pith. sign in

arxiv: 1811.02042 · v1 · submitted 2018-11-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc

Bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy

Gregory Ashton , Moritz Huebner , Paul D. Lasky , Colm Talbot , Kendall Ackley , Sylvia Biscoveanu , Qi Chu , Atul Divarkala
show 13 more authors
Paul J. Easter Boris Goncharov Francisco Hernandez Vivanco Jan Harms Marcus E. Lower Grant D. Meadors Denyz Melchor Ethan Payne Matthew D. Pitkin Jade Powell Nikhil Sarin Rory J. E. Smith Eric Thrane
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 13:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesBayesian inferenceparameter estimationLIGOVirgoPython librarycompact binary mergerspopulation studies
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bilby provides a Python library for expert Bayesian parameter estimation of gravitational-wave sources with simple syntax.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces Bilby as a user-friendly Python library that delivers expert-level infrastructure for Bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy. It enables accurate estimation of source properties from both real LIGO/Virgo data and simulations by offering straightforward tools for model changes, custom likelihoods, and new detectors. The library also supports hierarchical Bayesian modeling for population studies, such as inferring black hole mass distributions from multiple observations. A sympathetic reader would care because this setup allows reliable analyses without requiring deep prior expertise in sampling methods or data handling. If correct, the work makes advanced gravitational-wave parameter estimation practical for a wider range of users on freely available datasets.

Core claim

Bilby is a Python code that provides expert-level parameter estimation infrastructure with straightforward syntax and tools that facilitate use by beginners. It allows accurate and reliable gravitational-wave parameter estimation on both real, freely-available data from LIGO/Virgo, and simulated data. Examples cover compact binary mergers and other signals including supernovae and binary neutron star merger remnants, while additional functionality supports population studies via hierarchical Bayesian modelling to infer distributions such as the black hole mass function from ensembles of observations.

What carries the argument

Bilby, the Python library that supplies the syntax and tools for setting up Bayesian sampling, signal models, and data analysis for gravitational-wave signals.

If this is right

  • Users can switch signal models or implement new likelihood functions without rewriting core sampling infrastructure.
  • Analyses of real LIGO/Virgo data and simulated injections can be performed with the same interface.
  • Hierarchical modelling allows inference of population-level parameters, such as the shape of the black hole mass distribution, from multiple events.
  • New detectors can be added to the analysis framework through modular extensions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • New researchers could test custom signal models on public data without first building an entire inference pipeline.
  • Faster iteration on analysis methods might become possible once the library handles the underlying sampling and data interfaces.
  • Integration with other open tools could expand the set of signals and detectors that non-specialists can study routinely.

Load-bearing premise

The library's code is correctly implemented and well-tested so that the provided examples produce reliable results without hidden errors in the sampling or data processing.

What would settle it

Running one of the compact binary merger examples on real LIGO/Virgo data and obtaining parameter posteriors that match independent published results from other codes to within statistical expectations.

read the original abstract

Bayesian parameter estimation is fast becoming the language of gravitational-wave astronomy. It is the method by which gravitational-wave data is used to infer the sources' astrophysical properties. We introduce a user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Bilby. This python code provides expert-level parameter estimation infrastructure with straightforward syntax and tools that facilitate use by beginners. It allows users to perform accurate and reliable gravitational-wave parameter estimation on both real, freely-available data from LIGO/Virgo, and simulated data. We provide a suite of examples for the analysis of compact binary mergers and other types of signal model including supernovae and the remnants of binary neutron star mergers. These examples illustrate how to change the signal model, how to implement new likelihood functions, and how to add new detectors. Bilby has additional functionality to do population studies using hierarchical Bayesian modelling. We provide an example in which we infer the shape of the black hole mass distribution from an ensemble of observations of binary black hole mergers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Bilby, a Python library for Bayesian parameter estimation in gravitational-wave astronomy. It claims to deliver expert-level infrastructure with straightforward syntax suitable for both beginners and experts, enabling accurate analysis of real LIGO/Virgo data and simulations for compact binary mergers, supernovae, binary neutron star remnants, and other signals. Additional functionality supports hierarchical Bayesian population studies, illustrated by an example inferring the black hole mass distribution from binary black hole merger observations. The manuscript provides usage examples demonstrating how to modify signal models, implement new likelihoods, and add detectors.

