EGLR adds a deterministic layer-recursion axis gated by entropy that is complementary to temperature sampling, raising joint oracle accuracy on MATH-500 from 83.4% to 91.6% for a 3B model.
super hub Canonical reference
Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters
Canonical reference. 85% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
262
Pith papers citing it
Background
85% of classified citations
abstract
Enabling LLMs to improve their outputs by using more test-time computation is a critical step towards building generally self-improving agents that can operate on open-ended natural language. In this paper, we study the scaling of inference-time computation in LLMs, with a focus on answering the question: if an LLM is allowed to use a fixed but non-trivial amount of inference-time compute, how much can it improve its performance on a challenging prompt? Answering this question has implications not only on the achievable performance of LLMs, but also on the future of LLM pretraining and how one should tradeoff inference-time and pre-training compute. Despite its importance, little research attempted to understand the scaling behaviors of various test-time inference methods. Moreover, current work largely provides negative results for a number of these strategies. In this work, we analyze two primary mechanisms to scale test-time computation: (1) searching against dense, process-based verifier reward models; and (2) updating the model's distribution over a response adaptively, given the prompt at test time. We find that in both cases, the effectiveness of different approaches to scaling test-time compute critically varies depending on the difficulty of the prompt. This observation motivates applying a "compute-optimal" scaling strategy, which acts to most effectively allocate test-time compute adaptively per prompt. Using this compute-optimal strategy, we can improve the efficiency of test-time compute scaling by more than 4x compared to a best-of-N baseline. Additionally, in a FLOPs-matched evaluation, we find that on problems where a smaller base model attains somewhat non-trivial success rates, test-time compute can be used to outperform a 14x larger model.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 48
dataset 3
method 3
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Enabling LLMs to improve their outputs by using more test-time computation is a critical step towards building generally self-improving agents that can operate on open-ended natural language. In this paper, we study the scaling of inference-time computation in LLMs, with a focus on answering the question: if an LLM is allowed to use a fixed but non-trivial amount of inference-time compute, how much can it improve its performance on a challenging prompt? Answering this question has implications not only on the achievable performance of LLMs, but also on the future of LLM pretraining and how one
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
AutoTTS discovers width-depth test-time scaling controllers through agentic search in a pre-collected trajectory environment, yielding better accuracy-cost tradeoffs than hand-designed baselines on math reasoning tasks at low cost.
Test-time training with KV binding reduces to learned linear attention.
Physics-IQ benchmark reveals that generative video models exhibit limited physical understanding unrelated to their visual quality.
MedPRMBench is the first fine-grained benchmark for process reward models in medical reasoning, featuring 6500 questions, 13000 chains, 113910 step labels, and a baseline that improves downstream QA accuracy by 3.2-6.7 points.
Preregistered placebo-controlled decomposition shows external executable counterexamples drive self-repair gains in small code models more than re-exposure or self-critique.
LBR performs token-level test-time scaling via local branch routing on hidden states, enabling end-to-end RL training and improving Pass@1 and Pass@32 on math benchmarks over CoT and RLVR baselines.
KCSAT-ML benchmark supplies human error rates for math problems and DRG metric exposes that model accuracy collapses on high-human-error items while test-time scaling shows non-monotonic gains and alignment failures.
VLMs formulate differentiable rewards from task-specific rules to enable test-time online LoRA optimization of VGMs, delivering 16.7-point gains on symbolic and general video reasoning benchmarks over VLM-as-solver and Best-of-N baselines.
ATLAS introduces an LLM-orchestrated agentic framework for dynamic test-time scaling via extensible 'explore' actions, achieving higher accuracy with fewer API calls than fixed-workflow baselines on four benchmarks.
RiM trains LLMs to perform latent reasoning via fixed memory blocks processed in one forward pass using a two-stage curriculum, matching or exceeding prior latent methods on benchmarks.
The paper identifies unfaithful capitulation, a failure mode where chain-of-thought remains correct but the emitted answer flips wrong under sustained adversarial pressure in multi-turn dialogue.
LaneRoPE adds an inter-sequence attention mask and extended RoPE to enable collaborative parallel sequence generation in LLMs, yielding accuracy gains on math reasoning under length limits.
Co-ReAct adds step-level rubric guidance to ReAct agents via a GRPO-trained generator using list-wise ranking rewards, yielding consistent gains on DeepResearchBench and SQA-CS-V2.
