Agent-BRACE improves LLM agent performance on long-horizon partially observable tasks by 5.3-14.5% through a decoupled belief state of verbalized atomic claims with certainty labels that keeps context length constant.
super hub
SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
145 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
145
Pith papers citing it
abstract
Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a language model is tasked with editing the codebase to address the issue. Resolving issues in SWE-bench frequently requires understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and even files simultaneously, calling for models to interact with execution environments, process extremely long contexts and perform complex reasoning that goes far beyond traditional code generation tasks. Our evaluations show that both state-of-the-art proprietary models and our fine-tuned model SWE-Llama can resolve only the simplest issues. The best-performing model, Claude 2, is able to solve a mere $1.96$% of the issues. Advances on SWE-bench represent steps towards LMs that are more practical, intelligent, and autonomous.
hub tools
citation-role summary
method 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a
authors
co-cited works
fields
cs.SE 51 cs.AI 39 cs.CL 19 cs.LG 12 cs.CR 7 cs.MA 6 cs.CV 3 cs.DC 2 cond-mat.mtrl-sci 1 cs.HC 1roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
A new native-runtime benchmark reveals that current frontier AI agents succeed on at most 62 percent of realistic long-horizon CLI tasks.
PDEAgent-Bench is the first multi-metric, multi-library benchmark for AI-generated PDE solvers, evaluating executability, numerical accuracy, and efficiency across DOLFINx, Firedrake, and deal.II.
VibeServe demonstrates that AI agents can synthesize bespoke LLM serving systems end-to-end, remaining competitive with vLLM in standard settings while outperforming it in six non-standard scenarios involving unusual models, workloads, or hardware.
StabilizerBench is a new benchmark for evaluating AI agents on generating, optimizing, and making fault-tolerant stabilizer circuits for quantum error correction, with efficient verification and multi-tier scoring.
neuralCAD-Edit benchmark shows even the best foundation model (GPT 5.2) scores 53% lower than human CAD experts in acceptance trials for multimodal-instructed 3D model edits.
HWE-Bench is the first repository-level benchmark for LLM agents on real hardware bug repair, where the best agent fixes 70.7% of 417 tasks but drops below 65% on complex SoC projects.
The AI Scientist framework enables LLMs to independently conduct the full scientific process from idea generation to paper writing and review, demonstrated across three ML subfields with papers costing under $15 each.
OSWorld provides the first unified real-computer benchmark for open-ended multimodal agent tasks, exposing large performance gaps between humans and state-of-the-art LLM/VLM agents.
AEvo introduces a meta-agent that edits the evolution procedure or agent context based on accumulated state, outperforming baselines by 26% relative improvement on agentic benchmarks and achieving SOTA on open-ended tasks.
10.7% of passing SWE-agent trajectories are Lucky Passes with chaotic behaviors, and a quality score based on process references changes model rankings across eight backends.
ActGuide-RL uses human action data as plan-style guidance in mixed-policy RL to overcome exploration barriers in LLM agents, matching SFT+RL performance on search benchmarks without cold-start training.
StepCodeReasoner aligns code reasoning with verifiable stepwise execution traces via print anchors and bi-level GRPO reinforcement learning, reaching SOTA results on CRUXEval (91.1%) and LiveCodeBench (86.5%) for a 7B model.
CppPerf-Mine produces CppPerf-DB, a benchmark of 347 real-world performance-improving C++ patches (39% multi-file) from 42 repositories to evaluate repository-level repair tools.
TacoMAS performs test-time co-evolution of agent capabilities and communication topology in LLM multi-agent systems via fast capability updates and slow meta-LLM topology edits, delivering 13.3% average gains over strong baselines on four benchmarks.
LLMs encode tool necessity in pre-generation hidden states at AUROC 0.89-0.96, enabling Probe&Prefill to reduce tool calls 48% with 1.7% accuracy loss, outperforming prompt and reasoning baselines.
SkillGuard extracts executable environment contracts from LLM skill documents to detect only relevant drifts, reporting zero false positives on 599 cases, 100% precision in known-drift tests, and raising one-round repair success from 10% to 78%.
AgentForesight trains a 7B model to perform online auditing of multi-agent LLM trajectories, detecting early decisive errors and outperforming larger models on custom and external benchmarks.
AgentEscapeBench shows LLM agents' success rates drop from 90% to 60% as tool-dependency depth increases from 5 to 25 steps, while humans drop only from 98% to 80%.
LLM agents exhibit persistent attack-selection biases as fixed traits independent of success rates, with a bias momentum effect that resists steering and yields no performance gain.
LLM agents reach only 50.6% accuracy on chemical cost estimation within 25% error even with tools, dropping with noise due to parsing, pack selection, and tool-use failures.
Switchcraft routes agentic tool-calling queries to the lowest-cost model that preserves correctness, reaching 82.9% accuracy and 84% cost reduction on five benchmarks.
MOSAIC-Bench demonstrates that nine production coding agents achieve 53-86% end-to-end attack success rates on staged innocuous tickets across 10 web substrates and 31 CWE classes, far higher than the 0-20.4% rates seen with direct prompts.
ProgramBench introduces 200 tasks where models must reconstruct full programs like FFmpeg or SQLite from docs alone; none of 9 evaluated LMs fully solve any task and the best passes 95% tests on only 3% of tasks while favoring monolithic code.
citing papers explorer
-
Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation
EvalPlus augments HumanEval with 80x more tests via LLM and mutation strategies, exposing up to 28.9% more incorrect LLM-generated code and reversing some model performance rankings.