arxiv: 2510.21890 · v1 · pith:BF6N6YRRnew · submitted 2025-10-24 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.GR

The Principles of Diffusion Models

Chieh-Hsin Lai , Yang Song , Dongjun Kim , Yuki Mitsufuji , Stefano Ermon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 23:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AIcs.GR

keywords diffusion modelsgenerative modelingvariational inferencescore matchingnormalizing flowsvelocity fieldordinary differential equationssampling

0 comments

The pith

Diffusion models unify three perspectives through one time-dependent velocity field that moves noise to data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that diffusion models start with a forward process that adds noise to data until it matches a simple prior distribution. Learning then focuses on a reverse process that recovers the original data by undoing the noise step by step. Three standard formulations—variational, score-based, and flow-based—each describe this reversal differently yet rest on the identical underlying structure. A learned velocity field defines how probability mass flows continuously from the prior back to the data. Sampling therefore reduces to integrating an ordinary differential equation that follows this flow along a smooth trajectory.

Core claim

The variational view treats diffusion as successive noise removal steps inspired by variational autoencoders. The score-based view learns the gradient of the data density at each noise level to guide samples toward higher probability regions. The flow-based view directly parameterizes a velocity field that pushes samples along deterministic paths from noise to data. These three descriptions share the same time-dependent velocity field whose flow transports the prior distribution to the data distribution, so generation amounts to solving the ordinary differential equation that evolves samples along the resulting continuous trajectory.

What carries the argument

The time-dependent velocity field whose flow transports a simple prior to the data distribution.

If this is right

Sampling reduces to solving an ordinary differential equation that evolves noise into data along a continuous trajectory.
Guidance techniques can steer the velocity field to produce samples with desired properties.
Numerical solvers can be designed to integrate the velocity field more accurately and with fewer steps.
Flow-map models can be trained to predict direct mappings between any pair of times instead of using many small steps.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The shared velocity-field view could let practitioners import efficient ODE solvers developed in one formulation into models trained under another formulation.
Hybrid training objectives might be constructed by combining the variational lower bound, score-matching loss, and flow-matching loss on the same velocity field.
The continuous formulation makes it natural to ask whether similar velocity fields can unify other families of generative models beyond diffusion.

Load-bearing premise

The three views arise directly from the same mathematical structure without requiring extra unstated assumptions about the data distribution or the reverse process.

What would settle it

Deriving the reverse dynamics from the score-based perspective and finding that they differ from the flow-based dynamics by more than a simple reparameterization would show the claimed common backbone does not hold.

read the original abstract

This monograph presents the core principles that have guided the development of diffusion models, tracing their origins and showing how diverse formulations arise from shared mathematical ideas. Diffusion modeling starts by defining a forward process that gradually corrupts data into noise, linking the data distribution to a simple prior through a continuum of intermediate distributions. The goal is to learn a reverse process that transforms noise back into data while recovering the same intermediates. We describe three complementary views. The variational view, inspired by variational autoencoders, sees diffusion as learning to remove noise step by step. The score-based view, rooted in energy-based modeling, learns the gradient of the evolving data distribution, indicating how to nudge samples toward more likely regions. The flow-based view, related to normalizing flows, treats generation as following a smooth path that moves samples from noise to data under a learned velocity field. These perspectives share a common backbone: a time-dependent velocity field whose flow transports a simple prior to the data. Sampling then amounts to solving a differential equation that evolves noise into data along a continuous trajectory. On this foundation, the monograph discusses guidance for controllable generation, efficient numerical solvers, and diffusion-motivated flow-map models that learn direct mappings between arbitrary times. It provides a conceptual and mathematically grounded understanding of diffusion models for readers with basic deep-learning knowledge.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This monograph unifies variational, score, and flow views of diffusion models under one velocity-field ODE but introduces no new results or capabilities.

