arxiv: 2208.01618 · v1 · submitted 2022-08-02 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.CL· cs.GR· cs.LG

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversion

Amit H. Bermano, Daniel Cohen-Or, Gal Chechik, Or Patashnik, Rinon Gal, Yuval Alaluf, Yuval Atzmon

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 18:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.CLcs.GRcs.LG

keywords textual inversiontext-to-image generationpersonalizationword embeddingsfew-shot learningconcept representationdiffusion models

0 comments

The pith

A single word embedding optimized from 3-5 images can represent user concepts for personalized text-to-image generation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that pre-trained text-to-image models can be extended to handle specific user concepts by learning a new word in their text embedding space. With only a few example images of an object or style, the method finds an embedding vector that stands in for the concept, allowing it to appear in ordinary language prompts for creating new images. This matters for turning general generators into tools that produce pictures of personal items in arbitrary scenes or artistic styles. The work finds that one such embedding suffices to capture varied and unique concepts while keeping the original model unchanged.

Core claim

We present textual inversion: given 3-5 images of a user concept, optimize a single pseudo-word embedding in the frozen model's text embedding space so that the concept can be invoked by that word in natural language sentences to guide image synthesis.

What carries the argument

Textual inversion: optimization of one new vector in the text encoder embedding space to match the input images under the diffusion loss, leaving the rest of the model fixed.

Load-bearing premise

The embedding space of a frozen pre-trained text-to-image model is expressive enough to encode arbitrary new visual concepts from only 3-5 images while remaining composable with other words in prompts.

What would settle it

After optimizing the embedding on 3-5 images of a distinct object, prompts that insert the new word into ordinary sentences would produce images that do not visually match the object or that fail to combine naturally with other described elements.

read the original abstract

Text-to-image models offer unprecedented freedom to guide creation through natural language. Yet, it is unclear how such freedom can be exercised to generate images of specific unique concepts, modify their appearance, or compose them in new roles and novel scenes. In other words, we ask: how can we use language-guided models to turn our cat into a painting, or imagine a new product based on our favorite toy? Here we present a simple approach that allows such creative freedom. Using only 3-5 images of a user-provided concept, like an object or a style, we learn to represent it through new "words" in the embedding space of a frozen text-to-image model. These "words" can be composed into natural language sentences, guiding personalized creation in an intuitive way. Notably, we find evidence that a single word embedding is sufficient for capturing unique and varied concepts. We compare our approach to a wide range of baselines, and demonstrate that it can more faithfully portray the concepts across a range of applications and tasks. Our code, data and new words will be available at: https://textual-inversion.github.io

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper shows you can add a user concept to a frozen text-to-image model by optimizing one new embedding vector from 3-5 images, and the resulting token composes reasonably well in new prompts.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that Textual Inversion turns a small set of photos into a single pseudo-word token that you can drop into natural language prompts. You freeze the diffusion model and text encoder, then optimize just the new embedding to reconstruct the input images. The result lets you generate the concept in new scenes or styles without retraining the whole network. They show this on objects, styles, and faces, with examples that look more consistent than prompt-only baselines or other inversion approaches they tested. Releasing the code and the learned tokens makes it easy to check the claims directly. The core procedure is straightforward and the qualitative results support the idea that one vector can carry enough information for useful composition. The paper also includes some quantitative comparisons using CLIP similarity and user preference, which back up the visual demos. The soft spots are in the evaluation depth rather than the method itself. Most evidence is visual or based on a limited set of metrics, with little systematic breakdown of failure cases like highly textured objects, viewpoint changes, or when the embedding starts to leak into unrelated prompt elements. There is no theoretical analysis of how much information one embedding can reliably hold or why the optimization converges to a generalizable point instead of memorizing the views. These are real gaps but they do not break the central result. The work is aimed at people building or using generative models who need a lightweight personalization step. It has enough clean execution and reproducible evidence to deserve a serious referee, even though more failure-mode testing would make the claims tighter.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Textual Inversion, a method to personalize a frozen pre-trained text-to-image diffusion model by optimizing a single pseudo-word embedding vector from 3-5 user-provided images of a concept (object or style). This embedding is inserted into natural language prompts to enable generation of the concept in new contexts, compositions, and styles without retraining the model. The central claim is that one embedding suffices to capture unique concepts while preserving composability, supported by qualitative demonstrations and comparisons to baselines.

