pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Models

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (50%).

57 Pith papers citing it
Background 50% of classified citations
abstract

Reasoning models have made rapid progress on many benchmarks involving math, code, and science. Yet, there are still many open questions about the best training recipes for reasoning since state-of-the-art models often rely on proprietary datasets with little to no public information available. To address this, the goal of the OpenThoughts project is to create open-source datasets for training reasoning models. After initial explorations, our OpenThoughts2-1M dataset led to OpenThinker2-32B, the first model trained on public reasoning data to match DeepSeek-R1-Distill-32B on standard reasoning benchmarks such as AIME and LiveCodeBench. We then improve our dataset further by systematically investigating each step of our data generation pipeline with 1,000+ controlled experiments, which led to OpenThoughts3. Scaling the pipeline to 1.2M examples and using QwQ-32B as teacher yields our OpenThoughts3-7B model, which achieves state-of-the-art results: 53% on AIME 2025, 51% on LiveCodeBench 06/24-01/25, and 54% on GPQA Diamond - improvements of 15.3, 17.2, and 20.5 percentage points compared to the DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B. All of our datasets and models are available on https://openthoughts.ai.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 10 dataset 7 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Reasoning models have made rapid progress on many benchmarks involving math, code, and science. Yet, there are still many open questions about the best training recipes for reasoning since state-of-the-art models often rely on proprietary datasets with little to no public information available. To address this, the goal of the OpenThoughts project is to create open-source datasets for training reasoning models. After initial explorations, our OpenThoughts2-1M dataset led to OpenThinker2-32B, the first model trained on public reasoning data to match DeepSeek-R1-Distill-32B on standard reasoning
  • background future directions, including the integration of multi-modal reasoning, efficiency improvements, and enhanced knowledge frameworks. By providing a structured overview, this survey aims to inspire future research and further the development of reasoning large language models 1. 1 Introduction In recent years, as shown in Figure 1, the emergence of reasoning large language models (RLLMs) such as OpenAI o1 [ 307] and DeepSeek R1 [ 227] has sparked a growing body of research into Long Chain-of-Though

co-cited works

clear filters

representative citing papers

GIANTS: Generative Insight Anticipation from Scientific Literature

cs.CL · 2026-04-10 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

GIANTS-4B, trained with RL on a new 17k-example benchmark of parent-to-child paper insights, achieves 34% relative improvement over gemini-3-pro in LM-judge similarity and is rated higher-impact by a citation predictor.

Super Apriel: One Checkpoint, Many Speeds

cs.LG · 2026-04-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

A single 15B supernet checkpoint supports runtime switching between attention mixer placements for multiple decode speed presets while retaining 77-96% quality relative to the teacher model.

DMax: Aggressive Parallel Decoding for dLLMs

cs.LG · 2026-04-09 · conditional · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

DMax uses On-Policy Uniform Training and Soft Parallel Decoding to enable aggressive parallelism in dLLMs, raising TPF on GSM8K from 2.04 to 5.47 and on MBPP from 2.71 to 5.86 while preserving accuracy.

Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Models

cs.CL · 2025-10-29 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Looped language models with latent iterative computation and entropy-regularized depth allocation achieve performance matching up to 12B standard LLMs through superior knowledge manipulation.

Self-Supervised On-Policy Distillation for Reasoning Language Models

cs.LG · 2026-05-17 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

SSOPD converts intra-group correct-wrong contrast into process supervision by distilling a teacher distribution from the shortest correct completion into prefixes of the longest wrong completion, improving GRPO on AIME and HMMT benchmarks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 11 of 11 citing papers after filters.