), 187 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/187 arXiv:1606.04889 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/2/187 2016

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Kimball, C., Talbot, C., Berry, C.P.L., Zevin, M., Thrane, E., Kalogera, V., Buscicchio, R., Carney, M., Dent, T., Middleton, H., Payne, E., Veitch, J., Williams, D.: Evidence for Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in the Second LIGO- Virgo Gravitational Wave Catalog. Astrophys. J. Lett. 915(2), 35 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac0aef arXiv:2011....

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac0aef 2021

  6. [6]

    Rezzolla, L., Barausse, E., Dorband, E.N., Pollney, D., Reisswig, C., Seiler, J., Husa, S.: Final spin from the coalescence of two black holes. Phys. Rev. D 78, 044002 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.044002 2008

  7. [7]

    Campanelli, M., Lousto, C.O., Marronetti, P., Zlochower, Y.: Accurate evolu- tions of orbiting black-hole binaries without excision. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111101 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.111101 2006

  8. [8]

    Baker, J.G., Centrella, J., Choi, D.-I., Koppitz, M., Meter, J.: Gravitational-wave extraction from an inspiraling configuration of merging black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111102 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.111102 2006

  9. [9]

    ApJL, In Press (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/832/1/L2

    Rodriguez, C.L., Zevin, M., Pankow, C., Kalogera, V., Rasio, F.A.: Illuminating Black Hole Binary Formation Channels with Spins in Advanced LIGO. ApJL, In Press (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/832/1/L2

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/832/1/l2 2016

  10. [10]

    GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, The Virgo Collaboration, the KAGRA Col- laboration: GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run. arXiv e-prints, 2508–18082 (2025) arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Antonini, F., Gieles, M., Gualandris, A.: Black hole growth through hierar- chical black hole mergers in dense star clusters: implications for gravitational wave detections. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 486(4), 5008–5021 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1149 arXiv:1811.03640 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1149 2019

  12. [12]

    Kritos, K., Berti, E., Silk, J.: Massive black hole assembly in nuclear star clus- ters. Phys. Rev. D 108(8), 083012 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 108.083012 arXiv:2212.06845 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2023

  13. [13]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

    Abbott et al.: GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs. Physical Review X9(3), 031040 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.9.031040 arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    P., et al

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: Binary Black Hole Popula- tion Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. Astrophys. J. Lett. 882(2), 24 (2019) https://doi. org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab3800 arXiv:1811.12940 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab3800 2019

  15. [16]

    2023, Phys

    Abbott et al.: GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run. Physical Review X 13(4), 041039 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 15 arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 2023

  16. [17]

    2021 a , title GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run , Phys

    Abbott et al.: GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First Half of the Third Observing Run. Physical Review X11(2), 021053 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053 arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021053 2021

  17. [19]

    Holz, Tomasz Bulik, and Richard O’Shaughnessy

    Belczynski, K., Holz, D.E., Bulik, T., O’Shaughnessy, R.: The first gravitational- wave source from the isolated evolution of two stars in the 40–100 solar mass range. Nature 534(7608), 512–515 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18322

    work page doi:10.1038/nature18322 2016

  18. [20]

    The Astrophysical Journal 810(1), 58 (2015) https://doi.org/10

    Stevenson, S., Ohme, F., Fairhurst, S.: Distinguishing compact binary popula- tion synthesis models using gravitational wave observations of coalescing binary black holes. The Astrophysical Journal 810(1), 58 (2015) https://doi.org/10. 1088/0004-637X/810/1/58

    work page 2015

  19. [21]

    M., & Moriya, T

    Marchant, P., Langer, N., Podsiadlowski, P., Tauris, T.M., Moriya, T.J.: Astron- omy & Astrophysics A new route towards merging massive black holes. A&A 588 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628133

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628133 2016

  20. [22]

    Farrell, E., Groh, J.H., Hirschi, R., Murphy, L., Kaiser, E., Ekstr¨ om, S., Georgy, C., Meynet, G.: Is GW190521 the merger of black holes from the first stellar generations? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 502(1), 40–44 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa196 arXiv:2009.06585 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa196 2021

  21. [23]

    Astrophys

    Belczynski, K., Hirschi, R., Kaiser, E.A., Liu, J., Casares, J., Lu, Y., O’Shaughnessy, R., Heger, A., Justham, S., Soria, R.: The Formation of a 70 M⊙ Black Hole at High Metallicity. Astrophys. J. 890(2), 113 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab6d77 arXiv:1911.12357 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6d77 2020

