pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

hub

s1: Simple test-time scaling

42 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

42 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Test-time scaling is a promising new approach to language modeling that uses extra test-time compute to improve performance. Recently, OpenAI's o1 model showed this capability but did not publicly share its methodology, leading to many replication efforts. We seek the simplest approach to achieve test-time scaling and strong reasoning performance. First, we curate a small dataset s1K of 1,000 questions paired with reasoning traces relying on three criteria we validate through ablations: difficulty, diversity, and quality. Second, we develop budget forcing to control test-time compute by forcefully terminating the model's thinking process or lengthening it by appending "Wait" multiple times to the model's generation when it tries to end. This can lead the model to double-check its answer, often fixing incorrect reasoning steps. After supervised finetuning the Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct language model on s1K and equipping it with budget forcing, our model s1-32B exceeds o1-preview on competition math questions by up to 27% (MATH and AIME24). Further, scaling s1-32B with budget forcing allows extrapolating beyond its performance without test-time intervention: from 50% to 57% on AIME24. Our model, data, and code are open-source at https://github.com/simplescaling/s1

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Test-time scaling is a promising new approach to language modeling that uses extra test-time compute to improve performance. Recently, OpenAI's o1 model showed this capability but did not publicly share its methodology, leading to many replication efforts. We seek the simplest approach to achieve test-time scaling and strong reasoning performance. First, we curate a small dataset s1K of 1,000 questions paired with reasoning traces relying on three criteria we validate through ablations: difficulty, diversity, and quality. Second, we develop budget forcing to control test-time compute by forcef

co-cited works

years

2026 35 2025 7

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

GIANTS: Generative Insight Anticipation from Scientific Literature

cs.CL · 2026-04-10 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

GIANTS-4B, trained with RL on a new 17k-example benchmark of parent-to-child paper insights, achieves 34% relative improvement over gemini-3-pro in LM-judge similarity and is rated higher-impact by a citation predictor.

Preserving Long-Tailed Expert Information in Mixture-of-Experts Tuning

cs.LG · 2026-04-24 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

A new SFT framework for MoE models combines bias-driven sparsification with gated condenser experts to retain long-tailed expert information, outperforming DenseMixer and ESFT by over 2.5% on math reasoning and commonsense QA benchmarks.

Towards Unconstrained Human-Object Interaction

cs.CV · 2026-04-15 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Introduces the U-HOI task and shows MLLMs plus a language-to-graph pipeline can handle human-object interactions without any predefined vocabulary at training or inference time.

AI Achieves a Perfect LSAT Score

cs.AI · 2026-04-11 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Language models achieve a perfect LSAT score, with experiments showing that internal thinking phases and a fine-tuned process reward model are key to high performance on logical reasoning questions.

Evaluating the False Trust engendered by LLM Explanations

cs.HC · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

A user study finds that LLM reasoning traces and post-hoc explanations create false trust by increasing acceptance of incorrect answers, whereas contrastive dual explanations improve users' ability to detect errors.

AIPO: : Learning to Reason from Active Interaction

cs.CL · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

AIPO trains LLMs to expand their reasoning capability boundary via active multi-agent interaction with Verify, Knowledge, and Reasoning agents during RLVR, using importance sampling and clipping to handle feedback, then drops the agents at inference.

Procedural Knowledge at Scale Improves Reasoning

cs.CL · 2026-04-01 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Reasoning Memory decomposes reasoning trajectories into 32 million subquestion-subroutine pairs and retrieves them via in-thought prompts to improve language model performance on math, science, and coding benchmarks by up to 19.2%.

Gradient Extrapolation-Based Policy Optimization

cs.LG · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

GXPO approximates longer local lookahead in GRPO training via gradient extrapolation from two optimizer steps using three backward passes total, improving pass@1 accuracy by 1.65-5.00 points over GRPO and delivering up to 4x step speedup.

citing papers explorer

Showing 42 of 42 citing papers.