pith. sign in

arxiv: 1405.0301 · v2 · submitted 2014-05-01 · ✦ hep-ph

The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

J. Alwall , R. Frederix , S. Frixione , V. Hirschi , F. Maltoni , O. Mattelaer , H.-S. Shao , T. Stelzer
show 2 more authors
P. Torrielli M. Zaro
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 12:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords automated cross-section computationnext-to-leading orderparton-shower matchingtree-level calculationssample mergingcollider phenomenologyrenormalisable Lagrangiansdifferential distributions
0
0 comments X

The pith

A unified framework automates tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections along with parton-shower matching and sample merging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to establish that the full chain of collider phenomenology computations, from fixed-order perturbative results at tree level and next-to-leading order through matching to parton showers and merging of different multiplicity samples, can be performed inside one program. Human input is restricted to the choice of physical process and parameters while the code handles matrix-element generation, integration, matching, and merging. A reader would care because this removes the need for repeated manual technical work when studying processes at the LHC or a future electron-positron collider, allowing faster and more systematic exploration of predictions. The approach begins with QCD corrections to standard-model processes but is designed so that the user sees no interface change when other renormalisable interactions are added.

Core claim

A computer program handles parton-level fixed-order calculations, shower-matched results, and merged samples in a single framework whose defining features are flexibility, high parallelisation, and limitation of human intervention to input physics quantities. While next-to-leading order results are at first restricted to QCD corrections for standard-model processes, the user viewpoint requires no changes for corrections arising from any given renormalisable Lagrangian, and the implementation of those extensions is already under way.

What carries the argument

The unified automation framework that generates matrix elements, performs phase-space integration, applies parton-shower matching, and merges samples of differing light-parton multiplicity.

If this is right

  • Differential cross sections at next-to-leading order can be obtained and matched to parton showers for arbitrary processes with only physics input from the user.
  • Samples with different light-parton multiplicities can be merged consistently within the same run.
  • The identical workflow applies once non-QCD corrections from any renormalisable Lagrangian are incorporated.
  • Large-scale parallel execution becomes available for collider phenomenology studies without additional user coding.
  • Fixed-order, matched, and merged results are produced under one consistent interface.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same automation pattern could be extended to higher perturbative orders or to electroweak corrections once those modules are completed.
  • Experimental groups might incorporate the framework directly into analysis chains to generate theory predictions on demand.
  • Model builders could test new renormalisable interactions against collider data with far less computational overhead than before.
  • The reduction in manual setup time would allow more rapid iteration between theoretical proposals and numerical comparisons with data.

Load-bearing premise

Automation for any given renormalisable Lagrangian can be achieved without requiring the user to alter the program or its interface.

What would settle it

An explicit next-to-leading-order calculation for a chosen standard-model process that the program produces and that differs from an independent analytic or numerical result by more than the expected perturbative uncertainty.

read the original abstract

We discuss the theoretical bases that underpin the automation of the computations of tree-level and next-to-leading order cross sections, of their matching to parton shower simulations, and of the merging of matched samples that differ by light-parton multiplicities. We present a computer program, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, capable of handling all these computations -- parton-level fixed order, shower-matched, merged -- in a unified framework whose defining features are flexibility, high level of parallelisation, and human intervention limited to input physics quantities. We demonstrate the potential of the program by presenting selected phenomenological applications relevant to the LHC and to a 1-TeV $e^+e^-$ collider. While next-to-leading order results are restricted to QCD corrections to SM processes in the first public version, we show that from the user viewpoint no changes have to be expected in the case of corrections due to any given renormalisable Lagrangian, and that the implementation of these are well under way.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO computer program for the automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order (NLO) differential cross sections, their matching to parton shower simulations, and the merging of matched samples that differ by light-parton multiplicities. It discusses the theoretical bases for these computations and demonstrates the program's capabilities through selected phenomenological applications relevant to the LHC and a 1-TeV e+e- collider. The framework is designed to be flexible and highly parallelized, with human intervention limited to input physics quantities. While the first public version restricts NLO results to QCD corrections for Standard Model processes, the design ensures that extensions to corrections from any renormalizable Lagrangian require no changes from the user perspective, with such implementations noted as being under development.

Significance. This work holds significant value for the field of high-energy physics phenomenology by providing a unified, automated framework that integrates fixed-order calculations, parton-shower matching, and merging techniques. The modular separation between model input in UFO format and the computation engines (such as FKS subtraction for NLO) supports the claim of broad applicability with minimal user effort. By demonstrating applications on LHC and e+e- examples, the paper illustrates practical utility for collider physics. The high level of parallelization and automation of established methods like MC@NLO matching and MLM-style merging enhances efficiency in generating predictions for complex processes. If the implementation details in the full manuscript validate the claims, this tool would substantially lower the barrier for performing state-of-the-art calculations.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'the implementation of these are well under way' for non-QCD corrections could be clarified with a timeline or specific status to better inform readers about the current capabilities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation to accept it for publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in implementation description

full rationale

The paper describes the design and capabilities of the MadGraph5_aMC@NLO program for automating tree-level, NLO QCD, MC@NLO matching, and MLM merging computations. Its central claims concern software architecture (UFO model input, FKS subtraction, modular separation of physics input from computation engine) and are supported by explicit code structure and example applications rather than any derivation chain. No equations, predictions, or uniqueness theorems are presented that reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation load-bearing steps. The statement that extensions to arbitrary renormalisable Lagrangians require no user changes is framed as a realised design property, not a derived result. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks of established methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard perturbative QCD techniques and collider simulation methods already present in the literature; no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption QCD corrections to Standard Model processes can be computed via known automated techniques
    Invoked when stating that the program handles NLO computations for SM processes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5519 in / 1235 out tokens · 53373 ms · 2026-05-11T12:46:45.212447+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 60 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Search for single vector-like quark production in opposite-sign dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 8.0

