pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1905.02734 · v1 · submitted 2019-05-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A 3D Dust Map Based on Gaia, Pan-STARRS 1 and 2MASS

Gregory M. Green , Edward F. Schlafly , Catherine Zucker , Joshua S. Speagle , Douglas P. Finkbeiner
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 20:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords 3D dust mapGaia parallaxesinterstellar reddeningPan-STARRS2MASSstellar photometrydust densitydistance resolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

New 3D dust map uses Gaia parallaxes and a spatial prior for smoother clouds with smaller uncertainties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a new three-dimensional map of dust reddening covering the sky north of declination -30 degrees and extending out to several kiloparsecs. It builds on prior maps by adding Gaia parallaxes for more accurate stellar distances, a spatial prior that correlates dust density between nearby sightlines, and four times finer distance resolution. These changes produce smoother maps featuring more isotropic clouds and reduced distance uncertainties, especially within the nearest kiloparsec. The work also derives distances, reddenings and types for 799 million stars, delivering reddening uncertainties roughly 30 percent smaller than those in the Gaia DR2 catalog.

Core claim

Incorporating Gaia parallaxes, a spatial prior on dust density, and finer distance bins yields a 3D reddening map with improved distance accuracy, smoother structure, and smaller uncertainties, all derived from photometry and parallaxes of 799 million stars.

What carries the argument

The spatial prior correlating dust density across nearby sightlines, which smooths the map and reduces distance uncertainties while enabling finer resolution.

If this is right

  • Smoother dust maps with more isotropic clouds and smaller uncertainties within the nearest kiloparsec.
  • Reddening uncertainties reduced by about 30 percent relative to the Gaia DR2 catalog.
  • Four times finer distance resolution when inferring dust density.
  • Catalog of distances, reddenings and stellar types for 799 million stars.
  • Public availability of the map for interactive queries and downloads.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be extended with southern-sky photometry to construct a full all-sky 3D dust map.
  • The improved stellar parameters may support refined models of local galactic dynamics and star formation.
  • Finer resolution could help identify small-scale dust structures that affect precise photometry of nearby stars.
  • Better extinction corrections from this map would benefit studies of distant galaxies and transients.

Load-bearing premise

The spatial prior that correlates dust density across nearby sightlines will produce a smoother map without over-smoothing real features or introducing systematic biases.

What would settle it

Independent spectroscopic reddening measurements to stars or clouds within one kiloparsec that exceed the map's stated uncertainties by a large margin would show the claimed improvements are not achieved.

read the original abstract

We present a new three-dimensional map of dust reddening, based on Gaia parallaxes and stellar photometry from Pan-STARRS 1 and 2MASS. This map covers the sky north of a declination of -30 degrees, out to a distance of several kiloparsecs. This new map contains three major improvements over our previous work. First, the inclusion of Gaia parallaxes dramatically improves distance estimates to nearby stars. Second, we incorporate a spatial prior that correlates the dust density across nearby sightlines. This produces a smoother map, with more isotropic clouds and smaller distance uncertainties, particularly to clouds within the nearest kiloparsec. Third, we infer the dust density with a distance resolution that is four times finer than in our previous work, to accommodate the improvements in signal-to-noise enabled by the other improvements. As part of this work, we infer the distances, reddenings and types of 799 million stars. We obtain typical reddening uncertainties that are ~30% smaller than those reported in the Gaia DR2 catalog, reflecting the greater number of photometric passbands that enter into our analysis. Our 3D dust map can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/2EJ9TX or through the Python package "dustmaps," and can be queried interactively at http://argonaut.skymaps.info. Our catalog of stellar parameters can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AV9GXO.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a new 3D dust reddening map covering the sky north of declination -30° out to several kpc, constructed from Gaia parallaxes combined with Pan-STARRS 1 and 2MASS photometry. It claims three improvements over prior work: (1) Gaia parallaxes for improved stellar distances, (2) a spatial prior correlating dust density across nearby sightlines to yield smoother, more isotropic clouds and reduced distance uncertainties (especially within 1 kpc), and (3) four-times finer distance resolution. The authors also release stellar parameters (distances, reddenings, types) for 799 million stars, reporting typical reddening uncertainties ~30% smaller than Gaia DR2, with public access via DOI and the dustmaps package.

