arxiv: 2604.03128 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CL

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Self-Distilled RLVR

Chenxu Yang, Chuanyu Qin, Dingyu Yao, Jiaqi Wang, Minghui Chen, Naibin Gu, Nan Duan, Qingyi Si, Weiping Wang, Zheng Lin

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 19:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CL

keywords self-distillationRLVRon-policy distillationLLM trainingreinforcement learningupdate magnitudestraining stability

0 comments

The pith

RLSD restricts self-distillation to token-level policy differences for update magnitudes while RLVR supplies directions from verifiable rewards.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that on-policy self-distillation relying solely on privileged teacher signals produces information leakage and long-term instability. RLSD instead uses self-distillation only to compute token-level policy differences that determine fine-grained update magnitudes. It continues to draw reliable update directions from RLVR signals based on environmental feedback such as response correctness. This separation lets the method combine dense signals with stable directions, producing higher convergence ceilings and better training stability than either pure RLVR or full OPSD.

Core claim

Learning signals derived solely from the privileged teacher in on-policy self-distillation cause severe information leakage and unstable long-term training; RLSD therefore applies self-distillation exclusively to obtain token-level policy differences for setting update magnitudes while retaining RLVR to derive reliable directions from environmental feedback such as response correctness.

What carries the argument

RLSD, which splits self-distillation to set update magnitudes from token-level policy differences and RLVR to set update directions from verifiable environmental outcomes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The magnitude-direction split could be tested in other sequential learning settings where dense internal signals compete with sparse external rewards.
If the separation works, similar restrictions on privileged signals might stabilize self-evolution loops in multi-agent or hierarchical RL.
The result suggests that leakage arises mainly when privileged information controls direction rather than scale, pointing to a broader design rule for hybrid distillation methods.

Load-bearing premise

That limiting self-distillation to token-level policy differences for magnitudes will prevent the leakage and instability that appear when the same signals also dictate update directions.

What would settle it

A training run in which RLSD exhibits the same long-term instability or information leakage as pure OPSD, or fails to exceed the convergence level of standard RLVR, would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

On-policy distillation (OPD) has become a popular training paradigm in the LLM community. This paradigm selects a larger model as the teacher to provide dense, fine-grained signals for each sampled trajectory, in contrast to reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), which only obtains sparse signals from verifiable outcomes in the environment. Recently, the community has explored on-policy self-distillation (OPSD), where the same model serves as both teacher and student, with the teacher receiving additional privileged information such as reference answers to enable self-evolution. This paper demonstrates that learning signals solely derived from the privileged teacher result in severe information leakage and unstable long-term training. Accordingly, we identify the optimal niche for self-distillation and propose \textbf{RLSD} (\textbf{RL}VR with \textbf{S}elf-\textbf{D}istillation). Specifically, we leverage self-distillation to obtain token-level policy differences for determining fine-grained update magnitudes, while continuing to use RLVR to derive reliable update directions from environmental feedback (e.g., response correctness). This enables RLSD to simultaneously harness the strengths of both RLVR and OPSD, achieving a higher convergence ceiling and superior training stability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

RLSD splits self-distillation to magnitudes and RLVR to directions to dodge OPSD leakage, but the abstract supplies no runs or ablations to show the split actually works.

read the letter

The paper flags that pure on-policy self-distillation leaks outcome information through the privileged teacher and leads to long-term instability. Their response is to restrict self-distillation to token-level policy differences that only set update magnitudes, while RLVR supplies the directions from verifiable correctness. That division is the concrete new piece; it is not just another hybrid but a deliberate separation of concerns that prior OPD and RLVR work did not spell out this way. The write-up is clear on why the split is motivated and how it is implemented at the token level. The main gap is that none of this is backed by results. The abstract states the problem and the design but shows no training curves, no comparison to OPSD or RLVR baselines, and no ablation on whether the magnitude signal stays free of leakage. The stress-test worry about privileged correctness still bleeding through the magnitude channel therefore cannot be checked yet. If the full paper contains those runs and they hold, the method would be useful for groups already running RLVR on LLMs who want finer-grained updates without the instability. Until then it reads as a plausible engineering tweak rather than a demonstrated fix. I would send it to review because the problem is real in the literature and the proposed split is simple enough to test quickly, even if heavy revision on the empirical side is likely.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript identifies severe information leakage and long-term instability in on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) when the same model acts as teacher with privileged reference answers. It proposes RLSD, which retains RLVR to supply update directions from verifiable environmental outcomes (e.g., response correctness) while restricting self-distillation to token-level policy differences that set only the fine-grained update magnitudes. The central claim is that this separation harnesses the strengths of both paradigms to reach a higher convergence ceiling and better training stability.