    No excess observed in search for vector-like top quark T to tH in opposite-sign dilepton final states; 95% CL upper limits on sigma times BR range from 2.0 pb at 600 GeV to 0.1 pb at 1000 GeV.

  2. Generative models on phase space

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Generative diffusion and flow models are constructed to remain exactly on the Lorentz-invariant massless N-particle phase space manifold during sampling for particle physics applications.

  3. Observation of a cross-section enhancement near the $t\bar{t}$ production threshold in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    ATLAS reports an 8+ sigma excess in ttbar production near threshold, consistent with NRQCD quasi-bound states and measuring 9.3 pb.

  4. Collider-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents with Particle Physics Analysis Reproduction

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Collider-Bench is a new benchmark showing that current LLM agents cannot reliably reproduce LHC analyses at the level of a physicist-in-the-loop.

  5. Logarithmically-accurate showers with massive quarks

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PanScales final-state showers now include quark masses at NLL accuracy while keeping original accuracy for massless observables.

  6. Probing Boosted Light Scalars in the Type-I 2HDM

    hep-ph 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Boosted light scalars decaying to b b-bar in Type-I 2HDM can be tagged as double-b fat-jets and used with SM gauge bosons to probe heavy scalars up to 540 GeV at the HL-LHC for masses 30-70 GeV.

  7. Decaying spin-3/2 dark matter from baryon number violation

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-supersymmetric spin-3/2 dark matter with baryon-violating portals can explain the relic abundance through UV and Boltzmann-suppressed freeze-in, with viable parameter space constrained by indirect detection, direc...

  8. Differential measurements of $\gamma\gamma\to\tau\tau$ and constraints on $\tau$-lepton electromagnetic moments in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with ATLAS

    nucl-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First differential cross-sections for γγ→ττ in Pb+Pb collisions yield 95% CL intervals -0.057 < a_τ < 0.035 and |d_τ| < 2.7×10^{-16} e cm.

  9. Search for Long-Lived Dark Photons from Dark Radiation at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dark radiation from dark matter produced in Z decays generates long-lived dark photons that dominate over meson decays and bremsstrahlung for small kinetic mixing and masses above the GeV scale, allowing FASER2, FACET...

  10. Cascade Pipeline for Leading-Order Matrix Element Evaluation on AMD Versal AI Engine Arrays

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A cascade pipeline architecture on AMD Versal AI Engine tiles projects 1 million matrix element evaluations per second at 54.8 W for gg→ttg, delivering 34× CPU speedup and 7.7× better energy efficiency with parts-per-...

  11. Big Dipper, Help Me Find A Way -- Dip-hunting at hadron colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Parametric neural networks learn likelihood ratios to infer top-philic scalar resonances from dip patterns caused by signal-background interference in hadron collider data.

  12. Evidence of ZZ$\gamma$ production and observation of $4\ell\gamma$ in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    First evidence for ZZ gamma production at 3.7 sigma and observation of 4 lepton gamma at 5.0 sigma in CMS data at 13 TeV, with measured fiducial cross sections consistent with predictions.

  13. Many Wrongs Make a Right: Leveraging Biased Simulations Towards Unbiased Parameter Inference

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Template-Adapted Mixture Model uses many biased simulations for data-driven estimates of signal and background distributions, yielding unbiased signal fraction estimates with well-calibrated uncertainties.

  14. Probing compressed triplet scalars with ISR jets and soft leptons at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A cut-and-count analysis exploiting ISR jets and soft leptons can reach discovery sensitivity for compressed triplet scalars with 1-30 GeV splittings at 3000 fb^{-1}.

  15. Observation of a cross-section enhancement near the $t\bar{t}$ production threshold in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0

    ATLAS observes an excess over 8 sigma in ttbar production near threshold, consistent with NRQCD color-singlet S-wave quasi-bound states, with measured cross-section 9.3^{+1.4}_{-1.3} pb.

  16. Automated computation of spin-density matrices and quantum observables for collider physics

    hep-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An automated framework in MadGraph5_aMC@NLO computes tree-level production spin-density matrices and quantum observables for generic collider processes, with validation on ttbar and VV and new applications to multi-to...

  17. Bayesian Constraints on Pre-Equilibrium Jet Quenching and Predictions for Oxygen Collisions

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bayesian constraints on early-time jet quenching from large collision systems yield predictions of measurable energy loss in oxygen-oxygen collisions.