Significance. If the implementation and validation claims hold, Bilby would be a significant contribution to the field by lowering the barrier to reliable gravitational-wave parameter estimation and population inference. The emphasis on extensibility, open examples, and support for both real and simulated data positions it as a practical tool that could standardize workflows and facilitate broader community participation in LIGO/Virgo analyses.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Examples] The abstract states that results are 'accurate and reliable' on real and simulated data, but the manuscript should include at least one quantitative comparison (e.g., posterior overlap or credible-interval agreement) against an established code such as LALInference for a standard binary black hole injection to support this claim.
  2. [Population studies section] In the population-inference example, clarify the prior choices and the exact form of the hierarchical likelihood used for the black-hole mass distribution; this would help readers reproduce the reported shape inference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review of our manuscript and their recommendation to accept. The referee's summary accurately reflects the scope and goals of Bilby as a user-friendly library for Bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy, including its support for both real and simulated data as well as hierarchical population studies.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: software library description with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper introduces the Bilby Python library for Bayesian parameter estimation in gravitational-wave astronomy. It describes the API syntax, usage examples for compact binary mergers and other signals, hierarchical population inference, and states that results are reliable on real LIGO/Virgo and simulated data. No mathematical derivations, equations, parameter fittings, or predictions are presented that could reduce to inputs by construction. The work is a software announcement whose soundness depends on the released code and external testing rather than any self-referential chain. No self-citations or ansatzes are load-bearing in a circular manner.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a software library paper; no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented physical entities are introduced or required for the central claim.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5563 in / 1051 out tokens · 72414 ms · 2026-05-13T13:49:58.932278+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • Cost.FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Bayesian parameter estimation is fast becoming the language of gravitational-wave astronomy... We introduce a user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Bilby.

  • Foundation.DAlembert.Inevitability bilinear_family_forced unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Bilby provides expert-level parameter estimation infrastructure with straightforward syntax... for the analysis of compact binary mergers and other types of signal model

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 60 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GW231123: a Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190-265 $M_{\odot}$

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 accept novelty 9.0

    A new gravitational wave event reveals a binary black hole merger with total mass 190-265 solar masses, indicating black holes can form via gravitational-wave driven mergers beyond standard stellar channels.

  2. GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first informative astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors is reported using GW240925 and GW250207.

  3. Testing the Kerr hypothesis beyond the quadrupole with GW241011

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    GW241011 data shows consistency with Kerr black holes for both quadrupole and octupole moments and delivers the first observational bounds on spin-induced octupole deviations.

  4. Pulsed radio emission from a Central Compact Object

    astro-ph.HE 2025-12 conditional novelty 8.0

    The central compact object 1E 1207.4-5209 emits pulsed radio waves at its 0.4-second spin period, revealing it as a faint radio pulsar.

  5. From mass-loss histories to lightcurves: a generalised framework for interaction-powered transients

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces a generalized fast framework for modeling interaction-powered transients with arbitrary CSM profiles and multi-wavelength outputs.

  6. Prospect of Measuring the Cosmic Dipole by Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves Associated with Galaxy Surveys

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Simulations forecast that 10 years of Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer data could detect the cosmic dipole magnitude using strongly lensed GW events, with tighter bounds from combining double, triple, and quadru...

  7. A universal framework to identify eccentric binary mergers: GW200105 case study

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A reference-frequency-independent detection statistic for eccentric binary mergers is introduced and applied to GW200105, yielding ln B ≤ 0.9 in favor of the eccentric aligned-spin model over the quasi-circular preces...

