pith. sign in

super hub Canonical reference

The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey

Canonical reference. 93% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

109 Pith papers citing it
Background 93% of classified citations
abstract

For a long time, humanity has pursued artificial intelligence (AI) equivalent to or surpassing the human level, with AI agents considered a promising vehicle for this pursuit. AI agents are artificial entities that sense their environment, make decisions, and take actions. Many efforts have been made to develop intelligent agents, but they mainly focus on advancement in algorithms or training strategies to enhance specific capabilities or performance on particular tasks. Actually, what the community lacks is a general and powerful model to serve as a starting point for designing AI agents that can adapt to diverse scenarios. Due to the versatile capabilities they demonstrate, large language models (LLMs) are regarded as potential sparks for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), offering hope for building general AI agents. Many researchers have leveraged LLMs as the foundation to build AI agents and have achieved significant progress. In this paper, we perform a comprehensive survey on LLM-based agents. We start by tracing the concept of agents from its philosophical origins to its development in AI, and explain why LLMs are suitable foundations for agents. Building upon this, we present a general framework for LLM-based agents, comprising three main components: brain, perception, and action, and the framework can be tailored for different applications. Subsequently, we explore the extensive applications of LLM-based agents in three aspects: single-agent scenarios, multi-agent scenarios, and human-agent cooperation. Following this, we delve into agent societies, exploring the behavior and personality of LLM-based agents, the social phenomena that emerge from an agent society, and the insights they offer for human society. Finally, we discuss several key topics and open problems within the field. A repository for the related papers at https://github.com/WooooDyy/LLM-Agent-Paper-List.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 26 baseline 1 method 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract For a long time, humanity has pursued artificial intelligence (AI) equivalent to or surpassing the human level, with AI agents considered a promising vehicle for this pursuit. AI agents are artificial entities that sense their environment, make decisions, and take actions. Many efforts have been made to develop intelligent agents, but they mainly focus on advancement in algorithms or training strategies to enhance specific capabilities or performance on particular tasks. Actually, what the community lacks is a general and powerful model to serve as a starting point for designing AI agents that

authors

co-cited works

clear filters

representative citing papers

Revisable by Design: A Theory of Streaming LLM Agent Execution

cs.LG · 2026-04-25 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

LLM agents achieve greater flexibility during execution by classifying actions via a reversibility taxonomy and using an Earliest-Conflict Rollback algorithm that matches full-restart quality while wasting far less completed work.

Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents

cs.CY · 2026-04-11 · accept · novelty 8.0

This paper delivers the first systematic taxonomy and cross-benchmark consistency analysis of 40 agent safety benchmarks, finding broad but shallow risk coverage, no ranking concordance across evaluations, and that benchmark choice systematically alters reported safety.

Feedback-Driven Execution for LLM-Based Binary Analysis

cs.CR · 2026-04-16 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

FORGE uses a reasoning-action-observation loop and Dynamic Forest of Agents to perform scalable LLM-based binary analysis, finding 1,274 vulnerabilities across 591 of 3,457 real-world firmware binaries at 72.3% precision and broader coverage than prior methods.

SAGE: A Service Agent Graph-guided Evaluation Benchmark

cs.AI · 2026-04-10 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

SAGE is a new multi-agent benchmark that formalizes service SOPs as dynamic dialogue graphs to measure LLM agents on logical compliance and path coverage, uncovering an execution gap and empathy resilience across 27 models in 6 scenarios.

Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents

cs.AI · 2026-06-17 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

A prompt-based uncertainty decomposition separates action confidence from request uncertainty to enable clarification seeking in LLM agents, yielding F1 gains of 73% and 36% over baselines on two new underspecified benchmarks across five models.

LLM-as-Code: Agentic Programming for Agent Harness

cs.AI · 2026-06-14 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Proposes Agentic Programming in which programs control execution flow and LLMs act as invoked components (LLM-as-Code) only for reasoning, producing DAG-structured contexts that improve stability in long-horizon computer-use agents.

The Illusion of Multi-Agent Advantage

cs.AI · 2026-06-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Automatically generated multi-agent systems underperform CoT-SC on benchmarks and a new diagnostic dataset, exposing architectural bloat that fails to deliver functional utility.

citing papers explorer

Showing 18 of 18 citing papers after filters.