LLM+ASP framework enables task-agnostic nonmonotonic reasoning by having LLMs generate and self-correct ASP programs using solver feedback, outperforming SMT alternatives on diverse benchmarks.
hub
Reasoning models don’t always say what they think
19 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
19
Pith papers citing it
hub tools
years
2026 19representative citing papers
Language models trained on parallel streams of computation can overcome single-stream bottlenecks in autonomous agents by enabling simultaneous reading, thinking, and acting.
CoT traces align with internal answer commitment in only 61.9% of steps on average, dominated by confabulated continuations after commitment has stabilized.
ProFIL trains an activation probe on a frozen base model to zero advantages on theatrical post-commitment rollouts in GRPO, cutting theater 11-100%, raising faithful fractions, and shortening chains 4-19% without accuracy loss.
A user study finds that LLM reasoning traces and post-hoc explanations create false trust by increasing acceptance of incorrect answers, whereas contrastive dual explanations improve users' ability to detect errors.
AI deployment in high-stakes areas requires domain-scoped calibrated verification with monitoring and revocation, using a proposed six-component Verification Coverage standard instead of mechanistic interpretability.
Weighted rules extend stable model semantics to support probabilistic reasoning, model ranking, and statistical inference in answer set programs.
Counterfactual prompting effects on LLMs are often indistinguishable from those caused by meaning-preserving paraphrases, causing most previously reported demographic sensitivities to disappear under proper statistical comparison.
Meta-Aligner introduces a meta-learner network that produces dynamic preference weights to enable bidirectional optimization between preferences and LLM policy responses for multi-objective alignment.
RadAgent generates stepwise, tool-augmented chest CT reports with traceable decisions, improving accuracy, robustness, and adding a 37% faithfulness score absent in standard 3D VLMs.
VLMs show answer inertia in CoT reasoning and remain influenced by misleading textual cues even with sufficient visual evidence, making CoT an incomplete window into modality reliance.
A new backdoor technique called TSBH uses reverse tree search to create malicious chain-of-thought data and injects it in two stages to hijack LLM reasoning upon trigger activation.
MedMSA framework retrieves knowledge via language models then builds formal probabilistic models to produce uncertainty-weighted differential diagnoses from symptoms.
Non-reasoning LLMs fail the equivalence class problem while reasoning LLMs perform better but remain incomplete, with difficulty peaking at phase transition for the former and maximum diameter for the latter.
LLM reasoning is primarily mediated by latent-state trajectories rather than by explicit surface chain-of-thought outputs.
The paper introduces the Proxy Compression Hypothesis as a unifying framework explaining reward hacking in RLHF as an emergent result of compressing high-dimensional human objectives into proxy reward signals under optimization pressure.
LLMs support decision prediction and rationale generation but lack evidence for genuine decision explanation, requiring stricter standards to avoid over-crediting.
Knowledge distillation evaluations must report lost teacher capabilities via a Distillation Loss Statement rather than relying solely on task scores.
A harmonized risk reporting standard for internal frontier AI model use, structured around autonomous misbehavior and insider threats using means, motive, and opportunity factors.
citing papers explorer
-
Compared to What? Baselines and Metrics for Counterfactual Prompting
Counterfactual prompting effects on LLMs are often indistinguishable from those caused by meaning-preserving paraphrases, causing most previously reported demographic sensitivities to disappear under proper statistical comparison.
-
Reasoning Dynamics and the Limits of Monitoring Modality Reliance in Vision-Language Models
VLMs show answer inertia in CoT reasoning and remain influenced by misleading textual cues even with sufficient visual evidence, making CoT an incomplete window into modality reliance.