  18. Searching for a Charged Higgs Boson in Top-Quark Decays via the $WZ$ Mode

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Recasting ttZ analyses yields sub-permille constraints on Br(t→H±b)×Br(H±→WZ) and vΔ≲2 GeV in the Y=0 Higgs triplet model, accompanied by a 2σ preference for a non-zero signal.

  19. Probing Neutral Triple Gauge Couplings via $ZZ$ Production at $e^+e^-$ Colliders with Machine Learning

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0

    Formulates nTGC form factors from dim-8 SMEFT operators compatible with electroweak symmetry breaking and applies machine learning to fermion angular distributions to probe new physics scales up to multi-TeV in ZZ pro...

  20. Stay Positive: Neural Refinement of Sample Weights

    hep-ph 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Neural refinement of Monte Carlo sample weights via phase-space scaling and a new resampling protocol that maintains averages and uncertainties.

  21. Proposal for the validation of Monte Carlo implementations of the standard model effective field theory

    hep-ph 2019-06 accept novelty 7.0

    Proposes a numerical cross-validation procedure for SMEFT Monte Carlo implementations by comparing linearized EFT amplitudes and their SM interferences at fixed points.

  22. Search for soft unclustered energy patterns containing muons in the final state in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    No significant excess observed in search for SUEP signatures with muons; exclusion limits set on mediator cross section times branching fraction down to 0.05 fb at 750 GeV.

  23. RooAgent: An LLM Agent for Root-Based High Energy Physics Analysis

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RooAgent provides an LLM agent interface that translates natural-language prompts into calls to PyROOT analysis functions for high energy physics tasks, with support for multiple AI backends and tested on ZH simulatio...

  24. NLO QCD and parton-shower effects for Higgs-boson production in association with a hard photon via vector-boson fusion

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NLO QCD plus parton-shower matched implementation for VBF Higgs plus photon production, with studies showing small shower effects on Higgs observables and larger effects on sub-leading jets.

  25. SMEFT everywhere: a NLO study of $\boldsymbol{pp \to t\bar{t}H}$ with decaying tops

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NLO QCD corrections to pp to ttbar H in the di-lepton channel with SMEFT operators included in both production and top-quark decays.

  26. Composite top partners in exotic colour representations

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Colour-sextet top partners in composite Higgs models are excluded up to 2-2.5 TeV by current LHC data via top-rich decays, with HL-LHC reach near 3 TeV.

  27. Bounds on massive graviton-like particles from searches for axion-like particles coupling to photons

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Limits on axion-like particles from photon-coupling searches are recast as constraints on massive graviton-like particles across lab, astrophysical, and cosmological experiments using analogous Primakoff and Gertsensh...

  28. How Invisible: Regressing The Key Model Parameter for Semi-visible Jet Searches

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A regression model reconstructs the key parameter r_inv for semi-visible jets at higher precision than prior analytical methods and may unify s- and t-channel production searches.

  29. Low-Multiplicity Jets as Probes of GeV-Scale Light-Quark-Coupled Particles

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A proposed LHC search using low-multiplicity jets plus a photon can extend sensitivity to GeV-scale particles that couple to light quarks.

  30. Tree Amplitudes with Charged Matter in Pure Gauge Theory

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new Mathematica package computes tree amplitudes with arbitrary gauge bosons and arbitrarily charged massless fermions by reducing distinct-flavor partial amplitudes to linear combinations of single-flavor supersymm...

  31. Radiation effects on the entanglement of fermion pairs at colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Energetic radiation induces decoherence that significantly reduces entanglement in fermion pairs at colliders, with statistically significant signals observable in ttbar(g) at the LHC and tau pairs at Belle II.

  32. Operator Identification in Charged Lepton-Flavor Violation: Global EFT Analysis with RG Evolution, Polarization Observables, and Bayesian Model Discrimination at Future Colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Global EFT analysis of charged lepton-flavor violation at future colliders incorporates RG running, polarization, and Bayesian discrimination to identify operators, finding 10-30% shifts from tree-level mappings at mu...

  33. SemiCharmTag: a tool for Semileptonic Charm tagging

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SemiCharmTag achieves a factor of ~4 signal-over-background improvement at 81% efficiency for Drell-Yan muons using secondary-vertex hadron tagging in LHCb proton-proton collision simulations.

  34. Probing Higgs and Top Interactions through the Muon Lens at multi-TeV Muon Colliders

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A 10 TeV muon collider could improve existing bounds on muon-Higgs-gauge and muon-top interactions by up to an order of magnitude over current limits and FCC-ee projections.

  35. A Determination of the Top Mass from a Global PDF Analysis

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The top-quark pole mass is determined to be 172.80 ± 0.26 GeV from a global NNPDF analysis at approximate N³LO QCD including NLO QED, EW, and toponium corrections.

  36. Braking protons at the EIC: from invisible meson decay to new physics searches

    hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The EIC can probe invisible pseudoscalar meson decays down to branching ratios of 10^{-8} and invisibly decaying ALPs with couplings up to 10^5 GeV for masses 0.1-2 GeV.

  37. TeV Scale Quark-Lepton Unification

    hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A quark-lepton unified Pati-Salam model with Z2 symmetry realizes a leptoquark gauge boson as light as 4.3 TeV, compatible with LHC and flavor constraints, and predicts testable lepton flavor violation plus new vector...

