arxiv: 2407.12580 · v1 · submitted 2024-07-17 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.CV· cs.IR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

E5-V: Universal Embeddings with Multimodal Large Language Models

Ting Jiang , Minghui Song , Zihan Zhang , Haizhen Huang , Weiwei Deng , Feng Sun , Qi Zhang , Deqing Wang

show 1 more author

Fuzhen Zhuang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 22:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.CVcs.IR

keywords multimodal embeddingslarge language modelsuniversal representationstext-only trainingcontrastive learningmodality bridgingvision language models

0 comments

The pith

Prompted MLLMs trained only on text pairs deliver universal multimodal embeddings that rival or exceed specialized models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that multimodal large language models can be turned into effective embedders for different types of data by using prompts to unify inputs. Even without any fine-tuning, this setup closes the gap between text and images or other modalities. The key innovation is training the model using only text pairs for contrastive learning, which not only works better than training on image-text pairs but also slashes training costs by about 95 percent. This avoids the expense of gathering multimodal datasets altogether. Tests on retrieval, classification, and other tasks confirm it matches or beats existing state-of-the-art methods.

Core claim

E5-V demonstrates that MLLMs, when adapted with prompts, can generate universal embeddings across modalities. The model is trained exclusively on text pairs using contrastive objectives, leading to better generalization than traditional multimodal training while reducing costs dramatically. This approach achieves strong performance on four types of tasks without requiring multimodal fine-tuning data.

What carries the argument

The prompting strategy applied to MLLMs to encode any input type into a shared embedding space, combined with single-modality contrastive training on text.

Load-bearing premise

The internal representations from MLLM pretraining are already sufficient for representing non-text modalities through appropriate prompting.

What would settle it

If on a standard multimodal retrieval benchmark E5-V embeddings show no better alignment between images and captions than random chance or underperform a model trained directly on image-text pairs, the claim would be falsified.

read the original abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown promising advancements in general visual and language understanding. However, the representation of multimodal information using MLLMs remains largely unexplored. In this work, we introduce a new framework, E5-V, designed to adapt MLLMs for achieving universal multimodal embeddings. Our findings highlight the significant potential of MLLMs in representing multimodal inputs compared to previous approaches. By leveraging MLLMs with prompts, E5-V effectively bridges the modality gap between different types of inputs, demonstrating strong performance in multimodal embeddings even without fine-tuning. We propose a single modality training approach for E5-V, where the model is trained exclusively on text pairs. This method demonstrates significant improvements over traditional multimodal training on image-text pairs, while reducing training costs by approximately 95%. Additionally, this approach eliminates the need for costly multimodal training data collection. Extensive experiments across four types of tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of E5-V. As a universal multimodal model, E5-V not only achieves but often surpasses state-of-the-art performance in each task, despite being trained on a single modality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Training MLLMs on text pairs alone via prompting yields strong multimodal embeddings at much lower cost than multimodal training.

read the letter

The punchline is that training an MLLM only on text pairs with the right prompts can produce embeddings that handle multiple modalities effectively, often better than training on actual image-text data, and at a fraction of the cost. What is new is the explicit single-modality training framework for E5-V. Instead of collecting and training on multimodal pairs, they use text-only contrastive learning on the prompted model. This seems to leverage the MLLM's pretraining to handle the modality gap via prompting alone. The paper does well in reporting broad experiments across four task types and emphasizing the practical benefits like reduced data needs. The 95% cost reduction is a concrete number that stands out for anyone building these systems. The soft spots are around the details of the alignment. The concern that text-only loss might not sufficiently align vision outputs is reasonable because there's no direct multimodal objective during training. If the full paper has ablations showing that image embeddings do align properly and that performance holds on cross-modal tasks without degradation, that would address it. Otherwise, it risks being mostly a text embedding model with incidental multimodal capability. The abstract also leaves out specifics on statistical significance and exact baselines, which makes the superiority claim harder to assess immediately. This paper is for colleagues working on embedding models, MLLM adaptation, or efficient multimodal learning. A reader interested in lowering the barrier for multimodal systems would find the approach useful to try or build on. It deserves a serious referee. The idea is simple enough to verify, and if the results hold, it has clear implications for practice. Recommendation: Send to peer review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces E5-V, a framework adapting multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for universal multimodal embeddings via prompting. It claims strong performance across modalities even without fine-tuning, and proposes a single-modality training regime using only text pairs under contrastive loss. This reportedly outperforms traditional image-text multimodal training, cuts training costs by ~95%, removes the need for multimodal data collection, and achieves or exceeds SOTA on four task types.