  8. End-to-End Population Inference from Gravitational-Wave Strain using Transformers

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dingo-Pop uses a transformer to perform amortized, end-to-end population inference from GW strain data in seconds, bypassing per-event Monte Carlo sampling.

  9. Lessons from binary dynamics of inspiralling equal-mass boson-star mergers

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Numerical simulations of equal-mass boson-star mergers reveal larger waveform deviations from black-hole binaries in late inspiral and merger, plus odd multipole excitations for certain scalar-field phases, with some ...

  10. Novel ringdown tests of general relativity with black hole greybody factors

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GreyRing model based on greybody factors reproduces numerical relativity ringdown signals with mismatches of order 10^{-6} and enables a new post-merger consistency test of general relativity applied to GW250114.

  11. GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    gr-qc 2020-10 accept novelty 7.0

    LIGO and Virgo detected 39 compact binary coalescence events in O3a, including 13 new ones, with black hole binaries up to 150 solar masses and the first significantly asymmetric mass ratios.

  12. Cracking Gravitational Wave Multiple Ringdown Modes in Space

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FIREFLY algorithm enables 200-fold faster multi-mode ringdown analysis for space-borne gravitational wave detectors while remaining compatible with time-delay interferometry.

  13. Fast neural network surrogate for multimodal effective-one-body gravitational waveforms from generically precessing compact binaries

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Neural network surrogate approximates precessing compact binary gravitational waveforms up to 1000x faster than the base EOB model with validated accuracy.

  14. Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    pyEFPEHM extends prior PN models to include higher-order quasi-circular phasing, generalized precession solutions, and eccentric corrections up to 1PN in selected multipoles for eccentric precessing binaries with matt...

  15. GW231123: False Massive Graviton Signatures from Unmodeled Point-Mass Lensing

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Unmodeled point-mass lensing produces a spurious nonzero graviton mass posterior in GW231123 that vanishes when lensing is included in the analysis.

  16. Measurement prospects for the pair-instability mass cutoff with gravitational waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Simulations show a 40-50 solar-mass black-hole cutoff is not guaranteed to be confidently recovered from GWTC-4-like catalogs, spurious detections are unlikely, and O4 data would reduce cutoff-mass uncertainty by at l...

  17. Plunge-Merger-Ringdown Tests of General Relativity with GW250114

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GW250114 data constrains GR deviations in merger amplitude to 10% and frequency to 4% at 90% CL, with first bounds on the (4,4) mode frequency at 6%.

  18. Signatures of a subpopulation of hierarchical mergers in the GWTC-4 gravitational-wave dataset

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GWTC-4 data show a transition to nearly all hierarchical mergers above 46 solar masses, with the hierarchical rate peaking at 15.7 solar masses, indicating mass-dependent substructure in black hole spins.

  19. Improved Identification of Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves with Host Galaxy Locations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A two-step Bayesian reweighting scheme using Euclid galaxy locations boosts the Bayes factor for true lensed GW pairs by a factor of about 10 while lowering it for unlensed coincidences.

  20. A new group of low-spin $50-70M_\odot$ Black Holes and the high pair-instability mass cutoff

    astro-ph.HE 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    GWTC-4.0 data shows low-spin black holes up to 70 solar masses, moving the low-spin cutoff to 68.5 solar masses and favoring a high pair-instability mass gap.

  21. Inferring neutron-star Love-Q relations from gravitational waves in the hierarchical Bayesian framework

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Hierarchical Bayesian inference on 20 high-SNR simulated binary neutron star events shows a linear lnΛ-lnQ relation suffices and constrains dynamical Chern-Simons gravity length scale to ≤10 km.

  22. Scalar fields around black hole binaries in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Semi-analytic waveform model for scalar environments around black hole binaries is validated against numerical relativity and applied to LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data to obtain upper limits on scalar densities with tentative ...