  38. Measurement of the top-quark mass using decays with a $J/\psi$ meson at $\sqrt{s}=$13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2025-11 accept novelty 6.0

    Top quark mass measured at 172.17 ± 1.56 GeV via unbinned maximum-likelihood fit to m(ℓ μ⁺μ⁻) in ATLAS Run 2 data using J/ψ decays.

  39. An NLO-Matched Initial and Final State Parton Shower on a GPU

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GAPS v2 is a GPU-accelerated parton shower for initial and final state emissions with NLO matching that achieves speed and energy performance on par with a 96-core CPU cluster for NLO Z production at the LHC.

  40. Light new physics and the $\tau$ lepton dipole moments

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    This work provides a comprehensive analysis of light new physics contributions to tau lepton dipole moments, detailing interpretations of asymmetry measurements for spin-0 and spin-1 bosons, their decoupling to the EF...

  41. The Muonic Portal to Vector Dark Matter:connecting precision muon physics, cosmology, and colliders

    hep-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new model with SU(2)_D symmetry and vector-like muons mediates vector dark matter, simultaneously addressing relic abundance and muon g-2 while identifying an off-resonance suppression mechanism for light DM and der...

  42. Observation of $W^{+}W^{-}\gamma$ production in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge-boson couplings

    hep-ex 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ATLAS reports the observation of W⁺W⁻γ triboson production with 5.9σ significance and derives constraints on anomalous quartic gauge-boson couplings via effective field theory.

  43. Search for Higgs bosons produced in association with a high-energy photon via vector-boson fusion and decaying to a pair of $b$-quarks in the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2025-09 accept novelty 6.0

    ATLAS reports a new measurement of the Higgs signal strength in the VBF plus photon channel with H to bb decay, obtaining 0.2 ± 0.7 using an improved neural-network-based analysis on 133 fb^{-1} of data.

  44. Novel probes for electron-muon flavor violation from exotic Higgs decays

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Novel multilepton signatures from Higgs decays to a light pseudoscalar decaying to e-mu pairs in type-III 2HDM can set stronger limits on LFV couplings than low-energy experiments.

  45. Dark Matter Induced Proton Decays

    hep-ph 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework unifies dark matter stability and proton decay via residual Z4 symmetry from U(1)B+L breaking, with one-loop proton decay mediated by TeV-scale dark sector particles whose masses correlate with proton lifetime.

  46. Electroweak diboson production in association with a high-mass dijet system in semileptonic final states from $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2025-03 accept novelty 6.0

    Electroweak diboson plus high-mass dijet production observed at 7.4 sigma with signal strength 1.28, plus first semileptonic-channel limits on S02, T0 and M0 Wilson coefficients.

  47. Pretrained Event Classification Model for High Energy Physics Analysis

    hep-ph 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A GNN pretrained on 120M simulated HEP events generalizes to unseen processes and ATLAS data; fine-tuning boosts accuracy especially with small datasets, with CKA showing preserved encoders but altered intermediate layers.

  48. An EWPD SMEFT likelihood for the LHC -- and how to improve it with measurements of W and Z boson properties

    hep-ph 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The work supplies a modular SMEFT likelihood for EWPD that includes NLO effects and five input schemes, then combines it with LHC measurements to tighten constraints on lepton-flavor universality and quark coupling as...

  49. Photon-initiated enhancements in the pair production of highly charged coloured particles

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Mixed QCD-QED contributions from gγ initial states enhance pair-production cross sections of charge-5/3 leptoquarks by up to 33%, strengthening ATLAS-derived mass exclusions.

  50. NLO EW and QCD dimension-6 SMEFT results for Higgs and gauge boson decays in POPxf format

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    NLO QCD and EW corrections in dimension-6 SMEFT are provided for all 2- and 4-body Higgs decays, Z/W decays with EW precision observables, and e+e- to ZH at 240, 365, and 500 GeV, including the total Higgs width and a...

  51. Probing SMEFT Operators through $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ Production with Hyper-Graph Neural Networks at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A hyper-graph neural network improves discrimination of four-top production at 13 TeV, raising expected significance from 5.13 to 9.11 and enabling projected 95% CL limits on five dimension-six SMEFT Wilson coefficien...

  52. Heavy Vector Triplets at a Muon Collider

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Muon colliders can probe heavy vector triplets up to 12 TeV, competitive with HE-LHC but below FCC-hh projections, including indirect electroweak precision limits.

  53. Dark photon searches in the photon channel

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GEANT4 simulations indicate that photon spectral shape differences from pion decays in a tungsten foil setup could probe new dark photon parameter space with feasible proton beam runs.

  54. Search for pair production of additional neutral scalars within the Inert Doublet Model in a final state with two electrons or two muons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV and 13.6 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    No significant excess found; new exclusion limits reach m_H = 108 GeV for m_H - m_A = 78 GeV in the Inert Doublet Model.

  55. Time-dependent signals of new physics at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Incorporating timing information from time-dependent new physics signals can improve LHC search sensitivity by up to a factor of two compared to standard time-invariant analyses.