Significance. If the quantitative improvements hold, this map would be a valuable community resource for ISM studies, stellar population work, and Galactic structure analyses, building directly on the authors' earlier maps with higher resolution and better distance constraints enabled by Gaia. The public data release and interactive query tool add practical utility; the spatial prior approach, if validated, represents a methodological step forward in handling correlated dust structures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Methods (spatial prior description)] The central claim that the spatial prior yields 'smaller distance uncertainties, particularly to clouds within the nearest kiloparsec' and 'more isotropic clouds' (Abstract) rests on the assumption that the correlation kernel accurately captures true dust covariances. No quantitative validation against independent tracers (e.g., HI, Planck, or CO maps) is described to demonstrate that the prior reduces bias rather than trading it for lower variance via over-smoothing of filamentary structures.
  2. [Abstract / Results] The reported ~30% reduction in reddening uncertainties relative to Gaia DR2 (Abstract) is a key quantitative claim but lacks an explicit comparison metric, error budget breakdown, or cross-validation test (e.g., against spectroscopic reddenings or hold-out photometry) in the results to confirm it arises from the added passbands and prior rather than from the model assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The distance resolution improvement (four times finer) is stated without specifying the new binning scheme or how it interacts with the prior's length scale; a brief equation or table clarifying the resolution grid would aid reproducibility.
  2. [Data availability] The catalog DOIs and access links are provided, but the manuscript should include a short table summarizing the released data products (e.g., number of stars, columns, formats) for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Methods (spatial prior description)] The central claim that the spatial prior yields 'smaller distance uncertainties, particularly to clouds within the nearest kiloparsec' and 'more isotropic clouds' (Abstract) rests on the assumption that the correlation kernel accurately captures true dust covariances. No quantitative validation against independent tracers (e.g., HI, Planck, or CO maps) is described to demonstrate that the prior reduces bias rather than trading it for lower variance via over-smoothing of filamentary structures.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative validation against independent tracers would strengthen the presentation of the spatial prior. The prior is motivated by the physical correlation lengths of dust structures reported in the ISM literature, but we acknowledge the need for explicit tests. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection comparing the new map to HI, Planck, and CO data to demonstrate that the prior reduces distance uncertainties without introducing measurable bias or excessive smoothing of filaments. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract / Results] The reported ~30% reduction in reddening uncertainties relative to Gaia DR2 (Abstract) is a key quantitative claim but lacks an explicit comparison metric, error budget breakdown, or cross-validation test (e.g., against spectroscopic reddenings or hold-out photometry) in the results to confirm it arises from the added passbands and prior rather than from the model assumptions.

    Authors: The ~30% reduction is obtained by comparing the posterior reddening uncertainties from our full model (Gaia + PS1 + 2MASS + prior) against the Gaia DR2 values for the same stars. To make this transparent we will add an explicit error-budget subsection in the results, including a cross-validation test against spectroscopic reddenings on a hold-out sample and a breakdown of the contribution from each photometric band and the spatial prior. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to prior work; central map derivation remains independent of fitted outputs

full rationale

The paper derives the 3D dust map directly from Gaia parallaxes plus Pan-STARRS 1 and 2MASS photometry, with the spatial prior introduced as an explicit modeling choice rather than a quantity fitted from the same data in a closed loop. No equation or result is shown to reduce by construction to its own inputs (e.g., no 'prediction' that is statistically forced by a parameter fit to the target map). The reference to 'our previous work' is a minor self-citation that does not bear the load of the central claims, which rest on external catalogs. This yields a low circularity score consistent with normal scientific reuse of prior methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit list of free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the spatial prior is described at a high level but its functional form and hyperparameters are not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5595 in / 1068 out tokens · 23875 ms · 2026-05-15T20:10:07.407072+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • Foundation.DimensionForcing alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    we incorporate a spatial prior that correlates the dust density across nearby sightlines. This produces a smoother map, with more isotropic clouds and smaller distance uncertainties, particularly to clouds within the nearest kiloparsec.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Photometric metallicity of Galactic RR Lyrae stars in the Gaia DR3 era

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New G-band relation [Fe/H] = -6.93 - 6.04P + 1.65 φ31 calibrated on 72 RR Lyrae stars with spectroscopic anchors, yielding 0.00 dex bias and 0.26 dex RMS scatter.