read the letter

This monograph unifies the variational, score-based, and flow-based perspectives on diffusion models by showing they share a single time-dependent velocity field whose flow turns noise into data. It traces how each view leads to the same differential equation for sampling and explains guidance and solvers on top of that foundation. Readers with basic deep-learning knowledge will find the explanations accessible and the connections between ideas useful for building intuition. The paper does well at laying out the common mathematical backbone without introducing new results or experiments. That kind of synthesis is genuinely helpful when teaching or when trying to combine ideas from different lines of work. The main limitation comes from its nature as a review. The claim that the three views arise directly from the same structure assumes the standard setup with variance-preserving Gaussians and exact matching; the text should verify that no hidden regularity conditions are needed for arbitrary data or schedules. Without seeing the derivations, it is hard to judge how tightly the discrete and continuous versions line up. This work is aimed at people who want a coherent map of diffusion modeling rather than a new method. It will help students and researchers who are already familiar with parts of the literature but need to see how the pieces fit together. It does not change the state of the art, but it organizes what is already known. I recommend putting it through peer review. A careful synthesis like this can serve as a reference and deserves formal feedback even though it is not a research advance.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. This monograph traces the origins of diffusion models from a forward corruption process linking data distributions to a simple prior via intermediate states. It presents three complementary perspectives: the variational view (step-by-step noise removal akin to VAEs), the score-based view (learning gradients of the evolving distribution), and the flow-based view (smooth trajectories under a learned velocity field). These share a common backbone in a time-dependent velocity field, with sampling formulated as solving a differential equation along a continuous trajectory from noise to data. The work further covers guidance mechanisms, efficient numerical solvers, and diffusion-inspired flow-map models for direct time mappings, aiming to provide a conceptually and mathematically grounded overview for readers with basic deep-learning knowledge.

Significance. If the unification holds as described, the manuscript provides a useful educational synthesis by identifying the shared velocity-field structure across variational, score-based, and flow-based formulations. This framing can clarify how sampling reduces to ODE integration and may inspire extensions in guidance and solvers. As a review-style monograph, it earns credit for organizing known ideas into a coherent narrative without introducing new fitted parameters or self-referential derivations.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract, paragraph on three complementary views: the assertion that the variational, score-based, and flow-based perspectives 'share a common backbone' and arise directly from the same structure would benefit from an explicit statement of the regularity conditions (e.g., variance-preserving Gaussian transitions and exact score matching) under which the discrete variational objective yields the identical continuous probability-flow ODE velocity field. Without this, the unification risks appearing to hold for arbitrary data distributions or schedules when the equivalence is known to require additional steps.

minor comments (2)

[Throughout] Ensure consistent notation for the velocity field across sections; define it explicitly the first time it appears rather than assuming familiarity from the abstract.
[Section on diffusion-motivated flow-map models] In the discussion of flow-map models, add a brief comparison table or equation contrasting direct time mappings with standard ODE solvers to clarify computational advantages.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comment on the abstract. We address the point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph on three complementary views: the assertion that the variational, score-based, and flow-based perspectives 'share a common backbone' and arise directly from the same structure would benefit from an explicit statement of the regularity conditions (e.g., variance-preserving Gaussian transitions and exact score matching) under which the discrete variational objective yields the identical continuous probability-flow ODE velocity field. Without this, the unification risks appearing to hold for arbitrary data distributions or schedules when the equivalence is known to require additional steps.

Authors: We agree that an explicit statement of the regularity conditions improves clarity. The manuscript develops the shared velocity-field backbone under the standard assumptions of variance-preserving Gaussian forward transitions and exact score matching in the continuous limit; these ensure equivalence between the discrete variational objective and the probability-flow ODE. To prevent any misinterpretation for arbitrary distributions or schedules, we will revise the abstract to include a concise statement of these conditions, with the main text retaining the detailed derivations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review monograph unifies diffusion views without circular derivations

full rationale

The paper is a review monograph that traces the origins of diffusion models and explains how the variational, score-based, and flow-based views arise from shared mathematical ideas centered on a time-dependent velocity field. The provided abstract and context present this as a conceptual unification of previously published ideas without introducing new derivations, fitted parameters, or equations that reduce to inputs by construction. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional steps, or predictions that are statistically forced are indicated. The central claims are explanatory and self-contained against external benchmarks from prior literature on diffusion models.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is an expository monograph reviewing established principles of diffusion models and introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond those already present in the standard literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5768 in / 1240 out tokens · 38077 ms · 2026-05-17T23:52:12.877951+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

JCostGeometry Jcost_exp_eq echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

These perspectives share a common backbone: a time-dependent velocity field whose flow transports a simple prior to the data. Sampling then amounts to solving a differential equation that evolves noise into data along a continuous trajectory.
DiscretenessForcing continuous_no_isolated_zero_defect contradicts

?

contradicts
CONTRADICTS: the theorem conflicts with this paper passage, or marks a claim that would need revision before publication.