Significance. If validated, the approach offers a lightweight, training-free personalization technique for large generative models, with clear utility for creative editing and concept transfer tasks. The authors' commitment to releasing code, data, and learned embeddings is a notable strength for reproducibility.

major comments (2)

[Experiments] Experiments section: The claim of outperforming baselines in faithful portrayal across tasks is stated in the abstract and §4, but no quantitative metrics (e.g., CLIP similarity scores, user study percentages, or reconstruction errors), ablation tables on image count (3 vs. 5), or failure-case analysis are provided. This leaves the superiority and generalizability assertions unverified and load-bearing for the main contribution.
[Method] §3.2 (Optimization): The embedding is optimized solely via reconstruction loss on the input images with the prompt containing the new token; without analysis of convergence properties or regularization to prevent overfitting to image-specific artifacts, it is unclear whether the single vector encodes a generalizable concept rather than a memorization of the training views, directly impacting the composability claim.

minor comments (2)

[Method] Notation for the pseudo-word embedding (denoted *v* or similar) should be introduced consistently in §3.1 and used uniformly in equations and figures to avoid ambiguity.
[Figures] Figure captions in the qualitative results could more explicitly reference the exact prompt templates used for each example to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional quantitative evaluations and methodological clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: The claim of outperforming baselines in faithful portrayal across tasks is stated in the abstract and §4, but no quantitative metrics (e.g., CLIP similarity scores, user study percentages, or reconstruction errors), ablation tables on image count (3 vs. 5), or failure-case analysis are provided. This leaves the superiority and generalizability assertions unverified and load-bearing for the main contribution.

Authors: We agree that the original manuscript would benefit from quantitative support. In the revised version, we have added CLIP similarity scores measuring alignment between generated images and reference concept images, results from a user study with percentage preferences for our method over baselines, an ablation table comparing performance with 3 versus 5 input images, and a dedicated subsection analyzing failure cases (e.g., highly detailed textures or extreme viewpoint changes). These additions directly substantiate the claims in the abstract and §4. revision: yes
Referee: [Method] §3.2 (Optimization): The embedding is optimized solely via reconstruction loss on the input images with the prompt containing the new token; without analysis of convergence properties or regularization to prevent overfitting, it is unclear whether the single vector encodes a generalizable concept rather than a memorization of the training views, directly impacting the composability claim.

Authors: The reconstruction objective in §3.2 is chosen to align the pseudo-word embedding with the visual features of the concept. We have revised §3.2 to include convergence analysis via loss curves over optimization steps for multiple concepts, showing stable behavior without divergence. While no additional regularization term was introduced, the frozen backbone and limited image count (3-5) combined with stochastic diffusion sampling encourage generalization; we support this with new examples of compositions absent from the training views. The expanded discussion clarifies why the embedding captures a generalizable concept rather than view-specific memorization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's core contribution is an optimization procedure that learns a new token embedding vector by minimizing a reconstruction loss (diffusion denoising objective) over 3-5 input images while keeping the text-to-image model frozen. This produces the embedding used for subsequent generation and composition; the resulting capability claims are supported by empirical qualitative results and baseline comparisons rather than any derivation that reduces to the inputs by construction. No self-citations serve as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, no fitted parameters are relabeled as independent predictions, and no ansatzes or known results are smuggled via citation. The method is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the pre-trained model's embedding space being rich enough to host new concept vectors that remain composable; the only added element is the optimized embedding itself.

free parameters (1)

Concept embedding vector
A vector in the text embedding space that is optimized to reconstruct the provided images when used in prompts.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The text-to-image model remains frozen during optimization.
Invoked to enable efficient personalization without full model retraining.
domain assumption A single embedding vector suffices to represent the visual concept for generation.
Stated as an empirical finding but required for the one-word framing to hold.