  56. Electroweak Restoration: SMEFT and HEFT

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High-energy amplitude ratios for longitudinal di-boson production approach unity in the SM and dimension-6 SMEFT but not necessarily in HEFT, making the W±_L Z_L to W±_L h cross section ratio a promising discriminator...

  57. Cascade Pipeline for Leading-Order Matrix Element Evaluation on AMD Versal AI Engine Arrays

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A cascade pipeline on 400 AIE tiles evaluates gg→ttg leading-order matrix elements at 1 million per second with parts-per-million accuracy to MadGraph, delivering 34× CPU speedup and 7.7× better energy efficiency at 54.8 W.

  58. New insights into the $b\rightarrow c \bar{u}q$ puzzle through Top-Bottom synergies

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Anomalies in b to c u-bar q transitions remain puzzling as proposed new physics scenarios involving SU(2) doublets are not significantly relaxed by collider dilution or factorization breakdown.

  59. Can LLP detectors probe the reheating temperature? A case study of vector dark matter

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In a vector dark matter extension of the Higgs portal, far detectors at colliders can probe otherwise inaccessible parameter space and set novel bounds on the reheating temperature.

  60. Kitchen Sink Anomaly Detection

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A combined kitchen sink observable set of Energy Flow Polynomials and subjettiness variables outperforms standard baselines in sensitivity to a wide range of resonant signals, with new public benchmarks released and a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 144 Pith papers · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories , Phys.Rev.Lett. 30 (1973) 1343–1346

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    H. D. Politzer, Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions? , Phys.Rev.Lett. 30 (1973) 1346–1349

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    Appelquist and H

    T. Appelquist and H. Georgi, e+e− annihilation in gauge theories of strong interactions , Phys.Rev. D8 (1973) 4000–4002

    work page 1973

  4. [4]

    G. F. Sterman and S. Weinberg, Jets from Quantum Chromodynamics , Phys.Rev.Lett. 39 (1977) 1436

    work page 1977

  5. [5]

    Buras, E

    A. Buras, E. Floratos, D. Ross, and C. T. Sachrajda, Asymptotic Freedom Beyond the Leading Order, Nucl.Phys. B131 (1977) 308

    work page 1977

  6. [6]

    W. A. Bardeen, A. Buras, D. Duke, and T. Muta, Deep Inelastic Scattering Beyond the Leading Order in Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories , Phys.Rev. D18 (1978) 3998

    work page 1978

  7. [7]

    Altarelli, R

    G. Altarelli, R. K. Ellis, and G. Martinelli, Leptoproduction and Drell-Yan Processes Beyond the Leading Approximation in Chromodynamics , Nucl.Phys. B143 (1978) 521

    work page 1978

  8. [8]

    Celmaster and R

    W. Celmaster and R. J. Gonsalves, Fourth Order QCD Contributions to the e+e− Annihilation Cross-Section, Phys.Rev. D21 (1980) 3112

    work page 1980

  9. [9]

    R. K. Ellis, D. Ross, and A. Terrano, The Perturbative Calculation of Jet Structure in e+e− Annihilation, Nucl.Phys. B178 (1981) 421

    work page 1981

  10. [10]

    Three-jet cross sections to next-to-leading order

    S. Frixione, Z. Kunszt, and A. Signer, Three jet cross-sections to next-to-leading order , Nucl.Phys. B467 (1996) 399–442, [ hep-ph/9512328]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  11. [11]

    A General Algorithm for Calculating Jet Cross Sections in NLO QCD

    S. Catani and M. Seymour, A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in N LO QCD, Nucl.Phys. B485 (1997) 291–419, [ hep-ph/9605323]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  12. [12]

    A general approach to jet cross sections in QCD

    S. Frixione, A General approach to jet cross-sections in QCD , Nucl.Phys. B507 (1997) 295–314, [ hep-ph/9706545]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  13. [13]

    D. A. Kosower, Antenna factorization of gauge theory amplitudes , Phys.Rev. D57 (1998) 5410–5416, [ hep-ph/9710213]

    work page arXiv 1998

  14. [14]

    J. M. Campbell, M. Cullen, and E. N. Glover, Four jet event shapes in electron–positron annihilation, Eur.Phys.J. C9 (1999) 245–265, [ hep-ph/9809429]

    work page arXiv 1999

  15. [15]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, and D. A. Kosower, One-loop n-point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits , Nucl.Phys. B425 (1994) 217–260, [hep-ph/9403226]. – 138 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  16. [16]

    del Aguila and R

    F. del Aguila and R. Pittau, Recursive numerical calculus of one-loop tensor integrals , JHEP 0407 (2004) 017, [ hep-ph/0404120]

    work page arXiv 2004

  17. [17]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower, Bootstrapping multi-parton loop amplitudes in QCD, Phys.Rev. D73 (2006) 065013, [ hep-ph/0507005]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  18. [18]

    Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level

    G. Ossola, C. G. Papadopoulos, and R. Pittau, Reducing full one-loop amplitudes to scalar integrals at the integrand level , Nucl.Phys. B763 (2007) 147–169, [ hep-ph/0609007]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    D-dimensional unitarity cut method

