CL-Bench is the first expert-validated benchmark for continual learning in frontier LLMs across six real-world domains, showing limited gains and that naive in-context learning outperforms dedicated memory systems.
super hub Mixed citations
$\tau$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (60%).
157
Pith papers citing it
Background
60% of classified citations
abstract
Existing benchmarks do not test language agents on their interaction with human users or ability to follow domain-specific rules, both of which are vital for deploying them in real world applications. We propose $\tau$-bench, a benchmark emulating dynamic conversations between a user (simulated by language models) and a language agent provided with domain-specific API tools and policy guidelines. We employ an efficient and faithful evaluation process that compares the database state at the end of a conversation with the annotated goal state. We also propose a new metric (pass^k) to evaluate the reliability of agent behavior over multiple trials. Our experiments show that even state-of-the-art function calling agents (like gpt-4o) succeed on <50% of the tasks, and are quite inconsistent (pass^8 <25% in retail). Our findings point to the need for methods that can improve the ability of agents to act consistently and follow rules reliably.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 22
dataset 11
extension 1
method 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Existing benchmarks do not test language agents on their interaction with human users or ability to follow domain-specific rules, both of which are vital for deploying them in real world applications. We propose $\tau$-bench, a benchmark emulating dynamic conversations between a user (simulated by language models) and a language agent provided with domain-specific API tools and policy guidelines. We employ an efficient and faithful evaluation process that compares the database state at the end of a conversation with the annotated goal state. We also propose a new metric (pass^k) to evaluate th
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
A new native-runtime benchmark reveals that current frontier AI agents succeed on at most 62 percent of realistic long-horizon CLI tasks.
Agent-ValueBench is the first dedicated benchmark for agent values, showing they diverge from LLM values, form a homogeneous 'Value Tide' across models, and bend under harnesses and skill steering.
OccuBench is a new benchmark for AI agents on real-world occupational tasks via LLM-driven simulators, showing no model dominates all industries, implicit faults are hardest, and larger models with more reasoning perform better.
MCP-Atlas is a new benchmark with 1000 tasks on production MCP servers that uses claim-level scoring to evaluate LLM agents on realistic multi-step tool-use competency.
The SDE benchmark shows LLMs lag on scientific discovery tasks relative to general science tests, with diminishing scaling returns and shared weaknesses across models.
The paper defines entity binding failures as a distinct error category in tool-augmented agents separate from tool selection errors and evaluates entity-aware mechanisms that eliminate such failures in a controlled diagnostic setting.
PrincipalBench exposes a sharp split in frontier LLMs between selective and over-refusing behavior on multi-party loyalty, with prompt scaffolding and KL distillation reducing harm rates but only along an existing leak/over-refusal trade-off.
CLQT is a new closed-loop, cost-aware benchmark that diagnoses LLM trading agent capabilities through strategy-consistent metrics and hash-verifiable trails rather than outcome rankings.
MAC-Bench is a new adversarial benchmark that converts legal texts into executable scenarios via the SERV pipeline to measure procedural compliance in multi-agent LLM systems using CSR and MG metrics.
ADK Arena evaluates 51 Python ADKs by having an LLM learn each framework's API, write and repair agent code, and run on benchmarks, finding 57% success rate, 5.6x cost variation, no dominant framework, and substitutable information sources.
RealClawBench turns 281 real OpenClaw sessions into reproducible tasks that preserve the original distribution and shows the best of 14 models solves only 65.8 percent.
SkillDAG builds a self-evolving typed skill graph that LLM agents query and update at inference time, raising success on ALFWorld and SkillsBench by 12.8 and 8.6 points over graph baselines.
An empirical protocol measures rediscovery costs when coding agents resume interrupted tasks and finds that context-bearing handoffs cut agent events 20-59% and tokens 42-63% versus repository-only handoffs across three models.
SelSkill applies dual-granularity preference learning to selective skill-or-skip decisions, improving task success by 10.9 points and execution precision by 29.1 points on ALFWorld with Qwen3-8B.
Proposes the Intelligent Computing Architecture (ICA) as a six-layer framework with dual probabilistic-deterministic planes and three Amdahl-style heuristics to unify design of LLM-based systems.
VisualLeakBench shows vision-language agents propagate PII and unsafe text from images to tool arguments at 78.8% and 85.5% baseline rates, with defensive prompts reducing PII leakage to 2% mainly by suppressing tool use while unsafe-text leakage stays at 52.6%.