  23. A Robust and Efficient F-statistic-based Framework for Consistent Bayesian Inference of Compact Binary Coalescences

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    F-statistic framework analytically maximizes over distance and polarization to enable faster Bayesian inference of compact binary coalescences with a new evidence formulation that matches full frequency-domain results...

  24. Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114

    gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 6.0

    GW250114 data confirm the remnant is consistent with a Kerr black hole and bound the dominant quadrupolar mode frequency to within a few percent of the GR prediction, with constraints tighter than prior multi-event catalogs.

  25. Evidence for eccentricity in the population of binary black holes observed by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA

    gr-qc 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Bayesian inference on LVK O1-O3 events with eccentric aligned-spin waveforms yields log10 Bayes factors of 1.77-4.75 favoring eccentricity for GW200129, GW190701 and GW200208_22, and >99.5% probability that at least o...

  26. Computationally efficient models for the dominant and sub-dominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes

    gr-qc 2020-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    IMRPhenomXPHM is a new computationally efficient phenomenological model for precessing binary black hole gravitational-wave signals that incorporates higher-order modes via twisting-up maps from non-precessing waveforms.

  27. dynesty: A Dynamic Nested Sampling Package for Estimating Bayesian Posteriors and Evidences

    astro-ph.IM 2019-04 accept novelty 6.0

    dynesty is an open-source Python package for dynamic nested sampling that improves efficiency in Bayesian posterior and evidence estimation compared to MCMC on certain problems.

  28. Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1

    gr-qc 2019-03 accept novelty 6.0

    Binary black hole signals in GWTC-1 are consistent with general relativity predictions, with an improved graviton mass bound of mg ≤ 4.7 × 10^{-23} eV/c² at 90% credible level.

  29. Is the Binary Black Hole Population Inference from Gravitational-Wave Data Robust?

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Waveform modeling uncertainties can distort features in the binary black hole mass distribution inferred from gravitational-wave data more than statistical uncertainties.

  30. Constraints on primordial black holes from the first part of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA fourth observing run

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA O4a data yields the strongest constraints on primordial black hole abundance for 0.6-100 solar masses, with resolvable mergers dominating the limits and no compelling evidence for a PBH contribution i...

  31. The Impact of Spin Priors on Parameterized Tests of General Relativity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Spin prior choices propagate into tests of GR via the 1.5PN deviation parameter δφ̂3 in a non-trivial, event-dependent way, with stronger effects for short-inspiral events and partial degeneracy with χ_eff when the de...

  32. Bayesian Analysis of Gravitational Wave Microlensing Effects from Galactic Double White Dwarfs

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bayesian analysis of simulated Taiji observations shows microlensing from lenses above 10^5 solar masses can be distinguished from unlensed DWD signals when separation is below 3 Einstein radii, while lower masses or ...

  33. Detectability of Gravitational-Wave Memory with LISA: A Bayesian Approach

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bayesian parameter estimation on simulated LISA data establishes conditions for detecting displacement memory in MBHB events and projects observation rates from population models.

  34. GW231123: Overlapping Gravitational Wave Signals?

    gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0

    GW231123 data favors an overlapping two-signal model over a single merger with Bayes factors of 100-10000, mitigating waveform-dependent discrepancies and suggesting possible gravitational lensing.

  35. Gravitational-wave parameter estimation to the Moon and back: massive binaries and the case of GW231123

    gr-qc 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LGWA could observe more than one third of known binary black hole events, detect ~90 mergers per year, and measure chirp mass better than third-generation detectors for massive systems.

  36. Impact of facility timing and coordination for next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulations of ET and CE networks show delays degrade localization metrics far more than SNR, with LIGO India greatly reducing the impact for multi-messenger and stochastic searches.

  37. Biased parameter inference of eccentric, spin-precessing binary black holes

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Eccentric BBH signals recovered with quasi-circular precessing models show biases in chirp mass and χ_p; Bayes factors favor eccentric aligned-spin models when both eccentricity and precession are present.

