pith. sign in

super hub Canonical reference

Concrete Problems in AI Safety

Canonical reference. 90% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

205 Pith papers citing it
Background 90% of classified citations
abstract

Rapid progress in machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) has brought increasing attention to the potential impacts of AI technologies on society. In this paper we discuss one such potential impact: the problem of accidents in machine learning systems, defined as unintended and harmful behavior that may emerge from poor design of real-world AI systems. We present a list of five practical research problems related to accident risk, categorized according to whether the problem originates from having the wrong objective function ("avoiding side effects" and "avoiding reward hacking"), an objective function that is too expensive to evaluate frequently ("scalable supervision"), or undesirable behavior during the learning process ("safe exploration" and "distributional shift"). We review previous work in these areas as well as suggesting research directions with a focus on relevance to cutting-edge AI systems. Finally, we consider the high-level question of how to think most productively about the safety of forward-looking applications of AI.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 41 method 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Rapid progress in machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) has brought increasing attention to the potential impacts of AI technologies on society. In this paper we discuss one such potential impact: the problem of accidents in machine learning systems, defined as unintended and harmful behavior that may emerge from poor design of real-world AI systems. We present a list of five practical research problems related to accident risk, categorized according to whether the problem originates from having the wrong objective function ("avoiding side effects" and "avoiding reward hacking"), a

authors

co-cited works

clear filters

representative citing papers

The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling

cs.CL · 2020-12-31 · conditional · novelty 8.0

The Pile is a newly constructed 825 GiB dataset from 22 diverse sources that enables language models to achieve better performance on academic, professional, and cross-domain tasks than models trained on Common Crawl variants.

AI safety via debate

stat.ML · 2018-05-02 · conditional · novelty 8.0

AI agents trained through competitive debate can allow polynomial-time human judges to oversee PSPACE-level questions, with MNIST experiments boosting sparse classifier accuracy from 59% to 89% using only 6 pixels.

Competing Auctions in Intermediated Markets

cs.GT · 2026-06-04 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Sealed-bid second-price intermediary auctions fully unravel into sealed first-price principal auctions while open formats unravel only partially, limiting intermediary design space when a credible first-price channel exists.

Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.

Theoretical Limits of Language Model Alignment

cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

The maximum reward gain under KL-regularized LM alignment is a Jeffreys divergence term, estimable as covariance from base samples, with best-of-N approaching the theoretical limit.

Beyond Ability: The Four-Fold Spectrum of Power and the Logic of Full Inability

cs.LO · 2026-05-06 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Coalition Logic is extended by defining Full Inability (FI) as a distinct modality alongside Full Control, Positive Determination, and Adverse Determination, with algebraic structure, Klein four-group symmetry, and a sound, complete, conservative axiomatization CLFI that remains PSPACE-complete.

citing papers explorer

Showing 6 of 6 citing papers after filters.

  • Risks from Learned Optimization in Advanced Machine Learning Systems cs.AI · 2019-06-05 · accept · none · ref 34 · internal anchor

    Mesa-optimization arises when learned models act as optimizers with objectives that can differ from their training loss, creating alignment risks in advanced machine learning.

  • Learning the Arrow of Time cs.LG · 2019-07-02 · unverdicted · none · ref 8 · internal anchor

    Introduces a learned arrow of time in MDPs that aligns with the Jordan-Kinderlehrer-Otto notion for stochastic processes and enables practical RL utilities like reachability and side-effect detection.

  • Towards Empathic Deep Q-Learning cs.LG · 2019-06-26 · unverdicted · none · ref 1 · internal anchor

    Empathic DQN augments DQN value estimates with an empathy term computed by swapping the learning agent into other agents' situations, reducing collateral harms in two gridworld proof-of-concept environments.

  • Modeling AGI Safety Frameworks with Causal Influence Diagrams cs.AI · 2019-06-20 · accept · none · ref 1 · internal anchor

    Models AGI safety frameworks with causal influence diagrams to compare optimization objectives and causal assumptions.

  • Detecting Spiky Corruption in Markov Decision Processes cs.LG · 2019-06-30 · unverdicted · none · ref 1 · internal anchor

    In CRMDPs with spiky reward corruption, the environment is solvable; an algorithm detects corrupt states, fully characterizes the regret bound, and enables optimal policy learning with common RL algorithms.

  • The Role of Cooperation in Responsible AI Development cs.CY · 2019-07-10 · unverdicted · none · ref 1 · internal anchor

    Competitive pressures in AI development create collective action problems that may require industry cooperation, with key factors and strategies identified to enable responsible outcomes.