pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (57%).

59 Pith papers citing it
Background 57% of classified citations
abstract

The quality of texts generated by natural language generation (NLG) systems is hard to measure automatically. Conventional reference-based metrics, such as BLEU and ROUGE, have been shown to have relatively low correlation with human judgments, especially for tasks that require creativity and diversity. Recent studies suggest using large language models (LLMs) as reference-free metrics for NLG evaluation, which have the benefit of being applicable to new tasks that lack human references. However, these LLM-based evaluators still have lower human correspondence than medium-size neural evaluators. In this work, we present G-Eval, a framework of using large language models with chain-of-thoughts (CoT) and a form-filling paradigm, to assess the quality of NLG outputs. We experiment with two generation tasks, text summarization and dialogue generation. We show that G-Eval with GPT-4 as the backbone model achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.514 with human on summarization task, outperforming all previous methods by a large margin. We also propose preliminary analysis on the behavior of LLM-based evaluators, and highlight the potential issue of LLM-based evaluators having a bias towards the LLM-generated texts. The code is at https://github.com/nlpyang/geval

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 8 method 5 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

RWGBench: Evaluating Scholarly Positioning in Related Work Generation

cs.DL · 2026-05-30 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

RWGBench is a citation-centric benchmark for related work generation built from 40k CS papers and a 100-paper test set, with multi-dimensional metrics that better match human expert judgment than standard similarity scores.

Green Shielding: A User-Centric Approach Towards Trustworthy AI

cs.CL · 2026-04-27 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Green Shielding introduces CUE criteria and the HCM-Dx benchmark to demonstrate that routine prompt variations systematically alter LLM diagnostic behavior along clinically relevant dimensions, producing Pareto-like tradeoffs in plausibility versus coverage.

Four-Axis Decision Alignment for Long-Horizon Enterprise AI Agents

cs.AI · 2026-04-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Long-horizon enterprise AI agents' decisions decompose into four measurable axes, with benchmark experiments on six memory architectures revealing distinct weaknesses and reversing a pre-registered prediction on summarization.

EmbGen: Teaching with Reassembled Corpora

cs.CL · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

EmbGen creates synthetic QA data by entity decomposition, embedding-based reassembly into clusters, and multi-level sampling with cluster-specific prompts, yielding up to 88.9% higher Binary Accuracy than baselines on heterogeneous datasets under fixed token budgets.

DWTSumm: Discrete Wavelet Transform for Document Summarization

cs.CL · 2026-04-22 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

DWT decomposes sentence- or word-level embeddings into multi-resolution components that preserve semantics for direct or LLM-guided summarization, yielding up to 97% fidelity and gains in BERTScore and semantic metrics over GPT-4o baselines on clinical and legal benchmarks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 59 citing papers.