pith. sign in

super hub Canonical reference

Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learned

Canonical reference. 86% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

106 Pith papers citing it
Background 86% of classified citations
abstract

We describe our early efforts to red team language models in order to simultaneously discover, measure, and attempt to reduce their potentially harmful outputs. We make three main contributions. First, we investigate scaling behaviors for red teaming across 3 model sizes (2.7B, 13B, and 52B parameters) and 4 model types: a plain language model (LM); an LM prompted to be helpful, honest, and harmless; an LM with rejection sampling; and a model trained to be helpful and harmless using reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). We find that the RLHF models are increasingly difficult to red team as they scale, and we find a flat trend with scale for the other model types. Second, we release our dataset of 38,961 red team attacks for others to analyze and learn from. We provide our own analysis of the data and find a variety of harmful outputs, which range from offensive language to more subtly harmful non-violent unethical outputs. Third, we exhaustively describe our instructions, processes, statistical methodologies, and uncertainty about red teaming. We hope that this transparency accelerates our ability to work together as a community in order to develop shared norms, practices, and technical standards for how to red team language models.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 24 method 3 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract We describe our early efforts to red team language models in order to simultaneously discover, measure, and attempt to reduce their potentially harmful outputs. We make three main contributions. First, we investigate scaling behaviors for red teaming across 3 model sizes (2.7B, 13B, and 52B parameters) and 4 model types: a plain language model (LM); an LM prompted to be helpful, honest, and harmless; an LM with rejection sampling; and a model trained to be helpful and harmless using reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). We find that the RLHF models are increasingly difficult to re

authors

co-cited works

representative citing papers

Measuring Safety Alignment Effects in Autonomous Security Agents

cs.CR · 2026-05-19 · conditional · novelty 7.0

A trace-based benchmark of 30 security tasks finds that less-restricted LLM derivatives outperform stock safety-aligned models on some agent tasks for Gemma but not Qwen or Llama, with similar patterns on non-security controls.

Proteus: A Self-Evolving Red Team for Agent Skill Ecosystems

cs.CR · 2026-05-12 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Proteus demonstrates that adaptive red-teaming achieves 40-90% attack success after five rounds and bypasses even strong auditors at up to 41% joint success, revealing that static skill vetting underestimates residual risk.

Green Shielding: A User-Centric Approach Towards Trustworthy AI

cs.CL · 2026-04-27 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Green Shielding introduces CUE criteria and the HCM-Dx benchmark to demonstrate that routine prompt variations systematically alter LLM diagnostic behavior along clinically relevant dimensions, producing Pareto-like tradeoffs in plausibility versus coverage.

Collective Recourse for Generative Urban Visualizations

cs.HC · 2025-09-15 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Collective recourse formalizes community reports to fix group harms in diffusion models for urban visualizations via a report-triage-fix-verify pipeline, four primitives, a mandate score, and synthetic evaluation of 240 reports.

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

cs.LG · 2024-02-02 · conditional · novelty 7.0

KTO aligns LLMs by directly maximizing prospect-theoretic utility on binary signals and matches or exceeds preference-based methods like DPO from 1B to 30B parameters.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 106 citing papers.