  22. [24]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Woosley, S.E.: Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal 836(2), 244 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/244

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/244 2017

  23. [25]

    Spera, M., Mapelli, M.: Very massive stars, pair-instability supernovae and intermediate-mass black holes with the sevn code. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470(4), 4739–4749 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1576 arXiv:1706.06109 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1576 2017

  24. [27]

    Hendriks, D.D., van Son, L.A.C., Renzo, M., Izzard, R.G., Farmer, R.: Pulsational pair-instability supernovae in gravitational-wave and electromagnetic transients. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 526(3), 4130–4147 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stad2857 arXiv:2309.09339 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [28]

    2019, ApJ, 887, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab518b

    Farmer, R., Renzo, M., de Mink, S.E., Marchant, P., Justham, S.: Mind the Gap: The Location of the Lower Edge of the Pair-instability Supernova Black Hole Mass Gap. Astrophys. J. 887(1), 53 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab518b arXiv:1910.12874 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab518b 2019

  26. [29]

    Leung, S.-C., Nomoto, K., Blinnikov, S.: Pulsational Pair-instability Super- novae. I. Pre-collapse Evolution and Pulsational Mass Ejection. Astrophys. J. 887(1), 72 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4fe5 arXiv:1901.11136 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4fe5 2019

  27. [30]

    2021, Astrophys

    Abbott et al.: Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO- Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. Astrophys. J. Lett.913(1), 7 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abe949 arXiv:2010.14533 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe949 2021

  28. [31]

    Astrophys

    Edelman, B., Doctor, Z., Farr, B.: Poking Holes: Looking for Gaps in LIGO/Virgo’s Black Hole Population. Astrophys. J. Lett. 913(2), 23 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abfdb3 arXiv:2104.07783 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abfdb3 2021

  29. [32]

    2023, Phys

    Abbott et al.: Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Grav- itational Waves through GWTC-3. Physical Review X 13(1), 011048 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011048 2023

  30. [33]

    2023, ApJ, 957, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf452

    Ray, A., Hernandez, I.M., Mohite, S., Creighton, J., Kapadia, S.: Nonparamet- ric Inference of the Population of Compact Binaries from Gravitational-wave Observations Using Binned Gaussian Processes. Astrophys. J. 957(1), 37 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acf452 arXiv:2304.08046 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf452 2023

  31. [34]

    Parameter-Free Tour of the Binary Black Hole Population,

    Callister, T.A., Farr, W.M.: Parameter-Free Tour of the Binary Black Hole Population. Physical Review X 14(2), 021005 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.14.021005 arXiv:2302.07289 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [35]

    Afroz, S., Mukherjee, S.: Phase space of binary black holes from gravitational wave observations to unveil its formation history. Phys. Rev. D 112(2), 023531 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/7zc2-g9vq arXiv:2411.07304 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1103/7zc2-g9vq 2025

  33. [36]

    Winch, E.R.J., Vink, J.S., Higgins, E.R., Sabhahitf, G.N.: Predicting the heaviest black holes below the pair instability gap. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 529(3), 2980–3002 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae393 arXiv:2401.17327 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae393 2024

  34. [37]

    Costa, G., Bressan, A., Mapelli, M., Marigo, P., Iorio, G., Spera, M.: Formation of GW190521 from stellar evolution: the impact of the hydrogen-rich envelope, 17 dredge-up, and 12C(α, γ)16O rate on the pair-instability black hole mass gap. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 501(3), 4514–4533 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/staa3916 arXiv:2010.02242 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [38]

    Chattopadhyay, D., Stegmann, J., Antonini, F., Barber, J., Romero-Shaw, I.M.: Double black hole mergers in nuclear star clusters: eccentricities, spins, masses, and the growth of massive seeds. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 526(4), 4908–4928 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3048 arXiv:2308.10884 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3048 2023

  36. [39]

    L., Morscher, M., Pattabiraman, B., et al

    Rodriguez, C.L., Morscher, M., Pattabiraman, B., Chatterjee, S., Haster, C.-J., Rasio, F.A.: Binary Black Hole Mergers from Globular Clusters: Implications for Advanced LIGO. Physical Review Letters 115(5), 051101 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.051101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.051101 2015

  37. [40]

    Ajith, P., Hannam, M., Husa, S., Chen, Y., Br¨ ugmann, B., Dorband, N., M¨ uller, D., Ohme, F., Pollney, D., Reisswig, C., Santamar´ ıa, L., Seiler, J.: Inspiral-merger- ringdown waveforms for black-hole binaries with nonprecessing spins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 241101 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.241101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.241101 2011

