pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning

Canonical reference. 80% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

60 Pith papers citing it
Background 80% of classified citations
abstract

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful approach to enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), while its mechanisms are not yet well understood. In this work, we undertake a pioneering exploration of RLVR through the novel perspective of token entropy patterns, comprehensively analyzing how different tokens influence reasoning performance. By examining token entropy patterns in Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, we observe that only a small fraction of tokens exhibit high entropy, and these tokens act as critical forks that steer the model toward diverse reasoning pathways. Furthermore, studying how entropy patterns evolve during RLVR training reveals that RLVR largely adheres to the base model's entropy patterns, primarily adjusting the entropy of high-entropy tokens. These findings highlight the significance of high-entropy tokens (i.e., forking tokens) to RLVR. We ultimately improve RLVR by restricting policy gradient updates to forking tokens and uncover a finding even beyond the 80/20 rule: utilizing only 20% of the tokens while maintaining performance comparable to full-gradient updates on the Qwen3-8B base model and significantly surpassing full-gradient updates on the Qwen3-32B (+11.04 on AIME'25 and +7.71 on AIME'24) and Qwen3-14B (+4.79 on AIME'25 and +5.21 on AIME'24) base models, highlighting a strong scaling trend. In contrast, training exclusively on the 80% lowest-entropy tokens leads to a marked decline in performance. These findings indicate that the efficacy of RLVR primarily arises from optimizing the high-entropy tokens that decide reasoning directions. Collectively, our results highlight the potential to understand RLVR through a token-entropy perspective and optimize RLVR by leveraging high-entropy minority tokens to further improve LLM reasoning.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 14 method 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

DISA: Offline Importance Sampling for Distribution-Matching LLM-RL

cs.LG · 2026-05-17 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

DISA decouples partition function estimation using offline importance sampling for distribution-matching LLM-RL, matching or exceeding online baselines like FlowRL on math and code benchmarks while retaining more strategy diversity.

Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Models

cs.CL · 2025-10-29 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Looped language models with latent iterative computation and entropy-regularized depth allocation achieve performance matching up to 12B standard LLMs through superior knowledge manipulation.

Unified Data Selection for LLM Reasoning

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

High-Entropy Sum (HES) selects high-quality reasoning data for LLMs by summing entropy of the top highest-entropy tokens, matching full-dataset performance with top 20% in SFT and outperforming baselines in RFT and RL.

Beyond Mode Collapse: Distribution Matching for Diverse Reasoning

cs.AI · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

DMPO approximates forward KL minimization in on-policy RL by aligning the policy to a group-level reward-proportional target distribution, yielding 9-12% relative gains over GRPO on NP-Bench and smaller gains on math reasoning.

Holder Policy Optimisation

cs.LG · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

HölderPO unifies token-level aggregation in GRPO via the Hölder mean with a tunable p parameter and annealing schedule, delivering 54.9% average accuracy on math benchmarks and 93.8% success on ALFWorld.

Selective Off-Policy Reference Tuning with Plan Guidance

cs.AI · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

SORT turns all-wrong prompts into selective learning signals by weighting tokens more predictable under plan guidance from reference solutions, improving over GRPO on reasoning benchmarks especially for weaker models.

Epistemic Uncertainty for Test-Time Discovery

cs.LG · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

UG-TTT adds epistemic uncertainty measured by adapter disagreement as an exploration bonus in RL for LLMs, raising maximum reward and diversity on scientific discovery benchmarks.

AIPO: Learning to Reason from Active Interaction

cs.CL · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

AIPO adds active multi-agent consultation (Verify, Knowledge, Reasoning agents) plus custom importance sampling to RLVR training so LLMs expand their reasoning boundary and then operate without the agents.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 60 citing papers.