pith. sign in

hub Baseline reference

OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems

Baseline reference. 50% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.

80 Pith papers citing it
Baseline 50% of classified citations
abstract

Recent advancements have seen Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) surpassing general human capabilities in various tasks, approaching the proficiency level of human experts across multiple domains. With traditional benchmarks becoming less challenging for these models, new rigorous challenges are essential to gauge their advanced abilities. In this work, we present OlympiadBench, an Olympiad-level bilingual multimodal scientific benchmark, featuring 8,476 problems from Olympiad-level mathematics and physics competitions, including the Chinese college entrance exam. Each problem is detailed with expert-level annotations for step-by-step reasoning. Evaluating top-tier models on OlympiadBench, we implement a comprehensive assessment methodology to accurately evaluate model responses. Notably, the best-performing model, GPT-4V, attains an average score of 17.97% on OlympiadBench, with a mere 10.74% in physics, highlighting the benchmark rigor and the intricacy of physical reasoning. Our analysis orienting GPT-4V points out prevalent issues with hallucinations, knowledge omissions, and logical fallacies. We hope that our challenging benchmark can serve as a valuable resource for helping future AGI research endeavors. The data and evaluation code are available at \url{https://github.com/OpenBMB/OlympiadBench}

hub tools

citation-role summary

dataset 10 background 8

citation-polarity summary

clear filters

representative citing papers

Not only where, But when: Temporal Scheduling for RLVR

cs.LG · 2026-05-25 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Temporal scheduling of credit allocation criteria over RLVR training, using trajectory percentiles to target heterogeneous behaviors, yields more stable policy entropy and better reasoning benchmark results than static allocation.

AIS: Adaptive Importance Sampling for Quantized RL

stat.ML · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

AIS adaptively corrects non-stationary policy gradient bias in quantized LLM RL, matching BF16 performance while retaining 1.5-2.76x FP8 rollout speedup.

Verifiable Counterfactual Supervision for Process Reward Models

cs.AI · 2026-05-04 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Presents verifiable counterfactual process supervision that generates annotated trajectories via template-aware error injection on symbolic chains, improving Best-of-8 reranking on logical reasoning benchmarks with preliminary math transfer.

PRIMETIME : Limits of LLMs in Temporal Primitives

cs.NE · 2025-04-22 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

PRIMETIME generator reveals that LLM datetime parsing and arithmetic primitives are individually unreliable but fully learnable via fine-tuning, enabling frontier-level accuracy on event planning with small LoRA models.

RASFT: Rollout-Adaptive Supervised Fine-Tuning for Reasoning

cs.LG · 2026-06-05 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RASFT is an adaptive SFT method that strengthens or relaxes expert imitation per problem based on on-policy rollout solvability and adds clipped reference-policy ratio to limit drift, reporting better results than standard SFT and RL on math and code benchmarks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 21 of 21 citing papers after filters.