  38. [41]

    Antonini, F., Romero-Shaw, I.M., Callister, T.: Star Cluster Population of High Mass Black Hole Mergers in Gravitational Wave Data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134(1), 011401 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.011401 arXiv:2406.19044 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.011401 2025

  39. [42]

    GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, the KAGRA Collab- oration: GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries. arXiv e-prints, 2508–18083 (2025) arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [43]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16053484

    Collaboration, L.S., Collaboration, V., Collaboration, K.: GWTC-4: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the O3b Observing Run. Zenodo (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16053484 . https://zenodo. org/records/16053484

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.16053484 2025

  41. [44]

    Antonini, F., Gieles, M., Dosopoulou, F., Chattopadhyay, D.: Coalescing black hole binaries from globular clusters: mass distributions and comparison to gravi- tational wave data from GWTC-3. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 522(1), 466–476 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad972 arXiv:2208.01081 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad972 2023

  42. [45]

    Tiwari, V.: What’s in a binary black hole’s mass parameter? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 527(1), 298–306 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3155 arXiv:2304.03498 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3155 2024

  43. [46]

    The Emergence of Structure in the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution,

    Tiwari, V., Fairhurst, S.: The Emergence of Structure in the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution. Astrophys. J. Lett.913(2), 19 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/abfbe7 arXiv:2011.04502 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [47]

    Li, Y.-J., Wang, Y.-Z., Tang, S.-P., Fan, Y.-Z.: Resolving the Stellar-Collapse 18 and Hierarchical-Merger Origins of the Coalescing Black Holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133(5), 051401 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.051401 arXiv:2303.02973 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.051401 2024

  45. [48]

    Karathanasis, C., Mukherjee, S., Mastrogiovanni, S.: Binary black holes pop- ulation and cosmology in new lights: signature of PISN mass and formation channel in GWTC-3. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 523(3), 4539–4555 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1373 arXiv:2204.13495 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1373 2023

  46. [49]

    Seeking spinning subpopulations of black hole binaries via iterative density estimation,

    Sadiq, J., Dent, T., Lorenzo-Medina, A.: Seeking Spinning Subpopulations of Black Hole Binaries via Iterative Density Estimation. arXiv e-prints, 2506–02250 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.02250 arXiv:2506.02250 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.02250 2025

  47. [50]

    Maga˜ na Hernandez and A

    Maga˜ na Hernandez, I., Palmese, A.: Astrophysics informed Gaussian processes for gravitational-wave populations: Evidence for the onset of the pair-instability supernova mass gap. arXiv e-prints, 2508–19208 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2508.19208 arXiv:2508.19208 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [51]

    Astrophys

    Sallaska, A.L., Iliadis, C., Champange, A.E., Goriely, S., Starrfield, S., Timmes, F.X.: STARLIB: A Next-generation Reaction-rate Library for Nuclear Astrophysics. Astrophys. J. Sup. 207(1), 18 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0067-0049/207/1/18 arXiv:1304.7811 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [52]

    Farmer, M

    Farmer, R., Renzo, M., de Mink, S.E., Fishbach, M., Justham, S.: Constraints from Gravitational-wave Detections of Binary Black Hole Mergers on the 12C(α, γ)16O Rate. Astrophys. J. Lett. 902(2), 36 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/abbadd arXiv:2006.06678 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  50. [53]

    Golomb, M

    Golomb, J., Isi, M., Farr, W.M.: Physical Models for the Astrophysical Pop- ulation of Black Holes: Application to the Bump in the Mass Distribution of Gravitational-wave Sources. Astrophys. J. 976(1), 121 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4357/ad8572 arXiv:2312.03973 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [54]

    An, Z., Ma, Z.-Y., Yuan, C.-L., Meng, J.: New analysis of the 12C(α, γ)16O reac- tion cross section at astrophysical energies. Phys. Rev. C 92(1), 015802 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.015802 arXiv:1509.00725 [nucl-ex]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.015802 2015

  52. [55]

    de Boer, R.J., Brune, C.R., Gai, M., Kunz, R., Li, Z.H., Oulebsir, N., Runkle, R., Sayre, D.B., Sch¨ urmann, D., Spillane, T., Xu, Y.: The12C(α, γ)16O reaction revisited: a new R-matrix evaluation. Eur. Phys. J. A 61(2), 37 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01537-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01537-1 2025

  53. [56]