invented entities (1)

Pseudo-word embedding no independent evidence
purpose: To encode the user concept as a new token usable in natural language prompts.
Introduced by the optimization procedure; no external falsifiable prediction is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5533 in / 1405 out tokens · 88531 ms · 2026-05-11T18:00:40.695350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
We find v* through direct optimization, by minimizing the LDM loss of Equation (1) over images sampled from the small set... v* = arg min_v E[...] ∥ϵ−ϵθ(zt,t,cθ(y))∥²₂
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
Notably, we find evidence that a single word embedding is sufficient for capturing unique and varied concepts.

Forward citations

Cited by 31 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Adaptive Subspace Projection for Generative Personalization
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A training-free adaptive subspace projection method mitigates semantic collapsing in generative personalization by isolating and adjusting drift in a low-dimensional subspace using the stable pre-trained embedding as anchor.
A unified Benchmark for Multi-Frame Image Restoration under Severe Refractive Warping
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Presents the first large-scale benchmark for multi-frame geometric distortion removal in videos under severe refractive warping, using real and synthetic data across four distortion levels and evaluating classical and...
ASTRA: Enhancing Multi-Subject Generation with Retrieval-Augmented Pose Guidance and Disentangled Position Embedding
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

ASTRA disentangles subject identity from pose structure in diffusion transformers via retrieval-augmented pose guidance, asymmetric EURoPE embeddings, and a DSM adapter to improve multi-subject generation.
Large-Scale Universal Defect Generation: Foundation Models and Datasets
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A 300K quadruplet dataset and UniDG foundation model enable reference- or text-driven defect generation across categories, outperforming few-shot baselines on anomaly detection tasks.
Image-Guided Geometric Stylization of 3D Meshes
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A coarse-to-fine pipeline deforms 3D meshes to reflect geometric features from an image using diffusion model representations while preserving topology and part-level semantics.
Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation to Individual Taste
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

PAMELA provides a multi-user rating dataset and personalized reward model that predicts individual image preferences more accurately than prior population-level aesthetic models.
OrthoFuse: Training-free Riemannian Fusion of Orthogonal Style-Concept Adapters for Diffusion Models
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Training-free Riemannian fusion merges orthogonal style and concept adapters for diffusion models via geodesic approximation on GS matrices plus spectra restoration.
PromptEvolver: Prompt Inversion through Evolutionary Optimization in Natural-Language Space
cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

PromptEvolver recovers high-fidelity natural language prompts for given images by evolving them via genetic algorithm guided by a vision-language model, outperforming prior methods on benchmarks.
AnimateDiff: Animate Your Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Models without Specific Tuning
cs.CV 2023-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A single motion module trained on videos adds temporally coherent animation to any personalized text-to-image model derived from the same base without additional tuning.
CRAFT: Clinical Reward-Aligned Finetuning for Medical Image Synthesis
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

CRAFT adapts diffusion models to medical images via clinical reward alignment from LLMs and VLMs, improving alignment scores and cutting low-quality generations by 20.4% on average across modalities.
D-OPSD: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Continuously Tuning Step-Distilled Diffusion Models
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

D-OPSD enables continuous supervised fine-tuning of few-step diffusion models via on-policy self-distillation where the model acts as both teacher (multimodal context) and student (text-only context) on its own roll-outs.
Structured 3D Latents Are Surprisingly Powerful: Unleashing Generalizable Style with 2D Diffusion
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

DiLAST optimizes 3D latents via guidance from a 2D diffusion model to enable generalizable style transfer for OOD styles in 3D asset generation.
PostureObjectstitch: Anomaly Image Generation Considering Assembly Relationships in Industrial Scenarios
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

PostureObjectStitch generates assembly-aware anomaly images by decoupling multi-view features into high-frequency, texture and RGB components, modulating them temporally in a diffusion model, and applying conditional ...
StructDiff: A Structure-Preserving and Spatially Controllable Diffusion Model for Single-Image Generation
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