Significance. The proposed decoupling of direction (RLVR) from magnitude (self-distillation) is a conceptually clean way to combine sparse verifiable signals with dense token-level information. If the leakage concern can be shown not to reappear, the method could improve stability in RLVR pipelines for LLM reasoning without requiring larger external teachers. However, the manuscript supplies no experiments, ablations, or analysis, so any significance remains prospective rather than demonstrated.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract and design description: the claim that 'learning signals solely derived from the privileged teacher result in severe information leakage and unstable long-term training' is asserted without any supporting empirical results, ablation studies, training curves, or references to prior demonstrations of this failure mode.
RLSD design: the assumption that token-level policy differences computed from the privileged teacher can be used purely for magnitudes while RLVR supplies directions, without reintroducing outcome-correlated leakage, is stated but receives no formal bound, isolation experiment, or analysis that would confirm the claimed clean separation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and for recognizing the conceptual appeal of decoupling update direction (RLVR) from magnitude (self-distillation). We address each major comment below and will strengthen the empirical support in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and design description: the claim that 'learning signals solely derived from the privileged teacher result in severe information leakage and unstable long-term training' is asserted without any supporting empirical results, ablation studies, training curves, or references to prior demonstrations of this failure mode.

Authors: We agree the abstract claim would be stronger with direct empirical backing. The full manuscript motivates the leakage issue through the OPSD formulation and its dependence on privileged reference answers, but we will add explicit ablation studies, training curves comparing OPSD versus RLVR, and relevant references in the revision to demonstrate the instability. revision: yes
Referee: [—] RLSD design: the assumption that token-level policy differences computed from the privileged teacher can be used purely for magnitudes while RLVR supplies directions, without reintroducing outcome-correlated leakage, is stated but receives no formal bound, isolation experiment, or analysis that would confirm the claimed clean separation.

Authors: The separation is enforced by construction: RLVR alone determines update direction from verifiable outcomes (response correctness), while self-distillation contributes only the scalar magnitude via token-level policy differences. This prevents privileged information from influencing direction. We will add an isolation experiment in the revision that compares update directions with and without the distillation term to empirically verify no reintroduction of leakage. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; RLSD is a methodological combination of existing components

full rationale

The paper first demonstrates problems with pure OPSD (information leakage and instability), then proposes RLSD as a hybrid that uses self-distillation solely for token-level policy differences (magnitudes) and RLVR for directions from environmental feedback. This is framed as an empirical combination rather than a derivation. No equations reduce the claimed result to its inputs by construction, no fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, and no self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the outcome. The central claim remains independently testable via ablations and benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract alone, no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced beyond standard assumptions of reinforcement learning and distillation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1098 out tokens · 56628 ms · 2026-05-13T19:40:23.931799+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
wt = exp(sign(A)·Δt) = (PT(yt)/PS(yt))^sign(A) ... the environment reward retains exclusive authority over whether a trajectory is reinforced or penalized; the teacher only modulates the relative magnitude
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean embed_injective echoes
the signals governing update direction and update magnitude have asymmetric requirements: the directional signal can be sparse but must be reliable ... the magnitude signal ... benefits from being as dense as possible

Forward citations

Cited by 28 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Respecting Self-Uncertainty in On-Policy Self-Distillation for Efficient LLM Reasoning
cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

EGRSD and CL-EGRSD advance the accuracy-length frontier in LLM reasoning by entropy-guided weighting of token-level distillation signals from the teacher.
GEAR: Granularity-Adaptive Advantage Reweighting for LLM Agents via Self-Distillation
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

GEAR reshapes GRPO trajectory advantages using divergence signals from a ground-truth-conditioned teacher to create adaptive token- and segment-level credit regions.
Rebellious Student: Reversing Teacher Signals for Reasoning Exploration with Self-Distilled RLVR
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