Significance. If the central empirical claims hold, the result would be significant: it would demonstrate that MLLM pretraining already encodes sufficiently rich cross-modal structure for embedding tasks, that text-only contrastive adaptation suffices to produce a universal space, and that this yields both performance gains and dramatic cost reductions over conventional multimodal training pipelines.

major comments (2)

[single modality training approach] The claim that text-only contrastive training on pairs produces a universal embedding space (Abstract and the single-modality training section) rests on the unexamined assumption that gradients from text pairs alone will align vision-encoder and fusion-layer outputs with text representations. No analysis of cross-modal embedding distances, t-SNE visualizations, or ablation removing the vision pathway is provided to confirm that image representations actually move into the same space rather than remaining in a separate region.
[Extensive experiments] The reported superiority over multimodal training and the 95% cost reduction (Abstract) are presented without baseline details, statistical significance tests, data-split descriptions, or ablation studies on the contribution of the prompt versus the contrastive objective. These omissions make it impossible to verify whether the gains are attributable to the proposed method or to differences in model scale, prompt engineering, or evaluation protocol.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the prompt templates and the exact contrastive loss formulation should be stated explicitly rather than left implicit.
The four task types are mentioned but not enumerated with their datasets or metrics in the abstract; a concise table in the introduction would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the detailed review. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify and strengthen our claims regarding the single-modality training approach and the experimental details in E5-V. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [single modality training approach] The claim that text-only contrastive training on pairs produces a universal embedding space (Abstract and the single-modality training section) rests on the unexamined assumption that gradients from text pairs alone will align vision-encoder and fusion-layer outputs with text representations. No analysis of cross-modal embedding distances, t-SNE visualizations, or ablation removing the vision pathway is provided to confirm that image representations actually move into the same space rather than remaining in a separate region.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important aspect. Our empirical results on multimodal retrieval and other tasks after text-only training suggest that the representations are aligned, as the model performs well on image inputs without multimodal fine-tuning. However, we agree that direct evidence of alignment would strengthen the paper. In the revised manuscript, we will add t-SNE visualizations comparing embeddings from text, image, and multimodal inputs, as well as an ablation study that disables the vision encoder during inference to show its contribution to the shared space. This will confirm that the contrastive gradients from text pairs effectively align the vision pathway. revision: yes
Referee: [Extensive experiments] The reported superiority over multimodal training and the 95% cost reduction (Abstract) are presented without baseline details, statistical significance tests, data-split descriptions, or ablation studies on the contribution of the prompt versus the contrastive objective. These omissions make it impossible to verify whether the gains are attributable to the proposed method or to differences in model scale, prompt engineering, or evaluation protocol.

Authors: We acknowledge that additional details are necessary to fully substantiate our claims. The current manuscript provides high-level comparisons, but we will revise it to include: (1) precise specifications of baseline models and their scales, (2) statistical significance testing (e.g., bootstrap or t-tests with p-values), (3) detailed descriptions of data splits and preprocessing, and (4) ablation studies varying the prompt templates and isolating the contrastive objective. These additions will allow readers to better attribute the performance gains and cost reductions to the proposed method. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical claims rest on experiments, not derivations

full rationale

The paper presents E5-V as an empirical framework that adapts MLLMs via prompting and single-modality text-pair contrastive training. No equations, formal derivations, or self-referential definitions appear in the abstract or described content. Central claims of bridging modality gaps and outperforming multimodal training are supported solely by reported experimental results on four task types, with no load-bearing steps that reduce by construction to fitted inputs or self-citations. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the domain assumption that MLLM representations already encode cross-modal information accessible via prompts, with no free parameters or invented entities explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption MLLMs contain internal representations sufficient to bridge modalities when prompted appropriately
Invoked to justify prompt-based embedding extraction without multimodal fine-tuning.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5520 in / 1181 out tokens · 43262 ms · 2026-05-16T22:48:42.759101+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.DAlembert.Inevitability bilinear_family_forced unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We propose a single modality training approach for E5-V, where the model is trained exclusively on text pairs. This method demonstrates significant improvements over traditional multimodal training on image-text pairs, while reducing training costs by approximately 95%.
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.HierarchyEmergence hierarchy_emergence_forces_phi unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

By leveraging MLLMs with prompts, E5-V effectively bridges the modality gap between different types of inputs

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Unifying Scientific Communication: Fine-Grained Correspondence Across Scientific Media
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

Creates the first benchmark dataset integrating papers, slides, videos, and presentations for evaluating AI models on fine-grained multimodal correspondences in science.
Think When Needed: Adaptive Reasoning-Driven Multimodal Embeddings with a Dual-LoRA Architecture
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