StructDiff adds adaptive receptive fields and 3D positional encoding to a single-scale diffusion model to preserve structure and enable spatial control in single-image generation.
GroundingAnomaly: Spatially-Grounded Diffusion for Few-Shot Anomaly Synthesis
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

GroundingAnomaly uses a Spatial Conditioning Module and Gated Self-Attention in a frozen diffusion U-Net to synthesize spatially accurate few-shot anomalies, reaching SOTA on MVTec AD and VisA for detection, segmentat...
Generative Phomosaic with Structure-Aligned and Personalized Diffusion
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

The paper presents the first generative photomosaic framework that synthesizes tiles via structure-aligned diffusion models and few-shot personalization instead of color-based matching from large tile collections.
SpatialEdit: Benchmarking Fine-Grained Image Spatial Editing
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

SpatialEdit provides a benchmark, large synthetic dataset, and baseline model for precise object and camera spatial manipulations in images, with the model beating priors on spatial editing.
FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Space
cs.GR 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

FLUX.1 Kontext unifies image generation and editing via flow matching and sequence concatenation, delivering improved multi-turn consistency and speed on the new KontextBench benchmark.
IP-Adapter: Text Compatible Image Prompt Adapter for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
cs.CV 2023-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

IP-Adapter adds effective image prompting to text-to-image diffusion models using a lightweight decoupled cross-attention adapter that works alongside text prompts and other controls.
SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis
cs.CV 2023-07 conditional novelty 6.0

SDXL improves upon prior Stable Diffusion versions through a larger UNet backbone, dual text encoders, novel conditioning, and a refinement model, producing higher-fidelity images competitive with black-box state-of-t...
Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning
cs.LG 2023-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

DDPO uses policy gradients on the denoising process to optimize diffusion models for arbitrary rewards like human feedback or compressibility.
Aligning Text-to-Image Models using Human Feedback
cs.LG 2023-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A three-stage fine-tuning process uses human ratings to train a reward model and then improves text-to-image alignment by maximizing reward-weighted likelihood.
RealDiffusion: Physics-informed Attention for Multi-character Storybook Generation
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

RealDiffusion uses heat diffusion as a dissipative prior and a region-aware stochastic process inside a training-free physics-informed attention mechanism to improve multi-character coherence while preserving narrativ...
Visual Generation in the New Era: An Evolution from Atomic Mapping to Agentic World Modeling
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Visual generation models are evolving from passive renderers to interactive agentic world modelers, but current systems lack spatial reasoning, temporal consistency, and causal understanding, with evaluations overemph...
DiffMagicFace: Identity Consistent Facial Editing of Real Videos
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

DiffMagicFace uses concurrent fine-tuned text and image diffusion models plus a rendered multi-view dataset to achieve identity-consistent text-conditioned editing of real facial videos.
MegaStyle: Constructing Diverse and Scalable Style Dataset via Consistent Text-to-Image Style Mapping
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

A scalable pipeline generates an intra-consistent, inter-diverse 1.4M style image dataset from text-to-image models and uses it to train a style encoder and generalizable style transfer model.
ID-Sim: An Identity-Focused Similarity Metric
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

ID-Sim is a new similarity metric that aims to capture human selective sensitivity to identities by training on curated real and generative synthetic data and validating against human annotations on recognition, retri...
Movie Gen: A Cast of Media Foundation Models
cs.CV 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

A 30B-parameter transformer and related models generate high-quality videos and audio, claiming state-of-the-art results on text-to-video, video editing, personalization, and audio generation tasks.
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Survey
cs.LG 2024-03 accept novelty 4.0

A comprehensive survey of PEFT algorithms for large models, covering their performance, overhead, applications, and real-world system implementations.
LMMs Meet Object-Centric Vision: Understanding, Segmentation, Editing and Generation
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

This review organizes literature on large multimodal models and object-centric vision into four themes—understanding, referring segmentation, editing, and generation—while summarizing paradigms, strategies, and challe...
Evolution of Video Generative Foundations
cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

