pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains

Canonical reference. 91% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

47 Pith papers citing it
Background 91% of classified citations
abstract

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has proven effective for complex reasoning tasks with clear correctness signals such as math and coding. However, extending it to real-world reasoning tasks is challenging, as evaluation depends on nuanced, multi-criteria judgments rather than binary correctness. Instance-specific rubrics have recently been used in evaluation benchmarks to capture such judgments, but their potential as reward signals for on-policy post-training remains underexplored. We introduce $\textbf{Rubrics as Rewards}$ (RaR), an on-policy reinforcement learning method that extends RLVR beyond verifiable domains by using rubric-based feedback. Across both medical and science domains, we evaluate multiple strategies for aggregating rubric feedback into rewards. The best RaR variant achieves relative improvements of up to $31\%$ on HealthBench and $7\%$ on GPQA-Diamond over popular LLM-as-judge baselines that rely on direct Likert-based rewards. These results demonstrate that RaR-trained policies adapt well to diverse evaluation formats, performing strongly on both rubric-based and multiple-choice tasks. Moreover, we find that using rubrics as structured reward signals yields better alignment for smaller judges and reduces performance variance across judge scales.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 10 method 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 43 2025 4

representative citing papers

Rubric-based On-policy Distillation

cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Rubric-based on-policy distillation allows training student models using only teacher responses by generating scoring rubrics from contrasts and using them for on-policy optimization, achieving superior performance and up to 10x better sample efficiency than logit-based approaches.

Visual Preference Optimization with Rubric Rewards

cs.CV · 2026-04-14 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

rDPO uses offline-built rubrics to generate on-policy preference data for DPO, raising benchmark scores in visual tasks over outcome-based filtering and style baselines.

Deep Research as Rubric for Reinforcement Learning

cs.CL · 2026-05-31 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

DR-rubric is a two-stage framework using iterative agentic search to generate atomic verifiable constraints for GRPO-based RL, achieving competitive performance on 6 benchmarks with 1K-3K examples via bootstrap or frontier-model rubrics.

Step-wise Rubric Rewards for LLM Reasoning

cs.LG · 2026-05-17 · conditional · novelty 6.0

SRaR attributes rubric items to specific steps via an LLM judge, normalizes per-step scores across rollouts, and combines them with outcome rewards via a decoupled advantage estimator, yielding 3.57-point accuracy gains on Qwen3-8B across math benchmarks.

PopuLoRA: Co-Evolving LLM Populations for Reasoning Self-Play

cs.AI · 2026-05-16 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

PopuLoRA shows that co-evolving populations of LoRA adapters through cross-evaluated self-play can outperform compute-matched single-agent baselines on multiple code and math reasoning benchmarks.

Revisiting DAgger in the Era of LLM-Agents

cs.LG · 2026-05-13 · conditional · novelty 6.0

DAgger-style training with turn-level policy interpolation raises 4B and 8B LLM agents to 27.3% and 29.8% on SWE-bench Verified, beating several larger published systems.

Reward Hacking in Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning

cs.AI · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Rubric-based RL verifiers can be gamed via partial criterion satisfaction and implicit-to-explicit tricks, yielding proxy gains that do not improve quality under rubric-free judges; stronger verifiers reduce but do not eliminate the mismatch.

RVPO: Risk-Sensitive Alignment via Variance Regularization

cs.LG · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RVPO penalizes variance across multiple reward signals during RLHF advantage aggregation, using a LogSumExp operator as a smooth variance penalty to reduce constraint neglect in LLM alignment.

citing papers explorer

Showing 47 of 47 citing papers.