The variational view... sees diffusion as learning to remove noise step by step.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 17 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Generative models on phase space
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

Generative diffusion and flow models are constructed to remain exactly on the Lorentz-invariant massless N-particle phase space manifold during sampling for particle physics applications.
Coordinated Diffusion: Generating Multi-Agent Behavior Without Multi-Agent Demonstrations
cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

CoDi decomposes the multi-agent diffusion score into pre-trained single-agent policies plus a gradient-free cost guidance term to generate coordinated behavior from single-agent data alone.
Stochastic Transition-Map Distillation for Fast Probabilistic Inference
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

STMD distills the full transition map of diffusion sampling SDEs into a conditional Mean Flow model to enable fast one- or few-step stochastic sampling without teacher models or bi-level optimization.
Improved techniques for fine-tuning flow models via adjoint matching: a deterministic control pipeline
cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A new adjoint matching framework formulates flow model alignment as optimal control, enabling direct regression training and terminal-trajectory truncation for efficiency gains on models like SiT-XL and FLUX.
Beyond Prompts: Unconditional 3D Inversion for Out-of-Distribution Shapes
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Text-to-3D models lose prompt sensitivity for out-of-distribution shapes due to sink traps but retain geometric diversity via unconditional priors, enabling a decoupled inversion method for robust editing.
Learning Sampled-data Control for Swarms via MeanFlow
cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Generalizes MeanFlow to learn finite-horizon minimum-energy control coefficients for linear swarm systems via a differential identity and stop-gradient regression objective.
Is Flow Matching Just Trajectory Replay for Sequential Data?
stat.ML 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Flow matching on time series targets a closed-form nonparametric velocity field that is a similarity-weighted mixture of observed transition velocities, making neural models approximations to an ideal memory-augmented...
On The Hidden Biases of Flow Matching Samplers
stat.ML 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Empirical flow matching introduces coupled biases from plug-in estimation, including altered statistical targets, non-gradient minimizers, and non-unique dynamics via flux-null fields, with base distribution controlli...
From Navigation to Refinement: Revealing the Two-Stage Nature of Flow-based Diffusion Models through Oracle Velocity
cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0

Flow matching models follow a two-stage process of navigation across data modes then refinement to nearest samples, revealed by exact computation of the oracle marginal velocity field.
Unified Noise Steering for Efficient Human-Guided VLA Adaptation
cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

UniSteer unifies human corrective actions and noise-space RL for VLA adaptation by inverting actions to noise targets, raising success rates from 20% to 90% in 66 minutes across four real-world manipulation tasks.
V-GRPO: Online Reinforcement Learning for Denoising Generative Models Is Easier than You Think
cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

V-GRPO makes ELBO surrogates stable and efficient for online RL alignment of denoising models, delivering SOTA text-to-image performance with 2-3x speedups over MixGRPO and DiffusionNFT.
Uncertainty-Aware Spatiotemporal Super-Resolution Data Assimilation with Diffusion Models
physics.flu-dyn 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

DiffSRDA uses denoising diffusion models to perform uncertainty-aware spatiotemporal super-resolution data assimilation, achieving EnKF-like quality from low-resolution forecasts on an ocean jet testbed.
One Step Forward and K Steps Back: Better Reasoning with Denoising Recursion Models
cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Denoising Recursion Models train multi-step noise reversal in looped transformers and outperform the prior Tiny Recursion Model on ARC-AGI.
A Stability Benchmark of Generative Regularizers for Inverse Problems
eess.IV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Numerical benchmarks indicate generative regularizers deliver strong reconstructions in some imaging inverse problem settings but can be unstable or problematic under imperfect conditions compared to variational methods.
Generative AI Meets 6G and Beyond: Diffusion Models for Semantic Communications
eess.SP 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 3.0

The tutorial synthesizes diffusion model techniques for generative semantic communications to achieve high compression while preserving meaning in wireless transmission.
Lattice field theories with a sign problem
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

A review of holomorphic extensions, dual variables, tensor renormalization group, and machine learning approaches for controlling the sign problem in lattice field theories.
Lattice field theories with a sign problem
hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 1.0

Reviews approaches such as Lefschetz thimbles, complex Langevin dynamics, dual variables, tensor renormalization group, and machine learning to control the sign problem in lattice field theories.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 16 Pith papers · 6 internal anchors

[1]

Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusions

Ackley, D. H., G. E. Hinton, and T. J. Sejnowski. (1985). “A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines”.Cognitive science. 9(1): 147–169. Albergo, M. S., N. M. Boffi, and E. Vanden-Eijnden. (2023). “Stochastic interpolants: A unifying framework for flows and diffusions”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08797. Albergo, M. S. and E. Vanden-Eijnden. (2023). “Buildi...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1985
[2]

Reverse-time diffusion equation models

Anderson, B. D. (1982). “Reverse-time diffusion equation models”.Stochastic Processes and their Applications. 12(3): 313–326. Atkinson, K., W. Han, and D. E. Stewart. (2009).Numerical solution of ordinary differential equations. Vol

work page 1982
[3]

Universal guidance for diffusion models

John Wiley & Sons. Bansal, A., H.-M. Chu, A. Schwarzschild, S. Sengupta, M. Goldblum, J. Geip- ing, and T. Goldstein. (2023). “Universal guidance for diffusion models”. In:Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 843–852. Behrmann, J., W. Grathwohl, R. T. Chen, D. Duvenaud, and J.-H. Jacobsen. (2019). “Invertible ...

work page arXiv 2023
[4]

Wasserstein proximal algorithms for the Schrödinger bridge problem: Density control with nonlinear drift

Caluya, K. F. and A. Halder. (2021). “Wasserstein proximal algorithms for the Schrödinger bridge problem: Density control with nonlinear drift”.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 67(3): 1163–1178. Chen, R. T., J. Behrmann, D. K. Duvenaud, and J.-H. Jacobsen. (2019). “Residual flows for invertible generative modeling”.Advances in Neural Information Pr...

work page 2021
[5]

Neural ordinary differential equations

Chen, R. T., Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt, and D. K. Duvenaud. (2018). “Neural ordinary differential equations”.Advances in neural information processing systems

work page 2018
[6]

Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problems

Chen, T., G.-H. Liu, and E. Theodorou. (2022). “Likelihood Training of Schrödinger Bridge using Forward-Backward SDEs Theory”. In:Interna- tional Conference on Learning Representations. Chen, Y., T. T. Georgiou, and M. Pavon. (2016). “On the relation between optimal transport and Schrödinger bridges: A stochastic control viewpoint”. Journal of Optimizatio...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[7]

A Survey on Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems

Dai Pra, P. (1991). “A stochastic control approach to reciprocal diffusion processes”.Applied mathematics and Optimization. 23(1): 313–329. Daras, G., H. Chung, C.-H. Lai, Y. Mitsufuji, J. C. Ye, P. Milanfar, A. G. Dimakis, and M. Delbracio. (2024). “A survey on diffusion models for inverse problems”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00083. Daras, G., Y. Dagan, A...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1991
[8]

Tweedie’s formula and selection bias

Efron, B. (2011). “Tweedie’s formula and selection bias”.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 106(496): 1602–1614. Esser, P., S. Kulal, A. Blattmann, R. Entezari, J. Müller, H. Saini, Y. Levi, D. Lorenz, A. Sauer, F. Boesel,et al.(2024). “Scaling rectified flow trans- formers for high-resolution image synthesis”. In:Forty-first International C...

work page 2011
[9]

Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modeling

Genevay, A., G. Peyré, and M. Cuturi. (2018). “Learning generative models with sinkhorn divergences”. In:International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR. 1608–1617. Geng, Z., M. Deng, X. Bai, J. Z. Kolter, and K. He. (2025a). “Mean flows for one-step generative modeling”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13447. References457 Geng, Z., A. ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[10]

Manifold preserving guided diffusion

He, Y., N. Murata, C.-H. Lai, Y. Takida, T. Uesaka, D. Kim, W.-H. Liao, Y. Mitsufuji, J. Z. Kolter, R. Salakhutdinov,et al.(2023). “Manifold preserving guided diffusion”. In:International Conference on Learning Representations. He, Y., N. Murata, C.-H. Lai, Y. Takida, T. Uesaka, D. Kim, W.-H. Liao, Y. Mitsufuji, J. Z. Kolter, R. Salakhutdinov, and S. Ermo...

work page arXiv 2023
[11]

Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance

Ho, J. and T. Salimans. (2021). “Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance”. In: NeurIPS 2021 Workshop on Deep Generative Models and Downstream Applications. Hochbruck, M. and A. Ostermann. (2005). “Explicit exponential Runge–Kutta methods for semilinear parabolic problems”.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 43(3): 1069–1090. Hochbruck, M. and A. Ostermann. (20...