RLRT augments GRPO by reinforcing tokens on correct student rollouts that the teacher would not have predicted, outperforming standard self-distillation and exploration baselines on Qwen3 models.
TRACE: Distilling Where It Matters via Token-Routed Self On-Policy Alignment
cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

TRACE improves math reasoning by distilling only on annotator-marked critical spans with forward KL on correct key spans, optional reverse KL on errors, and GRPO elsewhere, gaining 2.76 points over GRPO while preservi...
Training with Harnesses: On-Policy Harness Self-Distillation for Complex Reasoning
cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

OPHSD uses harness-augmented models as teachers to distill reasoning capabilities into base LLMs, yielding strong standalone performance on classification and math tasks.
Structured Role-Aware Policy Optimization for Multimodal Reasoning
cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

SRPO refines GRPO into role-aware token-level advantages by emphasizing perception tokens based on visual dependency (original vs. corrupted inputs) and reasoning tokens based on consistency with perception, unified v...
VISD: Enhancing Video Reasoning via Structured Self-Distillation
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

VISD improves VideoLLM reasoning performance and training efficiency by combining structured multi-dimensional self-distillation feedback with RL via direction-magnitude decoupling, curriculum scheduling, and EMA stab...
Preference-Based Self-Distillation: Beyond KL Matching via Reward Regularization
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

PBSD derives a reward-reweighted teacher distribution as the analytic optimum of a reward-regularized objective, yielding better stability and performance than KL-based self-distillation on math reasoning and tool-use tasks.
MAD-OPD: Breaking the Ceiling in On-Policy Distillation via Multi-Agent Debate
cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

MAD-OPD recasts on-policy distillation teachers as a debating collective to supply better supervision, lifting agentic and code performance over single-teacher OPD across multiple model sizes.
Learn where to Click from Yourself: On-Policy Self-Distillation for GUI Grounding
cs.AI 2026-05 accept novelty 7.0

GUI-SD introduces on-policy self-distillation with visually enriched privileged context and entropy-guided weighting, outperforming GRPO and naive OPSD on six GUI grounding benchmarks while improving training efficiency.
Learn where to Click from Yourself: On-Policy Self-Distillation for GUI Grounding
cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

GUI-SD is the first on-policy self-distillation framework for GUI grounding that adds privileged bounding-box context and entropy-guided weighting to outperform GRPO methods on six benchmarks in accuracy and efficiency.
Near-Future Policy Optimization
cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

NPO uses a policy's own near-future checkpoint as auxiliary trajectories to maximize effective learning signal S = Q/V, improving performance from 57.88 to 63.15 on Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct with GRPO while accelerating co...
Learning with Rare Success but Rich Feedback via Reflection-Enhanced Self-Distillation
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

RESD turns failure trajectories into token-level supervision via retrospective reflections and a persistent global playbook, enabling faster improvement than standard self-distillation or GRPO with only one rollout pe...
Anti-Self-Distillation for Reasoning RL via Pointwise Mutual Information
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Anti-Self-Distillation reverses self-distillation signals via PMI to fix overconfidence on structural tokens, matching GRPO baseline accuracy 2-10x faster with up to 11.5 point gains across 4B-30B models.
SOD: Step-wise On-policy Distillation for Small Language Model Agents
cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

SOD reweights on-policy distillation strength step-by-step using divergence to stabilize tool use in small language model agents, yielding up to 20.86% gains and 26.13% on AIME 2025 for a 0.6B model.
D-OPSD: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Continuously Tuning Step-Distilled Diffusion Models
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

D-OPSD enables continuous supervised fine-tuning of few-step diffusion models via on-policy self-distillation where the model acts as both teacher (multimodal context) and student (text-only context) on its own roll-outs.
Uni-OPD: Unifying On-Policy Distillation with a Dual-Perspective Recipe
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Uni-OPD unifies on-policy distillation across LLMs and MLLMs with dual-perspective strategies that promote student exploration and enforce order-consistent teacher supervision based on outcome rewards.
Multilingual Safety Alignment via Self-Distillation
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

MSD enables cross-lingual safety transfer in LLMs via self-distillation with Dual-Perspective Safety Weighting, improving safety in low-resource languages without target response data.
Co-Evolving Policy Distillation
cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

CoPD integrates multiple expert capabilities by running parallel RLVR training with bidirectional online policy distillation among experts, outperforming mixed RLVR and sequential OPD while surpassing domain-specific ...
Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipe
cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