  38. Neural Post-Einsteinian Test of General Relativity with the Third Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Neural post-Einsteinian analysis of GWTC-3 finds no GR violation and sets constraints covering both post-Newtonian and beyond-post-Newtonian deviations in a single theory-agnostic setup.

  39. GW250114: testing Hawking's area law and the Kerr nature of black holes

    gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 5.0

    GW250114 data confirm the remnant black hole ringdown frequencies lie within 30% of Kerr predictions and that the final horizon area is larger than the sum of the progenitors' areas to high credibility.

  40. Disentangling spinning and nonspinning binary black hole populations with spin sorting

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Spin sorting with the default spin model distinguishes spinning and nonspinning binary black hole populations in simulations and shows real data rule out a fully nonspinning population but allow mixed ones with up to ...

  41. Assessment of normalizing flows for parameter estimation on time-frequency representations of gravitational-wave data

    gr-qc 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GP15 maps BBH spectrograms to parameter posteriors via residual networks and normalizing flows, producing results consistent with LVK analyses on GWTC-2.1 and GWTC-3 events while running in seconds.

  42. A practical Bayesian method for gravitational-wave ringdown analysis with multiple modes

    gr-qc 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    FIREFLY accelerates multi-mode GW ringdown analysis by analytically marginalizing QNM amplitudes and phases via Bayesian principles and importance sampling.

  43. Tests of General Relativity with GW230529: a neutron star merging with a lower mass-gap compact object

    gr-qc 2024-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    Parameterized inspiral tests on GW230529 find consistency with GR, with |δφ̂_{-2}| ≲ 8×10^{-5} and ℓ_GB ≲ 0.51 M_⊙ in ESGB theories.

  44. Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    gr-qc 2020-10 accept novelty 5.0

    No evidence for deviations from general relativity is found in LIGO-Virgo binary black hole events, with improved constraints on waveform parameters, graviton mass, and ringdown properties.

  45. Scalable Dark Siren Cosmology with gwcosmo: GPU Acceleration, Validation and Systematics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    GPU-accelerated gwcosmo enables 1000x faster dark-siren cosmological analyses for large GW catalogs.

  46. Polarization Birefringence and Waveform Systematics in GW231123

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Analysis of GW231123 with IMRPhenomXPHM, IMRPhenomXO4a and NRSur7dq4 yields no waveform-independent evidence for polarization birefringence, with 90% upper limits on the derived coefficient of 0.378, 0.097 and 0.273 r...

  47. Mitigating Systematic Errors in Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Mergers in O1-O3 LIGO-Virgo Data

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Parametric models incorporating waveform phase and amplitude uncertainties mitigate systematic errors in gravitational wave parameter estimation, producing consistent results across models and raw/deglitched data for ...

  48. Mitigating Systematic Errors in Parameter Estimation of Binary Black Hole Mergers in O1-O3 LIGO-Virgo Data

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Reanalysis of flagged LVK events with waveform uncertainty models produces consistent spin and precession inferences across raw/deglitched data and multiple waveform approximants.

  49. Gravitational-wave astronomy requires population-informed parameter estimation

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Population-informed hierarchical parameter estimation is required for unbiased astrophysical interpretation of gravitational-wave events rather than using standard individual posteriors with reference priors.

  50. Basilic: An end-to-end pipeline for Bayesian burst inference and model classification in gravitational-wave data

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Basilic is an end-to-end Bayesian pipeline for gravitational-wave burst inference and model classification, with a case study showing signal degeneracies between binary black hole mergers and cosmic strings.

  51. Investigating the effect of sensitivity of KAGRA on sky localization of gravitational-wave sources from compact binary coalescences

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    KAGRA enhances sky localization of binary neutron star mergers in the LVK network via added baselines, with measurable gains at current sensitivity and larger improvements as range reaches ~30 Mpc.