work page arXiv 2021
[12]

Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models

Cambridge university press. Karras, T., M. Aittala, T. Aila, and S. Laine. (2022). “Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models”.Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems. 35: 26565–26577. Karras, T., M. Aittala, J. Lehtinen, J. Hellsten, T. Aila, and S. Laine. (2023). “Analyzing and improving the training dynamics of diffu...

work page arXiv 2022
[13]

SDEdit: Guided Image Synthesis and Editing with Stochastic Differential Equations

Meng, C., K. Choi, J. Song, and S. Ermon. (2022). “Concrete score match- ing: Generalized score matching for discrete data”.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 35: 34532–34545. References461 Meng, C., R. Rombach, R. Gao, D. Kingma, S. Ermon, J. Ho, and T. Salimans. (2023). “On distillation of guided diffusion models”. In:Proceedings of the ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[14]

Stochastic differential equations

Øksendal, B. (2003). “Stochastic differential equations”. In:Stochastic differ- ential equations. Springer. 65–84. Onken, D., S. W. Fung, X. Li, and L. Ruthotto. (2021). “Ot-flow: Fast and accurate continuous normalizing flows via optimal transport”. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vol

work page 2003
[15]

On free energy, stochastic control, and Schrödinger processes

9223–9232. Pavon, M. and A. Wakolbinger. (1991). “On free energy, stochastic control, and Schrödinger processes”. In:Modeling, Estimation and Control of Systems with Uncertainty: Proceedings of a Conference held in Sopron, Hungary, September

work page 1991
[16]

Relative entropy policy search

Springer. 334–348. Peters, J., K. Mulling, and Y. Altun. (2010). “Relative entropy policy search”. In:Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vol

work page 2010
[17]

Computational optimal transport: With applications to data science

1607–1612. 462References Peyré, G., M. Cuturi,et al.(2019). “Computational optimal transport: With applications to data science”.Foundations and Trends®in Machine Learn- ing. 11(5-6): 355–607. Pontryagin, L. S. (2018).Mathematical theory of optimal processes. Routledge. Poole, B., A. Jain, J. T. Barron, and B. Mildenhall. (2023). “DreamFusion: Text-to-3D ...

work page 2019
[18]

Photore- alistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding

Saharia,C.,W.Chan,S.Saxena,L.Li,J.Whang,E.L.Denton,K.Ghasemipour, R. Gontijo Lopes, B. Karagol Ayan, T. Salimans,et al.(2022). “Photore- alistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding”. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 35: 36479–36494. Salimans, T. and J. Ho. (2021). “Progressive Distillation for Fast Sampling of...

work page 2022
[19]

Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms

Cambridge University Press. Schulman, J., F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, and O. Klimov. (2017). “Proximalpolicyoptimizationalgorithms”.arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347. References463 Shih, A., S. Belkhale, S. Ermon, D. Sadigh, and N. Anari. (2023). “Parallel Sampling of Diffusion Models”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16317. Sinkhorn, R. (1964). “A relatio...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[20]

Sliced score matching: A scalable approach to density and score estimation

Song, Y., S. Garg, J. Shi, and S. Ermon. (2020b). “Sliced score matching: A scalable approach to density and score estimation”. In:Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. PMLR. 574–584. Song, Y., J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole. (2020c). “Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations”. In:Inter...

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

Neu- ral autoregressive distribution estimation

464References Uria, B., M.-A. Côté, K. Gregor, I. Murray, and H. Larochelle. (2016). “Neu- ral autoregressive distribution estimation”.Journal of Machine Learning Research. 17(205): 1–37. Vahdat, A. and J. Kautz. (2020). “NVAE: A deep hierarchical variational autoencoder”.Advances in neural information processing systems. 33: 19667–19679. Villani, C.et al...

work page 2016
[22]

A connection between score matching and denoising autoencoders

Springer. Vincent, P. (2011). “A connection between score matching and denoising autoencoders”.Neural computation. 23(7): 1661–1674. Wallace, B., M. Dang, R. Rafailov, L. Zhou, A. Lou, S. Purushwalkam, S. Ermon, C. Xiong, S. Joty, and N. Naik. (2024). “Diffusion model alignment using direct preference optimization”. In:Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conferen...

work page 2011