    C. Anastasiou, R. Britto, B. Feng, Z. Kunszt, and P. Mastrolia , D-dimensional unitarity cut method, Phys.Lett. B645 (2007) 213–216, [ hep-ph/0609191]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  20. [20]

    Unitarity cuts and reduction to master integrals in d dimensions for one-loop amplitudes

    C. Anastasiou, R. Britto, B. Feng, Z. Kunszt, and P. Mastrolia , Unitarity cuts and Reduction to master integrals in d dimensions for one-loop a mplitudes, JHEP 0703 (2007) 111, [ hep-ph/0612277]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  21. [21]

    R. K. Ellis, W. Giele, and Z. Kunszt, A Numerical Unitarity Formalism for Evaluating One-Loop Amplitudes, JHEP 0803 (2008) 003, [ arXiv:0708.2398]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    R. K. Ellis, W. T. Giele, Z. Kunszt, and K. Melnikov, Masses, fermions and generalized D-dimensional unitarity , Nucl.Phys. B822 (2009) 270–282, [ arXiv:0806.3467]

    work page arXiv 2009

  23. [23]

    W. T. Giele, Z. Kunszt, and K. Melnikov, Full one-loop amplitudes from tree amplitudes , JHEP 0804 (2008) 049, [ arXiv:0801.2237]

    work page arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops

    F. Cascioli, P. Maierhofer, and S. Pozzorini, Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops , Phys.Rev.Lett. 108 (2012) 111601, [ arXiv:1111.5206]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Integrand reduction of one-loop scattering amplitudes through Laurent series expansion

    P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, and T. Peraro, Integrand reduction of one-loop scattering amplitudes through Laurent series expansion , JHEP 1206 (2012) 095, [ arXiv:1203.0291]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations

    S. Frixione and B. R. Webber, Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations, JHEP 0206 (2002) 029, [ hep-ph/0204244]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  27. [27]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P. Nason, A New method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo alg orithms, JHEP 0411 (2004) 040, [ hep-ph/0409146]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  28. [28]

    Dobbs, Incorporating next-to-leading order matrix elements for h adronic diboson production in showering event generators , Phys.Rev

    M. Dobbs, Incorporating next-to-leading order matrix elements for h adronic diboson production in showering event generators , Phys.Rev. D64 (2001) 034016, [ hep-ph/0103174]

    work page arXiv 2001

  29. [29]

    Y.-j. Chen, J. Collins, and X.-m. Zu, NLO corrections in MC event generator for angular distribution of Drell-Yan lepton pair production , JHEP 0204 (2002) 041, [ hep-ph/0110257]

    work page arXiv 2002

  30. [30]

    Kurihara et al

    Y. Kurihara, J. Fujimoto, T. Ishikawa, K. Kato, S. Kawabata, et al., QCD event generators with next-to-leading order matrix elements and parton show ers, Nucl.Phys. B654 (2003) 301–319, [ hep-ph/0212216]

    work page arXiv 2003

  31. [31]

    Matching parton showers to NLO computations

    Z. Nagy and D. E. Soper, Matching parton showers to NLO computations , JHEP 0510 (2005) 024, [ hep-ph/0503053]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    C. W. Bauer and M. D. Schwartz, Event Generation from Effective Field Theory , Phys.Rev. D76 (2007) 074004, [ hep-ph/0607296]

    work page arXiv 2007

  33. [33]

    Parton showers with quantum interference

    Z. Nagy and D. E. Soper, Parton showers with quantum interference , JHEP 0709 (2007) 114, [ arXiv:0706.0017]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  34. [34]

    W. T. Giele, D. A. Kosower, and P. Z. Skands, A simple shower and matching algorithm , Phys.Rev. D78 (2008) 014026, [ arXiv:0707.3652]. – 139 –

    work page arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    C. W. Bauer, F. J. Tackmann, and J. Thaler, GenEvA. I. A New framework for event generation, JHEP 0812 (2008) 010, [ arXiv:0801.4026]

    work page arXiv 2008

  36. [36]

    A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods

    S. Hoeche, F. Krauss, M. Schonherr, and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP 1209 (2012) 049, [ arXiv:1111.1220]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  37. [37]

    NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production

    K. Hamilton, P. Nason, E. Re, and G. Zanderighi, NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production, JHEP 1310 (2013) 222, [ arXiv:1309.0017]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  38. [38]

    MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond

    J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond, JHEP 1106 (2011) 128, [ arXiv:1106.0522]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Automatic Generation of Tree Level Helicity Amplitudes

    T. Stelzer and W. Long, Automatic generation of tree level helicity amplitudes , Comput.Phys.Commun. 81 (1994) 357–371, [ hep-ph/9401258]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  40. [40]

    Caravaglios and M

    F. Caravaglios and M. Moretti, An algorithm to compute Born scattering amplitudes without Feynman graphs, Phys.Lett. B358 (1995) 332–338, [ hep-ph/9507237]

    work page arXiv 1995

  41. [41]

    Yuasa, J

    F. Yuasa, J. Fujimoto, T. Ishikawa, M. Jimbo, T. Kaneko, et al., Automatic computation of cross-sections in HEP: Status of GRACE system , Prog.Theor.Phys.Suppl. 138 (2000) 18–23, [hep-ph/0007053]

    work page arXiv 2000

  42. [42]