TWN attaches separate reasoning and embedding LoRA adapters to a frozen backbone with gradient detachment and a self-supervised gate that decides per input whether to generate CoT, achieving SOTA on MMEB-V2 with 3-5% ...
Beyond Binary: Reframing GUI Critique as Continuous Semantic Alignment
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

BBCritic uses contrastive learning to align GUI actions in a continuous affordance space, outperforming larger binary critic models on a new four-level hierarchical benchmark while enabling zero-shot transfer.
Utility-Oriented Visual Evidence Selection for Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation
cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Evidence utility is defined as information gain on the model's output distribution, with ranking by gain on a latent helpfulness variable shown equivalent to answer-space utility under mild assumptions, enabling a tra...
jina-embeddings-v5-omni: Geometry-preserving Embeddings via Locked Aligned Towers
cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Jina-embeddings-v5-omni creates multimodal embeddings for text, image, audio, and video by freezing the text and media encoders and training only 0.35% of the weights via a VLM-style connector.
SLQ: Bridging Modalities via Shared Latent Queries for Retrieval with Frozen MLLMs
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

SLQ turns frozen MLLMs into retrievers via shared latent queries appended to inputs, outperforming fine-tuning on COCO and Flickr30K while introducing KARR-Bench for knowledge-aware evaluation.
Bottleneck Tokens for Unified Multimodal Retrieval
cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Bottleneck Tokens paired with a masked generative objective achieve state-of-the-art unified multimodal retrieval performance among 2B-scale models on the MMEB-V2 benchmark with 78 datasets.
PLUME: Latent Reasoning Based Universal Multimodal Embedding
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

PLUME uses latent-state autoregressive rollouts and a progressive training curriculum to deliver efficient reasoning for universal multimodal embeddings without generating explicit rationales.
Adapting MLLMs for Nuanced Video Retrieval
cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Text-only contrastive fine-tuning of an MLLM with hard negatives produces embeddings that handle temporal, negation, and multimodal nuances in video retrieval and achieves SOTA performance.
GME: Improving Universal Multimodal Retrieval by Multimodal LLMs
cs.CL 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

GME achieves state-of-the-art results in universal multimodal retrieval by training on a balanced synthetic multimodal dataset.
jina-embeddings-v5-omni: Geometry-preserving Embeddings via Locked Aligned Towers
cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

GELATO extends frozen text embedding models with locked image and audio encoders, training minimal connectors to produce a single semantic embedding space for text, image, audio, and video while keeping original text ...
Unifying Scientific Communication: Fine-Grained Correspondence Across Scientific Media
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Creates MCD, the first benchmark dataset integrating papers, slides, videos and presentations, then evaluates embedding and vision-language models on discovering fine-grained alignments across them.
A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and Challenges
cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A survey that categorizes RIR benchmarks by domain and modality, proposes a taxonomy for integrating reasoning into retrieval pipelines, and outlines key challenges.
Beyond Chain-of-Thought: Rewrite as a Universal Interface for Generative Multimodal Embeddings
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Rewrite-driven generation with alignment and RL produces shorter, more effective generative multimodal embeddings than CoT methods on retrieval benchmarks.
SLQ: Bridging Modalities via Shared Latent Queries for Retrieval with Frozen MLLMs
cs.CV 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

SLQ adapts frozen MLLMs for multimodal retrieval by appending shared latent queries to text and image tokens and introduces KARR-Bench to test knowledge-aware reasoning retrieval.
ReAlign: Optimizing the Visual Document Retriever with Reasoning-Guided Fine-Grained Alignment
cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

ReAlign improves visual document retrieval by training retrievers to match query-induced rankings with rankings derived from VLM-generated, region-focused descriptions of relevant page content.
EmbeddingGemma: Powerful and Lightweight Text Representations
cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A 300M-parameter open embedding model sets new SOTA on MTEB for its size class and matches models twice as large while staying effective when compressed.
Combating Visual Neglect and Semantic Drift in Large Multimodal Models for Enhanced Cross-Modal Retrieval
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

SSA-ME uses saliency-aware modeling to reduce visual neglect and semantic drift, achieving SOTA results on the MMEB benchmark for multimodal retrieval.
AFMRL: Attribute-Enhanced Fine-Grained Multi-Modal Representation Learning in E-commerce
cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

AFMRL uses MLLM-generated attributes in attribute-guided contrastive learning and retrieval-aware reinforcement to achieve SOTA fine-grained multimodal retrieval on e-commerce datasets.
Qwen3-VL-Embedding and Qwen3-VL-Reranker: A Unified Framework for State-of-the-Art Multimodal Retrieval and Ranking
cs.CL 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B achieves state-of-the-art performance with a 77.8 overall score on the MMEB-V2 multimodal embedding benchmark.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 17 Pith papers · 4 internal anchors

