AutoTTS discovers width-depth test-time scaling controllers through agentic search in a pre-collected trajectory environment, yielding better accuracy-cost tradeoffs than hand-designed baselines on math reasoning tasks at low cost.
hub Canonical reference
Learning to Discover at Test Time
Canonical reference. 100% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
33
Pith papers citing it
Background
100% of classified citations
abstract
How can we use AI to discover a new state of the art for a scientific problem? Prior work in test-time scaling, such as AlphaEvolve, performs search by prompting a frozen LLM. We perform reinforcement learning at test time, so the LLM can continue to train, but now with experience specific to the test problem. This form of continual learning is quite special, because its goal is to produce one great solution rather than many good ones on average, and to solve this very problem rather than generalize to other problems. Therefore, our learning objective and search subroutine are designed to prioritize the most promising solutions. We call this method Test-Time Training to Discover (TTT-Discover). Following prior work, we focus on problems with continuous rewards. We report results for every problem we attempted, across mathematics, GPU kernel engineering, algorithm design, and biology. TTT-Discover sets the new state of the art in almost all of them: (i) Erd\H{o}s' minimum overlap problem and an autocorrelation inequality; (ii) a GPUMode kernel competition (up to $2\times$ faster than prior art); (iii) past AtCoder algorithm competitions; and (iv) denoising problem in single-cell analysis. Our solutions are reviewed by experts or the organizers. All our results are achieved with an open model, OpenAI gpt-oss-120b, and can be reproduced with our publicly available code, in contrast to previous best results that required closed frontier models. Our test-time training runs are performed using Tinker, an API by Thinking Machines, with a cost of only a few hundred dollars per problem.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 10
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 33roles
background 10polarities
background 10representative citing papers
StarOR couples MCTS with GRPO-based test-time RL and unsupervised rewards to adapt optimization modeling policies instance-specifically, reporting SOTA results on five benchmarks with a 4B model.
Establishes a quadratic lower bound on query complexity for sampling from large classes of distributions given approximate density oracles, answers an open question on optimality of random walks, and shows circumvention for bounded classes as an abstraction of TTT.
TTT-RTL performs per-design test-time RL on an LLM policy with EDA-derived PPA rewards and an adaptive KL controller, reducing geometric-mean PPA product by 65.1% on RTLLM v2.0 and ADP by 59.4% on an industrial FPU unit.
Evolutionary coding agents achieve most benchmark gains through a small subset of edit types and by cycling previously deleted code lines rather than developing new algorithmic structures.
CODA re-expresses most non-attention Transformer computations as GEMM-plus-epilogue programs using a constrained set of composable primitives to keep intermediate results on-chip and cut global memory traffic.
EvoLib enables LLMs to accumulate, reuse, and evolve knowledge abstractions from inference trajectories at test time, yielding substantial gains on math reasoning, code generation, and agentic benchmarks without parameter updates or supervision.
AEvo introduces a meta-agent that edits the evolution procedure or agent context based on accumulated state, outperforming baselines by 26% relative improvement on agentic benchmarks and achieving SOTA on open-ended tasks.
MLS-Bench is a benchmark with 140 tasks that evaluates AI agents on inventing generalizable and scalable ML methods, finding they lag human performance especially in insight-driven invention rather than tuning.
Agentic-imodels evolves scikit-learn regressors via an autoresearch loop to jointly boost predictive performance and LLM-simulatability, improving downstream agentic data science tasks by up to 73% on the BLADE benchmark.
LLM-reinforced evolutionary search produces exact values Z(11,21,3,3)=116, Z(11,22,3,3)=121, Z(12,22,3,3)=132 and lower bounds for 41 additional Zarankiewicz numbers.
Meta-Harness discovers improved harness code for LLMs via agentic search over prior execution traces, yielding 7.7-point gains on text classification with 4x fewer tokens and 4.7-point gains on math reasoning across held-out models.
Evolution Fine-Tuning trains LLMs on 156K trajectories spanning 371 tasks to achieve 10.22% average improvement on 22 held-out optimization tasks and match SOTA on select circle-packing problems when combined with test-time RL.
REVES augments LLM post-training by decoupling revision and verification signals from successful multi-step trajectories, reporting +6.5 point gains on LiveCodeBench over RL baselines.
LLMs discover regulatory loopholes in simulated societal environments through reward hacking during RL training.
SAGE compares social co-evolution against matched self-evolution across three arenas and finds peer history enables breakthroughs only for agents that plateau under self-improvement, with abstraction of traces mattering more than raw volume.
TTT-SCL dynamically generates test-aligned training sets for supervised causal learning using score-based functions and outperforms prior SCL and traditional causal discovery methods on benchmarks and real data.
Bidirectional Evolutionary Search augments autoregressive expansion with evolutionary recombination operators and dense backward subgoal feedback to produce better candidates than standard best-of-N or tree search for language model self-improvement.
MAP improves LLM agent reasoning by constructing a structured cognitive map of the environment before task execution, yielding performance gains on benchmarks like ARC-AGI-3 and superior training data via the new MAP-2K dataset.
UG-TTT adds epistemic uncertainty measured by adapter disagreement as an exploration bonus in RL for LLMs, raising maximum reward and diversity on scientific discovery benchmarks.
Tail-extrapolated estimators approximate best-of-N policy gradients from limited training rollouts by leveraging upper-tail reward statistics under structural assumptions.
SimpleTES scales test-time evaluation in LLMs to discover state-of-the-art solutions on 21 scientific problems across six domains, outperforming frontier models and optimization pipelines with examples like 2x faster LASSO and new Erdos constructions.
A jointly learned hierarchical index with cross-attention and residual quantization scales exact retrieval in foundational recommendation models, deployed at Meta with additional performance from test-time training on index nodes.
Frontier-Eng is a new benchmark for generative optimization in engineering where agents iteratively improve designs under fixed interaction budgets using executable verifiers, with top models like GPT 5.4 showing limited success.
citing papers explorer
No citing papers match the current filters.