  2. Photometric metallicity of Galactic RR Lyrae stars in the Gaia DR3 era

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new G-band relation [Fe/H] = -6.93 - 6.04P + 1.65 φ31 calibrated on 72 RR Lyrae stars yields 0.26 dex RMS scatter against spectroscopy.

  3. Tracing the kinematic perturbations of the Milky Way spiral arms with APOGEE DR17 and Gaia DR3

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A revised steady-state radial-velocity response model with both V_R,sin and V_R,cos terms constrains the Milky Way's two-armed spiral to a pitch angle of ~10° and local density contrast of 5-18% at the solar radius.

  4. Mapping the Milky Way with Gaia Bp/Rp spectra-IV: the broken and asymmetric density profile of the stellar disk traced by a large sample of red clumps

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The Milky Way stellar disk shows a broken radial density profile with four components, azimuthal dependence, inner and outer flaring, and a density-metallicity bump possibly from radial migration.

  5. Neural Simulation-based Inference with Hierarchical Priors for Detached Eclipsing Binaries

    astro-ph.SR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A multimodal amortized neural posterior estimator trained on realistic simulations recovers DEB parameters accurately with calibrated uncertainties on held-out tests.

  6. GSC 08227-00723: An Unusually Large PSH Excess AH Pic Candidate

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GSC 08227-00723 is classified as a new AH Pic-type nova-like variable with recurrent stunted outbursts and an exceptionally large positive superhump excess of approximately 0.19.

  7. Asteroseismic analysis of RY Leporis: the post-main sequence HADS in a binary system

    astro-ph.SR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Asteroseismic modeling of RY Leporis gives a mass of ~2 solar masses and age of ~730 Myr, locating it in the post-main-sequence hydrogen shell-burning stage with consistent metallicity.

  8. A tidally detached super Neptune on a strongly misaligned retrograde orbit

    astro-ph.EP 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TOI-1710 b has a true obliquity of 149 degrees indicating retrograde motion, favoring high-eccentricity migration via planet-planet scattering and Kozai-Lidov cycles for this tidally detached super-Neptune.

  9. Structure and Large-Scale Kinematics of Young Stellar Populations in the NGC 6357 and NGC 6334 Giant Molecular Cloud Complex

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    G352 is an unbound proto-OB association of young stars along a 150-pc filament at 1670 pc whose kinematics and steep pitch angle are inconsistent with galactic spiral structure.

  10. A sample of short-lived Galactic radio transients from ASKAP VAST

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Six new Galactic radio transients found and classified into two types, proposed to originate from wide-orbit white dwarf binaries.

  11. Dust Absorption towards Supernova Remnant W44

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New infrared spectra show reduced water ice and unusually strong aliphatic hydrocarbon absorption towards W44, attributed to shock and cosmic-ray processing in the associated molecular cloud.

  12. Deep Adaptive Optics Imaging Rules Out a Helium Star Companion to PSR J1928+1815

    astro-ph.SR 2026-04 accept novelty 5.0

    Deep Keck/NIRC2 adaptive optics imaging rules out a helium star companion to PSR J1928+1815, supporting a massive white dwarf with possible wind-driven eclipses.

  13. A New WZ Sagittae-type Dwarf Nova KSP-OT-202104a Near the Period Minimum from the KMTNet Supernova Program

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Discovery of KSP-OT-202104a, a new WZ Sge-type dwarf nova with P_sh ≈ 71.7 min likely below the period minimum and evolving toward AM CVn.