This survey traces video generation technology from GANs to diffusion models and then to autoregressive and multimodal approaches while analyzing principles, strengths, and future trends.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 31 Pith papers · 7 internal anchors

[1]

Clip2stylegan: Unsupervised extraction of stylegan edit directions

Rameen Abdal, Peihao Zhu, John Femiani, Niloy J Mitra, and Peter Wonka. Clip2stylegan: Unsupervised extraction of stylegan edit directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05219,

work page arXiv
[2]

Soft-to-hard vector quantization for end-to-end learned compression of images and neural networks

Eirikur Agustsson, Fabian Mentzer, Michael Tschannen, Lukas Cavigelli, Radu Timofte, Luca Benini, and Luc Van Gool. Soft-to-hard vector quantization for end-to-end learned compression of images and neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.00648, 3,

work page arXiv
[3]

ISBN 9781450359016

Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450359016. doi: 10.1145/ 3240323.3241729. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3240323.3241729. Omri Avrahami, Ohad Fried, and Dani Lischinski. Blended latent diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02779, 2022a. Omri Avrahami, Dani Lischinski, and Ohad Fried. Blended diffusion for text-driven editing of natural images. I...

work page doi:10.1145/3240323.3241729
[4]

ACM Trans

ISSN 0730-0301. doi: 10.1145/ 3306346.3323023. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3306346.3323023. David Bau, Hendrik Strobelt, William Peebles, Jonas Wulff, Bolei Zhou, Jun-Yan Zhu, and Antonio Torralba. Semantic photo manipulation with a generative image prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07727,

work page doi:10.1145/3306346.3323023 2005
[5]

Ilvr: Conditioning method for denoising diffusion probabilistic models

Jooyoung Choi, Sungwon Kim, Yonghyun Jeong, Youngjune Gwon, and Sungroh Yoon. Ilvr: Conditioning method for denoising diffusion probabilistic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02938,

work page arXiv
[6]

Vqgan-clip: Open domain image generation and editing with natural language guidance

Katherine Crowson, Stella Biderman, Daniel Kornis, Dashiell Stander, Eric Hallahan, Louis Castricato, and Edward Raff. Vqgan-clip: Open domain image generation and editing with natural language guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.08583,

work page arXiv
[7]

BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding

15 Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[8]

Verifi: Towards verifiable federated unlearning,

Alireza Fallah, Aryan Mokhtari, and Asuman Ozdaglar. Personalized federated learning: A meta-learning approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.07948,

work page arXiv 2002
[9]

Stylegan-nada: Clip-guided domain adaptation of image generators

Rinon Gal, Or Patashnik, Haggai Maron, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Stylegan-nada: Clip-guided domain adaptation of image generators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.00946,

work page arXiv
[10]

Clip- adapter: Better vision-language models with feature adapters

Peng Gao, Shijie Geng, Renrui Zhang, Teli Ma, Rongyao Fang, Yongfeng Zhang, Hongsheng Li, and Yu Qiao. Clip-adapter: Better vision-language models with feature adapters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.04544,

work page arXiv
[11]

Classiﬁer-free diffusion guidance

Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans. Classiﬁer-free diffusion guidance. In NeurIPS 2021 Workshop on Deep Generative Models and Downstream Applications,

work page 2021
[12]

Improving federated learning personalization via model agnostic meta learning

Yihan Jiang, Jakub Koneˇcn`y, Keith Rush, and Sreeram Kannan. Improving federated learning personalization via model agnostic meta learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.12488,

work page arXiv 1909
[13]

Fine-tuning can distort pretrained features and underperform out-of-distribution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.10054,

Ananya Kumar, Aditi Raghunathan, Robbie Jones, Tengyu Ma, and Percy Liang. Fine-tuning can distort pretrained features and underperform out-of-distribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.10054,

work page arXiv
[14]

Clipstyler: Image style transfer with a single text condition

Gihyun Kwon and Jong Chul Ye. Clipstyler: Image style transfer with a single text condition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00374,

work page arXiv
[15]

