pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization

Canonical reference. 100% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

46 Pith papers citing it
Background 100% of classified citations
abstract

Despite their massive size, successful deep artificial neural networks can exhibit a remarkably small difference between training and test performance. Conventional wisdom attributes small generalization error either to properties of the model family, or to the regularization techniques used during training. Through extensive systematic experiments, we show how these traditional approaches fail to explain why large neural networks generalize well in practice. Specifically, our experiments establish that state-of-the-art convolutional networks for image classification trained with stochastic gradient methods easily fit a random labeling of the training data. This phenomenon is qualitatively unaffected by explicit regularization, and occurs even if we replace the true images by completely unstructured random noise. We corroborate these experimental findings with a theoretical construction showing that simple depth two neural networks already have perfect finite sample expressivity as soon as the number of parameters exceeds the number of data points as it usually does in practice. We interpret our experimental findings by comparison with traditional models.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 6

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 6

polarities

background 6

representative citing papers

Stochastic Trust-Region Methods for Over-parameterized Models

math.OC · 2026-04-15 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Stochastic trust-region methods achieve O(ε^{-2} log(1/ε)) complexity for unconstrained problems and O(ε^{-4} log(1/ε)) for equality-constrained problems under the strong growth condition, with experiments showing stable performance comparable to tuned baselines without learning-rate scheduling.

Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empirically

cs.LG · 2017-12-01 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Deep learning generalization error follows power-law scaling with training set size across multiple domains, with model size scaling sublinearly with data size.

The Propagation Field: A Geometric Substrate Theory of Deep Learning

cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Neural networks possess a propagation field of trajectories and Jacobians whose quality can be measured and optimized independently of endpoint loss, yielding better unseen-path generalization and reduced forgetting in continual learning.

Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regression

stat.ML · 2024-05-01 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Ridge regression in high dimensions exhibits power-law scalings because covariance fluctuations renormalize the ridge parameter, allowing closed-form error expressions and bias-variance decompositions for random feature models via free probability.

Bayesian Inference with Shaped Deep Non-linear MLPs

math.ST · 2026-05-29 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

In the LP/N = Θ(1) regime, Bayesian predictive posteriors for deep MLPs equal those of data-dependent kernels to first order, with a criterion identifying data processes that benefit from larger effective depth.

A Rigorous, Tractable Measure of Model Complexity

stat.ML · 2026-05-20 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

A gradient-similarity complexity measure that generalizes polynomial degree, kernel length scale, neighbor count, tree splits, and forest size while offering insights into double descent.

citing papers explorer

Showing 46 of 46 citing papers.