  52. GW190711_030756 and GW200114_020818: astrophysical interpretation of two asymmetric binary black hole mergers in the IAS catalog

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Two asymmetric BBH mergers are characterized with mass ratios 0.35 and ≤0.20; one shows high spins, negative χ_eff, and strong precession, suggesting an emerging population of massive rapidly spinning systems.

  53. The impact of waveform systematics and Gaussian noise on the interpretation of GW231123

    gr-qc 2026-01 accept novelty 4.0

    The high mass and high spin magnitudes inferred for GW231123 using NRSur7dq4 are robust to waveform systematics and Gaussian noise.

  54. False Alarm Rates in Detecting Gravitational Wave Lensing from Astrophysical Coincidences: Insights with Model-Independent Technique GLANCE

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Simulations of unlensed binary black hole mergers show that ~0.01% of event pairs are falsely classified as lensed by GLANCE at SNR threshold 1.5 with time delays of ~1000 days or more.

  55. An Implementation to Identify the Properties of Multiple Population of Gravitational Wave Sources

    gr-qc 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    GWKokab is a new modular JAX framework that uses normalizing flow samplers for efficient inference on subpopulations of compact binary mergers.

  56. Validating Prior-informed Fisher-matrix Analyses against GWTC Data

    gr-qc 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Fisher-matrix methods in GWFish match LIGO/Virgo posteriors reasonably when priors are included, with prior impact scaling with parameter degeneracy, supporting their use for ET forecasts.

  57. GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    gr-qc 2021-08 accept novelty 4.0

    GWTC-2.1 adds eight new high-significance compact binary coalescence events to the prior catalog, extending the observed black hole mass range and including candidates inside the pair-instability mass gap.

  58. Improved Constraints on Non-Kerr Deviations from Binary Black Hole Inspirals Using GWTC-4 Data

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Bayesian constraints from GWTC-4 binary black hole inspirals show Johannsen metric deformation parameters α13 and ε3 consistent with zero, supporting the Kerr hypothesis.

  59. Bayesian analysis of the complex singlet model with phase transition gravitational waves

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Bayesian forecasts for the Taiji detector constrain complex singlet model parameters through electroweak phase transition gravitational wave signals.

  60. The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    gr-qc 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The paper provides state-of-the-art predictions for the Einstein Telescope's impact on fundamental physics, cosmology, compact-object astrophysics, and multi-messenger astronomy across its proposed configurations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · cited by 61 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The core package The core package provides all of the code required for general problems of inference. It provides a unified inter- face to several different samplers listed below, standard sets of priors including arbitrary user-defined options, and a universal result object that stores all important information from a given simulation. Prior and likelihood...

    work page

  2. [2]

    GW150914

    The gw package The gw package provides the core functionality for parameter estimation specific to transient gravitational waves. Building on the core package, this provides prior specifications unique to such problems, e.g., a prior that is uniform in co-moving volume distance, as well as the standard likelihood used when studying gravitational- wave trans...

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 241102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott et al. , Phys. Rev. X 6, 041014 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbott et al. , Phys. Rev. X 6, 041015 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbott et al. , (2018), arXiv:1805.11581

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbott et al. , (2018), arXiv:1805.11579

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbott et al. , Astrophys. J. 848, L13 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbott et al. , Nature 551, 85 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Talbot and E

    C. Talbot and E. Thrane, Astrophys. J.856, 173 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Wysocki et al

    D. Wysocki et al. , Phys. Rev. D 97, 043014 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Optimal Search for an As- trophysical Gravitational-Wave Background,

    R. Smith and E. Thrane, “Optimal Search for an As- trophysical Gravitational-Wave Background,” (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    B. Farr, D. E. Holz, and W. M. Farr, Astrophys. J. 854, L9 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    S. R. Taylor and D. Gerosa, (2018), arXiv:1806.08365

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Constraints on Binary Black Hole Populations from LIGO-Virgo Detections

    J. Roulet and M. Zaldarriaga, (2018), arXiv:1806.10610

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 141101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 031104 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 201102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Vallisneri, J