Overcoming catastrophic forgetting during domain adaptation of seq2seq language gen- eration

Dingcheng Li, Zheng Chen, Eunah Cho, Jie Hao, Xiaohu Liu, Xing Fan, Edward Guo, and Yang Liu. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting during domain adaptation of seq2seq language gen- eration. In NAACL 2022 ,

work page 2022
[16]

Zhi-Song Liu, Li-Wen Wang, Wan-Chi Siu, and Vicky Kalogeiton

URL https://www.amazon.science/publications/ overcoming-catastrophic-forgetting-during-domain-adaptation-of-seq2seq-language-generation . Zhi-Song Liu, Li-Wen Wang, Wan-Chi Siu, and Vicky Kalogeiton. Name your style: An arbitrary artist-aware image style transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.13562,

work page arXiv
[17]

Three approaches for personalization with applications to federated learning

Yishay Mansour, Mehryar Mohri, Jae Ro, and Ananda Theertha Suresh. Three approaches for personalization with applications to federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.10619,

work page arXiv 2002
[18]

Text2mesh: Text-driven neural stylization for meshes

16 Oscar Michel, Roi Bar-On, Richard Liu, Sagie Benaim, and Rana Hanocka. Text2mesh: Text-driven neural stylization for meshes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.03221,

work page arXiv
[19]

GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Models

https://twitter.com/advadnoun/status/ 1351038053033406468. Alex Nichol, Prafulla Dhariwal, Aditya Ramesh, Pranav Shyam, Pamela Mishkin, Bob McGrew, Ilya Sutskever, and Mark Chen. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[20]

Mystyle: A personalized generative prior

Yotam Nitzan, Kﬁr Aberman, Qiurui He, Orly Liba, Michal Yarom, Yossi Gandelsman, Inbar Mosseri, Yael Pritch, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Mystyle: A personalized generative prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.17272,

work page arXiv
[21]

No token left behind: Explainability-aided image classiﬁcation and generation

Roni Paiss, Hila Chefer, and Lior Wolf. No token left behind: Explainability-aided image classiﬁcation and generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.04908,

work page arXiv
[22]

Styleclip: Text-driven manipulation of stylegan imagery

Or Patashnik, Zongze Wu, Eli Shechtman, Daniel Cohen-Or, and Dani Lischinski. Styleclip: Text-driven manipulation of stylegan imagery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.17249,

work page arXiv
[23]

Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision

Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.00020,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[24]

Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents

Aditya Ramesh, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alex Nichol, Casey Chu, and Mark Chen. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[25]

URL https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zX8YzwEACAAJ

ISBN 9781572309845. URL https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zX8YzwEACAAJ. Elad Richardson, Yuval Alaluf, Or Patashnik, Yotam Nitzan, Yaniv Azar, Stav Shapiro, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Encoding in style: a stylegan encoder for image-to-image translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.00951,

work page arXiv 2008
[26]

Pivotal tuning for latent-based editing of real images

Daniel Roich, Ron Mokady, Amit H Bermano, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Pivotal tuning for latent-based editing of real images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05744,

work page arXiv
[27]

Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding

Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Emily Denton, Seyed Kamyar Seyed Ghasemipour, Burcu Karagol Ayan, S Sara Mahdavi, Rapha Gontijo Lopes, et al. Photorealistic text-to- image diffusion models with deep language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11487,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[28]

LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairs

Christoph Schuhmann, Richard Vencu, Romain Beaumont, Robert Kaczmarczyk, Clayton Mullis, Aarush Katta, Theo Coombes, Jenia Jitsev, and Aran Komatsuzaki. Laion-400m: Open dataset of clip-ﬁltered 400 million image-text pairs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02114,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[29]

Df-gan: Deep fusion generative adversarial networks for text-to-image synthesis

Ming Tao, Hao Tang, Songsong Wu, Nicu Sebe, Xiao-Yuan Jing, Fei Wu, and Bingkun Bao. Df-gan: Deep fusion generative adversarial networks for text-to-image synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.05865,

work page arXiv 2008
[30]