On-policy distillation works when student and teacher models share thinking patterns and the teacher adds new capabilities, with success tied to alignment on a small set of high-probability tokens.
Self-Distilled Reinforcement Learning for Co-Evolving Agentic Recommender Systems
cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

CoARS enables co-evolving recommender and user agents by using interaction-derived rewards and self-distilled credit assignment to internalize multi-turn feedback into model parameters, outperforming prior agentic baselines.
Beyond GRPO and On-Policy Distillation: An Empirical Sparse-to-Dense Reward Principle for Language-Model Post-Training
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Sparse RL on a strong teacher followed by dense distillation to the student outperforms direct GRPO on the student for math tasks, with a forward-KL + OPD bridge enabling further gains.
On-Policy Distillation with Best-of-N Teacher Rollout Selection
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

BRTS improves on-policy distillation by sampling multiple teacher rollouts and selecting the best one via a correctness-first then alignment priority rule, yielding gains on AIME and AMC math benchmarks.
On-Policy Distillation with Best-of-N Teacher Rollout Selection
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

BRTS improves on-policy distillation by selecting the highest-quality teacher trajectory from a small pool of samples based on correctness and alignment with the student, yielding gains on AIME and AMC math benchmarks.
VISD: Enhancing Video Reasoning via Structured Self-Distillation
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

VISD improves VideoLLM reasoning by adding multi-dimensional diagnostic self-distillation and RL decoupling, yielding higher accuracy, better grounding, and nearly 2x faster training convergence.
VISD: Enhancing Video Reasoning via Structured Self-Distillation
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

VISD adds structured privileged feedback from a judge model and a direction-magnitude decoupling trick to let VideoLLMs learn token-level credit assignment while keeping RL stable, yielding higher accuracy and roughly...
Multilingual Safety Alignment via Self-Distillation
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

MSD transfers LLM safety from high-resource to low-resource languages via self-distillation and dual-perspective weighting without needing response data.
EasyVideoR1: Easier RL for Video Understanding
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

EasyVideoR1 delivers an optimized RL pipeline for video understanding in large vision-language models, achieving 1.47x throughput gains and aligned results on 22 benchmarks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 23 Pith papers · 17 internal anchors

[1]

Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, Y. K. Li, Y. Wu, and Daya Guo. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[2]

DeepSeek-AI, Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, Xiaokang Zhang, Xingkai Yu, Yu Wu, Z. F. Wu, Zhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Zhuoshu Li, Ziyi Gao, Aixin Liu, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Bei Feng, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang, Chong Ruan, Damai D...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[3]

Kimi Team, Tongtong Bai, Yifan Bai, Yiping Bao, S. H. Cai, Yuan Cao, Y. Charles, H. S. Che, Cheng Chen, Guanduo Chen, Huarong Chen, Jia Chen, Jiahao Chen, Jianlong Chen, Jun Chen, Kefan Chen, Liang Chen, Ruijue Chen, Xinhao Chen, Yanru Chen, Yanxu Chen, Yicun Chen, Yimin Chen, Yingjiang Chen, Yuankun Chen, Yujie Chen, Yutian Chen, Zhirong Chen, Ziwei Chen...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[4]

On-policy distillation of language models: Learning from self-generated mistakes

Rishabh Agarwal, Nino Vieillard, Yongchao Zhou, Piotr Stanczyk, Sabela Ramos Garea, Matthieu Geist, and Olivier Bachem. On-policy distillation of language models: Learning from self-generated mistakes. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. URLhttps://openreview.net/forum? id=3zKtaqxLhW

work page 2024
[5]

Thinking Machines Lab: Connectionism , year =

Kevin Lu and Thinking Machines Lab. On-policy distillation. Thinking Machines Lab: Connectionism, 2025. doi: 10.64434/tml.20251026. https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/on-policy-distillation

work page doi:10.64434/tml.20251026 2025
[6]

MiMo-V2-Flash Technical Report

Core Team, Bangjun Xiao, Bingquan Xia, Bo Yang, Bofei Gao, Bowen Shen, Chen Zhang, Chenhong He, Chiheng Lou, Fuli Luo, Gang Wang, Gang Xie, Hailin Zhang, Hanglong Lv, Hanyu Li, Heyu Chen, Hongshen Xu, Houbin Zhang, Huaqiu Liu, Jiangshan Duo, Jianyu Wei, Jiebao Xiao, Jinhao Dong, Jun Shi, Junhao Hu, Kainan Bao, Kang Zhou, Lei Li, Liang Zhao, Linghao Zhang,...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[7]

Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models

Siyan Zhao, Zhihui Xie, Mengchen Liu, Jing Huang, Guan Pang, Feiyu Chen, and Aditya Grover. Self-distilled reasoner: On-policy self-distillation for large language models, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18734

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[8]

Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation

Jonas Hübotter, Frederike Lübeck, Lejs Behric, Anton Baumann, Marco Bagatella, Daniel Marta, Ido Hakimi, Idan Shenfeld, Thomas Kleine Buening, Carlos Guestrin, and Andreas Krause. Reinforcement learning via self-distillation, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20802

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[9]

Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms

John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. Proximal policy optimization algorithms, 2017. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[10]

Unlocking Exploration in RLVR: Uncertainty-aware Advantage Shaping for Deeper Reasoning

Can Xie, Ruotong Pan, Xiangyu Wu, Yunfei Zhang, Jiayi Fu, Tingting Gao, and Guorui Zhou. Unlocking exploration in rlvr: Uncertainty-aware advantage shaping for deeper reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10649, 2025

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[11]

Outcome-grounded advantage reshaping for fine-grained credit assignment in mathematical reasoning

Ziheng Li, Liu Kang, Feng Xiao, Luxi Xing, Qingyi Si, Zhuoran Li, Weikang Gong, Deqing Yang, Yanghua Xiao, and Hongcheng Guo. Outcome-grounded advantage reshaping for fine-grained credit assignment in mathematical reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.07408, 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[12]

Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, 2017. URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/1412.6980

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[13]

Mmfinereason: Closing the multimodal reasoning gap via open data-centric methods, 2026

Honglin Lin, Zheng Liu, Yun Zhu, Chonghan Qin, Juekai Lin, Xiaoran Shang, Conghui He, Wentao Zhang, and Lijun Wu. Mmfinereason: Closing the multimodal reasoning gap via open data-centric methods, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21821

work page arXiv 2026
[14]

Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert agi, 2024

Xiang Yue, Yuansheng Ni, Kai Zhang, Tianyu Zheng, Ruoqi Liu, Ge Zhang, Samuel Stevens, Dongfu Jiang, Weiming Ren, Yuxuan Sun, Cong Wei, Botao Yu, Ruibin Yuan, Renliang Sun, Ming Yin, Boyuan Zheng, Zhenzhu Yang, Yibo Liu, Wenhao Huang, Huan Sun, Yu Su, and Wenhu Chen. Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for exp...

work page 2024
[15]

MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts

Pan Lu, Hritik Bansal, Tony Xia, Jiacheng Liu, Chunyuan Li, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Hao Cheng, Kai-Wei Chang, Michel Galley, and Jianfeng Gao. Mathvista: Evaluating mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02255

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[16]

Measuring multimodal math- ematical reasoning with math-vision dataset, 2024

Ke Wang, Junting Pan, Weikang Shi, Zimu Lu, Mingjie Zhan, and Hongsheng Li. Measuring multimodal math- ematical reasoning with math-vision dataset, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14804

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

Atkinson, Aaditya Baranwal, Alexandru Coca, Mikah Dang, Sebastian Dziadzio, Jakob D

Jonathan Roberts, Mohammad Reza Taesiri, Ansh Sharma, Akash Gupta, Samuel Roberts, Ioana Croitoru, Simion-Vlad Bogolin, Jialu Tang, Florian Langer, Vyas Raina, Vatsal Raina, Hanyi Xiong, Vishaal Udandarao, Jingyi Lu, Shiyang Chen, Sam Purkis, Tianshuo Yan, Wenye Lin, Gyungin Shin, Qiaochu Yang, Anh Totti Nguyen, David I. Atkinson, Aaditya Baranwal, Alexan...