OR-Space is a benchmark for LLM agents performing full-lifecycle optimization tasks across Build, Revise, and Explain modes in executable multi-artifact workspaces.
VitaBench 2.0 introduces a benchmark for long-term personalized and proactive agent behavior, with results indicating substantial gaps in current frontier LLMs.
JobBench is a new benchmark with 130 occupational tasks where the best of 36 tested AI models achieves only 45.9% success.
AgingBench demonstrates multi-dimensional degradation in deployed AI agents through four aging mechanisms diagnosed by temporal graphs and counterfactual probes across hundreds of runs.
Biased long-term memories in LLM agents cause measurable deviations in tool parameters across 105 scenarios, seven models, and 608 real tools, persisting under standard memory architectures.
Introduces QGP and PushBench to evaluate LLM agent persistence on quantitative goals, showing specialized controllers outperform baselines on verifier-checked artifact collection tasks.
Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.
citing papers explorer
-
Agent-ValueBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Agent Values
Agent-ValueBench is the first dedicated benchmark for agent values, showing they diverge from LLM values, form a homogeneous 'Value Tide' across models, and bend under harnesses and skill steering.
-
Switchcraft: AI Model Router for Agentic Tool Calling
Switchcraft routes agentic tool-calling queries to the lowest-cost model that preserves correctness, reaching 82.9% accuracy and 84% cost reduction on five benchmarks.
-
Evaluating Tool-Using Language Agents: Judge Reliability, Propagation Cascades, and Runtime Mitigation in AgentProp-Bench
AgentProp-Bench shows substring judging agrees with humans at kappa=0.049, LLM ensemble at 0.432, bad-parameter injection propagates with ~0.62 probability, rejection and recovery are independent, and a runtime fix cuts hallucinations 23pp on GPT-4o-mini but not Gemini-2.0-Flash.
-
Goal-Oriented Reasoning for RAG-based Memory in Conversational Agentic LLM Systems
Goal-Mem decomposes user goals into subgoals for targeted memory retrieval using Natural Language Logic, improving performance on multi-hop reasoning tasks in conversational agents.
-
From Controlled to the Wild: Evaluation of Pentesting Agents for the Real-World
A practical evaluation protocol for AI pentesting agents that uses validated vulnerability discovery, LLM semantic matching, and bipartite scoring to assess performance in realistic, complex targets.
-
ComplexMCP: Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dynamic, Interdependent, and Large-Scale Tool Sandbox
ComplexMCP benchmark shows top LLM agents achieve under 60% success on dynamic interdependent tool tasks versus 90% for humans, due to tool retrieval saturation, over-confidence, and strategic defeatism.
-
Can Agent Benchmarks Support Their Scores? Evidence-Supported Bounds for Interactive-Agent Evaluation
Agent benchmarks can report evidence-supported score bounds instead of single misleading success rates by adding a layer that checks required artifacts for outcome verification.
-
When Agents Overtrust Environmental Evidence: An Extensible Agentic Framework for Benchmarking Evidence-Grounding Defects in LLM Agents
EnvTrustBench is a new agentic benchmark that measures evidence-grounding defects where LLM agents overtrust faulty environmental observations and take incorrect actions.
-
AIT Academy: Cultivating the Complete Agent with a Confucian Three-Domain Curriculum
AIT Academy introduces a tripartite curriculum for AI agents across natural science, humanities, and social science domains, with reported gains of 15.9 points in security and 7 points in social reasoning under specific scheduling.
-
Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents
Claw-Eval is a new trajectory-aware benchmark for LLM agents that records execution traces, audit logs, and environment snapshots to evaluate completion, safety, and robustness across 300 tasks, revealing that opaque grading misses 44% of safety issues.
-
GenoMAS: A Multi-Agent Framework for Scientific Discovery via Code-Driven Gene Expression Analysis
GenoMAS deploys six specialized LLM agents with guided planning to preprocess transcriptomic data and identify genes, reaching 89.13% composite similarity and 60.48% F1 on the GenoTEX benchmark while outperforming prior methods.
-
Consistency as a Testable Property: Statistical Methods to Evaluate AI Agent Reliability
A framework with U-statistics and kernel-based metrics quantifies AI agent consistency and robustness, showing trajectory metrics outperform pass@1 rates in diagnosing failures.