Heimdall automates translation of eBPF C programs to Rust with formal equivalence proofs for 94.1% of 102 tested programs using LLMs, static analysis, and Z3-based checking.
super hub Canonical reference
SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
Canonical reference. 82% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.
307
Pith papers citing it
Background
82% of classified citations
abstract
Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a language model is tasked with editing the codebase to address the issue. Resolving issues in SWE-bench frequently requires understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and even files simultaneously, calling for models to interact with execution environments, process extremely long contexts and perform complex reasoning that goes far beyond traditional code generation tasks. Our evaluations show that both state-of-the-art proprietary models and our fine-tuned model SWE-Llama can resolve only the simplest issues. The best-performing model, Claude 2, is able to solve a mere $1.96$% of the issues. Advances on SWE-bench represent steps towards LMs that are more practical, intelligent, and autonomous.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 56
dataset 10
baseline 3
method 3
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
ExploitBench decomposes LLM exploitation into 16 oracle-verified capability flags and finds public frontier models trigger crashes but rarely reach arbitrary code execution on 41 V8 bugs.
EnergyAgentBench is a new benchmark with 70 task variants that evaluates LLM agents on live energy data for datacenter siting, long-horizon optimization, and causal grid diagnosis.
Agent-BRACE improves LLM agent performance on long-horizon partially observable tasks by 5.3-14.5% through a decoupled belief state of verbalized atomic claims with certainty labels that keeps context length constant.
A new native-runtime benchmark reveals that current frontier AI agents succeed on at most 62 percent of realistic long-horizon CLI tasks.
PDEAgent-Bench is the first multi-metric, multi-library benchmark for AI-generated PDE solvers, evaluating executability, numerical accuracy, and efficiency across DOLFINx, Firedrake, and deal.II.
SimWorld Studio deploys an evolving coding agent to create adaptive 3D environments that co-evolve with embodied learners, delivering 18-point success-rate gains over fixed environments in navigation benchmarks.
VibeServe demonstrates that AI agents can synthesize bespoke LLM serving systems end-to-end, remaining competitive with vLLM in standard settings while outperforming it in six non-standard scenarios involving unusual models, workloads, or hardware.
StabilizerBench is a new benchmark for evaluating AI agents on generating, optimizing, and making fault-tolerant stabilizer circuits for quantum error correction, with efficient verification and multi-tier scoring.
neuralCAD-Edit benchmark shows even the best foundation model (GPT 5.2) scores 53% lower than human CAD experts in acceptance trials for multimodal-instructed 3D model edits.
HWE-Bench is the first repository-level benchmark for LLM agents on real hardware bug repair, where the best agent fixes 70.7% of 417 tasks but drops below 65% on complex SoC projects.
SlopCodeBench shows coding agents degrade in structural quality and verbosity across iterative extensions, with no agent solving any problem completely and agent code 2x more eroded than human code.
MCP-Atlas is a new benchmark with 1000 tasks on production MCP servers that uses claim-level scoring to evaluate LLM agents on realistic multi-step tool-use competency.
ExCyTIn-Bench is the first benchmark of 7542 questions from Microsoft Sentinel threat investigation graphs, where the best LLM agent achieves a reward of 0.606.
The AI Scientist framework enables LLMs to independently conduct the full scientific process from idea generation to paper writing and review, demonstrated across three ML subfields with papers costing under $15 each.
OSWorld provides the first unified real-computer benchmark for open-ended multimodal agent tasks, exposing large performance gaps between humans and state-of-the-art LLM/VLM agents.
SpreadsheetBench 2 provides 321 expert-validated tasks from authentic business data showing frontier LLMs reach only 34.89% overall accuracy on end-to-end spreadsheet workflows.
CHIA introduces a framework for building and deploying agentic AI co-design flows as CHIA loops with tool nodes, reliability mechanisms, and five case-study demonstrations.
RigorBench evaluates AI coding agents on process discipline via five pillars and reports 41% higher process scores and 17% better outcome correctness with structured approaches on 30 tasks.
LLMs brew code answers in early layers before resolving into Resolved, Overprocessed, Misresolved, or Unresolved states, with 41.5% resolved overall and brewing duration stable at 24-42% across 16 models.
Visual graphs of repository structure added to text inputs for multimodal LLM agents reduce token consumption by up to 26% while maintaining or improving issue-resolution accuracy.
A new six-dimension process taxonomy for AI software development frameworks shows convergence on artifact persistence and human oversight but reveals that no framework covers all dimensions strongly, indicating a depth-portability trade-off.
Sakura is a multi-agent system that generates structurally complex tests from NL descriptions, achieving 50-78% higher compilability and 38-66% higher coverage overlap than baselines on 1,464 scenarios from 20 Apache Commons applications.
AgentCARD benchmark shows heterogeneous LLM agent teams with mixed deployments reach the cost-accuracy frontier, delivering up to 44% higher accuracy or 12x lower cost than uniform teams, with domain-specific role bottlenecks.
citing papers explorer
-
The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery
The AI Scientist framework enables LLMs to independently conduct the full scientific process from idea generation to paper writing and review, demonstrated across three ML subfields with papers costing under $15 each.
-
OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments
OSWorld provides the first unified real-computer benchmark for open-ended multimodal agent tasks, exposing large performance gaps between humans and state-of-the-art LLM/VLM agents.
-
MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering
MLE-bench evaluates frontier language models as ML engineering agents on 75 Kaggle competitions, with the top setup (o1-preview + AIDE) reaching bronze medal level in 16.9% of tasks.
-
$\tau$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
τ-bench shows state-of-the-art agents like GPT-4o succeed on under 50% of tool-using, rule-following tasks and are inconsistent across repeated trials.
-
LLM Agents can Autonomously Exploit One-day Vulnerabilities
GPT-4 LLM agents autonomously exploit 87% of tested one-day vulnerabilities when given CVE descriptions, far outperforming other models and tools.
-
CodeMind: Evaluating Large Language Models for Code Reasoning
CodeMind evaluates ten LLMs on four benchmarks using three new code reasoning tasks, finding performance varies by model size and drops with complexity while showing no correlation with bug repair ability.
-
Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Sampling
Repeated sampling scales problem coverage log-linearly with sample count, improving SWE-bench Lite performance from 15.9% to 56% using 250 samples.
-
DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence
An open-source MoE code model matches GPT-4 Turbo on coding and math benchmarks while expanding to 338 languages and 128K context length.
-
LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code
LiveCodeBench collects 400 recent contest problems to create a contamination-free benchmark evaluating LLMs on code generation and related capabilities like self-repair and execution.
-
"Should I Give Up Now?" Investigating LLM Pitfalls in Software Engineering
User study reveals nine LLM failure categories in SE tasks and quantifies abandonment factors from 26 participants.
-
LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods
A survey that organizes LLMs-as-judges research into functionality, methodology, applications, meta-evaluation, and limitations.
-
Precision or Peril: A PoC of Python Code Quality from Quantized Large Language Models
Smaller LLMs produce functional but limited Python code with variable quantization effects and quality/maintainability concerns that require validation before use.
-
The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey
A survey of emerging AI agent architectures that organizes single and multi-agent designs around reasoning, planning, tool use, communication, and reflection phases.