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

We-math: Does your large multimodal model achieve human-like mathematical reasoning?arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01284, 2024

Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong, Minhui Wu, Chong Sun, Xiaoshuai Song, Zhuoma GongQue, Shanglin Lei, Zhe Wei, Miaoxuan Zhang, Runfeng Qiao, Yifan Zhang, Xiao Zong, Yida Xu, Muxi Diao, Zhimin Bao, Chen Li, and Honggang Zhang. We-math: Does your large multimodal model achieve human-like mathematical reasoning?, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01284. 16

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

Qwen3-VL Technical Report

Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Lianghao Deng, Wei Ding, Chang Gao, Chunjiang Ge, Wenbin Ge, Zhifang Guo, Qidong Huang, Jie Huang, Fei Huang, Binyuan Hui, Shutong Jiang, Zhaohai Li, Mingsheng Li, Mei Li, Kaixin Li, Zicheng Lin, Junyang Lin, Xuejing Liu, Jiawei Liu, Chenglong Liu, Yang Liu, Dayiheng Liu, Shixuan ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[20]

Hybridflow: A flexible and efficient rlhf framework

Guangming Sheng, Chi Zhang, Zilingfeng Ye, Xibin Wu, Wang Zhang, Ru Zhang, Yanghua Peng, Haibin Lin, and Chuan Wu. Hybridflow: A flexible and efficient rlhf framework. InProceedings of the TwentiethEuropean Conference on Computer Systems, page 1279–1297. ACM, March 2025. doi: 10.1145/3689031.3696075. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3689031.3696075

work page doi:10.1145/3689031.3696075 2025
[21]

Easyr1: An efficient, scalable, multi-modality rl training framework.https://github.com/hiyouga/EasyR1, 2025

Yaowei Zheng, Junting Lu, Shenzhi Wang, Zhangchi Feng, Dongdong Kuang, Yuwen Xiong, and Richong Zhang. Easyr1: An efficient, scalable, multi-modality rl training framework.https://github.com/hiyouga/EasyR1, 2025

work page 2025
[22]

Let’s verify step by step

Hunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards, Bowen Baker, Teddy Lee, Jan Leike, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, and Karl Cobbe. Let’s verify step by step. InThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. URLhttps://openreview.net/forum?id=v8L0pN6EOi

work page 2024
[23]

Math- shepherd: Verify and reinforce llms step-by-step without human annotations

Peiyi Wang, Lei Li, Zhihong Shao, Runxin Xu, Damai Dai, Yifei Li, Deli Chen, Yu Wu, and Zhifang Sui. Math- shepherd: Verify and reinforce llms step-by-step without human annotations. InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume1: Long Papers), pages 9426–9439, 2024

work page 2024
[24]

Test-time prompt intervention, 2025

Chenxu Yang, Qingyi Si, Mz Dai, Dingyu Yao, Mingyu Zheng, Minghui Chen, Zheng Lin, and Weiping Wang. Test-time prompt intervention, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02511

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervision

Liangchen Luo, Yinxiao Liu, Rosanne Liu, Samrat Phatale, Meiqi Guo, Harsh Lara, Yunxuan Li, Lei Shu, Yun Zhu, Lei Meng, et al. Improve mathematical reasoning in language models by automated process supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06592, 2024

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[26]

Step-level value preference optimization for mathematical reasoning

Guoxin Chen, Minpeng Liao, Chengxi Li, and Kai Fan. Step-level value preference optimization for mathematical reasoning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, pages 7889–7903, 2024

work page 2024
[27]

Generative verifiers: Reward modeling as next-token prediction

Lunjun Zhang, Arian Hosseini, Hritik Bansal, Mehran Kazemi, Aviral Kumar, and Rishabh Agarwal. Generative verifiers: Reward modeling as next-token prediction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15240, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[28]

Dynamic early exit in reasoning models, 2025

Chenxu Yang, Qingyi Si, Yongjie Duan, Zheliang Zhu, Chenyu Zhu, Qiaowei Li, Minghui Chen, Zheng Lin, and Weiping Wang. Dynamic early exit in reasoning models, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15895

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

S-grpo: Early exit via reinforcement learning in reasoning models,

Muzhi Dai, Chenxu Yang, and Qingyi Si. S-grpo: Early exit via reinforcement learning in reasoning models,

work page
[30]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07686

work page arXiv
[31]

Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards

Ganqu Cui, Lifan Yuan, Zefan Wang, Hanbin Wang, Yuchen Zhang, Jiacheng Chen, Wendi Li, Bingxiang He, Yuchen Fan, Tianyu Yu, et al. Process reinforcement through implicit rewards.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01456, 2025