    Kanaki and C.G

    A. Kanaki and C. G. Papadopoulos, HELAC: A Package to compute electroweak helicity amplitudes, Comput.Phys.Commun. 132 (2000) 306–315, [ hep-ph/0002082]

    work page arXiv 2000

  43. [43]

    O'Mega: An Optimizing Matrix Element Generator

    M. Moretti, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter, O’Mega: An Optimizing matrix element generator , hep-ph/0102195

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  44. [44]

    AMEGIC++ 1.0, A Matrix Element Generator In C++

    F. Krauss, R. Kuhn, and G. Soff, AMEGIC++ 1.0: A Matrix element generator in C++ , JHEP 0202 (2002) 044, [ hep-ph/0109036]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    M. L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, R. Pittau, and A. D. Polos a, ALPGEN, a generator for hard multiparton processes in hadronic colli sions, JHEP 0307 (2003) 001, [hep-ph/0206293]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  46. [46]

    Fujimoto, T

    J. Fujimoto, T. Ishikawa, M. Jimbo, T. Kaneko, K. Kato, et al., GRACE/SUSY automatic generation of tree amplitudes in the minimal supersymmetri c standard model , Comput.Phys.Commun. 153 (2003) 106–134, [ hep-ph/0208036]

    work page arXiv 2003

  47. [47]

    CompHEP 4.4 - Automatic Computations from Lagrangians to Events

    CompHEP Collaboration, E. Boos et al., CompHEP 4.4: Automatic computations from Lagrangians to events , Nucl.Instrum.Meth. A534 (2004) 250–259, [ hep-ph/0403113]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  48. [48]

    Tsuno, T

    S. Tsuno, T. Kaneko, Y. Kurihara, S. Odaka, and K. Kato, GR@PPA 2.7 event generator for pp / p¯p collisions, Comput.Phys.Commun. 175 (2006) 665–677, [ hep-ph/0602213]

    work page arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    Cafarella, C.G

    A. Cafarella, C. G. Papadopoulos, and M. Worek, Helac-Phegas: A Generator for all parton level processes, Comput.Phys.Commun. 180 (2009) 1941–1955, [ arXiv:0710.2427]

    work page arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    WHIZARD: Simulating Multi-Particle Processes at LHC and ILC

    W. Kilian, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter, WHIZARD: Simulating Multi-Particle Processes at LHC and ILC , Eur.Phys.J. C71 (2011) 1742, [ arXiv:0708.4233]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  51. [51]

    MadGraph/MadEvent v4: The New Web Generation

    J. Alwall, P. Demin, S. de Visscher, R. Frederix, M. Herquet, et a l., MadGraph/MadEvent v4: The New Web Generation , JHEP 0709 (2007) 028, [ arXiv:0706.2334]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    Comix, a new matrix element generator

    T. Gleisberg and S. Hoeche, Comix, a new matrix element generator , JHEP 0812 (2008) 039, [ arXiv:0808.3674]. – 140 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model

    A. Belyaev, N. D. Christensen, and A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model , Comput.Phys.Commun. 184 (2013) 1729–1769, [arXiv:1207.6082]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  54. [54]

    Automatized One-Loop Calculations in 4 and D dimensions

    T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput.Phys.Commun. 118 (1999) 153–165, [ hep-ph/9807565]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  55. [55]

    Generating Feynman Diagrams and Amplitudes with FeynArts 3

    T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3 , Comput.Phys.Commun. 140 (2001) 418–431, [ hep-ph/0012260]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  56. [56]

    Automating dipole subtraction for QCD NLO calculations

    T. Gleisberg and F. Krauss, Automating dipole subtraction for QCD NLO calculations , Eur.Phys.J. C53 (2008) 501–523, [ arXiv:0709.2881]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  57. [57]

    An Automated Implementation of On-Shell Methods for One-Loop Amplitudes

    C. Berger, Z. Bern, L. Dixon, F. Febres Cordero, D. Forde, e t al., An Automated Implementation of On-Shell Methods for One-Loop Amplitude s, Phys.Rev. D78 (2008) 036003, [ arXiv:0803.4180]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  58. [58]

    Frederix, T

    R. Frederix, T. Gehrmann, and N. Greiner, Automation of the Dipole Subtraction Method in MadGraph/MadEvent, JHEP 0809 (2008) 122, [ arXiv:0808.2128]

    work page arXiv 2008

  59. [59]

    Giele and G

    W. Giele and G. Zanderighi, On the Numerical Evaluation of One-Loop Amplitudes: The Gluonic Case , JHEP 0806 (2008) 038, [ arXiv:0805.2152]

    work page arXiv 2008

  60. [60]

    Polarizing the Dipoles

    M. Czakon, C. Papadopoulos, and M. Worek, Polarizing the Dipoles , JHEP 0908 (2009) 085, [ arXiv:0905.0883]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  61. [61]

    Automation of next-to-leading order computations in QCD: the FKS subtraction

    R. Frederix, S. Frixione, F. Maltoni, and T. Stelzer, Automation of next-to-leading order computations in QCD: The FKS subtraction , JHEP 0910 (2009) 003, [ arXiv:0908.4272]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  62. [62]