Motionclip: Exposing human motion generation to clip space

Guy Tevet, Brian Gordon, Amir Hertz, Amit H Bermano, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Motionclip: Exposing human motion generation to clip space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.08063,

work page arXiv
[31]

Designing an encoder for stylegan image manipulation

Omer Tov, Yuval Alaluf, Yotam Nitzan, Or Patashnik, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Designing an encoder for stylegan image manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.02766,

work page arXiv
[32]

Improving text-to-image synthesis using contrastive learning

https://twitter.com/PaulYacoubian/status/ 1542867718071779330. Hui Ye, Xiulong Yang, Martin Takac, Rajshekhar Sunderraman, and Shihao Ji. Improving text-to-image synthesis using contrastive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02423,

work page arXiv
[33]

Scaling Autoregressive Models for Content-Rich Text-to-Image Generation

Jiahui Yu, Yuanzhong Xu, Jing Yu Koh, Thang Luong, Gunjan Baid, Zirui Wang, Vijay Vasudevan, Alexander Ku, Yinfei Yang, Burcu Karagol Ayan, et al. Scaling autoregressive models for content-rich text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10789,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[34]

Learning to prompt for vision-language models.Int

Kaiyang Zhou, Jingkang Yang, Chen Change Loy, and Ziwei Liu. Learning to prompt for vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01134,

work page arXiv
[35]

In-domain gan inversion for real image editing

Jiapeng Zhu, Yujun Shen, Deli Zhao, and Bolei Zhou. In-domain gan inversion for real image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.00049, 2020a. Jun-Yan Zhu, Philipp Kr ¨ahenb¨uhl, Eli Shechtman, and Alexei A Efros. Generative visual manipulation on the natural image manifold. In European conference on computer vision, pp. 597–613. Springer,

work page arXiv 2004
[36]

Improved stylegan embedding: Where are the good latents?, 2020b

Peihao Zhu, Rameen Abdal, Yipeng Qin, and Peter Wonka. Improved stylegan embedding: Where are the good latents?, 2020b. 18 Supplementary Materials An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversion Rinon Gal1,2 Yuval Alaluf1 Yuval Atzmon2 Or Patashnik1 Amit H. Bermano 1 Gal Chechik2 Daniel Cohen-Or1 1Tel-A viv Unive...

work page 2022
[37]

Below we outline both methods and our experimental results

and pivotal tuning (Roich et al., 2021). Below we outline both methods and our experimental results. Bipartite inversion Dhariwal & Nichol (2021) demonstrated that the DDIM sampling (Song et al.,

work page 2021
[38]

A photo of S∗

process can be inverted through a closed-form iterative approach. Speciﬁcally, their approach can ﬁnd a latent noise vectorxT which will be denoised into a speciﬁc target image when the denoising process is conditioned on a given code cθ(y). In (Ramesh et al., 2022), they further demonstrate that when the conditioning code is an output of CLIP, one can la...

work page 2022
[39]

When reducing the guidance scale, the outline of the original image becomes visible

scales ( 5-10), the denoiser network is unable to maintain the original object’s structure through prompt changes. When reducing the guidance scale, the outline of the original image becomes visible. However, alignment with the prompt is poor. Such guidance-dependent structure drift has also been demonstrated for GLIDE (Nichol et al., 2021). How- ever, th...

work page 2021
[40]

Notably, state-of-the-art mod- els (Saharia et al., 2022; Ramesh et al.,

(their Figure 9). Notably, state-of-the-art mod- els (Saharia et al., 2022; Ramesh et al.,

work page 2022
[41]

This gives us hope that a bipartite inversion would allow better shape preservation in more powerful genera- tive models

which are signiﬁcantly lower than LDM’s — within the range where we observe structure preservation, but no prompt-matching. This gives us hope that a bipartite inversion would allow better shape preservation in more powerful genera- tive models. Pivotal Tuning In the ﬁeld of GAN inversion, it has been shown (Roich et al., 2021; Bau et al.,

work page 2021