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[32]

Reasoning with exploration: An entropy perspective

Daixuan Cheng, Shaohan Huang, Xuekai Zhu, Bo Dai, Xin Zhao, Zhenliang Zhang, and Furu Wei. Reasoning with exploration: An entropy perspective. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 40, pages 30377–30385, 2026

work page 2026
[33]

Beyond the 80/20 rule: High-entropy minority tokens drive effective reinforcement learning for llm reasoning

Shenzhi Wang, Le Yu, Chang Gao, Chujie Zheng, Shixuan Liu, Rui Lu, Kai Dang, Xiong-Hui Chen, Jianxin Yang, Zhenru Zhang, et al. Beyond the 80/20 rule: High-entropy minority tokens drive effective reinforcement learning for llm reasoning. InThe Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

work page
[34]

Seed-grpo: Semantic entropy enhanced grpo for uncertainty-aware policy optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.12346, 2025

Minghan Chen, Guikun Chen, Wenguan Wang, and Yi Yang. Seed-grpo: Semantic entropy enhanced grpo for uncertainty-aware policy optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.12346, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

Ktae: A model-free algorithm to key-tokens advantage estimation in mathematical reasoning, 2025

Wei Sun, Wen Yang, Pu Jian, Qianlong Du, Fuwei Cui, Shuo Ren, and Jiajun Zhang. Ktae: A model-free algorithm to key-tokens advantage estimation in mathematical reasoning, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2505.16826. 17

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Attention illuminates llm reasoning: The preplan-and-anchor rhythm enables fine-grained policy optimization

Yang Li, Zhichen Dong, Yuhan Sun, Weixun Wang, Shaopan Xiong, Yijia Luo, Jiashun Liu, Han Lu, Jiamang Wang, Wenbo Su, et al. Attention illuminates llm reasoning: The preplan-and-anchor rhythm enables fine-grained policy optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13554, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Beyond high-entropy exploration: Correctness-aware low-entropy segment-based advantage shaping for reasoning llms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00908, 2025

Xinzhu Chen, Xuesheng Li, Zhongxiang Sun, and Weijie Yu. Beyond high-entropy exploration: Correctness-aware low-entropy segment-based advantage shaping for reasoning llms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00908, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

Revisiting On-Policy Distillation: Empirical Failure Modes and Simple Fixes

Yuqian Fu, Haohuan Huang, Kaiwen Jiang, Yuanheng Zhu, and Dongbin Zhao. Revisiting on-policy distillation: Empirical failure modes and simple fixes, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25562

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[39]

Self-distillation enables continual learning

Idan Shenfeld, Mehul Damani, Jonas Hübotter, and Pulkit Agrawal. Self-distillation enables continual learning. In ICLR 2026 Workshop on Lifelong Agents: Learning, Aligning, Evolving, 2026. URLhttps://openreview. net/forum?id=HlWA3V6iKF

work page 2026
[40]

On-Policy Context Distillation for Language Models

Tianzhu Ye, Li Dong, Xun Wu, Shaohan Huang, and Furu Wei. On-policy context distillation for language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12275, 2026

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026
[41]

CRISP: Compressed Reasoning via Iterative Self-Policy Distillation

Hejian Sang, Yuanda Xu, Zhengze Zhou, Ran He, Zhipeng Wang, and Jiachen Sun. On-policy self-distillation for reasoning compression.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05433, 2026

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[42]

Privileged information distillation for language models

Emiliano Penaloza, Dheeraj Vattikonda, Nicolas Gontier, Alexandre Lacoste, Laurent Charlin, and Massimo Caccia. Privileged information distillation for language models. InThe 1st Workshop on Scaling Post-training for LLMs, 2026. URLhttps://openreview.net/forum?id=FbJu6NEBQR

work page 2026
[43]

Reinforcement-aware Knowledge Distillation for LLM Reasoning

Zhaoyang Zhang, Shuli Jiang, Yantao Shen, Yuting Zhang, Dhananjay Ram, Shuo Yang, Zhuowen Tu, Wei Xia, and Stefano Soatto. Reinforcement-aware knowledge distillation for llm reasoning, 2026. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2602.22495. A Deferred Proofs and Extended Analysis A.1 Proof of Theorem 1 (KL Decomposition) We suppress conditioning on(x, y<t)throughout ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026