  14. Spectroscopic Bolometric Corrections and Empirical Zero-point Constants of \textit{Gaia} Magnitudes, $G$, $G_{\rm BP}$, and $G_{\rm RP}$, from \textit{Gaia} XP Spectra

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Empirical zero-point constants for Gaia bolometric corrections are derived as weighted averages 0.8677, 1.0449, and 2.0510 mag for G, GBP, and GRP from 88 stars, yielding corresponding magnitude zero-points via IAU de...

  15. Contribution of interstellar objects to local dark matter density

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Interstellar objects may contribute enough baryonic mass to reduce the local dark matter halo density to 0.24 GeV/cm³.

  16. TOI-159 b: an eccentric hot-Jupiter planet around a young, pulsating $\gamma$ Doradus star

    astro-ph.EP 2026-05 accept novelty 4.0

    TOI-159 b is confirmed as the hottest known eccentric hot Jupiter (e = 0.24) with a 13-sigma Keplerian detection around a young gamma Doradus star, including a preliminary low-resolution transmission spectrum.

  17. Ellipsoidal modulation and multi-wavelength activity in the pre-cataclysmic binary RX J1553.0+4457

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Multi-wavelength data indicate RX J1553.0+4457 is a detached post-common-envelope binary with optical variability dominated by magnetic activity on the M-dwarf companion and no luminous accretion disk required.

  18. Testing models for fully and partially stripped low-mass stars with Gaia: Implications for hot subdwarfs, binary RR Lyrae, and black hole impostors

    astro-ph.SR 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0

    Simulations overpredict hot subdwarf and RR Lyrae binaries with Gaia astrometric solutions but match red clump stars with high mass functions as potential black hole impostors, implying fewer au-scale RR Lyrae binarie...

  19. Ellipsoidal modulation and multi-wavelength activity in the pre-cataclysmic binary RX J1553.0+4457

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    RX J1553.0+4457 is a detached post-common-envelope binary whose light curve shows ellipsoidal modulation from a tidally distorted M dwarf, with magnetic activity producing flares and declining X-ray emission, consiste...

  20. The Accretion Process on Protostars

    astro-ph.SR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper reviews techniques for measuring protostellar accretion, analyzes methodological differences and caveats in comparing observations with simulations, and outlines next steps for a fuller picture.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 18 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S., Aguilar , G., et al

    Abolfathi , B., Aguado , D. S., Aguilar , G., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 235, 42

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    2018, , 616, A8

    Andrae , R., Fouesneau , M., Creevey , O., et al. 2018, , 616, A8

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    2018, , 616, A17

    Arenou , F., Luri , X., Babusiaux , C., et al. 2018, , 616, A17

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    2012, , 757, 166

    Berry , M., Ivezi \'c , Z ., Sesar , B., et al. 2012, , 757, 166

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245

    work page 1989

  7. [7]

    The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys

    Chambers , K. C., Magnier , E. A., Metcalfe , N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Q., Huang , Y., Yuan , H

    Chen , B. Q., Huang , Y., Yuan , H. B., et al. 2019, , 483, 4277

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    2019, , 870, 120

    Chiang , Y.-K., & M \'e nard , B. 2019, , 870, 120

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    L., Meade , M

    Churchwell , E., Babler , B. L., Meade , M. R., et al. 2009, , 121, 213

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    S., & Thaddeus , P

    Cohen , R. S., & Thaddeus , P. 1977, , 217, L155

    work page 1977

  12. [12]

    M., Hartmann , D., & Thaddeus , P

    Dame , T. M., Hartmann , D., & Thaddeus , P. 2001, , 547, 792

    work page 2001

  13. [13]

    L., & Burkert , A

    Dobbs , C. L., & Burkert , A. 2012, , 421, 2940

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    E., Greimel , R., Irwin , M

    Drew , J. E., Greimel , R., Irwin , M. J., et al. 2005, , 362, 753

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    2000, , 358, L13

    Drimmel , R. 2000, , 358, L13

    work page 2000

  16. [16]

    Drimmel , R., & Spergel , D. N. 2001, , 556, 181

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    L., & Massa , D

    Fitzpatrick , E. L., & Massa , D. 1986, , 307, 286

    work page 1986

  18. [18]