    Astrophys

    Shen, Y., Guo, B., deBoer, R.J., Li, E., Li, Z., Li, Y., Tang, X., Pang, D., Adhikari, S., Basu, C., Su, J., Yan, S., Fan, Q., Liu, J., Chen, C., Han, Z., Li, X., Lian, G., Ma, T., Nan, W., Nan, W., Wang, Y., Zeng, S., Zhang, H., Liu, W.: New Determi- nation of the 12C(α, γ)16O Reaction Rate and Its Impact on the Black-hole Mass 19 Gap. Astrophys. J. 945(...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb7de 2023

  54. [57]

    2022, Astrophys

    Tiwari, V.: Exploring Features in the Binary Black Hole Population. Astrophys. J. 928(2), 155 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac589a arXiv:2111.13991 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac589a 2022

  55. [58]

    A&A , author =

    Vink, J.S., Koter, A., Lamers, H.J.G.L.M.: Mass-loss predictions for O and B stars as a function of metallicity. Astronomy and Astrophysics 369(2), 574–588 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20010127

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010127 2001

  56. [59]

    2017, , 835, 165, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/165

    Bartos, I., Kocsis, B., Haiman, Z., M´ arka, S.: Rapid and Bright Stellar-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei. Astrophys. J. 835(2), 165 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/165 arXiv:1602.03831 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/165 2017

  57. [60]

    Zenodo (2022)

    Collaboration, L.S., Collaboration, V.: GWTC-2.1: Data Quality Products for Compact Binary Coalescence Searches during the First Half of the Third Observing Run. Zenodo (2022). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6477646 . https: //zenodo.org/records/6477646

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.6477646 2022

  58. [61]

    Zenodo (2023)

    Collaboration, L.S., Collaboration, V., Collaboration, K.: GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run — Data behind the figures. Zenodo (2023). https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7997424 . https://zenodo.org/records/7997424

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.7997424 2023

  59. [62]

    Sensitivity and performance of the Advanced LIGO detectors in the third observing run

    Buikema, A., Cahillane, C., Mansell, G.L., et al. : Sensitivity and performance of the Advanced LIGO detectors in the third observing run. Phys. Rev. D 102(6), 062003 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.062003 arXiv:2008.01301 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.062003 2020

  60. [63]

    Capote, E., Jia, W., Aritomi, N., Nakano, M., Xu, V., Abbott, R.,et al.: Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run. Phys. Rev. D 111(6), 062002 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.062002 arXiv:2411.14607 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.062002 2025

  61. [64]

    and others

    Soni, S., Berger, B.K., Davis, D., Di Renzo, F., Effler, A., et al. : LIGO Detector Characterization in the first half of the fourth Observing run. Classical and Quan- tum Gravity 42(8), 085016 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/adc4b6 arXiv:2409.02831 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adc4b6 2025

  62. [65]

    Nature 643(8073), 955–960 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-09224-3 arXiv:2412.11824 [quant-ph]

    Novikov, V., Jia, J., Brasil, T.B., Grimaldi, A., Bocoum, M., Balabas, M., M¨ uller, J.H., Zeuthen, E., Polzik, E.S.: Hybrid quantum network for sensing in the acous- tic frequency range. Nature 643(8073), 955–960 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-09224-3 arXiv:2412.11824 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [66]

    Kuwahara and K

    Ganapathy, D., Jia, W., Nakano, M., Xu, V., Aritomi, N., Cullen, T., et al. : Broadband quantum enhancement of the ligo detectors with frequency-dependent 20 squeezing. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041021 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX. 13.041021

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx 2023

  64. [67]

    Squeezing the quantum noise of a gravitational-wave detector below the standard quantum limit

    Jia, W., Xu, V., Kuns, K., Nakano, M., Barsotti, L., et al. : Squeezing the quan- tum noise of a gravitational-wave detector below the standard quantum limit. Science 385(6715), 1318–1321 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado8069 arXiv:2404.14569 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1126/science.ado8069 2024

  65. [68]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636816

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collabo- ration: GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run — O1+O2+O3 Search Sen- sitivity Estimates. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636816 . https://doi.org/10. 5281/zenodo.5636816

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.5636816

  66. [69]

    A., Miller, S

    Callister, T.A., Miller, S.J., Chatziioannou, K., Farr, W.M.: No Evidence that the Majority of Black Holes in Binaries Have Zero Spin. Astrophys. J. Lett. 937(1), 13 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac847e arXiv:2205.08574 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac847e 2022