HIDBench unifies DARPA-E3, DARPA-E5, and NodLink datasets with a data pipeline to benchmark LLMs for host-based intrusion detection, showing high precision on simple logs but sharp drops in MCC and rises in false positives on complex noisy data.
Anchored Tree Sampling converts horizon-compounding drift into anchor-bounded drift by organizing video generation as a sparse-to-dense tree of imputations instead of left-to-right autoregressive rollout.
A neuro-symbolic post-training pipeline lets a 4B transformer learn cubing heuristics that reach pass@5 of 53 on 100 SAT competition instances, matching the strongest symbolic baseline.
CAPS is a four-stage inference-only cascade that adapts how much of each solution the verifier sees and how comparisons are distributed, halving per-candidate verifier tokens while outperforming uniform pairwise verification on most benchmarks.
Minerva-Ego is a new benchmark for egocentric visual reasoning with dense human-annotated traces and masks, showing that spatiotemporal hints substantially improve frontier model performance.
A survey that unifies prior work on multi-agent LLM systems via the LIFE framework, mapping dependencies across collaboration, failure attribution, and autonomous self-evolution while identifying cross-stage challenges.
EvoLib enables LLMs to accumulate, reuse, and evolve knowledge abstractions from inference trajectories at test time, yielding substantial gains on math reasoning, code generation, and agentic benchmarks without parameter updates or supervision.
Language models produce overcomplete reasoning traces where on average 46% of steps can be removed while preserving the answer in 86% of cases, with necessity concentrated in the top three steps.
QueST adapts LLMs at test time by generating query-specific problem-solution pairs for self-supervised fine-tuning, improving reasoning performance without external data.
VeGAS improves MLLM-based embodied agents by sampling action ensembles and using a verifier trained on LLM-synthesized failure cases, yielding up to 36% relative gains on hard multi-object long-horizon tasks in Habitat and ALFRED.
citing papers explorer
-
LLMs Improving LLMs: Agentic Discovery for Test-Time Scaling
AutoTTS discovers width-depth test-time scaling controllers through agentic search in a pre-collected trajectory environment, yielding better accuracy-cost tradeoffs than hand-designed baselines on math reasoning tasks at low cost.
-
Rewarding the Scientific Process: Process-Level Reward Modeling for Agentic Data Analysis
DataPRM is an environment-aware generative process reward model that improves LLM data analysis agents by 7-11% on benchmarks via active verification and reflection-aware ternary rewards.
-
Hint Tuning: Less Data Makes Better Reasoners
Hint Tuning reduces token usage 24-66% (31.5% avg) in reasoning models via 1K self-annotated samples aligned to an instruct model's capabilities while keeping benchmark accuracy.
-
AIPO: Learning to Reason from Active Interaction
AIPO adds active multi-agent consultation (Verify, Knowledge, Reasoning agents) plus custom importance sampling to RLVR training so LLMs expand their reasoning boundary and then operate without the agents.
-
Length Value Model: Scalable Value Pretraining for Token-Level Length Modeling
LenVM models token-level remaining generation length as a bounded discounted value function derived from constant negative per-token rewards, providing a scalable proxy for generation horizon.
-
Phase-Associative Memory: Sequence Modeling in Complex Hilbert Space
PAM, a complex-valued associative memory model, exhibits steeper power-law scaling in loss and perplexity than a matched real-valued baseline when trained on WikiText-103 from 5M to 100M parameters.
-
Fin-PRM: A Domain-Specialized Process Reward Model for Financial Reasoning in Large Language Models
Fin-PRM is a domain-specialized process reward model that supplies binary step-level and trajectory-level supervision signals for financial reasoning in LLMs and outperforms general PRMs on CFLUE and FinQA benchmarks.
-
ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMs
ReTool uses outcome-driven RL to train 32B LLMs to dynamically use code tools during reasoning, reaching 72.5% accuracy on AIME and surpassing o1-preview.
-
JoyAI-LLM Flash: Advancing Mid-Scale LLMs with Token Efficiency
JoyAI-LLM Flash delivers a 48B MoE LLM with 2.7B active parameters per token via FiberPO RL and dense multi-token prediction, released with checkpoints on Hugging Face.
-
Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models
A survey organizing techniques to achieve efficient reasoning in LLMs by shortening chain-of-thought outputs.
-
A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge
A survey on LLM-as-a-Judge that reviews reliability strategies, proposes evaluation methods, and introduces a novel benchmark for assessing such systems.