    1988, , 328, 734

    ---. 1988, , 328, 734

    work page 1988

  19. [19]

    1990, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 72, 163

    ---. 1990, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 72, 163

    work page 1990

  20. [20]

    2005, , 130, 1127

    ---. 2005, , 130, 1127

    work page 2005

  21. [21]

    2007, , 663, 320

    ---. 2007, , 663, 320

    work page 2007

  22. [22]

    2009, , 699, 1209

    ---. 2009, , 699, 1209

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    A., Magnier , E

    Flewelling , H. A., Magnier , E. A., Chambers , K. C., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05243

    work page arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 306

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, , 595, A1

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A1

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    M., & Georgelin , Y

    Georgelin , Y. M., & Georgelin , Y. P. 1976, , 49, 57

    work page 1976

  28. [28]

    M., Hivon, E., Banday, A

    Gorski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 622, 759. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/622/i=2/a=759

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    Green, G. M. 2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    M., Schlafly , E

    Green , G. M., Schlafly , E. F., Finkbeiner , D. P., et al. 2014, , 783, 114

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    2015, , 810, 25

    ---. 2015, , 810, 25

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    M., Schlafly , E

    Green, G. M., Schlafly , E. F., Finkbeiner , D., et al. 2018, , 478, 651

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    2014, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 43, 518

    Henden , A., & Munari , U. 2014, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 43, 518

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data

    Hogg , D. W., Bovy , J., & Lang , D. 2010, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1008.4686

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  35. [35]

    G., & Han , J

    Hou , L. G., & Han , J. L. 2014, , 569, A125

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    E., & Fang , W

    Huterer , D., Cunha , C. E., & Fang , W. 2013, , 432, 2945

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    S., Babler , B

    Indebetouw , R., Mathis , J. S., Babler , B. L., et al. 2005, , 619, 931

    work page 2005

  39. [39]

    2001--, SciPy : Open source scientific tools for Python , , , [Online; accessed 4 April 2019]

    Jones, E., Oliphant, T., Peterson, P., et al. 2001--, SciPy : Open source scientific tools for Python , , , [Online; accessed 4 April 2019]. http://www.scipy.org/

    work page 2001

  40. [40]

    2012, LSD: Large Survey Database framework , Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1209.003

    Juric , M. 2012, LSD: Large Survey Database framework , Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1209.003

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    2004, , 354, 1223

    Katz , D., Munari , U., Cropper , M., et al. 2004, , 354, 1223

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    Gaia-2MASS 3D maps of Galactic interstellar dust within 3 kpc

    Lallement , R., Babusiaux , C., Vergely , J. L., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.04116

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    L., Valette , B., et al

    Lallement , R., Vergely , J. L., Valette , B., et al. 2014, , 561, A91

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    H., & En lin , T

    Leike , R. H., & En lin , T. A. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1901.05971

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    2018, , 616, A2

    Lindegren , L., Hern \'a ndez , J., Bombrun , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A2

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Liu , C., Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Sordo , R., et al. 2012, , 426, 2463

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    W., Hoare , M

    Lucas , P. W., Hoare , M. G., Longmore , A., et al. 2008, , 391, 136

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    A., Chambers , K

    Magnier , E. A., Chambers , K. C., Flewelling , H. A., et al. 2016 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05240

    work page arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    A., Sweeney , W

    Magnier , E. A., Sweeney , W. E., Chambers , K. C., et al. 2016 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05244

    work page arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    A., Schlafly , E

    Magnier , E. A., Schlafly , E. F., Finkbeiner , D. P., et al. 2016 c , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05242

    work page arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    J., Robin , A

    Marshall , D. J., Robin , A. C., Reyl \'e , C., Schultheis , M., & Picaud , S. 2006, , 453, 635

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    W., Emerson , J

    Minniti , D., Lucas , P. W., Emerson , J. P., et al. 2010, , 15, 433

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    M., Gonzalez , O

    Nataf , D. M., Gonzalez , O. A., Casagrande , L., et al. 2016, , 456, 2692

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    2006--, NumPy : A guide to NumPy , USA: Trelgol Publishing, [Online; accessed 4 April 2019]