    M. Vallisneri, J. Kanner, R. Williams, A. Weinstein, and B. Stephens, in Journal of Physics Conference Se- ries, Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 610 (2015) p. 012021

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Veitch et al

    J. Veitch et al. , Phys. Rev. D 91, 042003 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    C. M. Biwer, C. D. Capano, S. De, M. Cabero, D. A. Brown, A. H. Nitz, and V. Raymond, (2018), arXiv:1807.10312

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    gwastro/pycbc: 1.12.3 release,

    A. Nitz, I. Harry, D. Brown, C. M. Biwer, et al. , “gwastro/pycbc: 1.12.3 release,” (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 241103 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 221101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    B. P. Abbott et al. , Astrophys. J. 851, L35 (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Skilling, AIP Conf

    J. Skilling, AIP Conf. Proc. 735, 395 (2004)

    work page 2004

  30. [30]

    Thrane and C

    E. Thrane and C. Talbot, “An introduction to Bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy: parameter estimation, model selection, and hierarchical models,” (2018), arXiv:1809.02293

    work page arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Pierce, Types and Programming Languages (The MIT Press, 2002)

    B. Pierce, Types and Programming Languages (The MIT Press, 2002)

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    Buchner et al., Astron

    J. Buchner et al., Astron. Astrophys. 564, A125 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Foreman-Mackey, D

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 306 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/

    work page

  35. [35]

    https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/

    work page

  36. [36]

    https://pypi.org/project/BILBY/

    work page

  37. [37]

    https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/bilby/ ()

    work page

  38. [38]

    https://lscsoft.docs.ligo.org/bilby/ ()

    work page

  39. [39]

    W. D. Vousden, W. M. Farr, and I. Mandel, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455, 1919 (2016)

    work page 1919

  40. [40]

    Salvatier, T

    J. Salvatier, T. Wiecki, and C. Fonnesbeck, PeerJ Com- puter Science 2, 55 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Skilling, Bayesian Anal

    J. Skilling, Bayesian Anal. 1, 833 (2006)

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    Feroz and M

    F. Feroz and M. P. Hobson, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 384, 449 (2008)

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    Feroz, M

    F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, and M. Bridges, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    Importance Nested Sampling and the MultiNest Algorithm

    F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, E. Cameron, and A. N. Pettitt, (2013), arXiv:1306.2144

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2013

  45. [45]

    http://kylebarbary.com/nestle/

    work page

  46. [46]

    https://github.com/joshspeagle/dynesty

    work page

  47. [47]

    Veitch et al

    J. Veitch et al. , https://github.com/johnveitch/ cpnest (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Hierarchical Data Format, version 5,

    The HDF Group, “Hierarchical Data Format, version 5,” (1997-NNNN), http://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/

    work page 1997

  49. [49]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration Algorithm Li- brary software packages: LALInference, LALSimu- lation, and LALInspiral,

    LSC, “LIGO Scientific Collaboration Algorithm Li- brary software packages: LALInference, LALSimu- lation, and LALInspiral,” https://wiki.ligo.org/ DASWG/LALSuite

    work page

  50. [50]

    L., Massinger T., et al., 2018, gwpy/gwpy: 0.12.0, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.1346349

    D. Macleod, S. Coughlin, A. L. Urban, T. Massinger, et al. , (2018), 10.5281/zenodo.1346349

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.1346349 2018

  51. [51]

    van der Sluys, V

    M. van der Sluys, V. Raymond, I. Mandel, C. R¨ over, N. Christensen, V. Kalogera, R. Meyer, and A. Vecchio, Classical and Quantum Gravity 25, 184011 (2008)

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    M. V. van der Sluys, C. R¨ over, A. Stroeer, V. Raymond, I. Mandel, N. Christensen, V. Kalogera, R. Meyer, and A. Vecchio, ApJ 688, L61 (2008), arXiv:0710.1897

    work page arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    Veitch and A