[1]

isearle: Improving textual inversion for zero-shot composed image retrieval

[ABBDB24] Lorenzo Agnolucci, Alberto Baldrati, Marco Bertini, and Alberto Del Bimbo. isearle: Improving textual inversion for zero-shot composed image retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.02951,

work page arXiv
[2]

LLaMA-Adapter V2: Parameter-Efficient Visual Instruction Model

[GHZ+23] Peng Gao, Jiaming Han, Renrui Zhang, Ziyi Lin, Shijie Geng, Aojun Zhou, Wei Zhang, Pan Lu, Conghui He, Xiangyu Yue, et al. Llama-adapter v2: Parameter-efficient visual instruction model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.15010,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[3]

SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings

[GYC21] Tianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, and Danqi Chen. Simcse: Simple contrastive learning of sentence embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08821,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[4]

Scal- ing sentence embeddings with large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16645,

[JHL+23] Ting Jiang, Shaohan Huang, Zhongzhi Luan, Deqing Wang, and Fuzhen Zhuang. Scal- ing sentence embeddings with large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16645,

work page arXiv
[5]

Promptbert: Improving bert sentence embeddings with prompts

[JJH+22] Ting Jiang, Jian Jiao, Shaohan Huang, Zihan Zhang, Deqing Wang, Fuzhen Zhuang, Furu Wei, Haizhen Huang, Denvy Deng, and Qi Zhang. Promptbert: Improving bert sentence embeddings with prompts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.04337,

work page arXiv
[6]

Vision-by-language for training-free compositional image retrieval

[KRMA23] Shyamgopal Karthik, Karsten Roth, Massimiliano Mancini, and Zeynep Akata. Vision-by-language for training-free compositional image retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.09291,

work page arXiv
[7]

Microsoft coco: Common objects in context

[LMB+14] Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pages 740–755. Springer,

work page 2014
[8]

Universal vision-language dense retrieval: Learning a unified representation space for multi-modal retrieval

[LXL+22] Zhenghao Liu, Chenyan Xiong, Yuanhuiyi Lv, Zhiyuan Liu, and Ge Yu. Universal vision-language dense retrieval: Learning a unified representation space for multi-modal retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00179,

work page arXiv
[9]

Sgpt: Gpt sentence embeddings for semantic search

[Mue22] Niklas Muennighoff. Sgpt: Gpt sentence embeddings for semantic search. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08904,

work page arXiv
[10]

Sentence-t5: Scalable sentence encoders from pre-trained text-to-text models

[NÁC+21] Jianmo Ni, Gustavo Hernández Ábrego, Noah Constant, Ji Ma, Keith B Hall, Daniel Cer, and Yinfei Yang. Sentence-t5: Scalable sentence encoders from pre-trained text-to-text models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.08877,

work page arXiv
[11]

EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scale

[SFW+23] Quan Sun, Yuxin Fang, Ledell Wu, Xinlong Wang, and Yue Cao. Eva-clip: Improved training techniques for clip at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15389,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[12]

Uniir: Training and benchmarking universal multimodal information retrievers

[WCC+23] Cong Wei, Yang Chen, Haonan Chen, Hexiang Hu, Ge Zhang, Jie Fu, Alan Ritter, and Wenhu Chen. Uniir: Training and benchmarking universal multimodal information retrievers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17136,

work page arXiv
[13]

Improving text embeddings with large language models

[WYH+23] Liang Wang, Nan Yang, Xiaolong Huang, Linjun Yang, Rangan Majumder, and Furu Wei. Improving text embeddings with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00368,

work page arXiv
[14]

A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models

[YFZ+23] Shukang Yin, Chaoyou Fu, Sirui Zhao, Ke Li, Xing Sun, Tong Xu, and Enhong Chen. A survey on multimodal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13549,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[15]

VISTA: Visualized Text Embedding For Universal Multi-Modal Retrieval

11 [ZLX+24] Junjie Zhou, Zheng Liu, Shitao Xiao, Bo Zhao, and Yongping Xiong. VISTA: Visualized Text Embedding For Universal Multi-Modal Retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04292,

work page arXiv
[16]

Long-CLIP: Unlocking the long-text capa- bility of clip

[ZZD+24] Beichen Zhang, Pan Zhang, Xiaoyi Dong, Yuhang Zang, and Jiaqi Wang. Long-clip: Unlocking the long-text capability of clip. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15378,

work page arXiv