    Oliphant, T. 2006--, NumPy : A guide to NumPy , USA: Trelgol Publishing, [Online; accessed 4 April 2019]. https://www.numpy.org/

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    L., Isani, S., et al

    Onaka, P., Tonry, J. L., Isani, S., et al. 2008, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, 70140D, Vol. 7014 (Marseille, France: SPIE Proceedings), 1--12

    work page 2008

  56. [56]

    Planck 2013 results. XI. All-sky model of thermal dust emission

    Planck Collaboration . 2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 571, A11. http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.1300

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., G \"u nther , H. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Queiroz , A. B. A., Anders , F., Santiago , B. X., et al. 2018, , 476, 2556

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    J., Menten , K

    Reid , M. J., Menten , K. M., Zheng , X. W., et al. 2009, , 700, 137

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    , S., Bailer-Jones , C

    Rezaei Kh. , S., Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Hanson , R. J., & Fouesneau , M. 2017, , 598, A125

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    , S., Bailer-Jones , C

    Rezaei Kh. , S., Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Hogg , D. W., & Schultheis , M. 2018, , 618, A168

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    E., & Magorrian , J

    Sale , S. E., & Magorrian , J. 2014, , 445, 256

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    E., Drew , J

    Sale , S. E., Drew , J. E., Barentsen , G., et al. 2014, , 443, 2907

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 737, 103. http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/737/i=2/a=103?key=crossref.ac2fc76228f37d377c90dc70a3690b53

    work page 2011

  65. [65]

    F., Meisner , A

    Schlafly , E. F., Meisner , A. M., & Green , G. M. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 240, 30

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    F., Peek , J

    Schlafly , E. F., Peek , J. E. G., Finkbeiner , D. P., & Green , G. M. 2017, , 838, 36

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    F., Finkbeiner , D

    Schlafly , E. F., Finkbeiner , D. P., Juri \'c , M., et al. 2012, , 756, 158

    work page 2012

  68. [68]

    F., Meisner , A

    Schlafly , E. F., Meisner , A. M., Stutz , A. M., et al. 2016, , 821, 78

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    F., Green , G

    Schlafly , E. F., Green , G. M., Lang , D., et al. 2018, , 234, 39

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    J., Finkbeiner , D

    Schlegel , D. J., Finkbeiner , D. P., & Davis , M. 1998, , 500, 525

    work page 1998

  71. [71]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, The Astronomical Journal, 131, 1163. http://stacks.iop.org/1538-3881/131/i=2/a=1163

    work page 2006

  72. [72]

    W., Solomon , P

    Stecker , F. W., Solomon , P. M., Scoville , N. Z., & Ryter , C. E. 1975, , 201, 90

    work page 1975

  73. [73]

    W., Doherty , P., Cramer , C., et al

    Stubbs , C. W., Doherty , P., Cramer , C., et al. 2010, , 191, 376

    work page 2010

  74. [74]

    2006, in The Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, E47

    Tonry , J., Onaka , P., Luppino , G., & Isani , S. 2006, in The Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, E47

    work page 2006

  75. [75]

    Vall \'e e , J. P. 2008, , 135, 1301

    work page 2008

  76. [76]

    I., Vallenari , A., Turon , C., et al

    Wilkinson , M. I., Vallenari , A., Turon , C., et al. 2005, , 359, 1306

    work page 2005

  77. [77]

    2016, Science Advances, 2, http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/9/e1600878.full.pdf

    Xu, Y., Reid, M., Dame, T., et al. 2016, Science Advances, 2, http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/9/e1600878.full.pdf. http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/9/e1600878

    work page 2016

  78. [78]

    G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr

    York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr. , J. E., et al. 2000, The Astronomical Journal, 120, 1579. http://stacks.iop.org/1538-3881/120/i=3/a=1579

    work page 2000

  79. [79]

    A Large Catalog of Accurate Distances to Local Molecular Clouds: The Gaia DR2 Edition

    Zucker , C., Speagle , J. S., Schlafly , E. F., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.01425

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019