  67. [70]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =

    Fishbach, M., Holz, D.E., Farr, W.M.: Does the black hole merger rate evolve with redshift? The Astrophysical Journal Letters 863(2), 41 (2018) https://doi. org/10.3847/2041-8213/aad800

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad800 2018

  68. [71]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =

    Callister, T., Fishbach, M., Holz, D.E., Farr, W.M.: Shouts and murmurs: Com- bining individual gravitational-wave sources with the stochastic background to measure the history of binary black hole mergers. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 896(2), 32 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab9743

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab9743 2020

  69. [72]

    K., Garcia Lambas, D., Ruiz, A

    Antonini, F., Callister, T., Dosopoulou, F., Romero-Shaw, I., Chattopadhyay, D.: Inferring the pair-instability mass gap from gravitational wave data using flexible models. arXiv e-prints, 2506–09154 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506. 09154 arXiv:2506.09154 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506 2025

  70. [73]

    Massive runaways and walkaway stars

    Renzo, M., Zapartas, E., de Mink, S.E., G¨ otberg, Y., Justham, S., Farmer, R.J., Izzard, R.G., Toonen, S., Sana, H.: Massive runaway and walkaway stars. A study of the kinematical imprints of the physical processes governing the evolution and explosion of their binary progenitors. A&A 624, 66 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1051/0004-6361/201833297 arXiv:1804...

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  71. [74]

    2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab584d , 888, 76 , arXiv: 1909.01371

    Mapelli, M., Spera, M., Montanari, E., Limongi, M., Chieffi, A., Giacobbo, N., Bressan, A., Bouffanais, Y.: Impact of the Rotation and Compactness of Pro- genitors on the Mass of Black Holes. Astrophys. J. 888(2), 76 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab584d arXiv:1909.01371 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab584d 2020

  72. [75]

    Astrophys

    Woosley, S.E.: The Evolution of Massive Helium Stars, Including Mass Loss. Astrophys. J. 878(1), 49 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b41 arXiv:1901.00215 [astro-ph.SR] 21

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b41 2019

  73. [76]

    Fern´ andez, R., Quataert, E., Kashiyama, K., Coughlin, E.R.: Mass ejec- tion in failed supernovae: variation with stellar progenitor. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 476(2), 2366–2383 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty306 arXiv:1710.01735 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty306 2018

  74. [77]

    Iorio, G., Mapelli, M., Costa, G., Spera, M., Escobar, G.J., Sgalletta, C., Trani, A.A., Korb, E., Santoliquido, F., Dall’Amico, M., Gaspari, N., Bressan, A.: Compact object mergers: exploring uncertainties from stellar and binary evolu- tion with SEVN. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 524(1), 426–470 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1630 arXiv:2211.1...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1630 2023

  75. [78]

    Formation mechanisms, mass, and spin of intermediate-mass black holes in star clusters with up to 1 million stars

    Arca Sedda, M., Kamlah, A.W.H., Spurzem, R., Rizzuto, F.P., Naab, T., Giersz, M., Berczik, P.: The DRAGON-II simulations - II. Formation mechanisms, mass, and spin of intermediate-mass black holes in star clusters with up to 1 million stars. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 526(1), 429–442 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1093/mnras/stad2292 arXiv:2307.04806 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [79]

    Costa, G., Mapelli, M., Iorio, G., Santoliquido, F., Escobar, G.J., Klessen, R.S., Bressan, A.: Massive binary black holes from Population II and III stars. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.525(2), 2891–2906 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stad2443 arXiv:2303.15511 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/ 2023

  77. [80]

    The Astrophysical Journal879(2), 82 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ab22b8

    Santoliquido, F., Mapelli, M., Bouffanais, Y., Giacobbo, N., Di Carlo, U.N., Rastello, S., Artale, M.C., Ballone, A.: The Cosmic Merger Rate Density Evo- lution of Compact Binaries Formed in Young Star Clusters and in Isolated Binaries. Astrophys. J. 898(2), 152 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ab9b78 arXiv:2004.09533 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ 2020

  78. [81]

    Dickerson

    De Luca, V., Franciolini, G., Riotto, A.: GW231123: a Possible Primordial Black Hole Origin. arXiv e-prints, 2508–09965 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2508.09965 arXiv:2508.09965 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 2025

  79. [82]

    Mandel, I., Farr, W.M., Gair, J.R.: Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 486(1), 1086–1093 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz896 arXiv:1809.02063 [physics.data-an]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz896 2019

  80. [83]

    Abbott et al.: GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run. Phys. Rev. D 109(2), 022001 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022001 arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.022001 2024

Showing first 80 references.