Shared token budgets between visible chain-of-thought and answers create a coupling tax that makes non-thinking competitive on math benchmarks, with a truncation decomposition predicting the crossover and split budgets improving results.
super hub Canonical reference
Let's Verify Step by Step
Canonical reference. 81% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
178
Pith papers citing it
Background
81% of classified citations
abstract
In recent years, large language models have greatly improved in their ability to perform complex multi-step reasoning. However, even state-of-the-art models still regularly produce logical mistakes. To train more reliable models, we can turn either to outcome supervision, which provides feedback for a final result, or process supervision, which provides feedback for each intermediate reasoning step. Given the importance of training reliable models, and given the high cost of human feedback, it is important to carefully compare the both methods. Recent work has already begun this comparison, but many questions still remain. We conduct our own investigation, finding that process supervision significantly outperforms outcome supervision for training models to solve problems from the challenging MATH dataset. Our process-supervised model solves 78% of problems from a representative subset of the MATH test set. Additionally, we show that active learning significantly improves the efficacy of process supervision. To support related research, we also release PRM800K, the complete dataset of 800,000 step-level human feedback labels used to train our best reward model.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 25
dataset 4
method 2
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract In recent years, large language models have greatly improved in their ability to perform complex multi-step reasoning. However, even state-of-the-art models still regularly produce logical mistakes. To train more reliable models, we can turn either to outcome supervision, which provides feedback for a final result, or process supervision, which provides feedback for each intermediate reasoning step. Given the importance of training reliable models, and given the high cost of human feedback, it is important to carefully compare the both methods. Recent work has already begun this comparison, bu
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
MedPRMBench is the first fine-grained benchmark for process reward models in medical reasoning, featuring 6500 questions, 13000 chains, 113910 step labels, and a baseline that improves downstream QA accuracy by 3.2-6.7 points.
A Lean-verified multi-agent system produces a catalogue of 14,116 quantum codes with transversal diagonal gates for small parameters, extracts infinite families, and resolves specific distance-3 cases with constructions and no-go proofs.
ExCyTIn-Bench is the first benchmark of 7542 questions from Microsoft Sentinel threat investigation graphs, where the best LLM agent achieves a reward of 0.606.
EDGE-OPD adds guided rollouts and evidence masking to on-policy self-distillation, enabling successful learning of target identities where standard OPSD and RLSD fail.
GS-QA is a new benchmark of 2,800 QA pairs on 28 templates using OSM and Wikipedia data to evaluate LLMs on spatial predicates, multi-source reasoning, and diverse answer types including distances and counts.
Causal diagnosis identifies the routing module as bottleneck in LLM agents but prompt patching there degrades results due to linguistic co-adaptation, while upstream patching improves them.
In 1-3B instruction-tuned LMs on GSM8K, arithmetic CoT readout is dominated by positional copying of the trailing number before the answer delimiter, accounting for 54-92 percentage points of accuracy.
LinAlg-Bench shows LLMs switch from execution errors to computational abandonment and structured fabrication at 4x4 matrix scale, indicating a working memory limit rather than knowledge gaps.
DCDM replaces positional blocks with learnable semantic chunks via differentiable Chunking Attention, yielding consistent gains over block and unstructured diffusion baselines up to 1.5B parameters.
VPD frames language feedback learning as variational EM so the teacher policy refines itself via trust-region updates on outcomes while the student learns dense token distributions on its own rollouts, outperforming fixed-teacher baselines on reasoning and code tasks.
DRATS derives a minimax objective from a feasibility formulation of MTRL to adaptively sample tasks with the largest return gaps, leading to better worst-task performance on MetaWorld benchmarks.
Hallucination is detected as a transport-cost excursion in hidden-state trajectories, localized via contrastive PCA in a teacher model and distilled to a BiLSTM student.
RDPO applies magnitude-aware quantile normalization and Mahalanobis whitening to decorrelate heterogeneous rewards in multi-objective RL, improving instruction following and writing quality on LongCat-Flash post-training while staying competitive on reasoning and coding.
Test-Time Hinting trains a hint generator to prepend contextual guidance to VLM prompts, improving accuracy on natural-image VQA benchmarks with generalization to unseen tasks and models.
Reward-Weighted On-Policy Distillation with an open property-equivalence verifier produces a 7B model that surpasses prior SOTA on NL-to-SVA generation across pass@1/5/10 metrics.
Distillation signals align better with ideal updates on incorrect student rollouts than correct ones, with optimal teacher context depending on student capacity and task.
Presents a likelihood-based benchmark for equation-suffix prediction in technical papers with controls to detect shortcut vulnerabilities in model forecasts.
LLMs rely on semantic cues for matrix-game equilibria but can acquire approximate computation via residual training on small instances, with a Lipschitz proof enabling transfer to larger anonymous games.
Frontier LLMs achieve 95-100% accuracy on AMC/AIME problems but recover far fewer distinct valid strategies than human references, while collectively generating 50 novel strategies.
AgentPSO evolves reusable multi-agent reasoning skills via PSO-inspired natural-language updates, outperforming static agents and test-time multi-agent baselines on math and general reasoning tasks with cross-benchmark transfer.
Massive activations first appear in a single ME Layer due to RMSNorm and FFN, remain invariant thereafter, and a simple softening method raises LLM performance while reducing attention sinks.
vOPD stabilizes on-policy distillation gradients by subtracting a closed-form per-token negative reverse KL baseline as a detached control variate, preserving unbiasedness while lowering variance and matching expensive full-vocabulary methods.
CIKA uses LLM-based interventions to probe causal effects of concepts on math reasoning success, achieving competitive results on benchmarks like Omni-MATH and GSM8K with a frozen 7B model.
citing papers explorer
No citing papers match the current filters.