pith. sign in

hub Baseline reference

MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities

Baseline reference. 56% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.

96 Pith papers citing it
Baseline 56% of classified citations
abstract

We propose MM-Vet, an evaluation benchmark that examines large multimodal models (LMMs) on complicated multimodal tasks. Recent LMMs have shown various intriguing abilities, such as solving math problems written on the blackboard, reasoning about events and celebrities in news images, and explaining visual jokes. Rapid model advancements pose challenges to evaluation benchmark development. Problems include: (1) How to systematically structure and evaluate the complicated multimodal tasks; (2) How to design evaluation metrics that work well across question and answer types; and (3) How to give model insights beyond a simple performance ranking. To this end, we present MM-Vet, designed based on the insight that the intriguing ability to solve complicated tasks is often achieved by a generalist model being able to integrate different core vision-language (VL) capabilities. MM-Vet defines 6 core VL capabilities and examines the 16 integrations of interest derived from the capability combination. For evaluation metrics, we propose an LLM-based evaluator for open-ended outputs. The evaluator enables the evaluation across different question types and answer styles, resulting in a unified scoring metric. We evaluate representative LMMs on MM-Vet, providing insights into the capabilities of different LMM system paradigms and models.

hub tools

citation-role summary

dataset 18 background 13 baseline 3

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract We propose MM-Vet, an evaluation benchmark that examines large multimodal models (LMMs) on complicated multimodal tasks. Recent LMMs have shown various intriguing abilities, such as solving math problems written on the blackboard, reasoning about events and celebrities in news images, and explaining visual jokes. Rapid model advancements pose challenges to evaluation benchmark development. Problems include: (1) How to systematically structure and evaluate the complicated multimodal tasks; (2) How to design evaluation metrics that work well across question and answer types; and (3) How to give

co-cited works

representative citing papers

Mema: Memory-Augmented Adapter for Enhanced Vision-Language Understanding

cs.CV · 2026-02-28 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Mema adds a stateful memory module to vision encoders that accumulates hierarchical visual features across layers and selectively injects portions back via feedback to preserve fine-grained cues, yielding consistent gains on multimodal benchmarks.

Transfer between Modalities with MetaQueries

cs.CV · 2025-04-08 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

MetaQueries act as an efficient bridge allowing multimodal LLMs to augment diffusion-based image generation and editing without complex training or unfreezing the LLM backbone.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 96 citing papers.