MathAtlas is the first large-scale benchmark for autoformalizing graduate mathematics, where even strong models reach only 9.8% correctness on theorem statements and drop to 2.6% on the hardest dependency-deep subset.
hub Mixed citations
MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematics
Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (60%).
abstract
We present miniF2F, a dataset of formal Olympiad-level mathematics problems statements intended to provide a unified cross-system benchmark for neural theorem proving. The miniF2F benchmark currently targets Metamath, Lean, Isabelle (partially) and HOL Light (partially) and consists of 488 problem statements drawn from the AIME, AMC, and the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO), as well as material from high-school and undergraduate mathematics courses. We report baseline results using GPT-f, a neural theorem prover based on GPT-3 and provide an analysis of its performance. We intend for miniF2F to be a community-driven effort and hope that our benchmark will help spur advances in neural theorem proving.
hub tools
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
representative citing papers
MathConstraint generates scalable, automatically verifiable combinatorial problems where LLMs achieve 18.5-66.9% accuracy without tools but roughly double that with solver access.
LAMP achieves 96.7% success generating verified Lean proofs for 90 Combinatorics on Words theorems by coordinating Planner, Builder, and Verifier agents with a CoW ontology accessed through Model Context Protocol.
GTBench is a new curriculum-grounded benchmark showing GPT-5 performs strongly on basic graph theory tasks but all models, including it, struggle more on advanced proofs with notable evaluator disagreements.
A new benchmark of 9,415 Lean 4 specifications derived from 2,772 scraped Python property-based tests, plus a three-agent LLM transpilation pipeline and proof-generation baselines.
COVCAL is a risk-controlled selector using Lean diagnostics to accept natural-language math answers only when a certified error bound can be met, feasible at 79% coverage with a specialized formalizer but not with a 7B one.
CAM-Bench is a new Lean 4 theorem-proving benchmark of 1,000 problems in computational and applied mathematics, built from textbook exercises using a dependency-recovery pipeline to reconstruct local context.
Formal Conjectures is a Lean 4 benchmark containing 2615 formalized problems with 1029 open conjectures, designed to evaluate automated mathematical reasoning and proof discovery.
Frontier LLMs achieve 95-100% accuracy on AMC/AIME problems but recover far fewer distinct valid strategies than human references, while collectively generating 50 novel strategies.
Re²Math is a new benchmark that evaluates AI models on retrieving and verifying the applicability of theorems from math literature to advance steps in partial proofs, accepting any sufficient theorem while controlling for leakage.
Roundtrip verification with diagnosis-guided repair improves faithful autoformalization of statutory text by LLMs, where failing equivalence checks correlate with 1.4x-2.5x higher NLI drift than passing ones.
LLMs display clear performance stratification on formal language tasks aligned with Chomsky hierarchy complexity levels, limited by severe efficiency barriers rather than absolute capability.
Omni-MATH supplies 4428 human-verified Olympiad math problems that expose top LLMs achieving only 52.55% to 60.54% accuracy on the most difficult items.
The signal-coverage matrix stratifies autoformalization outputs into true success, type-only, semantic-only, and both-fail cells, showing type-correctness gains are mostly type-stratum recovery with semantic errors largely unchanged.
Agent-directed tree search improves LLM performance on Lean formal verification tasks, with context-based orchestration solving more intermediate specs at lower token cost than baseline agents.
OProver-32B achieves top Pass@32 scores on MiniF2F, ProverBench, and PutnamBench by combining continued pretraining with iterative agentic proving, retrieval, SFT on repairs, and RL on unresolved cases using a 6.86M-proof dataset.
Segment-level supervision extracts coherent proof segments to train policy models that achieve 61-66% success on miniF2F, outperforming step-level and whole-proof methods while also improving existing provers.
A hybrid pipeline lets an LLM write high-level proof sketches in a compact DSL that a lightweight kernel then expands into explicit, checkable obligations for reliable math and logic reasoning.
A minimal agentic system achieves competitive performance in automated theorem proving with a simpler design and lower cost than state-of-the-art methods.
Ax-Prover is a tool-using multi-agent LLM system that matches state-of-the-art provers on public math benchmarks and outperforms them on new abstract-algebra and quantum-theory benchmarks while also assisting an expert with a cryptography proof.
Repeated sampling scales problem coverage log-linearly with sample count, improving SWE-bench Lite performance from 15.9% to 56% using 250 samples.
DeepSeekMath 7B reaches 51.7% on MATH via continued pretraining on curated web math data and Group Relative Policy Optimization.
Continued pretraining of Code Llama on Proof-Pile-2 yields Llemma, an open math-specialized LLM that beats known open base models on MATH and supports tool use plus formal proving out of the box.
An agentic theorem prover in Lean uses a control plane to route actions based on cost and success estimates, achieving 28.9% lower average cost than a fixed-step baseline on a PutnamBench subset while preserving performance.
citing papers explorer
-
LAMP: Lean-based Agentic framework with MCP and Proof Repair
LAMP achieves 96.7% success generating verified Lean proofs for 90 Combinatorics on Words theorems by coordinating Planner, Builder, and Verifier agents with a CoW ontology accessed through Model Context Protocol.
-
Automating Formal Verification with Agent-Guided Tree Search
Agent-directed tree search improves LLM performance on Lean formal verification tasks, with context-based orchestration solving more intermediate specs at lower token cost than baseline agents.
-
ReasonOps: A Unified Operational Paradigm for Trustworthy Verified LLM Reasoning
ReasonOps proposes treating LLM reasoning as a continuously monitored, verifiable operational process that unifies multiple verification techniques into a lifecycle to address inconsistencies and hallucinations.