pith. sign in

hub Baseline reference

MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding

Baseline reference. 50% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.

32 Pith papers citing it
Baseline 50% of classified citations
abstract

We introduce MedXpertQA, a highly challenging and comprehensive benchmark to evaluate expert-level medical knowledge and advanced reasoning. MedXpertQA includes 4,460 questions spanning 17 specialties and 11 body systems. It includes two subsets, Text for text evaluation and MM for multimodal evaluation. Notably, MM introduces expert-level exam questions with diverse images and rich clinical information, including patient records and examination results, setting it apart from traditional medical multimodal benchmarks with simple QA pairs generated from image captions. MedXpertQA applies rigorous filtering and augmentation to address the insufficient difficulty of existing benchmarks like MedQA, and incorporates specialty board questions to improve clinical relevance and comprehensiveness. We perform data synthesis to mitigate data leakage risk and conduct multiple rounds of expert reviews to ensure accuracy and reliability. We evaluate 18 leading models on \benchmark. Moreover, medicine is deeply connected to real-world decision-making, providing a rich and representative setting for assessing reasoning abilities beyond mathematics and code. To this end, we develop a reasoning-oriented subset to facilitate the assessment of o1-like models. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/TsinghuaC3I/MedXpertQA

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 3 dataset 3

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 30 2025 2

representative citing papers

Fully Open Meditron: An Auditable Pipeline for Clinical LLMs

cs.AI · 2026-05-15 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0 · 2 refs

Presents the first fully open pipeline for clinical LLMs by unifying eight public QA datasets with three clinician-vetted synthetic extensions and applying it to five base models to achieve benchmark gains while maintaining auditability.

Large Language Models Lack Temporal Awareness of Medical Knowledge

cs.LG · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

LLMs lack temporal awareness of medical knowledge, showing gradual performance decline on up-to-date facts, much lower accuracy on historical knowledge (25-54% relative), and inconsistent year-to-year predictions.

Green Shielding: A User-Centric Approach Towards Trustworthy AI

cs.CL · 2026-04-27 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Green Shielding introduces CUE criteria and the HCM-Dx benchmark to demonstrate that routine prompt variations systematically alter LLM diagnostic behavior along clinically relevant dimensions, producing Pareto-like tradeoffs in plausibility versus coverage.

Single-Rollout Hidden-State Dynamics for Training-Free RLVR Data Selection

cs.LG · 2026-05-27 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

SHIFT selects compact RLVR training subsets using the magnitude of hidden-state change from a single inference rollout plus quality-weighted farthest-first coverage, outperforming training-free baselines on math reasoning and medical QA under low budgets.

Evaluation-driven Scaling for Scientific Discovery

cs.LG · 2026-04-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

SimpleTES scales test-time evaluation in LLMs to discover state-of-the-art solutions on 21 scientific problems across six domains, outperforming frontier models and optimization pipelines with examples like 2x faster LASSO and new Erdos constructions.

citing papers explorer

Showing 32 of 32 citing papers.