    J. Veitch and A. Vecchio, Phys. Rev. D 78, 022001 (2008)

    work page 2008

  54. [54]

    Schmidt, M

    P. Schmidt, M. Hannam, and S. Husa, Phys. Rev. D 86, 104063 (2012)

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    Aasi et al

    J. Aasi et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Raymond and W

    V. Raymond and W. M. Farr, (2014), arXiv:1402.0053

    work page arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    B. Farr, E. Ochsner, W. M. Farr, and R. O’Shaughnessy, Phys. Rev. D 90, 024018 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Marginalisation of the time and phase pa- rameters in cbc parameter estimation,

    W. M. Farr, “Marginalisation of the time and phase pa- rameters in cbc parameter estimation,” (2014), https: //dcc.ligo.org/T1400460-v2/public

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    L. P. Singer and L. R. Price, Phys. Rev. D 93, 024013 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    L. P. Singer et al. , Astrophys. J. 829, L15 (2016)

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    Modelling calibration errors in cbc waveforms,

    W. M. Farr, B. Farr, and T. Littenberg, “Modelling calibration errors in cbc waveforms,” (2014), https: //dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1400682/public

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    This example is found in the Bilby git repository at https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/bilby/blob/master/ examples/injection_examples/basic_tutorial.py

    work page

  63. [63]

    Acernese et al

    F. Acernese et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    B. P. Abbott et al. , Astrophys. J. 848, L12 (2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    S. De, D. Finstad, J. M. Lattimer, D. A. Brown, E. Berger, and C. M. Biwer, (2018), arXiv:1804.08583

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    This example is found in the Bilby git repository at https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/bilby/blob/master/ examples/injection_examples/binary_neutron_ star_example.py

    work page

  67. [67]

    ´E. ´E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Phys. Rev. D 77, 021502 (2008). 14

    work page 2008

  68. [68]

    B. D. Lackey and L. Wade, Phys. Rev. D 91, 043002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    M. E. Lower, E. Thrane, P. D. Lasky, and R. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 98, 083028 (2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    Ligo-india, proposal of the consortium for indian initiative in gravitational-wave observa- tions (indigo),

    B. R. Iyer, T. Souradeep, C. S. Unnikrishnan, S. Dhurandhar, S. Raja, A. Sengupta, and I. Con- sortium), “Ligo-india, proposal of the consortium for indian initiative in gravitational-wave observa- tions (indigo),” (2011), https://dcc.ligo.org/ LIGO-M1100296/public

    work page 2011

  71. [71]

    Aso et al

    Y. Aso et al. , Phys. Rev. D 88, 043007 (2013)

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    Miller, L

    J. Miller, L. Barsotti, S. Vitale, P. Fritschel, M. Evans, and D. Sigg, Phys. Rev. D 91, 062005 (2015)

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    B. P. Abbott et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 44001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    Punturo et al

    M. Punturo et al. , Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 194002 (2010)

    work page 2010

  75. [75]

    https://git.ligo.org/gwinc/pygwinc

    work page

  76. [76]

    This example is found in the Bilby git repository at https://git.ligo.org/lscsoft/bilby/blob/ master/examples/injection_examples/Australian_ detector.py

    work page

  77. [77]

    Finesse,

    D. D. Brown and A. Freise, “Finesse,” (2014), You can download the binaries and source code at http: //www.gwoptics.org/finesse

    work page 2014

  78. [78]

    Logue, C

    J. Logue, C. D. Ott, I. S. Heng, P. Kalmus, and J. Scargill, Phys. Rev. D 86, 044023 (2012)

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    Powell, S

    J. Powell, S. E. Gossan, J. Logue, and I. S. Heng, Phys. Rev. D 94, 123012 (2016)

    work page 2016

  80. [80]

    Powell, M

    J. Powell, M. Szczepanczyk, and I. S. Heng, Phys. Rev. D 96, 123013 (2017)

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.