    Hasegawa, S

    K. Hasegawa, S. Moch, and P. Uwer, AutoDipole: Automated generation of dipole subtraction terms , Comput.Phys.Commun. 181 (2010) 1802–1817, [ arXiv:0911.4371]

    work page arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    Höche, F

    S. Hoche, F. Krauss, M. Schonherr, and F. Siegert, Automating the POWHEG method in Sherpa, JHEP 1104 (2011) 024, [ arXiv:1008.5399]

    work page arXiv 2011

  64. [64]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX , JHEP 1006 (2010) 043, [arXiv:1002.2581]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2010

  65. [65]

    Mastrolia, G

    P. Mastrolia, G. Ossola, T. Reiter, and F. Tramontano, Scattering AMplitudes from Unitarity-based Reduction Algorithm at the Integrand-lev el, JHEP 1008 (2010) 080, [arXiv:1006.0710]

    work page arXiv 2010

  66. [66]

    Frederix, T

    R. Frederix, T. Gehrmann, and N. Greiner, Integrated dipoles with MadDipole in the MadGraph framework, JHEP 1006 (2010) 086, [ arXiv:1004.2905]

    work page arXiv 2010

  67. [67]

    Becker, C

    S. Becker, C. Reuschle, and S. Weinzierl, Numerical NLO QCD calculations , JHEP 1012 (2010) 013, [ arXiv:1010.4187]

    work page arXiv 2010

  68. [68]

    Automation of one-loop QCD corrections

    V. Hirschi, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, M. V. Garzelli, F. Maltoni, et a l., Automation of one-loop QCD corrections , JHEP 1105 (2011) 044, [ arXiv:1103.0621]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  69. [69]

    Helac-nlo

    G. Bevilacqua, M. Czakon, M. Garzelli, A. van Hameren, A. Kardo s, et al., HELAC-NLO, Comput.Phys.Commun. 184 (2013) 986–997, [ arXiv:1110.1499]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  70. [70]

    Becker, D

    S. Becker, D. Goetz, C. Reuschle, C. Schwan, and S. Weinzierl, NLO results for five, six and seven jets in electron-positron annihilation , Phys.Rev.Lett. 108 (2012) 032005, [arXiv:1111.1733]. – 141 –

    work page arXiv 2012

  71. [71]

    Automated One-Loop Calculations with GoSam

    G. Cullen, N. Greiner, G. Heinrich, G. Luisoni, P. Mastrolia, et al., Automated One-Loop Calculations with GoSam , Eur.Phys.J. C72 (2012) 1889, [ arXiv:1111.2034]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  72. [72]

    Binoth, D

    T. Binoth, D. Goncalves Netto, D. Lopez-Val, K. Mawatari, T. P lehn, et al., Automized Squark-Neutralino Production to Next-to-Leading Order , Phys.Rev. D84 (2011) 075005, [arXiv:1108.1250]

    work page arXiv 2011

  73. [73]

    Agrawal, T

    S. Agrawal, T. Hahn, and E. Mirabella, FormCalc 7, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 368 (2012) 012054, [arXiv:1112.0124]

    work page arXiv 2012

  74. [74]

    Z. Bern, G. Diana, L. Dixon, F. Febres Cordero, S. Hoeche, et al., Four-Jet Production at the Large Hadron Collider at Next-to-Leading Order in QCD , Phys.Rev.Lett. 109 (2012) 042001, [ arXiv:1112.3940]

    work page arXiv 2012

  75. [75]

    Recursive generation of one-loop amplitudes in the Standard Model

    S. Actis, A. Denner, L. Hofer, A. Scharf, and S. Uccirati, Recursive generation of one-loop amplitudes in the Standard Model , JHEP 1304 (2013) 037, [ arXiv:1211.6316]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  76. [76]

    Numerical evaluation of virtual corrections to multi-jet production in massless QCD

    S. Badger, B. Biedermann, P. Uwer, and V. Yundin, Numerical evaluation of virtual corrections to multi-jet production in massless QCD , Comput.Phys.Commun. 184 (2013) 1981–1998, [ arXiv:1209.0100]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  77. [77]

    Goncalves-Netto, D

    D. Goncalves-Netto, D. Lopez-Val, K. Mawatari, T. Plehn, and I. Wigmore, Automated Squark and Gluino Production to Next-to-Leading Order , Phys.Rev. D87 (2013) 014002, [arXiv:1211.0286]

    work page arXiv 2013

  78. [78]

    Badger, B

    S. Badger, B. Biedermann, P. Uwer, and V. Yundin, Computation of multi-leg amplitudes with NJet , arXiv:1312.7140

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    Z. Bern, L. Dixon, F. F. Cordero, S. Hoeche, H. Ita, et al., The BlackHat Library for One-Loop Amplitudes, arXiv:1310.2808

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    van Deurzen, G

    H. van Deurzen, G. Luisoni, P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, G. Ossola, et al., Multi-leg One-loop Massive Amplitudes from Integrand Reduction via Laurent Ex pansion, JHEP 1403 (2014) 115, [ arXiv:1312.6678]

    work page arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.